Behavioural economics of organization: employees and managers

dc.contributor.authorHoudek, Petr
dc.contributor.authorKoblovský, Petr
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-21
dc.date.available2017-03-21
dc.date.issued2017-03-15
dc.description.abstractThis short perspective article presents an overview of empirical evidence on the behavioural organizational economics on the basis of the extended standard model of worker's behaviour. The advancements of behavioural economics theories, new detailed and structured data on actions of economic actors, and increasingly used fields experiments provide a strong basis for the creation of more precise and more robust models of the behaviour of employers and employees. In this article we analyse 4 stylized extensions of standard model of worker's behaviour. Firstly, we give several examples of worker's reference dependent decision-making. Secondly, we utilize Akerlof’s hypothesis on the relationship between an employer and an employee which is as predicted very reciprocal, similarly to the gifts exchange paradigm. We show that the more the employee thinks s/he is trusted by the employer, the harder and more efficiently s/he works. Thirdly, we show several instances of the importance of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in employees and how those two motivations interfere with each other and crowd each other out in some situations. The research shows that meaningfulness of the work can be a significant driver of the employees’ efficiency as well. In the last section devoted to employees we provide evidence on the impacts of relative performance compensation on cooperation, reciprocity, and sabotage in firms. The last part is devoted to analysing behavioural regularities of managers in their day-to-day decision-making. The overview briefly expands particularly on their over-optimism and on their possibly undeserved remuneration resulting from random events and market changes rather than from the managerial skills. The article concludes by proposing possible directions for further field research.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent4-15 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2017-1-001
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/19852
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAl-Ubaydli, O., & List, J. A. (2016). Field Experiments in Markets. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 22113. doi: 10.3386/w22113.
dc.relation.isbasedonAriely, D., Gneezy, U., Loewenstein, G., & Mazar, N. (2009). Large Stakes and Big Mistakes. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 451-469. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00534.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonAriely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3), 671-677. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.01.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonAkerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2005). Identity and the Economics of Organizations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 9-32. doi:10.1257/0895330053147930.
dc.relation.isbasedonBandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Rasul, I. (2005). Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 917-962. doi:10.1093/qje/120.3.917.
dc.relation.isbasedonBarberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173-196. doi:10.1257/jep.27.1.173.
dc.relation.isbasedonBen-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2013). Managerial Miscalibration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1547-1584. doi:10.1093/qje/qjt023.
dc.relation.isbasedonBengtsson, N., & Engström, P. (2013). Replacing Trust with Control: A Field Test of Motivation Crowd Out Theory. The Economic Journal, 124(577), 833-858. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12049.
dc.relation.isbasedonBertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 901-932. doi:10.1162/00335530152466269.
dc.relation.isbasedonBewley, T. F. (2007). Fairness, Reciprocity, and Wage Rigidity. In P. Diamond & H. Vartiainen (Eds.), Behavioral Economics and Its Applications (pp. 157-194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonBloom, N., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). The Organization of Firms Across Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(4), 1663-1705. doi:10.1093/qje/qje029.
dc.relation.isbasedonCamerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407-441. doi:10.1162/003355397555244.
dc.relation.isbasedonCamerer, C. F., & Malmendier, U. (2007). Behavioral Economics of Organization. In P. Diamond & H. Vartiainen (Eds.), Behavioral Economics and Its Applications (pp. 235-290). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonCroson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448.
dc.relation.isbasedonDahl, M. S., Dezső, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Fatherhood and Managerial Style: How a Male CEO’s Children Affect the Wages of His Employees. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(4), 669-693. doi:10.1177/0001839212466521.
dc.relation.isbasedonDellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.315.
dc.relation.isbasedonEllingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Paying respect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 135-150. doi:10.1257/jep.21.4.135.
dc.relation.isbasedonFarber, H. S. (2015). Why you Can’t Find a Taxi in the Rain and Other Labor Supply Lessons from Cab Drivers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1975-2026. doi:10.1093/qje/qjv026.
dc.relation.isbasedonFalk, A., & Fehr, E. (2003). Why labour market experiments? Labour Economics, 10(4), 399-406. doi:10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00050-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonFehr, E., Goette, L., & Zehnder, C. (2009). A Behavioral Account of the Labor Market: The Role of Fairness Concerns. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 355-384. doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143217.
dc.relation.isbasedonFehr, E., & Götte, L. (2007). Do Workers Work More if Wages Are High? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. The American Economic Review, 97(1), 298-317. doi:10.1257/aer.97.1.298.
dc.relation.isbasedonGneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 191-209. doi:10.1257/jep.25.4.191.
dc.relation.isbasedonGraham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 103-121. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.010.
dc.relation.isbasedonHarbring, C., Irlenbusch, B., Kräkel, M., & Selten, R. (2007). Sabotage in corporate contests – an experimental analysis. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 14(3), 367-392. doi:10.1080/13571510701597445.
dc.relation.isbasedonHenrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
dc.relation.isbasedonHerbst, D., & Mas, A. (2015). Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science, 350(6260), 545-549. doi:10.1126/science.aac9555.
dc.relation.isbasedonHoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., & Van Praag, M. (2013). The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 59(7), 1514-1528. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674.
dc.relation.isbasedonHoudek, P. (2016). What comes to a manager’s mind: Theory of local thinking. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(4), 359-366. doi:10.1177/1056492616640380.
dc.relation.isbasedonHoudek, P., & Koblovský, P. (2016). Přehled oboru behaviorální finance a organizace. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 24(2), 33-45. doi:10.18267/j.aop.527.
dc.relation.isbasedonHudík, M. (2012). When X Becomes Xʹ: Sameness and the Internal Consistency of Choice. Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2177207.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, K. P. (2003). Sabotage in Promotion Tournaments. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(1), 119-140. doi:10.1093/jleo/19.1.119.
dc.relation.isbasedonImas, A. (2016). The Realization Effect: Risk-Taking after Realized versus Paper Losses. American Economic Review, 106(8), 2086-2109. doi:10.1257/aer.20140386.
dc.relation.isbasedonKahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking - Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741.
dc.relation.isbasedonKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory - Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
dc.relation.isbasedonKamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 427-452. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909.
dc.relation.isbasedonKöszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133-1165. doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133.
dc.relation.isbasedonKrueger, A. B., & Mas, A. (2004). Strikes, scabs, and tread separations: Labor strife and the production of defective Bridgestone/Firestone tires. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 253-289. doi:10.1086/381479.
dc.relation.isbasedonKube, S., Maréchal, M. A., & Puppe, C. (2013). Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(4), 853-870. doi:10.1111/jeea.12022.
dc.relation.isbasedonKube, S., Maréchal, M. A., & Puppe, C. (2012). The Currency of Reciprocity: Gift Exchange in the Workplace. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1644-1662. doi:10.1257/aer.102.4.1644.
dc.relation.isbasedonKuběna, A. A., Houdek, P., Lindová, J., Příplatová, L., & Flegr, J. (2014). Justine Effect: Punishment of the Unduly Self-Sacrificing Cooperative Individuals. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e92336. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092336.
dc.relation.isbasedonList, J. A., & Rasul, I. (2011). Chapter 2 – Field Experiments in Labor Economics. In A. Orley & C. David (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 4, Part A, pp. 103-228). Amsterodam: Elsevier.
dc.relation.isbasedonMalmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonMalmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002.
dc.relation.isbasedonMalmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2009). Superstar CEOs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1593-1638. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1593.
dc.relation.isbasedonMas, A. (2006). Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 783-821. doi:10.1162/qjec.121.3.783.
dc.relation.isbasedonMas, A., & Moretti, E. (2009). Peers at Work. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 112-145. doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.112.
dc.relation.isbasedonParboteeah, K. P., Addae, H. M., & Cullen, J. B. (2005). National culture and absenteeism: An empirical test. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 13(4), 343-361. doi:10.1108/eb029011.
dc.relation.isbasedonPascual-Ezama, D., Prelec, D., & Dunfield, D. (2013). Motivation, money, prestige and cheats. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93(September), 367-373. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.015.
dc.relation.isbasedonPedace, R., & Smith, J. K. (2013). Loss aversion and managerial decisions: Evidence from major league baseball. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1475-1488. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00463.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonRabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11-46.
dc.relation.isbasedonRusinova, K., & Houdek, P. (2013). Physicians looking in the mirror: how we may influence the end-of-life decisions of surrogates. Critical Care Medicine, 41(7), 1814-1815. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182913395.
dc.relation.isbasedonStafford, T. M. (2015). What Do Fishermen Tell Us That Taxi Drivers Do Not? An Empirical Investigation of Labor Supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(3), 683-710. doi:10.1086/679682.
dc.relation.isbasedonVranka, M. A., & Houdek, P. (2015). Many Faces of Bankers’ Identity: How (not) to study dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(302). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00302.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectbehavioural economicsen
dc.subjectfirm cultureen
dc.subjectfield experimentsen
dc.subjectgift exchangeen
dc.subjecthubrisen
dc.subjectCEOen
dc.subjectintrinsic and extrinsic motivationen
dc.subjectloss aversionen
dc.subjectreference-dependence modelen
dc.subjectreciprocityen
dc.subjectsocial preferencesen
dc.subjectwageen
dc.subjectlabouren
dc.subject.classificationC93
dc.subject.classificationD86
dc.subject.classificationJ41
dc.subject.classificationM54
dc.titleBehavioural economics of organization: employees and managersen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage15
local.citation.spage4
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume20
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2017_01.pdf
Size:
925.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections