Mandatory CCCTB implementation in the Eurozone and its impact on corporate tax revenues in the Czech Republic

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNerudová, Danuše
dc.contributor.authorSolilová, Veronika
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29
dc.date.available2018-03-29
dc.date.issued2018-03-29
dc.description.abstractThe European Commission has been attempting to coordinate the corporate taxation systems of the EU Member States since 1962. One of the most ambitious projects in the history of the harmonization effort was introduced on 16 March 2011, when the European Commission published, after more than ten years of work, the text of the CCCTB Directive proposal. The directive proposal suggests the consolidation regime and the allocation formula with three equally weighted factors – sales, labour and assets, i.e. the consolidated tax base should be shared among the members of the group based on those micro factors. That tax-sharing mechanism as a new allocation rule has raised much discussion and will definitely have an impact on EU Member States’ budgets. The aim of the paper is to research the impact of mandatory CCCTB implementation in the Eurozone on tax bases in the Czech Republic and consequently on Czech corporate tax revenues, and to identify whether the implementation of the system in the Eurozone will result in the outflow or inflow of tax bases from/to the Czech Republic. The research is based on empirical data from the Amadeus and Bankscope databases covering 2,424 parent companies with 3,860 Czech subsidiaries. In order to verify the results of the research, a sensitivity analysis was also performed. The research revealed that mandatory implementation of the CCCTB system in the Eurozone would have negative impact on the tax bases currently generated and located in the Czech Republic. As a result of this fact, the Czech Republic would lose between 0.87% and 8.84% of the corporate tax liability recorded in 2011.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent20 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-001
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/22783
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAmadeus database, Bureau Van Dijk.
dc.relation.isbasedonAgúndez-García, A. (2006). The Delineation and Apportionment of an EU Consolidated Tax Base for Multi-jurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation: a Review of Issues and Options (Working Paper No. 9/2006). European Commission.
dc.relation.isbasedonAvi-Yonah, R. S., & Clausing, K. (2007). Reforming Corporate Taxation in a Global Economy: A Proposal to Adopt Formulary Apportionment (The Hamilton Project Discussion Paper).
dc.relation.isbasedonBankscope database, Bureau Van Dijk.
dc.relation.isbasedonBartelsman, E. J., & Beetsma Roel, M. W. J. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10), 2225-2252. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00018-X.
dc.relation.isbasedonBettendorf, L., Devereux, M. P., van der Horst, A., Loretz, S., & De Mooij, R. A. (2010). Corporate tax harmonization in the EU. Economic Policy, 537-590.
dc.relation.isbasedonCline, R., Neubig, T., Phillips, A., Sanger, C., & Walsh, A. (2010). Study on the economic and budgetary impact of the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the European Union. Ernst & Young LLP.
dc.relation.isbasedonCobham, A., & Loretz, S. (2014). International distribution of the corporate tax base: Impact of different apportionment factors under unitary taxation. In 70th Annual Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance. Lugano, Switzerland.
dc.relation.isbasedonCommission of European Communities. (1992). Report of the Committee of independent experts on company taxation. Luxembourg: Office for the official publication of the European Communities.
dc.relation.isbasedonDanko, Z. (2012). Corporate tax harmonization in the European Union. In Conference proceedings: Crisis Aftermath: Economic Policy Changes in the EU and its Member States. (pp. 207-218). Szeged: University of Szeged.
dc.relation.isbasedonDavid, P., & Nerudová, D. (2008). Selected problems of value added tax application in the agricultural sector of the European Union internal market. Agricultural Economics, 54(1), 1-11.
dc.relation.isbasedonDe Mooij, R. A., & Ederveen, S. (2008). Corporate tax elasticities: a reader’s guide to empirical findings. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 680-697. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn033.
dc.relation.isbasedonDevereux, M., & Loretz, S. (2008) Increased Efficiency through Consolidation and Formula Apportionment in the European Union? (Working Paper No. 12). Oxford: Oxford University, Centre for Business Taxation.
dc.relation.isbasedonDischinger, M. (2007). Profit Shifting by Multinationals: Indirect Evidence from European Micro Data (Munich Discussion Paper No. 2007-30). University of Munich.
dc.relation.isbasedonDomonkos, T., Domonkos, Š., Dolinajcová, M., & Grisáková, N. (2013). Effect of the Formulary Apportionment of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base on the Tax Revenue in the Slovak Republic. Ekonomický časopis, 61(5), 453-467.
dc.relation.isbasedonDosser, D. (1973). British Taxation and the Common Market. London: Charles Knight.
dc.relation.isbasedonEberhartinger, E., & Petutschnig, M. (2014). CCCTB – The Employment Factor Game (WU International Taxation Research Paper Series No. 2014 – 01).
dc.relation.isbasedonFuest, C., Hemmelgam, T., & Ramb, F. (2007). How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(5), 605-626. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9008-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonFuest, C., Spengel, C., Finke, K., Heckemeyer, J. H., & Nusser, H. (2013). Profit Shifting and “Aggressive” Tax Planning by Multinational Firms: Issues and Options for Reform (Discussion Paper No. 13-078). ZEW Centre for European Economic Research.
dc.relation.isbasedonGrubert, H., & Slemrod, J. (1998). The effect of taxes on investment and income shifting into Puerto Rico. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(3), 365-373. http://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557609.
dc.relation.isbasedonHines, J. R. Jr. (2010). Income misattribution under formula apportionment. European Economic Review, 54(1), 108-120. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.011.
dc.relation.isbasedonHitiris, T. (1994). European Community Economics (3rd ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
dc.relation.isbasedonKolářová, E., & Kuderová, E. (2015). Analysis of the Czech companies’ departures to tax havens and their effect on the Czech Economy. In E. Pastuzsková, Z. Crhová, J. Vychytilová, B. Vytrhlíková, & A. Knápková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Firm and Performance of firms in science, education and practice (pp. 623-637).
dc.relation.isbasedonKrchnivá, K. (2014). Comparison of European, Canadian and the U.S. formula apportionment on real data. In Enterprise and Competitive Environment - Conference Abstract Proceedings. Bučovice: Martin Stříž Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonKrchnivá, K., & Nerudová, D. (2015). The Influence of Allocation Formula on Generation of Profit in Different Economy Sectors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(6), 1961-1967. http://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563061961.
dc.relation.isbasedonKubátová, K. (1998). Harmonizace daní v Evropské unii. Daně, (7-8), 2-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonLodin, S. O., & Gammie, M. (2001). Home State Taxation. Amsterdam: IBFD.
dc.relation.isbasedonMackie-Mason, J. K., & Gordon, R. H. (1997). How much do taxes discourage incorporation? Journal of Finance, 52(2), 477-505. http://doi.org/10.2307/2329487.
dc.relation.isbasedonMayer, S. (2009). Formulary Apportionment for the Internal Market. Amsterdam: IBFD.
dc.relation.isbasedonMcLure, Ch. E. (2008). Harmonizing corporate income taxes in the European community: Rational and implications. Tax Policy and the Economy, 22, 151-195.
dc.relation.isbasedonMintz, J. M. (2004). Corporate Tax Harmonization in Europe: It's All About Compliance. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 221-234. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011401.67566.14.
dc.relation.isbasedonMintz, J. (2008). Europe slowly lurches to a common consolidated corporate tax base: Issues at stake. In M. Lang et al. (Eds.), A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Europe (pp. 128-138). Alemanha: Springer.
dc.relation.isbasedonMusgrave, P. B. (1967). Fiscal Harmonization in Common Markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonNerudová, D. (2014). Harmonizace daňových systémů zemí Evropské unie (4th ed.). Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.
dc.relation.isbasedonNerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2014). Missing data and its impact on the CCCTB determination. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00368-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonNerudová, D. (2012). Common Consolidated Corporate Tax base: Sharing the Tax Base under Formulary Apportionment. In D. Stavárek, & P. Vodová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on finance and banking (pp. 279-288).
dc.relation.isbasedonNerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2015). Quantification of the impact on the total corporate tax basis in the Czech Republic caused by the CCCTB implementation in EU28. Politická ekonomie, 63(4), 456-773.
dc.relation.isbasedonPethig, R., & Wagener, A. (2003). Profit Tax Competition and Formula Apportionment (CESifo Working Paper No. 1011).
dc.relation.isbasedonPetutschnig, M. (2010). Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Effects of Formulary Apportionment on Corporate Group Entities (WU International Taxation Research Paper Series No. 2012-04).
dc.relation.isbasedonPirvu, D., Banica, L., & Hagiu, A. (2011). Implications of the introduction of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for tax revenues in Romania. Financial theory and practice, 35(2), 197-215.
dc.relation.isbasedonRoggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2012). An empirical investigation into the design of an EU apportionment formula related to profit generating factors. Transformations in Business & Economics, 11(3(27)), 36-56.
dc.relation.isbasedonSimon, J. (2000). Can We Harmonise Our Views on European Tax Harmonisation? Bulletin for international fiscal documentation, 54(6), 263-269.
dc.relation.isbasedonSolilová, V., & Nerudová, D. (2016). Implementation of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and its Implications for Non-participating Country: A Case Study for the Czech Republic. Ekonomický časopis, 64(3), 282-298.
dc.relation.isbasedonSpengel, C., Endres, D., Finke, K., & Heckemeyer, J. (2014). Effective Tax Levels Using the Devereux/Griffith Methodology. EU Commission project No. TAXUD/2013/CC/120, Manheim: ZEW.
dc.relation.isbasedonTan, J. H. D. (2010). Unitary Formulary Apportionment as a Solution to the Conundrum of Source. New York University School of Law.
dc.relation.isbasedonTrandafir, A. (2011). Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, a new measure to remove tax competition distortions in the EU. Economy Transdisciplinary Cognition, 14(1), 310-317.
dc.relation.isbasedonVan Der Horst, A., Bettendorf, L., & Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2007). Will corporate tax consolidation improve efficiency in the EU? (CPB Documents 141). CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
dc.relation.isbasedonWeiner, J. M. (2005). Formulary Apportionment and Group Taxation in the EU: Insights from the United States and Canada. Taxation papers (Working Paper No. 8). DG Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectCCCTBen
dc.subjectgroupen
dc.subjecttax baseen
dc.subjecttax revenueen
dc.subjectCzech Republicen
dc.subjectEurozoneen
dc.subject.classificationH25
dc.subject.classificationK22
dc.titleMandatory CCCTB implementation in the Eurozone and its impact on corporate tax revenues in the Czech Republicen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage23
local.citation.spage4
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_1_2018_01
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2018_01.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 1