TRENDS IN CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCULTURAL MANAGEMENT

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJurásek, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorWawrosz, Petr
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T08:08:05Z
dc.date.available2021-09-15T08:08:05Z
dc.description.abstractCultural intelligence (CQ), expressing a capacity to effectively function in a cultural or culturally diverse environment (professional and otherwise), has great importance not only for the success of individuals who operate professionally in a intercultural environment, but also for the competitiveness of companies or organizations operating in international markets. For this reason research about CQ abroad is given the high level of attention, however this is not the case in the Czech Republic. This review uses the relatively new method of systematic quantitative literature review to provide a detailed mapping of cultural intelligence research in the years 2015–2019. The results of the analysis indicate that CQ is a global multidisciplinary phenomenon that has become established in intercultural management as a compelling area of research. The concept of CQ is well conceptualized and operationalized; the research at present is focused on the known relationships of new mediators or moderators and other correlations between CQ and new variables are being sought at the level of international economies and management. From the number of published research outcomes it can be seen that interest in CQ is growing, primarily among authors from multicultural countries. Researchers in the years 2015–2019 tested (predominantly in empirical studies) far more hypotheses related to CQ than they did in a comparable previous period; the studies took place in 33 countries, however mostly in the USA. European countries nonetheless fall somewhat behind in this area. Building on previous literature reviews, the nomological network of CQ has been supplemented for the years 2018 and 2019. From the classification of research outcomes it is evident that researchers are most interested in topics oriented on psychology of work. Our study brings entirely new information about CQ research pertaining to the methods used in quantitative analysis and the characteristics of respondents and localization of research.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2021-03-003
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/160957
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonBabbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The Practice of Social Science Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
dc.relation.isbasedonFang, F., Schei, V., & Selart, M. (2018). Hype or hope? A new look at the research on cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 66, 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.002
dc.relation.isbasedonLeung, K., Ang, S., & Tan, M. L. (2014). Intercultural competence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 489–519. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229
dc.relation.isbasedonMareš, J. (2013). Přehledové studie: Jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření [Review studies: Their typology, functions and method of creation]. Pedagogická Orientace, 23(4), 427–454. http://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-4-427
dc.relation.isbasedonMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
dc.relation.isbasedonPickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D., & Byrne, J. (2015). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1756–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907
dc.relation.isbasedonPickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
dc.relation.isbasedonOtt, D. L., & Michailova, S. (2018). Cultural Intelligence: A Review and New Research Avenues. International Journal of Management Reviews, Oxford, 20(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12118
dc.relation.isbasedonSolomon, A., & Steyn, R. (2017). Exploring cultural intelligence truths: A systematic review. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1–11. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1888670727/abstract/C917A983FCB2457FPQ/1.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectcultural intelligence (CQ)en
dc.subjectliterature reviewen
dc.subjectsystematic quantitative literature reviewen
dc.subjectCQ nomological networken
dc.subject.classificationM21
dc.subject.classificationM54
dc.titleTRENDS IN CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCULTURAL MANAGEMENTen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage57
local.citation.spage40
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume24
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2021_03.pdf
Size:
889.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3