Changes in industrial structure and potential: the case of Lithuania

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSaboniene, Asta
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29
dc.date.available2018-03-29
dc.date.issued2018-03-29
dc.description.abstractThe core aim of the research paper is to analyze the changes in the structure and potential of Lithuanian manufacturing industry, affected by the long process of economic transformation experienced since 1991. The purpose of this paper is to disclose how Lithuanian industrial structure has been moving towards the level of advanced industries, to analyze which sectors have the potential to contribute to the development of the overall manufacturing industry, and to explore how the contribution of individual manufacturing industries has changed over the researched period. The study provides the analysis of several key indicators, which enable to estimate the potential of Lithuanian industrial structure in accordance with quantitative particulars and revise the alteration of the contribution of individual manufacturing industries to the overall potential of Lithuanian manufacturing industry. This paper intends to present the estimations of the changes in Lithuanian industrial structure and its potential during the period of 2000-2014 on the basis of the composite Index of the Long Run Income Potential of Industrial Structure. The empirical analysis has revealed the significance of medium-high and low-tech industries and disclosed the variance of the contribution of individual manufacturing industries to the overall potential of Lithuanian manufacturing industry. The empirical study has disclosed that Lithuanian industrial structure shows a very modest potential of growth and development, and the potential of Lithuanian industrial structure remains a controversial issue. The evident shift into high-value added manufacturing industries, where knowledge and technology intensive sectors play the central role, has not been confirmed.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent13 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-003
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/22785
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAiginger, K. (2000). Europe’s Position in Quality Competition. Background Report for “The European Competitiveness report 2000” (Enterprise working paper). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from http://www.uni-mannheim.de/edz/pdf/entpap/ep-04-2001.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonBarry, F., & Kearney, C. (2003). A Portfolio Analysis of Industrial Structure (Working Paper Series; WP03/09). UCD Centre for Economic Research. Retrieved November 3, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24140418_A_Portfolio_Analysis_of_Industrial_Structure.
dc.relation.isbasedonBos, M. R., & Jalil, S. A. (2006). Industrial Structure and Concentration in Malaysian Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Management Studies, 13, 83-101.
dc.relation.isbasedonBruneckiene, J., & Cincikaite, R. (2009). Measurement of Lithuanian Regions by Regional Competitiveness Index: Aspect of Accuracy Increasement. Economics & Management, (14), 700-708.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarrol, P., Pol, E., & Robertson, P. L. (2000). Classification of Industries by Level of Technology: an Appraisal and some Implications. Prometheus, 18(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020020008523.
dc.relation.isbasedonFreudenberg, M. (2003). Composite Indicators of Country Performance: a Critical Assessment (STI working paper, vol. 16), 2-34. https://doi.org/10.1787/405566708255.
dc.relation.isbasedonHatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1997/02). OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/134337307632.
dc.relation.isbasedonHenricsson, J. P. E., & Ericsson, S. (2005). Measuring Construction Industry Competitiveness: a Holistic Approach. In QUT Research Week 2005 Conference Proceedings, 2005. Brisbane, Australia.
dc.relation.isbasedonKanovska, L., & Tomaskova, E. (2014). Market Orientation and Strategic Behaviour at High-Tech companies. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 17(4), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-4-007.
dc.relation.isbasedonLien, L. B., & Foss, N. J. (2009). The Determinants of Industry Concentration: two new empirical regularities. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30(8), 503-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1466.
dc.relation.isbasedonLin, J., & Chang, H.-J. (2009). Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy It? A Debate between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00456.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonLiu, Y., & Mu, H. (2010). The Grey Correlation Degree Analysis on Industry Structure and Economic Growth in Henan Province. Information Science and Management Engineering (ISME), 2010 International Conference of (Volume 1) (pp. 278-281). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISME.2010.144.
dc.relation.isbasedonLu, W., Shen, L., & Yam, M. C. H. (2008). Critical Success Factors for Competitiveness of Contractors: China study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12).
dc.relation.isbasedonObren, M. P. (2009). Linking Increasing Returns to Industry-level Change. Retrieved November 3, 2015, from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1375142.
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD. (2011). ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition. Retrieved June 19, 2015, from https://data.oecd.org/.
dc.relation.isbasedonOrozco, F., Serpell, A., & Molenaar, K. (2010). Competitiveness Factors and Indexes for Construction Companies: findings of Chile. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718915X2011000100009&script=sci_arttext.
dc.relation.isbasedonPeneder, M. (1999). Intangible Investment and Human Resources. The new WIFO taxonomy of Manufacturing Industries (WIFO Working Papers No. 114). Retrieved September 2, 2015, from http://www.wifo.ac.at/jart/prj3/wifo/resources/person_dokument/person_dokument.jart?publikationsid=1585&mime_type=application/pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonPorter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonPorter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonRoubickova, M., & Heryan, T. (2014). Impacts of Selected NACE Industries’ Foreign Ownership on the Czech Economy. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 17(4), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-4-005.
dc.relation.isbasedonSaisana, M., Tarantola, S., & Saltelli, A. (2005). Uncertainty and Sensitivity Techniques as Tools for the Analysis and Validation of Composite Indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A. 168(2), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonSasaki, H., & Ueyama, S. (2009). China’s Industrial Structure and its Changes in Recent Years: An Analysis of the 1997–2005 Input-Output Tables (Bank of Japan Working Paper No.09-E-2, June 2009). Retrieved September 5, 2015, from http://www.hkimr.org/uploads/conference_detail/413/con_paper_0_671_p9_satoko-ueyama.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonShank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1992). Strategic Cost Management: The Value Chain Perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 4, 179-197.
dc.relation.isbasedonSzirmai, A., Ren, R., & Bai, M. (2005). Chinese Manufacturing Performance in Comparative Perspective, 1980-2002 (Economic Growth Center discussion paper No. 920). Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=770948.
dc.relation.isbasedonTikhomirova, G. (1997). Analyzing Changes in Industry Structure (CSES working paper, no. 11). Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.cfses.com/documents/ wp11cses.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonUri, N. D., & Coate, M. B. (1989). Modelling Industry Structure and Economic Performance. Math. Comput. Modelling, 12(12), 1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90330-3.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectmanufacturing industryen
dc.subjectindustrial structureen
dc.subjectpotentialen
dc.subjectthe Index of the Long Run Income Potential of Industrial Structureen
dc.subject.classificationL16
dc.subject.classificationL60
dc.subject.classificationF14
dc.titleChanges in industrial structure and potential: the case of Lithuaniaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage51
local.citation.spage39
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_1_2018_03
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2018_03.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 1