Comparative performance of the Visegrad group banks for the period 2009-2013

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorČernohorská, Liběna
dc.contributor.authorPilyavskyy, Anatoliy
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, William
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-26
dc.date.available2017-06-26
dc.date.issued2017-06-15
dc.description.abstractThe article examines the comparative performance of Banks for the Visegrad group (V4) of four Central European States for the period 2009-2013. We study the technical efficiency as well as the total factor of productivity changes differences between countries by employing the Data Envelopment Analysis. The efficiency scores are calculated with an output-oriented model. Specification of inputs and outputs is one of the major problems for measurement of bank’s efficiency and productivity changes. To determine inputs and outputs, we made use of assets approach that treats banks as classical intermediators between depositors and borrowers. We have determined three inputs (personnel, physical capital, purchased funds) and two outputs: net loans, total securities. Our results showed that average technical efficiency (for all banks) trended upward during the study period. This increase efficiency is not common for all banks in the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary and Slovak. We found that efficiency for Czech, Polish and Slovak banks increase during research time. Development of efficiency Hungarian banks has on the contrary a downward trend from 0.882 in 2009 to 0.856 in 2013. We also founded that the Total Factor of Productivity (TFP) changes across all countries was relatively stable in 3 of the 4 observation periods. However, there was a substantial decline in TFP in 2011-2012. Examination of the trends for each of the countries showed that Hungary overly influenced the sample mean. The TFP remained stable during this period for all Poland and Czech Republic, declined slightly for Slovakia, but declined precipitously for Hungary in 2011-2012.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent175-187 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-013
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/20850
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAnayiotos, G., Toroyan, H., & Vamvakidis, A. (2010). The efficiency of emerging Europe’s banking sector before and after the recent economic crisis. Financial Theory and Practice, 34(3), 247-267.
dc.relation.isbasedonBalk, B. M. (2001). Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15(3), 159-183. doi:10.1023/A:1011117324278.
dc.relation.isbasedonApergis, N., & Alevizopoulou, E. (2011). Bank efficiency: Evidence from a panel of European banks. Panoeconomicus, 58(3), 329-341. doi:10.2298/PAN1103329A.
dc.relation.isbasedonBankscope database (2015). Bureau van Dijk.
dc.relation.isbasedonBanker, R. D., & Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
dc.relation.isbasedonBerger, A. N., Hanweck, G. A., & Humphrey, D. B. (1987). Competitive Viability in Banking: Scale, Scope, and Product Mix Economies. Journal of Monetary Economy, 20(3), 501-520. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(87)90039-0.
dc.relation.isbasedonBenston, G. J. (1965). Branch Banking and Economies of Scale. Journal of Finance, 20(2), 312-331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb00212.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonCasu, B., Girardone, C., & Molyneux, P. (2004). Productivity Change in European Banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), 2521-2540. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.10.014.
dc.relation.isbasedonCharnes, A., & Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonCharnes, A., & Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonColwell, R. J., & Davis, E. P. (1992). Output and Productivity in Banking. Scandinavian Journals of Economics. Computers and Operations Research, 30, 279-295. doi:10.2307/3440252.
dc.relation.isbasedonCzech National Bank. (2012). Financial Stability Report 2010/2011. Prague: Czech National Bank. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://www.cnb.cz/miranda2/export/sites/www.cnb.cz/cs/financni_ stabilita/zpravy_fs/fs_2010-2011/fs_2010-2011.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonČernohorský, J., & Černohorská, L. (2014). The Criticism of Basel II Based on Credit Risk Modelling. In SGEM2014 Conference Proceedings, 2 (pp. 721-728).
dc.relation.isbasedonDec, P., & Masiukiewicz, P. (2011). Bank Tax in the European Union. Economics and Applied Informatics. 17(2), 91-96.
dc.relation.isbasedonFäre, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. In International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis (pp. 81-97). Springer Netherlands.
dc.relation.isbasedonFäre, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1994a). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach. In Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 253-272). Springer Netherlands.
dc.relation.isbasedonFäre, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994b). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American economic review, 84(1) 66-83.
dc.relation.isbasedonFäre, R., & Primont, D. (2012). Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
dc.relation.isbasedonGrifell-Tatjé, E., & Lovell, C. K. (1999). A generalized Malmquist productivity index. Top, 7(1), 81-101. doi:10.1007/BF02564713.
dc.relation.isbasedonHancock, D. (1985). Bank Profitability, Interest Rates and Monetary Policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(2), 189-202. doi:10.2307/1992333.
dc.relation.isbasedonHolod, D., & Lewis, H. F. (2011). Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 2801-2810. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.007.
dc.relation.isbasedonJemrić, I., & Vujčić, B. (2002). Efficiency of Banks in Croatia: A DEA Approach [Working Paper No. 7]. Zagreb: Croatian National Bank. doi:10.1057/ces.2002.13.
dc.relation.isbasedonKamecka, M. (2010). Bank efficiency in CEE (Doctoral dissertation). WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
dc.relation.isbasedonMalmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica y de Investigacion Operativa, 4(2), 209-242.
dc.relation.isbasedonMester, L. J. (1996). A study of Bank Efficiency Taking into Account Risk-Preferences. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(6), 1025-1045. doi:10.1016/0378-4266(95)00047-X.
dc.relation.isbasedonMukherjee, K., Ray, S. C., & Miller, S. M. (2001). Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(5), 913-939. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(00)00103-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonPalečková, I. (2015). Banking Efficiency in Visegrad Countries: A Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(6), 2085-2091. doi:10.11118/actaun201563062085.
dc.relation.isbasedonPilyavskyy, A., & Matsiv, Y. (2009). Performance of Banks in Ukraine (2005–2008). Zeszyty Naukowe “Współczesne Problemy Zarządzania“, 7-20.
dc.relation.isbasedonPilyavskyy, A. I., & Matsiv, Y. I. (2010). An Analysis of the Efficiency and Productivity of Ukrainian Banks. Studia i Prace Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, (11), 91-106.
dc.relation.isbasedonRay, S. C., & Desli, E. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 1033-1039.
dc.relation.isbasedonŘepková, I. (2014). Efficiency of the Czech banking sector employing the DEA window analysis approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 587-596. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00383-9.
dc.relation.isbasedonSealey, C. W., & Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1251-1266. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03324.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonShepherd, R. W. (1970). Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonStavarek, D. (2003). Banking efficiency in Visegrad countries before joining the European Union. doi:10.2139/ssrn.671664.
dc.relation.isbasedonSimon, Z. (2012). Hungarian Economy Slips Into Second Recession in 4 Years. Retrieved October 9, 2016, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-08-14/hungarian-economy-slips-into-second-recession-in-4-years.
dc.relation.isbasedonStavárek, D., & Řepková, I. (2013). Efficiency in the Czech banking industry: A non-parametric approach. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(2), 357-366.
dc.relation.isbasedonTeplý, P., Stárová, H., & Černohorský, J. (2010). Value creation of European bank mergers and acquistitions in the 1998-2007 period. Ekonomický časopis. 58(5). 458-470.
dc.relation.isbasedonThe Economist. (2013). Hungary´s central bank. Retrieved June 9, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21573166-government-entrenches-its-power-european-unions-dismay-orbans-soldiers.
dc.relation.isbasedonThan, K. (2012). Analysis: Crisis-weary Hungarians lose faith in government. Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-hungary-economy-idUSBRE85G08120120617.
dc.relation.isbasedonValentinyi, A. (2012) The Hungarian crisis. Retrieved September 13, 2015, from http://voxeu.org/article/hungarian-crisis.
dc.relation.isbasedonTripe, D. (2005). The Cost of Funds and Bank Efficiency Through Time. Retrieved April 17, 2015, from http://eprints.otago.ac.nz/630/01/CostofFunds2005.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonVodová, P. (2013). Liquid assets in banking what matters in the visegrad countries. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(3), 113-129.
dc.relation.isbasedonWozniewska, G. (2008). Methods of measuring the efficiency of commercial banks: an example of Polish banks. Ekonomika, 84, 81-91. doi:10.15388/Ekon.2009.0.5124.
dc.relation.isbasedonZimková, E. (2014). Window analysis of technical efficiency: case of the Slovak banking system. In 17th Applications of Mathematics and Statistics in Economics, International Scientific Conference (pp. 294-300). doi:10.15611/amse.2014.17.32.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectperformance of banksen
dc.subjectVisegrad Groupen
dc.subjecttechnical efficiencyen
dc.subjecttotal factor of productivity changesen
dc.subject.classificationG34
dc.subject.classificationM12
dc.titleComparative performance of the Visegrad group banks for the period 2009-2013en
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage187
local.citation.spage175
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume20
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2017_13.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 2