A critique of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPichova, Simona
dc.contributor.authorCernohorsky, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKacerova, Marketa
dc.contributor.authorZila, Jan
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T11:47:24Z
dc.date.available2023-12-04T11:47:24Z
dc.description.abstractThe application of quantitative easing tools by certain central banks has been and continues to be the subject of professional debate. Therefore, this paper aims to assess an alternative scenario to the use of quantitative easing. We have used counterfactual analysis to estimate GDP growth in the US and in the Eurozone for the period during which quantitative easing was implemented, i.e., since 2009 in the US and since 2015 in the Eurozone. We used a vector autoregression (VAR) model for the analysis. We concluded that, in retrospect, the use of quantitative easing appears to be unwarranted. While there was slightly higher GDP growth in the Eurozone than there would have been without quantitative easing, there was no smoothing of the economic cycle. At the same time, returning to the inflation target took a relatively long time. In the US, quantitative easing prevented an initial slide into a deep recession and smoothed the economic cycle over the medium term. Overall, however, quantitative easing has mostly had a negative effect. One major negative is that when this instrument is used over a long time period, economic subjects gradually come to see it as a standard tool. Furthermore, inflation, central banks’ main objective, did not rise rapidly over the period in question; on the contrary, over the long term, quantitative easing has become one of the factors behind today’s higher inflation rates. An excessive monetary supply has created imbalances in the financial markets and has been a factor in price bubbles in the stock, bond, and property markets. Last but not least, it has increased moral hazard for governments, which have gone further into debt without difficulty. At the same time, central bank independence was violated, which has caused an abnormal increase in the central banks’ balance sheets. We, therefore, recommend that this unconventional monetary policy instrument should only be used in the short term for emergency situations as a clear central bank response to stabilize the economy.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-009
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/174251
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectQuantitative easingen
dc.subjectthe Federal Reserve Systemen
dc.subjectthe European Central Banken
dc.subject.classificationE37
dc.subject.classificationE58
dc.subject.classificationE52
dc.titleA critique of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Banken
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage147
local.citation.spage134
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_4_2023_9
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue4
local.relation.volume26
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
E+M_4_2023_09_corr.pdf
Size:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 4