The issue of income redistribution

dc.contributor.authorMikušová Meričková, Beáta
dc.contributor.authorHalásková, Renáta
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-28
dc.date.available2014-08-28
dc.date.defense2014-09-04
dc.description.abstractThe issue of trade off efficiency and equity, which is represented by income redistribution, becomes increasingly debated not only in economic and social, but also in political dimension. Solution of this trade-off is virtually projected into the implementation of social policy and results achieved in macro economics policy, with the goal to define the optimal scope and character of the income redistribution processes. The submitted empirical study responds to this problem through the solution of research question concerning the existence of a relationship between the extent of selected classes of social protection expenditure (expenditure on policy of family, old age and unemployment) and the achieved level of economics development, quantified by Human Development Index (HDI). The existence of this relationship is statistically tested in the sample of 15 countries of the world economy. The research sample is heterogeneous in relation to the analysed indicators and it concerns countries with a different attained level of economics development and income redistribution policy. In most surveyed countries, based on the results of quantitative analysis was confirmed the impact of social protection expenditure on the reached level of economic development. In the area of family policy and old-age pensions this impact was positive and in the area of employment policy this impact was negative. A high level of heterogeneity of selected countries with respect to the observed aspects proves a markedly different extent and nature of redistribution processes. The findings of the research should therefore be analysed more deeply through the redistribution theory of defined compromise “trade off” between efficiency and equity. The compromise in each country depends on the character of the subparts and the models of social policy. From our perspective, these are models of family policy (liberal, social-market, universalistic), labour market policy (scandinavian, liberal and consensual corporate democracy model) and concepts of pension policy (presented by liberal, socio-democratic and conservative model of social policy). The amount of expenditures of social protection (on the old age, family policy and unemployment) in selected countries provides basic outline of tendencies of these expenditures, which differ according to adopted concepts in family policy, employment policy and policy of the pension system.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent15-26 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2014-3-002
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7083
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonBAILEY, S.J. Public Sector Economics. 1st ed. London: Macmillan, 1995. ISBN 978-0333598016.
dc.relation.isbasedonBALDOCK, J., MITTON, L., MANNING, N., VICKERSTAFF, S. Social Policy. 4th ed.Oxford: University Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0199570843.
dc.relation.isbasedonBENTHAM, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation [online]. Batoche Books, Kitchener, 2000 [cit. 2013-08-28]. 248 p. Available from: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/morals.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonBLOME, A., KECK, W., ALBER, J. Family and the Welfare State in Europe. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2009. ISBN 978-1-84844-479-9.
dc.relation.isbasedonCOSTANTINI, V., MONNI, S. Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics. 2008, Vol. 4, Iss. 64, pp. 867-880. ISSN 0921-8009.
dc.relation.isbasedonCULLIS, J., JONES, P. Public Finance and Public Choice. 1st ed. London: McGraw-Hill, 1992. ISBN 0-07-7070400-9.
dc.relation.isbasedonDINIZ, F., SEQUEIRA, T. A. Social and Economic Development Index. NUTS Ranking in Portugal. American Journal of Economics. 2012, Vol. 2, Iss. 7, pp. 146-163. ISSN 2166-496X.
dc.relation.isbasedonESSPROS Manual and user guidelines The European System of integrated Social Protection Statistics (ESSPROS). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. 207 p. ISBN 978-92-79-24751-4.
dc.relation.isbasedonFARNSWORTH, K., IRVING, Z. Social policy in challenging times. Economic crisis and welfare systems. 1st ed. Bristol: Policy Press University of Bristol, 2011. ISBN 978-1847428271.
dc.relation.isbasedonGAYE, A. Contribution to Beyond GDP online. UNDP Human Development Report Office, 2011 [cit. 2014-01-20]. Available from: http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/download/factsheets/HumanDevelopment_Index.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonHOREHÁJOVÁ, M., MARASOVÁ, J. The Institutional Factors of the Corporate Social Responsibility Development in the Central European. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2008, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 58-64. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonHuman Development Report 2013 [online]. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2013 [cit. 2014-01-20]. 216 p. (PDF). Avalible from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2013_EN_complete.pdf. ISBN 978-92-1-126340-4.
dc.relation.isbasedonIMMERVOLL, H., RICHARDSON. L. Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers [online]. OECD Publishing, 2011. No. 122 [cit. 2014-01-20]. 97 p. (PDF). Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5kg5dlkhjq0x.pdf?expires=1391967003&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1B1AF37B7795933DD332564EFE3AA2CA.
dc.relation.isbasedonKENNETT, P. Comparative Social Policy.Theory and research. 1st ed. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001. ISBN 0-335-20123-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonKUVÍKOVÁ, H., VACEKOVÁ, G. Diversification of financial sources in non-profit organisations. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2009, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 84-96. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonLEVIN, J.A., FOX, J.A., FORDE, D.R. Elementary Statistics in Social Research: International Edition. 12th ed. Pearson, 2013. ISBN 978-0133079548.
dc.relation.isbasedonLISTER, R. Understanding theories and concepts in social policy. 1st ed. Bristol: Policy Press University of Bristol, 2010. ISBN 978-1861347930.
dc.relation.isbasedonLYNCH, S.M. Using Statistics in Social Research. 1st ed. New York: Springer, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4614-8572-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonNEMEC, J., ŠPAČEK, D., SUWAJ, P., MODRZEJEWSKI, A. Public Management as a University Discipline in New European Union Member States: The Central European case. Public Management Review. 2012, Vol. 14, Iss. 8, pp. 1087-1108. ISSN 1471-9037.
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD StatExtracts 2013 [online]. OECD, c2013 [cit. 2014-01-20]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG.
dc.relation.isbasedonOCHRANA, F., NEKOLA, M. Economic evaluation of public programs. Ekonomický časopis. 2009, Vol. 57, Iss. 5, pp. 458-474. ISSN 0013-3035.
dc.relation.isbasedonPESTIEAU, P. The Welfare State in the European Union: Economic and Social Perspectives. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 0-19-926102-4.
dc.relation.isbasedonRANIS, G. Human Development and Economic Growth online. Yale: Yale University Economic Growth Center. Discussion Paper. 2004, No. 887 cit. 2013-09-01. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm? abstract_id=551662.
dc.relation.isbasedonROGERS, J. The Swedish Welfare State: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. In: JENSEN, H. The Welfare State, Past, Present, Future. 4th ed. Pisa: Edizoni Plus University di Pisa, 2002. 221 p. ISBN 978-8884920331.
dc.relation.isbasedonSARACENO, C. Families, Ageing and Social Policy. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2008. ISBN 978-1-84720-648-0.
dc.relation.isbasedonSAUNDERS, P. Recent trends in the Size and Growth of Government in OECD Countries. In: GEMMELL, N. The growth of the Public Sector. 1st ed. London: Macmillan & Co Ltd, 1993. 288 p. 978-1-85278-525-3.
dc.relation.isbasedonURAMOVÁ, M., KOŽIAK, R. Regional disparities in Slovakia from the Aspect of Average Nominal Wage. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2008, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 6–17. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonWONNACOTT, T., WONNACOTT, R. Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics. 4th ed. WILEY, 1990. ISBN 978-0-471-61517-0.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectprice regulationen
dc.subjectmedicinal productsen
dc.subjectprescription managementen
dc.subjectpublic expendituresen
dc.subjectSloveniaen
dc.subject.classificationI38
dc.subject.classificationH5
dc.titleThe issue of income redistributionen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage26
local.citation.spage15
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume17
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_03_14_2.pdf
Size:
268.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections