Performance management systems in Czech companies: findings from a questionnaire survey

dc.contributor.authorStříteská, Michaela
dc.contributor.authorZapletal, David
dc.contributor.authorJelínková, Lucie
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05
dc.date.available2016-12-05
dc.date.issued2016-12-05
dc.description.abstractMeasuring and managing performance is an integral part of contemporary management systems, which are focused on achieving outstanding business results. This is based on a systematic, comprehensive review of a company's activities and results with the goal of identifying weaknesses and opportunities for improvement. Therefore, it is put more emphasis on the development of an effective performance measurement and management system as a tool for enhancing business competitiveness. Given the importance and urgency of this issue the revolutionary developments in this area can be observed over the last 20 years. Researchers and managers are constantly trying to understand all the variables affecting the performance of the company. They are looking for an answer to the question of how best to use the lessons learned from performance measurement to its management. They design and develop various concepts, frameworks and methods for measuring and managing performance in the current business practice. They are constantly trying to eliminate the drawbacks of contemporary systems in order to increase their effectiveness. Cognition of these systems, their characteristics and identification of weaknesses can be seen as challenges for performance measurement and management in the future, for which solutions must be found. Therefore, the primary goal of this paper is to investigate the level of development of current performance management systems in Czech companies. The level of development is determined by fulfilment of the characteristics of an effective performance management system based on literature review. Attention is also paid to determination whether the level of a performance management system's development is dependent on company size. The method of an electronic questionnaire was selected for acquiring data.en
dc.format.extent44-55 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2016-4-004
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/19268
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAtkinson, M. (2012). Developing and Using a Performance Management Framework: A Case Study. Measuring business excellence, 16(3), 47-56. doi:10.1108/13683041211257402.
dc.relation.isbasedonBarnabe, F. (2011). A System Dynamics-Based Balanced Scorecard to Support Strategic Decision Making, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(5), 446-473. doi:10.1108/17410401111140383.
dc.relation.isbasedonBititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: a Development Guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(5/6), 522-534. doi:10.1108/01443579710167230.
dc.relation.isbasedonBititci, U. S., Carrie, A., & Turner, T. (2002). Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: Structure and Dynamics. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice (pp. 174-197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511753695.012.
dc.relation.isbasedonBititci, U., Carrie, A., & Turner, T. (2006). Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: Structure and Dynamics. Business Performance Measurement. Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonCZECHTOP100. (2014). RESULTS of 100 Most Significant Companies in the Czech Republic. Retrieved November 11, 2014, from http://www.czechtop100.cz/menu/aktualne/100-nejvyznmanejsich-firem-cr.html.
dc.relation.isbasedonČermák, V. (1980). Výběrové statistické zjišťování. Praha: SNTL/Bratislava: Alfa.
dc.relation.isbasedonFiol, C. M., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Maps for Managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies. 29(3), 267-285. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00665.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonForza, C., & Salvador, F. (2000). Assessing some Distinctive Dimensions of Performance Feedback Information in High Performing Plants. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(3), 359-385. doi:10.1108/01443570010308112.
dc.relation.isbasedonGhalayini, A. M., & Noble, J. S. (1996). The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63-80. doi:10.1108/01443579610125787.
dc.relation.isbasedonGomes, C. F., Yasin, M. M., & Lisboa, J. V. (2011) Performance Measurement Practices in Manufacturing Firms Revisited. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(1), 5-30. doi:10.1108/01443571111098726.
dc.relation.isbasedonIttner, C., Larcker, D., & Randall, T. (2003) Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Service Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 715-741. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3.
dc.relation.isbasedonKennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2002) A Framework of the Factors Affecting the Evolution of Performance Measurement System. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(11), 1222-1245. doi:10.1108/01443570210450293.
dc.relation.isbasedonKennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2003). Measuring Performance in a Changing Business Environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 23(2), 213-229. doi:10.1108/0144370310458465.
dc.relation.isbasedonKnápková, A., Homolka, L., & Gavurová, B. (2014). Využití Balanced Scorecard a vliv jeho využívání na finační výkonnost podniků v ČR. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 17(2), 146-160. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-011.
dc.relation.isbasedonKnápková A., Pavelková, D., & Chodur, M. (2011) Měření a řízení výkonnosti podniku. Praha: Linde.
dc.relation.isbasedonLebas, M. J. (1995). Performance Measurement and Performance Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1/3), 23-35. doi:10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X.
dc.relation.isbasedonMaskel, B. H. (1991). Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies. New York: Productivity Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonMelnyk, A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is Performance Measurement and Management Fit for the Future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007.
dc.relation.isbasedonMyšková, R. (2011). Economic Information Systems for Small and Medium Businesses and Evaluation of Return. Wseas Transaction on Information Science and Applications. 8(3), 119-128.
dc.relation.isbasedonNeely, A. (2005). The Evolution of Performance Measurement Research: Development in the Last Decade and a Research Agenda for the Next. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 17(11), 1131-1152. doi:10.1108/01443570510633648.
dc.relation.isbasedonNita, B. (2008). Requirements for Performance Management Systems: A Delineation of the Comprehensive Set of Criteria. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 3(3), 6-22.
dc.relation.isbasedonOtley, D. T. (1999). Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382. doi:10.1006/mare.1999.0115.
dc.relation.isbasedonPacáková, V. et al. (2009). Štatistické metódy pre ekonómov. Bratislava: Iura Edition.
dc.relation.isbasedonPunch, K. F. (2008). Základy kvantitativního šetření. Praha: Portál.
dc.relation.isbasedonRobinson, H. S., Carrillo, P. M., Anumba, C. J., & Al-Ghassani, A. M. (2005). Review and Implementation of Performance Management Models in Construction Engineering Organizations. Construction Innovation, 5(4), 203-217. doi:10.1108/14714170510815258.
dc.relation.isbasedonStivers, B. P., Covin, T. J., Hall, N. G., & Smalt, S. W. (1998) How Nonfinancial Performance Measures Are Used. Management Accounting, 44(February), 46-49.
dc.relation.isbasedonStříteská, M., & Jelínková, L. (2015). Trends in Performance Management: Comparison and Summary of Surveys. In Finance and Performance of firms in Science, Education and Practice. April 23 – 24, 2015. (pp. 1443-1479).
dc.relation.isbasedonStříteská, M., & Jelínková, L. (2015). The Characteristics of Effective Performance Measurement System: Case Study Analysis. In Proceedings of Energy, Environment, Development and Economics. Conferences of INASE.org, Zakynthos, Greece, July 16-20, 2015 (7 p.).
dc.relation.isbasedonStříteská, M., & Sadská, V. (2015). A case Study of Performance Management System Implementation. Innovation Management and Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to Global Growth. In Proceedings of 26th International Business Information Management Association Conference. November 11-12, 2015, Madrid, Spain (pp. 1561-1568).
dc.relation.isbasedonYadav, N., Sushil, & Sagar, M. (2012). Dynamics of Strategic Initiatives and Expected Performance: An Application of Flexible Strategy Game-card. In Proceedings of 30th International conference of System Dynamics Society, University of St. Gallen, March 16, 2012.
dc.relation.isbasedonYadav, N., Sushil, & Sagar, M. (2013). Performance Measurement and Management Frameworks: Research Trends of the Last Two Decades. Business Process Management Journal, 19(6), 947-970. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-01-2013-0003.
dc.relation.isbasedonVera-Muňoz, S. C., Shackell, M., & Buehmer, M. (2007). Accountants’ Usage of Causal Business Models in the Presence of Benchmark Data: A Note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 1015-1038. doi:10.1506/car.24.3.12.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectperformanceen
dc.subjectmeasurementen
dc.subjectmanagementen
dc.subjectsystemen
dc.subject.classificationM14
dc.subject.classificationM21
dc.subject.classificationM29
dc.titlePerformance management systems in Czech companies: findings from a questionnaire surveyen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage55
local.citation.spage44
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue4
local.relation.volume19
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_4_2016_4.pdf
Size:
1.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections