A comparison of location factors evaluation in the secondary and tertiary sectors

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJirásková, Eliška
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05
dc.date.available2015-03-05
dc.date.defense2015-03-05
dc.description.abstractThe paper deals with the evaluation of selected current location factors in the individual economical activities of the secondary and the tertiary sectors. These two sectors were chosen because of the increasing importance of appropriate localization and huge costs associated with its change. A review of literature on location theories related to both examined sectors is carried out in the first part of the paper. In the scope of this review, a brief description of location factors can be found. It is followed by a diagram of chosen location factors. 26 factors were divided into four groups – local, business, workforce and infrastructural factors. This classification is used for a better and clearer understanding of the chosen factors. The following part of the paper contains a description of the research methodology, including the appropriate choice of investigative method and a detailed characteristics of chosen respondents. As well as the primary sector, large enterprises were eliminated, as focusing described research to very small, small and medium-sized enterprises is much easier and, in case of SME, it is also possible to presume a stronger emphasis placed on the location factors under examination. The aim of the paper is to verify by means of regression analysis whether the assessment of both sectors can be considered identical. This hypothesis was confirmed in all examined groups and therefore it is not possible to presume a different perception of location factors in the case of industrial enterprises in comparison to enterprises providing services.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent46-56 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2015-1-004
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7164
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonŽIŽKA, M. Služby v kontextu podnikatelského prostředí České republiky. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2012, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 97-109. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonZAHEER, S., LAMIN, A. and M. SUBRAMANI. Cluster capabilities or ethnic ties? Location choice by foreign and domestic entrants in the services offshoring industry in India. Journal of International Business Studies. 2009, Vol. 40, Iss. 6, pp. 944-968. ISSN 00472506. doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.91.
dc.relation.isbasedonWOKOUN, R. Regionální konkurenceschopnost a faktory regionálního rozvoje v ČR. In: KLÍMOVÁ, V. (Ed.). Sborník příspěvků z XI. mezinárodního kolokvia o regionálních vědách 2008. 1st ed. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2008. pp. 24-32. ISBN 978-80-210-4625-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonWEBER, A. Theory of the Location of Industrie. University of Chicago, 1969.
dc.relation.isbasedonvon THÜNEN, J. H. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg: Puthes, 1826.
dc.relation.isbasedonVITURKA, M. Konkurenceschopnost regionů a možnosti jejího hodnocení. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, Iss. 5, pp. 637-657. ISSN 0032-3233.
dc.relation.isbasedonVITURKA M., et al. Investiční atraktivita vybraných měst České republiky. 1st ed. Brno: Vydavatelství MU, 1998. ISBN 80-210-2007-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonTÖTLING, F. and H. WANZENBÖCK. Regional differences in structural characteristics of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2003, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 351-370. ISSN 1464-5114. doi:10.1080/0898562032000058923.
dc.relation.isbasedonVAŠÍČEK, B. Prostorová ekonomie a prostorové externality: Přehled teorie a empirická evidence. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 684-708. ISSN 0032-3233.
dc.relation.isbasedonSTARZYCZNÁ, H. Prostorová ekonomika. 1st ed. Opava: Slezská univerzita v Opavě, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7248-439-3.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHÄFFLE, A. E. Das Gesellschaftliche System der menschlichen Wirtschaft. Tübingen, 1873.
dc.relation.isbasedonRUMPEL, P., O. SLACH and J. KOUTSKÝ. Měkké faktory regionálního rozvoje. 1st ed. Ostrava: Repronis, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7368-435-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonROSCHER, W. Studien über Naturgesetze, welche den zweckmässigen Standort der Industriezweige bestimen. Heidelberg, 1865.
dc.relation.isbasedonPONIKELSKÝ, P., Z. KOŠTEJNOVÁ and V. KUPKA. Ekonomika municipalit a regionů [online]. Praha: VŠRR, 2008 [cit. 2011-08-19]. Available from: http://www.vsrr.cz/reg/kestazeni/emr2.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonNetherlands Economic Institute in cooperation with Ernst & Young. New location factors for mobile investment in Europe. Brussels Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of European Communities, 1993. ISBN 92-826-5859-7
dc.relation.isbasedonNELSON, R. R. and WINTER, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. USA: Cambridge, 1982. ISBN 0-674-27228-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonMORI, T., NISHIKIMI, K. and E. T. SMITH. The Number-Average Size Rule: A New Empirical Relationship Between Industrial Location and City Size. Journal of Regional Science. 2008, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, pp. 165-211. ISSN 0022-4146. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00550.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonMAZZAROL, T. and CHOO, S. A study of the factors influencing the operating location decisions of small firms. [online]. Property management. 2003, Vol. 21, Iss. 2 [cit. 2012-09-15], pp. 190-208. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/213302163/abstract/1396210C8BC65B3E01F/27?accountid=17116. doi.org/10.1108/02637470310478918.
dc.relation.isbasedonMASKELL, P. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2001, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. 921-943. ISSN 1464-3650. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.921. [27] MATOUŠKOVÁ, Z., et al. Regionální a municipální ekonomika. Praha: VŠE, 2000. ISBN 80-245-0052-3.
dc.relation.isbasedonMARTIN, R. The new „geographical turn“ in economics: some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1999, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, pp. 65-91. ISSN 1464-3545. doi:10.1093/cje/23.1.65.
dc.relation.isbasedonMALECKI, E. J. Telecommunications technology and American rural development in the 21th century. OTA Follow up conference report. Kentucky: University of Kentucky, 1996.
dc.relation.isbasedonLÖSCH, A. The Economics of Location. 7th ed. USA: The Murray Printing Company, 1978. ISBN 0-300-00727-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonLAUNHARDT, W. Mathematische Begrüdung der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Leipzig, 1885.
dc.relation.isbasedonKUPKE, V. and J. PEARCE. Changing industrial location and site preferences for small business: a south Australian case study. In: Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Fourth Annual Conference. Perth: Western Australia, 1998.
dc.relation.isbasedonKRUGMAN, P. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political economy. 1990, Vol. 99, Iss. 3, pp. 483-499. ISSN 0022-3808. doi:10.1086/261763.
dc.relation.isbasedonKOLEKTIV autorů. Úvod do regionálních věd a veřejné správy. 4th ed. Plzeň: Vydavatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2004. ISBN 80-86473-80-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonKARAKAYA, F. and C. CANEL. Underlying dimensions of business location decisions. Industrial Management + Data Systems Competitiveness Review. 1998, Vol. 98, Iss. 7, pp. 321-329. ISSN 0263-5577. doi:10.1108/02635579810205395.
dc.relation.isbasedonJIRÁSKOVÁ, E. Význam vybraných faktorů lokalizace pro malé a střední podniky. Liberec, 2013. 177 pp., 30 pp. app. Disertační práce (Ph.D.). Technická univerzita v Liberci, Ekonomická fakulta.
dc.relation.isbasedonJIRÁSKOVÁ, E. Faktory lokalizace malých a středních podniků v České republice. 1st ed. Liberec: Technická univerzita v Liberci, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7372-782-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonJEŽEK, J. Prostorová a regionální ekonomika. 1st ed. Plzeň: Vydavatelství Západočeské univerzity, 1998. ISBN 80-7082-483-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonIVANIČKA, K. Úvod do ekonomicko-geografického výskumu. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Slovenska akadémia vied, 1971.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHRISTALLER, W. Central Places in Southern Germany. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1966.
dc.relation.isbasedonHOLUB, A. Strukturální odvětvové změny v procesu transformace české ekonomiky - s ohledem na mezinárodní aspekty. Politická ekonomie. 1998, Vol. 46, Iss. 6, pp. 788-804. ISSN 0032-3233.
dc.relation.isbasedonHOFSTEDE, G. The business of international business is culture. International Business Review. 1994, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 1-14. ISSN 0969-5931.
dc.relation.isbasedonGRABOW, B. and B. HOLLBACH-GROMIG. Weiche Standortfaktoren. Schriften des Deutschen Institut für Urbanistik Band, 89. Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln: Dt. Gemeindeverlag, 1995.
dc.relation.isbasedonFUJITA, M., et al. The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. ISBN 978-0262561471.
dc.relation.isbasedonFELDMAN, M. P. and R. FLORIDA. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1994, Vol. 84, Iss. 2, pp. 210-229. ISSN 1467-8306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonENGLÄNDER, O. Theorie der Volkswirtschaft. Wien: J. Springer, 1930.
dc.relation.isbasedonDUNNING, J. H. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies. 1998, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, pp. 45-66. ISSN 0047-2506. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490024.
dc.relation.isbasedonDatabáze ročních národních účtů [online]. Praha: Český statistický úřad, 2011 [cit. 2012-01-29]. Available from: http://apl.czso.cz/pll/rocenka/rocenka.indexnu.
dc.relation.isbasedonDAMBORSKÝ, M. a R. WOKOUN. Lokalizační faktory malého a středního podnikání v podmínkách ekonomiky ČR. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2010, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 32-43. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonCOFFEY, W. J. and M. POLES. Producer Services and Regional Development: A policy-oriented perspective. Regional Science. 1989, Vol. 67, Iss. 1, pp. 13-27. ISSN 1056-8190. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1989.tb01179.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonBOTER, H. SME perspectives on business support services: The role of company size, industry and location. Strategic Direction. 2006, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 244-258. ISSN 0258-0543. doi:org/10.1108/sd.2006.05622baf.007.
dc.relation.isbasedonBOSCHMA, R. A. and K. FRENKEN. Why is Economic Geography not an Evolutionary Science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography. 2005, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. 273-302. ISSN 1468-2710. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectmotivationen
dc.subjectmotivational programmeen
dc.subjectchange of motivationen
dc.subjecteconomic crisisen
dc.subjecttwo-sample t-testen
dc.subjectDuncan’s testen
dc.subject.classificationC12
dc.subject.classificationR10
dc.subject.classificationR53
dc.titleA comparison of location factors evaluation in the secondary and tertiary sectorsen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage56
local.citation.spage46
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.identifier.publikace1835
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume18
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2015_4.pdf
Size:
853.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Číslo 1