At the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution

Title Alternative:who gets who loses
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKraftová, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorDoudová, Iveta
dc.contributor.authorMiláček, Radim
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T08:33:31Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T08:33:31Z
dc.description.abstractAt the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century, the Fourth Industrial Revolution based on the digitization of production processes, more precisely connecting the virtual world to the real world began. The aim of this article is to present the results of the research that focused on comparing the positions of the selected group of countries at the threshold of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in terms of their performance and competitiveness. The analysis is aimed at 13 countries – the six largest economies of the world and seven economies of the former Soviet bloc – from 1993 to 2015 using the localization quotient and index of regional concentration of the industry on the basis of gross added value, supplemented by the SHADE model, the Balassa index and evaluating the comparative advantage of countries in the area of ICT. The research defines the position pattern of countries for the manufacturing and ICT industries. It cannot be said that the differences in localization, resp. the concentration of the industries surveyed were determined by the size of the economy or its membership of traditional market economies. Exportability in ICT goods positively evaluates those economies that have managed to increase their positive Balassa index over time, resp. to get from its negative values to positive ones. The beginning of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is an unrepeatable moment of human history, just as it was with the First, Second and Third Industrial Revolutions. The one who knows and is able to accept, use and multiply the supporting trends is the one who gains.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent17 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-002
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/26627
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.ispartofBlažek, J. (2012). Regionální inovační systémy a globální produkční sítě: dvojí optika na zdroje konkurenceschopnosti v současném světě? Geografie, 117(2), 209-233.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDlouhý, V. (2016). Neničme talenty, průmysl to ocení. Svět 2017. Praha: Economia.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDoucek, P., Maryška, M., & Novotný, O. (2013). Analýza souladu obsahu ICT studijních oborů s požadavky praxe v České republice. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(3), 148-161.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Commission. (2010). Evropa 2020. Strategie pro inteligentní a udržitelný růst podporující začlenění. Brusel: COM.cs
dc.relation.ispartofFisher, A. G. B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, 15(1), 24-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1939.tb01015.x.cs
dc.relation.ispartofFojtíková, L. (2016). Trends in the revealed comparative advantages of the EU member states. Economic Annals-XXI, 161(9-10), 7-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-02.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGarvy, G. (1943). Kondratieff’s Theory of Long Cycles. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 25(4), 203-220. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927337.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGatautis, R. (2008). The Impact of ICT on Public and Private Sectors in Lithuania. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 59(4), 18-28.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGrinin, L. E., Grinin, A. L., & Korotayev, A. (2017). Forthcoming Kondratieff wave, Cybernetic Revolution, and global ageing. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 115, 52-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.017.cs
dc.relation.ispartofJirsák, P., Martinéz, F., Lorenc, M., & Jančík, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic – State of the Art. In Proceedings of the 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics (pp. 766-769).cs
dc.relation.ispartofKamensky, E. (2017). Society. Personality. Technologies: Social Paradoxes of Industry 4.0. Economic Annals, XXI, 164(3-4), 9-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-02.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKorbel, P. (2016). Reindustrializace je cestou k bezpečí. Svět 2017. Praha: Economia.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKotynková, M. (2016). Industry 4.0: Europe's (Re)Industrialization Needs a Global Level. In Proceedings of the 16th international scientific conference Globalization and its Socio-economic Consequences (pp. 1014-1021).cs
dc.relation.ispartofKraft, J. (2016). Analysis of Changes in Selected Market Structures in Relation to Economic Success. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 27(1), 32-28. .cs
dc.relation.ispartofKraftová, I. (2011). Odvětvové změny a rozvoj regionů. ERSA, Zimný seminár regionálnej vedy (pp. 1-14).cs
dc.relation.ispartofKraftová, I., Matěja, Z., & Zdražil, P. (2013). Innovation Industry Drivers. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum (pp. 334-342). Liberec: Technická univerzita v Liberci.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKraftová, I., & Prášilová, P. (2013). Prosperující podnik v regionálním kontextu. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.cs
dc.relation.ispartofLi, G., Hou, Y., & Wu, A. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological Drivers, Impacts and Coping Methods. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 626-637. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11769-017-0890-x.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMacDougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Smart Manufactruing for the Futurre. Berlin: GTAI.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMakridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impacts on society and firms. Futures, 90, 40-60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMallick, J., & Kraftová, I. (2015). The Development of Quaternary Activities in Japanese Economy. Asian Economic Review, 57(2), 1-14.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMarais, G. (1981). Structural Changes in Manufacturing Industry 1916 to 1975. South African Journal of Economics, 49(1), 16-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.1981.tb00686.x.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMaskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalson, I., Malmberg, A., & Vatne, E. (1998). Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development. (Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies). London and New York: Routledge.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMaštálka, M., & Vávra, M. (2016). Koncept smart cities v prostředí České republiky. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.), 19th International Colloquium on reginal Sciences (pp. 747-752). https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-95.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMinistry of Education, Youth and Sport of the CR. (2014). Národní výzkumná a inovační strategie pro inteligentní specializaci České republiky (Národní RIS3 strategie). Retrieved July 29, 2017, from .cs
dc.relation.ispartofOECD. (2011). Guide on Measuring the Information Society 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2017, from .cs
dc.relation.ispartofPaci, R. (1997). More similar and less equal: Economic growth in the European regions. Review of World Economics, 133(4), 609-634. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02707405.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPostelnicu, C., Dinu, V., & Dabija, D. C. (2015). Economic Deglobalization – from Hypothesis to Reality. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 18(2), 4-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-001.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPůžová, K., & Marešová, P. (2014). . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 880-885. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.558.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPwC. (2017). Lidé a digitalizace byznysu. Průzkum názorů generálních ředitelů. Praha: Economia.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRed. (2013). Evropa na sestupu. Míří do „druhé ligy“. Ekonom, 57(40), 47-51.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRogoff, K. (2012). Poučení ze hry králů. Ekonom, 56(41), 38.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRostow, W. W. (1985). Is There Need for Economic Leadership – Japanese or United States. American Economic Review, 75(2), 285-291.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSaboniene, A. (2009). Lithuanian Export Competitiveness: Comparison with other Baltic States. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 60(2), 49-57.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSaboniene, A. (2010). The Evaluation of the Potential of Lithuanian Manufacturing Industry Structure on the Basis of CI Index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 61(4), 399-407.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSachs, J. D. (2014). Nová globální vedoucí role Číny. Ekonom, 58(49), 36.cs
dc.relation.ispartofThe National Convention on the EU. (2016). Společnost 4.0. Praha: Hospodářská komora ČR.cs
dc.relation.ispartofUNCTAD. (2014). Updating the Partnership Definition of ICT Goods from HS 2007 to HS 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2017, from .cs
dc.relation.ispartofUNSTAT. (2016). GDP/breakdown at constant 2005 prices in US Dollars (all countries and regions). Retrieved March 22, 2016, from .cs
dc.relation.ispartofVacek, J. (2016). Socio-Economic Aspects of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Corporate Sustainability (pp. 731-741).cs
dc.relation.ispartofVolejníková, J., & Lelek, T. (2012). Hospodářský růst v éře nové ekonomiky. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, XXI(39/1), 98-106.cs
dc.relation.ispartofZdražil, P., & Applová, P. (2016). Growth Disparities among Regions of the Visegrad Group Countries: An Evidence of Their Extent and Nature. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 9(2), 37-53.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectThe fourth industrial revolutionen
dc.subjectlocalization and concentration of industryen
dc.subjectmanufacturingen
dc.subjectICTen
dc.subjectposition patternen
dc.subjectICT goodsen
dc.subjectcomparative advantageen
dc.subjectperformanceen
dc.subjectcompetitivenessen
dc.subject.classificationF63
dc.subject.classificationL69
dc.subject.classificationO33
dc.titleAt the threshold of the fourth industrial revolutionen
dc.title.alternativewho gets who losesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage39
local.citation.spage23
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2018_02
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2018_02.pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3