Impact of economic development on the ecology in the regions of Lithuania

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGinevicius, Romualdas
dc.contributor.authorGedvilaite, Dainora
dc.contributor.authorStasiukynas, Andrius
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-28
dc.date.available2018-06-28
dc.date.issued2018-06-28
dc.description.abstractAll three components of sustainable development (SD) – economic, social and ecological – are closely interrelated and have both direct and reverse impacts. To better understand the SD phenomenon and to manage it purposefully, we need to perform two essential tasks: first, a quantitative analysis of the status of the components; and second, a quantitative assessment of their impact on one another. Both economic development and ecological development are complex processes that manifest themselves in many aspects; thus, the quantitative assessment of the condition of these processes is based on multi-criteria methods. The article analyses the impact of economic development of the regions of the state on the ecological development as an essential component thereof. The latter statement represents the purpose of the study. The set of economic development indices is formed based on the possibility to obtain the required statistical information. Only those indices that reflect irreversible resources: water, air and land resources – are included in the system of economic development indices. Following the assessment of the condition of economic development and of the ecological development, the interrelation between the economic development and the ecological development shall be analysed based on correlation and regression analysis. It has been determined that economic development in the regions of Lithuania has a negative impact on the ecological development in those regions (r = 0.82). The components of economic development reflect only 57% of its impact on the ecology; whereas construction (r = 0.71) and industry (r = 0.47) have the biggest negative impact.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent17 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-2-002
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/26412
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.ispartofBabu, S. S., & Datta, S. K. (2015). Revisiting the link between socio-economic development and environmental status indicators – focus on panel data. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(3), 567-586. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9561-6.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBelton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Dordrecht.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBoggia, A., & Cortina, C. (2010). Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2301-2306. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.009.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699-705. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.001.cs
dc.relation.ispartofChansarn, S. (2013). Assessing the Sustainable Development of Thailand. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 611-619. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.077.cs
dc.relation.ispartofČiegis, R., Ramanauskienė, J., & Šimanskienė, L. (2010). Lietuvos regionų darnaus vystymosi vertinimas [Evaluation of sustainable development of Lithuanian regions]. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universiteto leidykla.cs
dc.relation.ispartofCounties of Lithuania 2010. Retrieved from http://osp.stat.gov.lt/services-portlet/pub-edition-file?id=14761.cs
dc.relation.ispartofCounties of Lithuania 2011. Retrieved from http://osp.stat.gov.lt/services-portlet/pub-edition-file?id=2068.cs
dc.relation.ispartofCounties of Lithuania 2012. Retrieved from http://osp.stat.gov.lt/services-portlet/pub-edition-file?id=2068.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGinevičius, R. (2009). Socioekonominių sistemų būklės kiekybinio įvertinimo problematika [Some problems of quantitative evaluation of the state of social-economic systems]. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 10(2), 69-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.69-83.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGinevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2007). Complex assessment of sustainable development of state regions with emphasis on ecological and dwelling conditions. Ekologija, 53 (Supplement), 41-48.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGinevičius, R., & Podvezko, A. (2012). Features of applying decision-making methods to evaluation of financial stability of commercial banks. Business: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 314-323.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGinevičius, R., Gedvilaitė, D., & Bruzgė, Š. (2015). Assessment of a country’s regional economic development on the basis of Estimation of a Single Process (ESP) method. Entrepreneurial business and economics review (EBER), 3(2), 141-153. https://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2015.030210.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGinevičius, R., Podvezko, V., & Podvezko, A. (2011). A new approach for evaluating of socio-economical processes by multi-criteria decision methods. In The 7th International Scientific Conference. Business and management - 2012. May 10-11, 2012, Vilnius, Lithuania.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGolusin, M., Munitlak, I. O., & Teodorovic, N. (2011). The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe – The use of linear regression method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 766-772. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.064.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHamilton, K. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development: genuine savings. Note for technical discussion on sustainable development indicators. Paris.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making – methods and applications. A state of the art survey. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.cs
dc.relation.ispartofJia, Z., Haifeng, X., Jincheng, S., & Xuelin, Z. (2007). Assessment of Sustainable Development System in Suihua City, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 17(4), 304-310. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11769-007-0304-6.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKondyli, J. (2010). Measurement and evaluation of sustainable development. A composite indicator for the islands of the North Aegean region, Greece. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(6), 347-356. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.006.cs
dc.relation.ispartofLange, G. M. (2003). Policy Applications of Environmental Accounting. Environmental Economics Series Papers.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., & Nor, K. M. (2015). Application of multiple-criteria decision - making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(5), 1034-1068. https://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1095233.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Zakuan, N., Valipour, A., & Kazemilari, M. (2016). Proposing a new hierarchical framework for the evaluation of quality management practices: a new combined fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 1-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1061589.cs
dc.relation.ispartofNess, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498-508. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRadovanović, M., & Lior, M. (2017). Sustainable economic–environmental planning in Southeast Europe – beyond-GDP and climate change emphases. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 580-594. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1679.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRochen, M., & Dincer, I. (2001). Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development. Exergy International Journal, 1(1), 3-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1164-0235(01)00004-8.cs
dc.relation.ispartofWallis, A. N., Graymore, M. J. M., & Richards, A. J. (2011). Significance of environment in the assessment of sustainable development: The case for south west Victoria. Ecological Economics, 70(4), 595-605. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.010.cs
dc.relation.ispartofZinatizadeh, S., Azmi, A., Monavari, S. M., & Sobhanardakani, S. (2017). Evaluation and prediction of sustainability of urban areas: A case study for Kermanshah city, Iran. Cities, 66, 1-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.002.cs
dc.relation.ispartofZolfani, S. H., Maknoon, R., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Multiple nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 290-306. https://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2014.967715.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectsustainable development of regionsen
dc.subjectimpact of economic development on the ecologyen
dc.subjectmulticriteria assessment methodsen
dc.subjectcorrelation analysisen
dc.subject.classificationQ01
dc.subject.classificationR11
dc.subject.classificationO01
dc.titleImpact of economic development on the ecology in the regions of Lithuaniaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage37
local.citation.spage21
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_2_2018_02
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2018_02.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 2