Evaluation of the usability of selected innovation concepts for managing innovation activities

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPeterková, Jindra
dc.contributor.authorZapletalová, Šárka
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T09:21:42Z
dc.date.available2018-12-17T09:21:42Z
dc.description.abstractA significant number of enterprise owners and managers realize an importance of innovations for the future existence of their business and its development. It appears that in theory and business practice a number of innovation concepts can be found, however for managers and business owners it is difficult to be knowledgeable in innovation concepts in order to use them in practice. Innovation concepts represent solutions outline, which react to the business ability to innovate. Each innovation concept is different in the area of focusing on innovation problem and way of detailization. Chosen innovation concepts can be applied when solving following problems: Identifying the innovation potential, organizational readiness for innovation and achieved levels of innovation climate, or the actual implementation of the innovation process and the evaluation of innovation. It is worth noting that concrete innovation concepts are not at the same level of usability in practice, some of them need to be better specified for application in business. A set of innovation concepts was created and evaluated the usability of individual concepts in the enterprise. The evaluation was carried out by qualitative analysis using selected criteria, which were determined by an expert group with the assistance of the researcher. Variants of usability of innovation concepts were defined subsequently. At the same time, decision-making model based on the Analytic Hierarchical Process was designed and applied in order to classify innovation concepts. Decision-making model can be used by managers for the purpose of innovations management while choosing the concept of innovation.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent18 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-4-010
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/124751
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.ispartofBanu, G. S. (2018). Measuring Innovation Using Key Performance Indicators. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.128.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBalanced Scorecard Institute. (2017). Balanced Scorecard Basics. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from http://www.balancedscorecard.org/BSC-Basics/About-the-Balanced-Scorecard.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDe Bonis, J. N., Balinski, E., & Allen, P. (2002). Value-Based Marketing for Bottom-Line Success: 5 Steps to Creating Customer Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in Organizations. The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810911156.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Clayton, M. C. (2011). The Innovator´s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEscobar, M. T., Aguarón, J., & Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. (2004). A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 318-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1.cs
dc.relation.ispartofFew, S. (2006). Information Dashboard Design. Sebastopol: O´Reilly Media.cs
dc.relation.ispartofFotr, J., & Švecová, L. (2010). Manažerské rozhodování: metody, postupy a nástroje [Managerial Decision Making: Methods, Procedures, and Tools]. Praha: Ekopress.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGala, L., Pour, J., & Šedivá, Z. (2009). Podniková informatika [Business Informatics]. Praha: Grada.cs
dc.relation.ispartofGupta, P., & Trusko, B. E. (2014). Global Innovation Science Hanbook. USA: McGraw-Hill Education.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHamel, G. (2006). The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 72-83.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHauschildt, J. (2007). Innovations management. München: Verlag Vahlen.cs
dc.relation.ispartofChester, K. M. (2017). A Quad Model for Assessing Innovation Potential: Toward a Theory of Innovation Orchestration Quality. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440.101004.cs
dc.relation.ispartofIshizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy proces. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143.cs
dc.relation.ispartofJáč, I., Rydvalová, P., & Žižka, M. (2005). Inovace v malém a středním podnikání [Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises]. Brno: Computer Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps. Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006). Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies: How to Apply the Balanced Scorecard to Corporate Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKopčaj, A. (2007). Spirálový management [Spiral Management]. Praha: Alfa Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKoráb, V., & Koudelková, P. (2016). What determines innovation in small and medium enterprise? A Case study from the Czech Republic. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2), 78-88.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKošturiak, J., & Chal´, J. (2008). Inovace vaše konkurenční výhoda! [Innovation Your Competitive Advantage!]. Brno: Computer Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKošturiak, J., & Frolík, Z. (2006). Štíhlý a inovativní podnik [Lean and Innovative Company]. Praha: Alfa Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKovač, M., & Sabadka, D. (2004). Model inovačního potenciálu podniku [Model of The Company´s Innovation Potential]. Transfér inovácií, 7, 3-6.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKraśnicka, T., Głód, W., & Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2016). Management Innovation and Its Measurement. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(2), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.7341/20161225.cs
dc.relation.ispartofLee, J. (2008). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on Innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 670-687. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810894747.cs
dc.relation.ispartofLudvík, L., & Peterková, J. (2013). Specifics of size structure and managing role of the large companies in enterprise environment in the Czech Republic. Journal of Applied Economics Sciences, 8(1), 63-72.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMaxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. London: SAGE Publications.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMerrill, P. (2015). Innovation Never Stops: Innovation Generation – The Culture, Process, and Strategy. Milwauke: ASQ Quality Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMiles, L. D. (1972). Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMikoláš, Z., Peterková, J., Tvrdíková, M. et al. (2011). Konkurenční potenciál průmyslového podniku [Competitive Potential of Industrial Company]. Praha: C. H. Beck.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMikoláš, Z., & Wozniakova, Z. (2009). Virtual firm competitiveness. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58, 270-274.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMlčoch, J. (2002). Inovace a výnosnost podniku [Innovation and Business Performance]. Praha: Linde.cs
dc.relation.ispartofParmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPIs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPearl, M. (2011). Grow Globally. New Jersey: Wiley.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPitra, Z. (2006). Management inovačních aktivit [Management of Innovation Activities]. Praha: Professional Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPrahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). The new age of innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSaaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. London: McGraw-Hill International Book Co.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSaaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSaaty, T. L., & Peniwati, K. (2012). GROUP DECISION MAKING: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pitsburgh: RWS Publications.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C, & Arroniz, I. (2014). The Innovation Radar and Enterprise Business System. In P. Gupta, & B. E. Trusko (Eds.), Global Innovation Science Hanbook (pp. 581-591). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSilverstein, D., Samuel, D., & DeCarlo, N. (2012). The Innovator’s Toolkit. 50+ Techniques for Predictable and Sustainable organic Growth. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSzabo, Z. K., Šoltés M., & Herman, E. (2013). Innovative Capacity & Performance of Transition Economies: Comparative Study at the Level of Enterprises. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(1), 52-68.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTemel, S. (2014). Measuring for Innovation. In P. Gupta, & B. E. Trusko (Eds.), Global Innovation Science Hanbook (pp. 719-731). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.cs
dc.relation.ispartofŠulák, M., & Vacík, E. (2005). Měření výkonnosti firem [Measuring Business Performance]. Praha: EUPRESS.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.cs
dc.relation.ispartofVlček, R. (1986). Příručka hodnotové analýzy [Value Analysis Manual]. Praha: Nakladatelství technické literatury Alfa.cs
dc.relation.ispartofVlček, R. (2002). Hodnota pro zákazníka [Value for Customer]. Praha: Management Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofVlček, R. (2008). Management hodnotových inovací [Value Innovation Management]. Praha: Management Press.cs
dc.relation.ispartofVlček, R. (2011). Strategie hodnotových inovací: tvorba, rozvoj a měřitelnost inovací [Value Innovation Strategy: Creation, Development, and Measurability of Innovation]. Praha: Professional Publishing.cs
dc.relation.ispartofZelený, M. (2012). High Technology and Barriers to Innovation: From Globalization to Relocalization. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(2), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201240010X.cs
dc.relation.ispartofŽižlavský, O. (2014). Net present value approach: method for economic assessment of innovation projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 506-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.230cs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectinnovation concepten
dc.subjectmanaging innovationsen
dc.subjectdecision modelen
dc.subjectThe AHP methoden
dc.subjectCzech Republicen
dc.subject.classificationM1
dc.subject.classificationO32
dc.titleEvaluation of the usability of selected innovation concepts for managing innovation activitiesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage158
local.citation.spage141
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_4_2018_10
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue4
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_4_2018_10.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 4