The impact of social network on the innovative behavior of it professionals

Title Alternative:what is the role of sharing mistakes?
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKhorakian, Alireza
dc.contributor.authorJahangir, Mostafa
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T08:33:34Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T08:33:34Z
dc.description.abstractIn today’s competitive world, organizations need constant innovations in products, services and processes in order to grow and survive. Key of Innovation is in the innovative behavior of organization employees. Various factors affect the innovative behavior of the staff. The existence of a social network among the employees is one of the factors which can affect this behavior. Despite this fact, the way it affects is one of the major issues in the society of IT professionals. The aim of the research is investigating the mediatory role of sharing mistakes in the impact of social network on innovative behavior of IT professionals. In order to evaluate the research variables, a questionnaire of 18 questions has been used. This questionnaire has been distributed among 210 IT professionals in Mashhad. To analyze the data, structural equation modeling has been used. The results of this research showed that social network has positive impact on sharing mistakes. Also sharing mistakes has impact on generating and promoting ideas. In addition sharing mistakes mediates the impact of social network on generating and promoting ideas. Finally, in the conclusion of the scientific achievement of this research, one can refer to the fact that to promote and develop the IT companies in this competitive industry, innovation is needed. Innovation is created by the innovative employees. To behave innovatively, the employees should have contact through social network, yet if the social network leads the employees to share their mistakes, it would enhance the innovative behavior to a greater extent.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent17 strancs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-012
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/26637
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.ispartofBorges, R. (2012). Tacit knowledge sharing between IT workers: The role of organizational culture, personality, and social environment. Management Research Review, 36(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171311284602.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBouman, A. (2010). 21 Tech Companies that Changed The World... Before They Died. Retrieved from: http://www.maximumpc.com/21-tech-companies-that-changed-the-world-before-they-died/#.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBowers, J., & Khorakian, A. (2014). Integrating risk management in the innovation project. European journal of innovation management, 17(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2013-0010.cs
dc.relation.ispartofBrass, D. J. (2003). A social network perspective on human resources management. In Networks in the knowledge economy (pp. 283-323).cs
dc.relation.ispartofBurt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas1. American journal of sociology, 110(2), 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787.cs
dc.relation.ispartofCannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of organizational behavior, 22(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85.cs
dc.relation.ispartofChen, I. Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2009). Examining the factors influencing participants' knowledge sharing behavior in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 134-148.cs
dc.relation.ispartofChin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.cs
dc.relation.ispartofConstantinides, P. (2013). The communicative constitution of IT innovation. Information and Organization, 23(4), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.07.002.cs
dc.relation.ispartofDe Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and innovation management, 23(3), 318-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12079.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEdmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48-55.cs
dc.relation.ispartofFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of management journal, 48(5), 776-793. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803922.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHomsma, G. J., Van Dyck, C., De Gilder, D., Koopman, P. L., & Elfring, T. (2009). Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.12.003.cs
dc.relation.ispartofHulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195cs
dc.relation.ispartofHülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978.cs
dc.relation.ispartofJanssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038.cs
dc.relation.ispartofJanssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of organizational behavior, 25, 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.238.cs
dc.relation.ispartofKanter, R., & Myers, P. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In P.S. Myers (Ed.), Knowledge Management and Organisational Design (pp. 93-131). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMadsen, P. M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51467631.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMartin, D. E., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. R. (2009). Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: A criterion study. Ethics & Behavior, 19(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420802623666.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMontes, F. J. L., Moreno, A. R., & Fernández, L. M. M. (2004). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720410535972.cs
dc.relation.ispartofMura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., & Spiller, N. (2013). Promoting professionals' innovative behaviour through knowledge sharing: the moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0105.cs
dc.relation.ispartofNonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPalmer, M. A. (2010). The role of attitudes, individual innovativeness, and organizational support for innovation in evidence-based practice implementation. University of South Dakota.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPerry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of management review, 28(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.8925236.cs
dc.relation.ispartofPhelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 1115-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640.cs
dc.relation.ispartofRadaelli, G., Mura, M., Spiller, N., & Lettieri, E. (2011). Intellectual capital and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of organisational knowledge-sharing climate. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2011.29.cs
dc.relation.ispartofReagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 240-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658.cs
dc.relation.ispartofScott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSlowinski, G., Hummel, E., & Kumpf, R. J. (2006). Protecting know-how and trade secrets in collaborative R&D relationships. Research-Technology Management, 49(4), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2006.11657385.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSmall, C. T., & Sage, A. P. (2006). Knowledge management and knowledge sharing: A review. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 5(3), 153-169.cs
dc.relation.ispartofSzabo, Z. K., Soltés, M., & Herman, E. (2013). Innovative capacity & performance of transition economies: Comparative study at the level of enterprises. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(1), 52-68.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTaştan, S. B. (2013). The influences of participative organizational climate and self-leadership on innovative behavior and the roles of job involvement and proactive personality: A survey in the Context of SMEs in Izmir. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.045.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTeigland, R., Di Gangi, P. M., Flåten, B.-T., Giovacchini, E., & Pastorino, N. (2014). Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity. Information and Organization, 24(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.01.001.cs
dc.relation.ispartofTortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization science, 23(4), 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688.cs
dc.relation.ispartofVan Dyck, C.(2005). Putting errors to good use: Error management culture in organizations (doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences. University of Amsterdam).cs
dc.relation.ispartofVan Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: a two-study replication. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1228-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228.cs
dc.relation.ispartofWang, X. H. F., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of organizational behavior, 36(3), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1994.cs
dc.relation.ispartofWong, S.-S., & Boh, W. F. (2010). Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among peers. Academy of management journal, 53(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037265.cs
dc.relation.ispartofWoodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectsharing mistakesen
dc.subjectinnovative behavioren
dc.subjectsocial networken
dc.subjectIT professionalsen
dc.subject.classificationO31
dc.subject.classificationM10
dc.subject.classificationD83
dc.titleThe impact of social network on the innovative behavior of it professionalsen
dc.title.alternativewhat is the role of sharing mistakes?en
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage204
local.citation.spage188
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2018_12
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2018_12.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3