Supplier involvement in new product development: a case study from the semiconductor industry

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVayvay, Özalp
dc.contributor.authorCruz-Cunha, Maria Manuela
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-23
dc.date.available2016-09-23
dc.date.defense2016-09-23
dc.description.abstractThe global competition requires that the companies adapt themselves to technological changes rapidly, develop new products, reduce the cost, shorten the time to market, and increase the quality. In this context, supplier involvement in New Product Development (NPD) is determinant for a company to respond to the requirements of the increasingly dynamic markets. The main purpose of the paper is to demonstrate the importance of supplier involvement in NPD, buyer-supplier relationships and their effects on buyer’s NPD process, highlighting the benefits of supplier involvement, the barriers, the strategic aspects and industry aspects. These issues are addressed with a case study from the semiconductor industry. Besides helping to understand NPD in the semiconductor industry, the contribution and findings of this work are clear: the results achieved confirm the findings of studies referred in the literature review, and confirm that the semiconductor industry sector requires a closer and more complex relationship structure with suppliers, given the specificities and challenges of the sector, such as rapid technological changes, permanent innovation, global competition, reduction of cost and time-to-market cycle, increased capacity, among other. The main contribution of the paper to the scientific literature and to managers is the better understanding of the buyer-supplier relationships in NPD in the semiconductor industry.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent123-141 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-009
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/18196
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAuramo, J., & Ala-Risku, T. (2005). Challenges for going downstream. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(4), 333-345. doi:10.1080/13675560500407358.
dc.relation.isbasedonBaregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578.
dc.relation.isbasedonBinder, M., & Clegg, B. (2007). Designing and managing collaborative enterprises in the automotive industry. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 10(2), 135-152. doi:10.1080/13675560701427346.
dc.relation.isbasedonBstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2008). Developing trust in vertical product development partnerships: A comparison of South Korea and Austria. Journal of World Business, 43(1), 35-46. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2007.10.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarlile, P. R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 12(4), 442-455. .
dc.relation.isbasedonChang, S.-C., Chen, R.-H., Lin, R.-J., Tien, S.-W., & Sheu, C. (2006). Supplier involvement and manufacturing flexibility. Technovation, 26(10), 1136-1146. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.010.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, G., & Muller, A. (2010). Measuring innovation from different perspectives. Employment Relations Today, 37(1), 1-8. doi:10.1002/ert.20279.
dc.relation.isbasedonCooper, J. R. (1998). A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation. Management Decision, 36(8), 493-502. doi:10.1108/00251749810232565.
dc.relation.isbasedonCunha, M. M., & Putnik, G. D. (2006). Identification of the Domain of Opportunities for a Market of Resources for Virtual Enterprise Integration. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2277-2298. doi:10.1080/00207540500409947.
dc.relation.isbasedonDe Brentani, U., Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Salomo, S. (2010). Success in Global New Product Development: Impact of Strategy and the Behavioral Environment of the Firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 143-160. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00707.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonEmden, Z., Calantone, R. J., & Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for New Product Development: Selecting the Partner with Maximum Potential to Create Value. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 330-341. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00205.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonEnglhardt, E. A. (1993). Product evolution vs. product revolution maximizing continuous improvement while minimizing risk. In Proceedings of the International Semiconductor Manufacturing Science Symposium. ISMSS , IEEE/SEMI International (pp. 98-103). San Francisco, CA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ISMSS.1993.263691.
dc.relation.isbasedonForslund, H., & Jonsson, P. (2010). Integrating the performance management process of on-time delivery with suppliers. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(3), 225-241. doi:10.1080/13675561003712799.
dc.relation.isbasedonGotzamania, K. D., & Theodorakioglou, Y. D. (2010). Critical barriers to the implementation of close supplier-buyer relationships: the case of Greek manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 13(3), 211-224. doi:10.1080/13675560903286151.
dc.relation.isbasedonHartley, J., Meredith, J., McCutcheon, D., & Kamath, E. (1997). Suppliers' contributions to product development: an exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 258-267. doi:10.1109/17.618077.
dc.relation.isbasedonHomburg, C., Cannon, J. P., Krohmer, H., & Kiedaisch, I. (2009). Governance of International Business Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Study on Alternative Governance Modes. Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 1-20. doi:10.1509/jimk.17.3.1.
dc.relation.isbasedonHou, L., Han, D., & Lin, Z. (2006, June 21-23). Research on Supplier Selection for Inter-firm Product Collaborative Development. Paper presented at the The Sixth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. WCICA 2006, Dalian, China. doi:10.1109/WCICA.2006.1714440.
dc.relation.isbasedonHua, S. Y., & Wemmerlöv, U. (2006). Product Change Intensity in the Personal Computer Industry: A Study of Firm-Supplier Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 348-360. doi:10.1109/TEM.2006.878108.
dc.relation.isbasedonInemek, A., & Tuna, O. (2009). Global supplier selection strategies and implications for supplier performance: Turkish suppliers' perception. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 12(5), 381-406. doi:10.1080/13675560903181543.
dc.relation.isbasedonJohnson, J. K., White, A., & Hearne, S. (1997). From solvents to services: restructuring chemical supplier relationships to achieve environmental excellence. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISEE-1997 (pp. 322-325). San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
dc.relation.isbasedonKeller, W. W., & Pauly, L. W. (2009). Innovation in the Indian Semiconductor Industry: The Challenge of Sectoral Deepening. Business and Politics, 11(2). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1457088.
dc.relation.isbasedonKnudsen, M. P. (2007). The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(2), 117-138. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00238.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonLam, P.-K., & Chin, K.-S. (2005). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for conflict management in collaborative new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 761-772. doi:10.1108/02635570810868326.
dc.relation.isbasedonLawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009). Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 156-172. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00343.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonLengnick-Hall, C. A. (1992). Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Journal of Management, 18(2), 399-429. doi:10.1177/014920639201800209.
dc.relation.isbasedonLi, S., Gu, S., & Wang, Q. (2010). An empirical study on the influencing factors of supplier involvement in new product development. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(3), 451-484. doi:10.1007/s11782-010-0106-z.
dc.relation.isbasedonLiker, J. K., Sobek, D. K., Ward, A. C., & Cristiano, J. J. (1996). Involving Suppliers in Product Development in the United States; and Japan: Evidence for Set-Based Concurrent Engineering. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 43(2), 165-178. doi:10.1109/17.509982.
dc.relation.isbasedonLou, C.-C., Lee, T.-P., Gong, S.-C., & Lin, S.-L. (2010). Effects of technical innovation on market value of the U.S. semiconductor industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1322-1338. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.016.
dc.relation.isbasedonMcIvor, R., Humphreys, P., & Cadden, T. (2006). Supplier involvement in product development in the electronics industry: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 374-397. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonNieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367-377. doi:10.16/j.technovation.2006.10.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonOke, A., & Idiagbon-Oke, M. (2010). Communication channels, innovation tasks and NPD project outcomes in innovation-driven horizontal networks. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 442-453. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonOlson, E. M., Walker Jr., O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-62.
dc.relation.isbasedonPage, A. L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 273-290. doi:10.2307/1252014.
dc.relation.isbasedonPetersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2003). A Model of Supplier Integration into New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(4), 284-299. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.00028.
dc.relation.isbasedonPetersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3-4), 371-388. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009.
dc.relation.isbasedonPrimo, M. A. M., & Amundson, S. D. (2002). An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 33-52. doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00080-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonRagatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 190-202. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1430190.
dc.relation.isbasedonReed, F. M., & Walsh, K. (2002). Enhancing technological capability through supplier development: a study of the UK aerospace industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 231-242. doi:10.1109/TEM.2002.803379.
dc.relation.isbasedonRNCOS. (2007). Semiconductor Industry (2007-2010): RNCOS Industry Research Solutions. Available online at Semiconductor Industry (2007-2010).
dc.relation.isbasedonRuey-Jer, J., Sinkovics, R. R., & Kim, D. (2010). Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Relationship Learning for Suppliers in Cross-Border Customer–Supplier Relationships: The Role of Communication Culture. Journal of International Marketing, 18(1), 63-85. doi:10.1509/ijmk.18.1.63.
dc.relation.isbasedonSammarra, A., & Biggiero, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 800-829. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00770.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonSIA (2006). Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.sia-online.org/galleries/annual_report/Annual%20Report%202006.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonSIA. (2011). Semiconductor Industry Association. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.sia-online.org/cs/industry_resources/glossary.
dc.relation.isbasedonSmart, P., Bessant, J., & Gupta, A. (2007). Towards technological rules for designing innovation networks: a dynamic capabilities view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(10), 1069-1092. doi:10.1108/01443570710820639.
dc.relation.isbasedonSong, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2008). Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonSwink, M. (2006). Building Collaborative Innovation Capability. Research-Technology Management, 49, 37-47.
dc.relation.isbasedonTerziovski, M., & Sohal, A. S. (2000). The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 20(10), 539-550. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00173-X.
dc.relation.isbasedonTidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.relation.isbasedonTomala, F., & Sénéchal, O. (2004). Innovation management: a synthesis of academic and industrial points of view. International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 281-287. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.06.003.
dc.relation.isbasedonTomek, G., & Chromcová, A. (2002). Supply Chain Management a automobilový průmysl. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 5(4).
dc.relation.isbasedonTwigg, D., & Slack, N. (1999). Supplier involvement in product development: lessons from using 'guest engineers’ in the automotive industry. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 3(3). doi:10.1080/13675569808962047.
dc.relation.isbasedonVan Echtelt, F. E. A., Wynstra, F., Van Weele, A. J., & Duysters, G. (2008). Managing Supplier Involvement in New Product Development: A Multiple-Case Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 180-201. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonVeryzer, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 304-321. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1540304.
dc.relation.isbasedonWagner, S. M., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 936-943. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.009.
dc.relation.isbasedonWalker, J., & Hon, S. E. (1988). Supplier Quality Improvement – The Key to Long-term Quality Relationships. IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Communications, 6(8), 1322-1325. doi:10.1109/49.7862.
dc.relation.isbasedonZhang, Q., Lim, J.-S., & Cao, M. (2004). Innovation-driven learning in new product development: a conceptual model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(3), 252-261. doi:10.1108/02635570410525799.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectnew product developmenten
dc.subjectsupplier involvementen
dc.subjectsemiconductor industryen
dc.subjectbuyer-supplier relationshipen
dc.subject.classificationL21
dc.subject.classificationL23
dc.subject.classificationL25
dc.subject.classificationM11
dc.titleSupplier involvement in new product development: a case study from the semiconductor industryen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage141
local.citation.spage123
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume19
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2016_9.pdf
Size:
2.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3