A study on the influence of family on family business and its relationship to satisfaction with financial performance

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, Evren
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05
dc.date.available2014-06-05
dc.date.defense2014-06-11
dc.description.abstractThis article investigated, within family businesses, the theoretical and practical relationships between the influence of family on the family business and the satisfaction of the top manager family member with the financial performance of his or her business. How a family can influence its own business and what is meant by satisfaction with financial performance has been examined on the basis of the extant literature. Questionnaires have been created regarding the influence of family and satisfaction with financial performance. Afterwards, the relationship between influence and satisfaction was examined within the scope of a proposed model. Data were collected from the family businesses located in the organized industrial zones of Istanbul, Turkey. The influence of family and the satisfaction of the top manager family member with financial performance were found to be based on five and two key factors, respectively. In view of the findings, although spouses of the family members within the family business did not influence satisfaction with profit or debt, they did cause a decrease in satisfaction with sales and operations. The involvement of family in the financial decisions along with the business successor also negatively affected satisfaction with debt, profit, sales, and operations. Although the founder of the business did not have a significant influence on the factors that affected satisfaction with financial performance, family members’ loyalty to and harmony with the business positively affected satisfaction with financial performance. In conclusion, the influence of family has a weak inverse relationship with top manager family member’s financial performance satisfaction.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent87-105 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-007
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7061
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonADSAN, E., GUMUSTEKIN, G.E. A research about applications of family constitution and family council in publicly traded companies. Paper presented at the Istanbul Kultur University 2nd Congress On Family Businesses. Istanbul, April 2006.
dc.relation.isbasedonALCARAZ, J.A. Family influence on financial performance satisfaction in Mexican family businesses. San Diego (CA), 2004. 278 p. Dissertation thesis. Alliant International University, California School of Business and Organizational Studies.
dc.relation.isbasedonANDERSON, R.C., MANSI, S.A., REEB, D.M. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics. 2003, Vol. 68, Iss. 2, pp. 263-285. ISSN 0304-405X.
dc.relation.isbasedonANDERSON, R.C., REEB, D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance. 2003, Vol. 58, Iss. 3, pp. 1301-1328. ISSN 0022-1082.
dc.relation.isbasedonANG, J.S., COLE, R.A. and LIN, J.W. Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance. 2000, Vol. 55, Iss. 1, pp. 81-106. ISSN 0022-1082.
dc.relation.isbasedonASTRACHAN, J.H., KLEIN, S.B. and SMYRNIOS, K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review. 2002, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 45-58. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonATHANASSIOU, N., CRITTENDEN, W.F., KELLY, L.M., MARQUEZ, P. Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firms’ top management group: Firm culture, strategic vision and goals and firm performance. Journal of World Business. 2002, Iss. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 139-150. ISSN 1090-9516.
dc.relation.isbasedonATLI, H. An application on the views of young generations about institutionalization at family businesses. İzmir, 2007. Master’s thesis. Dokuz Eylul University.
dc.relation.isbasedonAYRANCI, E. The influence of family at family businesses and a research on its relationship with financial performance satisfaction. İstanbul, 2009. Doctoral dissertation. İstanbul University.
dc.relation.isbasedonBARNES, L.B., HERSHON, S.A. Transferring power in the family business. Family Business Review. 1989, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 187-202. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonBARRY, B. The development of organizational structure in the family firm. Family Business Review. 1989, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, pp. 293-315. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonBAS, M., ARTAR, A. Inspection of efficiency in businesses. MPM publications no. 435: Ankara, 1991.
dc.relation.isbasedonBERGSTROM, T.C. A fresh look at the Rotten Kid Theorem and other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy. 1989, Vol. 97, Iss. 5, pp. 1138-1159. ISSN 0022-3808.
dc.relation.isbasedonBILGIN, N. Inclinations of family businesses to institutionalization: Ankara SME sample. Ankara, 2007. Master’s thesis. Atilim University.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHRISMAN, J.J., CHUA, J.H. and LITZ, R.A. Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2004, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, pp. 335-354. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHURCHILL, N.C., HATTEN, K.J. Non-market based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business. 1987, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 51-64. ISSN 0363-9428.
dc.relation.isbasedonCLIFF, J.E. and JENNINGS, P.D. Commentary on the multidimensional degree of family influence construct and the F-PEC measurement instrument. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 341-347. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonDAILY, C.M. and DOLLINGER, M.J. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review. 1992, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, pp. 117-136. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonDANNHAEUSER, N. The survival of family-operated firms under developed conditions: The case of Hassfurt, Germany. The Journal of Developing Areas. 1993, Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 307-328. ISSN 0022-037X.
dc.relation.isbasedonDAVIS, P. Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics. 1983, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 47-56. ISSN 0090-2616.
dc.relation.isbasedonDIAMANTOPOULOS, A., SIGUAW, J. Introducing LISREL. A Guide for the Uninitiated. SAGE Publications, 2000. 171 p. ISBN 9780761951711.
dc.relation.isbasedonDI POFI, J.A. Effects of family influence on satisfaction with financial performance in family businesses. Auburn (Alabama), 2003. Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University.
dc.relation.isbasedonDONCKELS, R., FRÖHLICH, E. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from stratos. Family Business Review. 1991, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, pp. 149-160. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonDYER, W.G., HANDLER, W. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, pp. 71-83. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonGARCIA-ALVAREZ, E., LOPEZ-SINTAS, J., GONZALVO, P.S. Socialization patterns of successors in first to second generation family businesses. Family Business Review. 2002, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp. 189-204. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonGOLDBERG, S.D. Research note: Effective successors in family-owned business: Significant elements. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 185-197. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonGUNDRY, L.K., WELSCH, H.P. Differences in familial influence among women-owned businesses. Family Business Review. 1994, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 273-286. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonHANDLER, W.C. Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1990, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 37-51. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonIKITELLI OIZ. Firm guide [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.iosb.org.tr/v2/firmalar.xls.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL BEYLIKDUZU OIZ. Firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.ibosb.com/TR/firm.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL DUDULLU OIZ. Enterprizes in the zone [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.idosb.org.tr/bolgedekikuruluslar.asp.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL LEATHER OIZ. Firm catalogue [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.ideriosb.org.tr/index.php?option=com_sobi2&Itemid=18.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL TUZLA OIZ. The list of all firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.itosb.org.tr/tumfirma.htm.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL TUZLA PAINT AND LECQUER OIZ. Firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.boyavernikosb.com/firmalar.htm.
dc.relation.isbasedonJAFFE, D.T. Strategic planning for the family in business. Journal of Financial Planning. 2005, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 50-56. ISSN 1040-3981.
dc.relation.isbasedonKARPUZOGLU, E. Family constitution for the future. Paper presented at Istanbul Kultur University 1st Congress On Family Businesses April 2004. Istanbul, 2004.
dc.relation.isbasedonKAYE, K. Mate selection and family business success. Family Business Review. 1999, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 107-115. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonKLEIN, S.B., ASTRACHAN, J.H., SMYRNIOS, K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 321-339. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonKOBIEFOR. Tuzla chemical enterprises [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.kobi-efor.com.tr/haber_detay.asp?id=2647.
dc.relation.isbasedonKURATKO, D.F. Family business succession in Korean and U.S. Firms. Journal of Small Business Management. 1993, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 132-136. ISSN 0047-2778.
dc.relation.isbasedonLACHAPELLE, K., BARNES, L.B. The trust catalyst in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review. 1998, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-17. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonLITZ, R.A. The family firm’s exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void; addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1997, Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 55-71. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonMATEAR, S., CADOGAN, J.W., HOOLEY, G. First steps towards an internationally invariant measure of firm performance. Paper presented at ANZMAC 2003 Conference December 2003. Adelaide, 2003.
dc.relation.isbasedonMCCONAUGHY, D.L., MATTHEWS, C.H., FIALKO, A.S. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency, risk and value. Journal of Small Business Management. 2001, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, pp. 31-50. ISSN 0047-2778.
dc.relation.isbasedonPERVAIZ, A.K., KWANG, L.K., MOHAMED, Z. Measurement practice for knowledge management. Journal of Workplace Learning. 1999, Vol. 11, Iss. 8, pp. 304-311. ISSN 1366-5626.
dc.relation.isbasedonPONTET, S.B., WROSCH, C., GAGNE, M. An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family businesses approaching succession. Family Business Review. 2007, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 337-354. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonPOZA, E.J., MESSER, T. Spousal leadership and continuity in the family firm. Family Business Review. 2001, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 25-35. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonRUE, L.W., IBRAHIM, N.A. The status of planning in smaller family-owned business. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 29-44. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHERMELLEH-ENGEL, K., MOOSBRUGGER, H. Evaluating the fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research. 2003, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 23-74. ISSN 1616-8119.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHULZE, W.S., LUBATKIN, M.H., DINO, R.N., BUCHHOLTZ, A.K. Agency relationship in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science. 2001, Vol. 12, Iss. 9, pp. 99-116. ISSN 1047-7039.
dc.relation.isbasedonSHANKER, M.C., ASTRACHAN, J.H. Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. Economy – a framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 107-122. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonSRAER, D., TESHMAR, D. Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the french stock market. ECGI – Finance Working Paper No.130/2006 [online]. January, 2006 [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://ssrn.Com/abstract=925415.
dc.relation.isbasedonTHE FREE DICTIONARY. Satisfaction [online]. [cit. 2011-01-07]. Available from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/satisfaction.
dc.relation.isbasedonTHE HIGHER COUNCIL OF ORGANIZED INDUSTRIAL ZONES. [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.osbuk.org/index.php?page=content/osbler&id=1.
dc.relation.isbasedonTUZLA MARBLE OIZ. Tuzla marble OIZ active firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.tmosb.com/dosyalar/faalliste.xls.
dc.relation.isbasedonVERA, C.F. and DEAN, M.A. An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession. Family Business Review. 2005, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, pp. 321-345. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonVON BUCH, S.D. The relationship of family influence, top management teams’ behavioral integration and firm performance in German family businesses. San Diego (CA), 2006. Doctoral dissertation (DBA). Alliant International University, Marshall Goldsmith School of Management.
dc.relation.isbasedonWARD, J.L., DOLAN, C. Defining and describing family business ownership configurations. Family Business Review. 1998, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. 305-310. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonWESTHEAD, P., HOWORTH, C. Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review. 2006, Vol. 19, Iss. 4, pp. 301-316. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonZAHRA, S.A. International expansion of U.S. Manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing. 2003, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, pp. 495-512. ISSN 0883-9026.
dc.relation.isbasedonADSAN, E., GUMUSTEKIN, G.E. A research about applications of family constitution and family council in publicly traded companies. Paper presented at the Istanbul Kultur University 2nd Congress On Family Businesses. Istanbul, April 2006.
dc.relation.isbasedonALCARAZ, J.A. Family influence on financial performance satisfaction in Mexican family businesses. San Diego (CA), 2004. 278 p. Dissertation thesis. Alliant International University, California School of Business and Organizational Studies.
dc.relation.isbasedonANDERSON, R.C., MANSI, S.A., REEB, D.M. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics. 2003, Vol. 68, Iss. 2, pp. 263-285. ISSN 0304-405X.
dc.relation.isbasedonANDERSON, R.C., REEB, D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance. 2003, Vol. 58, Iss. 3, pp. 1301-1328. ISSN 0022-1082.
dc.relation.isbasedonANG, J.S., COLE, R.A. and LIN, J.W. Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance. 2000, Vol. 55, Iss. 1, pp. 81-106. ISSN 0022-1082.
dc.relation.isbasedonASTRACHAN, J.H., KLEIN, S.B. and SMYRNIOS, K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review. 2002, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 45-58. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonATHANASSIOU, N., CRITTENDEN, W.F., KELLY, L.M., MARQUEZ, P. Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firms’ top management group: Firm culture, strategic vision and goals and firm performance. Journal of World Business. 2002, Iss. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 139-150. ISSN 1090-9516.
dc.relation.isbasedonATLI, H. An application on the views of young generations about institutionalization at family businesses. İzmir, 2007. Master’s thesis. Dokuz Eylul University.
dc.relation.isbasedonAYRANCI, E. The influence of family at family businesses and a research on its relationship with financial performance satisfaction. İstanbul, 2009. Doctoral dissertation. İstanbul University.
dc.relation.isbasedonBARNES, L.B., HERSHON, S.A. Transferring power in the family business. Family Business Review. 1989, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 187-202. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonBARRY, B. The development of organizational structure in the family firm. Family Business Review. 1989, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, pp. 293-315. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonBAS, M., ARTAR, A. Inspection of efficiency in businesses. MPM publications no. 435: Ankara, 1991.
dc.relation.isbasedonBERGSTROM, T.C. A fresh look at the Rotten Kid Theorem and other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy. 1989, Vol. 97, Iss. 5, pp. 1138-1159. ISSN 0022-3808.
dc.relation.isbasedonBILGIN, N. Inclinations of family businesses to institutionalization: Ankara SME sample. Ankara, 2007. Master’s thesis. Atilim University.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHRISMAN, J.J., CHUA, J.H. and LITZ, R.A. Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2004, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, pp. 335-354. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHURCHILL, N.C., HATTEN, K.J. Non-market based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business. 1987, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 51-64. ISSN 0363-9428.
dc.relation.isbasedonCLIFF, J.E. and JENNINGS, P.D. Commentary on the multidimensional degree of family influence construct and the F-PEC measurement instrument. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 341-347. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonDAILY, C.M. and DOLLINGER, M.J. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review. 1992, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, pp. 117-136. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonDANNHAEUSER, N. The survival of family-operated firms under developed conditions: The case of Hassfurt, Germany. The Journal of Developing Areas. 1993, Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 307-328. ISSN 0022-037X.
dc.relation.isbasedonDAVIS, P. Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics. 1983, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 47-56. ISSN 0090-2616.
dc.relation.isbasedonDIAMANTOPOULOS, A., SIGUAW, J. Introducing LISREL. A Guide for the Uninitiated. SAGE Publications, 2000. 171 p. ISBN 9780761951711.
dc.relation.isbasedonDI POFI, J.A. Effects of family influence on satisfaction with financial performance in family businesses. Auburn (Alabama), 2003. Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University.
dc.relation.isbasedonDONCKELS, R., FRÖHLICH, E. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from stratos. Family Business Review. 1991, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, pp. 149-160. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonDYER, W.G., HANDLER, W. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, pp. 71-83. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonGARCIA-ALVAREZ, E., LOPEZ-SINTAS, J., GONZALVO, P.S. Socialization patterns of successors in first to second generation family businesses. Family Business Review. 2002, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp. 189-204. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonGOLDBERG, S.D. Research note: Effective successors in family-owned business: Significant elements. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 185-197. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonGUNDRY, L.K., WELSCH, H.P. Differences in familial influence among women-owned businesses. Family Business Review. 1994, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 273-286. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonHANDLER, W.C. Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1990, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 37-51. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonIKITELLI OIZ. Firm guide [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.iosb.org.tr/v2/firmalar.xls.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL BEYLIKDUZU OIZ. Firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.ibosb.com/TR/firm.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL DUDULLU OIZ. Enterprizes in the zone [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.idosb.org.tr/bolgedekikuruluslar.asp.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL LEATHER OIZ. Firm catalogue [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.ideriosb.org.tr/index.php?option=com_sobi2&Itemid=18.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL TUZLA OIZ. The list of all firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.itosb.org.tr/tumfirma.htm.
dc.relation.isbasedonISTANBUL TUZLA PAINT AND LECQUER OIZ. Firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.boyavernikosb.com/firmalar.htm.
dc.relation.isbasedonJAFFE, D.T. Strategic planning for the family in business. Journal of Financial Planning. 2005, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 50-56. ISSN 1040-3981.
dc.relation.isbasedonKARPUZOGLU, E. Family constitution for the future. Paper presented at Istanbul Kultur University 1st Congress On Family Businesses April 2004. Istanbul, 2004.
dc.relation.isbasedonKAYE, K. Mate selection and family business success. Family Business Review. 1999, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 107-115. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonKLEIN, S.B., ASTRACHAN, J.H., SMYRNIOS, K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 321-339. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonKOBIEFOR. Tuzla chemical enterprises [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.kobi-efor.com.tr/haber_detay.asp?id=2647.
dc.relation.isbasedonKURATKO, D.F. Family business succession in Korean and U.S. Firms. Journal of Small Business Management. 1993, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 132-136. ISSN 0047-2778.
dc.relation.isbasedonLACHAPELLE, K., BARNES, L.B. The trust catalyst in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review. 1998, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-17. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonLITZ, R.A. The family firm’s exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void; addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1997, Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 55-71. ISSN 1042-2587.
dc.relation.isbasedonMATEAR, S., CADOGAN, J.W., HOOLEY, G. First steps towards an internationally invariant measure of firm performance. Paper presented at ANZMAC 2003 Conference December 2003. Adelaide, 2003.
dc.relation.isbasedonMCCONAUGHY, D.L., MATTHEWS, C.H., FIALKO, A.S. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency, risk and value. Journal of Small Business Management. 2001, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, pp. 31-50. ISSN 0047-2778.
dc.relation.isbasedonPERVAIZ, A.K., KWANG, L.K., MOHAMED, Z. Measurement practice for knowledge management. Journal of Workplace Learning. 1999, Vol. 11, Iss. 8, pp. 304-311. ISSN 1366-5626.
dc.relation.isbasedonPONTET, S.B., WROSCH, C., GAGNE, M. An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family businesses approaching succession. Family Business Review. 2007, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 337-354. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonPOZA, E.J., MESSER, T. Spousal leadership and continuity in the family firm. Family Business Review. 2001, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 25-35. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonRUE, L.W., IBRAHIM, N.A. The status of planning in smaller family-owned business. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 29-44. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHERMELLEH-ENGEL, K., MOOSBRUGGER, H. Evaluating the fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research. 2003, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 23-74. ISSN 1616-8119.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHULZE, W.S., LUBATKIN, M.H., DINO, R.N., BUCHHOLTZ, A.K. Agency relationship in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science. 2001, Vol. 12, Iss. 9, pp. 99-116. ISSN 1047-7039.
dc.relation.isbasedonSHANKER, M.C., ASTRACHAN, J.H. Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. Economy – a framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review. 1996, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 107-122. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonSRAER, D., TESHMAR, D. Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the french stock market. ECGI – Finance Working Paper No.130/2006 [online]. January, 2006 [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://ssrn.Com/abstract=925415.
dc.relation.isbasedonTHE FREE DICTIONARY. Satisfaction [online]. [cit. 2011-01-07]. Available from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/satisfaction.
dc.relation.isbasedonTHE HIGHER COUNCIL OF ORGANIZED INDUSTRIAL ZONES. [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.osbuk.org/index.php?page=content/osbler&id=1.
dc.relation.isbasedonTUZLA MARBLE OIZ. Tuzla marble OIZ active firms [online]. [cit. 2011-03-04]. Available from: http://www.tmosb.com/dosyalar/faalliste.xls.
dc.relation.isbasedonVERA, C.F. and DEAN, M.A. An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession. Family Business Review. 2005, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, pp. 321-345. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonVON BUCH, S.D. The relationship of family influence, top management teams’ behavioral integration and firm performance in German family businesses. San Diego (CA), 2006. Doctoral dissertation (DBA). Alliant International University, Marshall Goldsmith School of Management.
dc.relation.isbasedonWARD, J.L., DOLAN, C. Defining and describing family business ownership configurations. Family Business Review. 1998, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. 305-310. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonWESTHEAD, P., HOWORTH, C. Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review. 2006, Vol. 19, Iss. 4, pp. 301-316. ISSN 0894-4865.
dc.relation.isbasedonZAHRA, S.A. International expansion of U.S. Manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing. 2003, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, pp. 495-512. ISSN 0883-9026.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectsuccess factorsen
dc.subjectIJVen
dc.subjectperformanceen
dc.subjectChinaen
dc.subjectFinlanden
dc.subject.classificationM10
dc.titleA study on the influence of family on family business and its relationship to satisfaction with financial performanceen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage105
local.citation.spage87
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume17
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_02_14_7.pdf
Size:
757.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Číslo 2