On the gravity equation of trade: a case of Germany
dc.contributor.author | Mazurek, Jiří | |
dc.contributor.other | Ekonomická fakulta | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-23 | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-23 | |
dc.date.defense | 2016-09-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | Gravity models (equations) of trade belong among the most successful empirical tools in the modern economics since their first economic applications in the yearly 1960s. They assume that bilateral trade is directly proportional to “economic sizes” (usually described in terms of GDP or income) of both trading partners and inversely proportional to their distance. The aim of this study was to examine Germany’s latest (2012) yearly aggregate exports to its major international partners by a gravity equation without and with selected trade frictions including a geographical adjacency (the so called border effect), an influence of the same or different currency (Euro), and a location in the Schengen Area, the zone of a free movement of persons. Gravity models both without and with selected trade frictions fitted the data well, while the model with frictions performed significantly better. The adjacency was found the most important single trade friction, the location in the Schengen Area appeared to be the least important friction (but it was still statistically significant). Other feasible trade frictions, such as border length, a location in Europe or democracy index were examined too, but their effect on the trade was rather negligible. A possible explanation of the border effect, based on information deficiency, is included in the study as well. Furthermore, it was observed that yearly Germany’s exports data are susceptible to large year-to-year fluctuations especially for countries with low imports. Therefore, using averaged data over five or ten years long periods might be more appropriate. | en |
dc.format | text | |
dc.format.extent | 20-30 s. | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-002 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2336-5604 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 12123609 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/18189 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Technická Univerzita v Liberci | cs |
dc.publisher | Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic | en |
dc.publisher.abbreviation | TUL | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Anderson, J. E. (2010). The Gravity model (NBER Working Paper No. 16576). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Anderson, J. E., van Wincoop, E. (2003), Gravity with Gravitas: A solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192. doi:10.3386/w8079. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). Bonus Vetus OLS: A Simple Method for Approximating International Trade-Cost Effects using the Gravity Equation. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 77-85. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474-481. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Bergstrand, J. H., Egger, P. (2011). Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy. Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, 532-570. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Chaney, T. (2011). The gravity equation in international trade: an explanation (NBER Working Papers No. 19285). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Deardorff, A. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?. The Regionalization of the World Economy. 7-32. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Disdier, A., Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37-41. doi:10.1162/rest.90.1.37. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Egger, P. (2000). A Note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economic Lettters, 66(1), 25-31. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00183-4. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-61. doi:10.2307/1912352. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441-487. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Herrera, E. G. (2013). Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empirical Economics, 44(3), 1087-1111. doi:10.1007/s00181-012-0576-2. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Herrera, E. G., & Baleix, J. M. (2010). Are estimation techniques neutral to estimate gravity equations? An application to the impact of EMU on third countries’ export. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.ub.edu /jei/papers/GOMEZ-MILGRAM.pdf. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | International Monetary Fund. (2013). IMF Data. Retrieved October 12, 2013, from http://www.imf.org. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Martínez-Zarzoso I., Nowak-Lehmann, F., & Vollmer, S. (2007). The log of gravity revisited (CEGE Discussion Paper No. 64). Göttingen: University of Göttingen. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | O’Brian, R. M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factor. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673-690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Salvatici, L. (2014). The gravity model in international trade (AGRODEP Technical Notes No. TN-04). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Santos Silva, J. M., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Foreign Trade – Ranking of Germany’s trading partners in foreign trade. Retrieved April 28, 2014, from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/National EconomyEnvironment/ForeignTrade/TradingPartners. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Statistisches Bundesamt. (2014). Foreign Trade – Ranking of Germany’s trading partners in foreign trade. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/National EconomyEnvironment/ForeignTrade/TradingPartners. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015a). The main German export product: motor vehicles. Retrieved December 5, 2015, from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment /ForeignTrade/TradingGoods/Current.html. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015b). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2015. Retrieved December 6, 2015, from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/StatistischesJahrbuch/StatistischesJahrbuch2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Timeanddate. (2013). Calculators and Timers. Retrieved October 24, 2013, from http://www. timeanddate.com/worldclock/distance.html. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund. | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ekonomie a Management | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Economics and Management | en |
dc.relation.isrefereed | true | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC | |
dc.subject | export | en |
dc.subject | Germany | en |
dc.subject | gravity equation | en |
dc.subject | international trade | en |
dc.subject | trade frictions | en |
dc.subject.classification | C51 | |
dc.subject.classification | F14 | |
dc.subject.classification | F17 | |
dc.title | On the gravity equation of trade: a case of Germany | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
local.access | open | |
local.citation.epage | 30 | |
local.citation.spage | 20 | |
local.faculty | Faculty of Economics | |
local.fulltext | yes | |
local.relation.abbreviation | E&M | en |
local.relation.abbreviation | E+M | cs |
local.relation.issue | 3 | |
local.relation.volume | 19 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- EM_3_2016_2.pdf
- Size:
- 1.37 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Článek