Využití balanced scorecard a vliv jeho využívání na finanční výkonnost podniků v ČR
Title Alternative:Utilization of balanced scorecard and the effect of its use on the financial performance of companies in the Czech Republic
| dc.contributor.author | Knápková, Adriana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Homolka, Lubor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pavelková, Drahomíra | |
| dc.contributor.other | Ekonomická fakulta | cs |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-05 | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-06-05 | |
| dc.date.defense | 2014-06-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The article aims to analyze the use of the balanced scorecard (BSC) concept in Czech enterprises and the effect of its use on the financial performance of companies. The article defines the BSC concept and its important shift from the basic system for measuring the performance of the BSC as a strategic tool for measuring and managing business and management performance. There are also analyzed the results of the empirical findings of foreign studies that examined the relationship between the use of BSC and financial performance of companies. An extensive questionnaire survey carried out by the Faculty of Management and Economics of TBU in Zlín (a total of 350 enterprises in the Czech Republic) revealed that the BSC is used by approximately 13% of enterprises. A company’s size affects the use of BSC, which was confirmed by chi-square, and therefore we can state that the use of BSC grows with a company’s size. Although the use of BSC in manufacturing and service-based businesses is higher than in trading companies, the use of the chi-square did not confirm the impact of company specialization on the use of BSC. The BSC concept is also more frequently used in companies established before 1990 than in those founded later, but not even in this case did the use of the chi-square verified the impact of company age on the use of BSC. It was also tested whether the use of BSC in corporate practice improves the financial performance of companies. As financial performance indicators were selected return on equity and return on assets. The testing was carried out by using Wilcoxon test. Although enterprises using the BSC are reaching higher mean profitability, the differences in the achieved performance can not be due to the results considered significant. The results are consistent with the results achieved by Ittner et al. [22], and Griffith and Neely [15]. Different conclusions were then drawn by studies done by the following authors (Hoque and James, [16], Davis, Albright [8], Braam, Nijsen [6], Crabtree, DeBusk [7], DeGeuser, Mooraj, Oyon [9], which show that the concept of BSC use in the system for performance measurement and management is associated with higher performance. Using the Wilcoxon test, it was found that neither the level of satisfaction with the use of BSC has any effect on the financial performance of companies. There are specified benefits and limitations of this study in conclusion. | en |
| dc.format | text | |
| dc.format.extent | 146-160 s. | cs |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-011 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2336-5604 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 12123609 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7065 | |
| dc.language.iso | cs | |
| dc.publisher | Technická Univerzita v Liberci | cs |
| dc.publisher | Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic | en |
| dc.publisher.abbreviation | TUL | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ZENG, K., LUO, X. The balanced scorecard in China: Does it work? Business Horizons. 2013, roč. 56, č. 5, s. 611-620. ISSN 0007-6813. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | TUNG, A., BAIRD, K., SCHOCH, H. Factors influencing the effectiveness of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2011, roč. 31, č. 12, s. 1287-1310. ISSN 0144-3577. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | SPECKBACHER, G., BISCHOF, J., PFEIFFER, T. A descriptive analysis on the implementation of Balanced Scorecard in German speaking countries. Management Accounting Research. 2003, roč. 14, č. 4, s. 361-388. ISSN 1741-0401. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ŠIŠKA, L. Nástroje řízení a měření výkonnosti uplatňované v praxi tuzemských podniků. In Koncepce a praxe řízení výkonnosti. Praha: Oeconomica. 2007, s. 179-196. ISBN 978-80-245-1222-8. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | SHENG, C., XIONG, Y., SU, W. Survey on the balanced scorecard: From performance evaluation to strategic management. Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce. 2008, roč. 22, č. 1, s. 37-45. ISSN 1009-6701. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | RIGBY, D., BILODEAU, B. Management Tools and Trends 2011 [online]. Bain and Company, Inc. Publication, 2011 [cit. 2014-02-10]. 16 s. (PDF). Dostupné z: http://www.bain.com/Images/BAIN_BRIEF_Management_Tools.pdf. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | QUESADO, P.R., RODRIGUES, L.L. Factores determinantes na implementação do balanced scorecard em Portugal. Revista Universo Contábil. 2009, roč. 5, č. 4, s. 94-115. Dostupné také z: http://www.unisinos.br/abcustos/_pdf/239.pdf. ISSN 1980-4814. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | NORREKLIT, H. The balance on the Balanced Scorecard – a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research. 2000, roč. 20, č. 11, s. 65-88. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | NEELY, A.D., ADAMS, C., KENNERLEY, M. The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. London: Pearson Education Ltd., 2002. ISBN 978-0273653349. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | NEELY, A., GREGORY, M., PLATTS, K. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 1995, roč. 15, č. 4, s. 80-116. ISSN 0144-3577. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | NEELY, A., ADAMS, C. Perspectives on Performance: The Performance Prism. London: Gee Publishing, 2000. ISBN 978-0273653349. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | NANNI, A.J., MILLER, J.G., VOLLMANN, T.E. What shall we account for? Management Accounting. 1988, roč. 69, č. 7, s. 42-48. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | MARR, B., SCHIUMA, G. Business Performance Measurement – Past, Present, and Future. Management Decision. 2003, roč. 41, č. 8, s. 680-687. ISSN 0025-1747. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | MALMI, T. Balanced Scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note. Management Accounting Research. 2001, roč. 12, č. 2, s. 207-220. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | MACHADO, M.J.C.V. Balanced Scorecard: an empirical study of small and medium size enterprises. Review of Business Management. 2013, roč. 15, č. 46, s. 129-148. ISSN 1806-4892. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | LYNCH, R.L., CROSS, K.F. Measure Up – The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance. London: Mandarin. 1991. ISBN 978-1557867186. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | LEE, CH., YANG, H. Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance. Management Accounting Research. 2010, roč. 22, č. 2, s. 84-104. Dostupné také z: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044500510000831. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KRAUS, K., LIND, J. The impact of corporate balanced scorecard on corporate control: a research note. Management Accounting Research. 2010, roč. 21, č. 4, s. 265-277. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KOLAŘÍK, R., PAVELKOVÁ, D. Měření a řízení výkonnosti v podnicích v ČR. In Sborník příspěvků z konference Hradecké ekonomické dny 2007. Hradec Králové: Fakulta informatiky a managementu, Univerzita Hradec Králové, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7041-812-3. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KNÁPKOVÁ, A., PAVELKOVÁ, D., CHODÚR, M. Měření a řízení výkonnosti podniku. Praha: Linde Praha, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7201-882-6. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KAPLAN, R.S., NORTON, D.P. The Strategy Focused Organization. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press, 2001. ISBN 978-1-5785-1250-8. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KAPLAN, R.S., NORTON, D.P. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review. 2000, roč. 78, č. 5, s. 167-176. ISSN 0017-8012. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KAPLAN, R.S., NORTON, D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press, 1996. ISBN 0-87584-651-3. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | KAPLAN, R.S., NORTON, D.P. The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 1992, roč. 70, č. 1, s. 70-79. ISSN 00178012. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | JOHNSON, H.T., KAPLAN, R.S. Relevance Lost – The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press, 1987. ISBN 978-0875841380. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | JUHMANI, O. Usage, motives and usefulness of the Balanced Scorecard: evidence from Bahrain. International Journal of Business Research. 2007, roč. 7, č. 5, s. 106-117. ISSN 1555-1296. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ITTNER, CH.D., LARCKER, D.F., RANDALL, T. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2003, roč. 28, č. 7-8, s. 715-741. ISSN 0361-3682. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | CHOW, C.W., VAN DER STEDE, W.A. The use and usefulness of nonfinancial performance measures. Management Accounting Quarterly. 2006, roč. 7, č. 3, s. 1-8. ISSN 1528-5359. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | CHODÚR, M., PÁLKA, P. Characteristics of a Model for Measuring and Managing Business Value – Creation Chain, Using the Synergy Effects of Selected Management Concepts. In FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE. Zlín: FaME UTB ve Zlíně, 2011, s. 195-203. ISBN 978-80-7454-020-2. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | CHODÚR, M., PAVELKOVÁ, D. a KNÁPKOVÁ, A. Model for Performance Management and Measurement: Using Synergic Effects of Selected Tools. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE. Sophia-Antipolis: SKEMA Business Sch., 2011. s. 60-70. ISBN 978-1-908272-16-4. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | HYNEK, J., JANECEK, V. a kol. Hodnocení přínosů vyspělých technologií. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 2009. ISBN 978-80-7435-035-1. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | HOROVÁ, M., HRDÝ, M. Aktuální problémy strategického finančního řízeni podniku v ČR. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2007, roč. 10, č. 4, s. 80-86. ISBN 1212-3609. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | HOQUE, Z., JAMES, W. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 2000, roč. 12, č. 1, s. 1-15. ISSN 1049-2127. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | GRIFFITH, R., NEELY, A. Performance pay and managerial experience in multitask teams: evidence from within a firm. Journal of Labor Economics. 2009, roč. 27, č. 1, s. 49-82. ISSN 0734-306X. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | GAVUROVA,B. Meranie výkonnosti v organizáciách s dôrazom na aplikáciu systému Balanced Scorecard. Košice: Technická univerzita v Košiciach. 2010, 188 s. ISBN 978-80-553-0847-0. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | FRANCO-SANTOS M., LUCIANETTI, L., BOURNE, M. Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research. 2012, roč. 23, č. 2, s. 79-119. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ECCLES, R.G., PYBURN, P.J. Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Management Accounting. 1992, Vol. 74, Iss. 4, s. 41-44. ISSN 0017-8012. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ECCLES, R.G. The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review. 1991, roč. 69, č. 1, s. 131-137. ISSN 00178012. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | DIXON, J.R., NANNI, A.J., VOLLMAN, T.E. The new performance challenge – Measuring operations for world-class competition. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1990. ISBN 978-1556233012. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | DEGEUSER, F., MOORAJ, S., OYON, D. Does the Balanced Scorecard Add Value? Empirical Evidence on its Effect on Performance. European Accounting Review. 2009, roč. 18, č. 1, s. 93-122. ISSN 0963-8180. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | DAVIS, S., ALBRIGHT, T. An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research. 2004, roč. 15, č. 2, s. 135-153. ISSN 1044-5005. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | CRABTREE, A.D., DEBUSK, G.K. The effects of adopting the balanced scorecard on shareholder returns. Advances in Accounting. 2008, roč. 24, č. 1, s. 8-15. ISSN 0882-6110. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | BRAAM, G., NIJSSEN, E. Performance effects of using the BSC: a note on the Dutch experience. Long Range Planning. 2004. roč. 37, č. 4, s. 335-349. ISSN 00246301. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | BERLINER, C., BRIMSON, J.A. Cost Management for Today’s Advanced Manufacturing. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1988. ISBN 0-87584-197-X. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | BEDFORD, D.S., BROWN, D.A., MALMI, T., SIVABALAN, P. Balanced Scorecard design and performance impacts: some Australian evidence. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research. 2006, Vol. 6, No. 2, s. 17-36. ISSN 1443-9905 | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | BANKER, R.D, POTTER, G., SRINIVASAN, D. An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures. The Accounting Review. 2000, roč. 75, č. 1, s. 65-92. ISSN 0001-4826. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ATKINSON, A.A., BALAKRISHNAN, R., BOOTH, P., COTE, J.M., GROOT, T., MALMI, T., ROBERTS, H., ULIANA, E. a WU, A. New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 1997, roč. 9, s. 79-108. ISSN 1049-2127. | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | ANAND, M., SAHAY, B.S., SAHA, S. Balanced Scorecard in Indian Companies. Vikalpa. 2005, roč. 30, č. 2, s. 11-25. ISSN 0256-0909. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ekonomie a Management | cs |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Economics and Management | en |
| dc.relation.isrefereed | true | |
| dc.rights | CC BY-NC | |
| dc.subject | lung cancer | en |
| dc.subject | healthcare costs | en |
| dc.subject | process maps | en |
| dc.subject | health care reimbursement | en |
| dc.subject.classification | M21 | |
| dc.title | Využití balanced scorecard a vliv jeho využívání na finanční výkonnost podniků v ČR | cs |
| dc.title.alternative | Utilization of balanced scorecard and the effect of its use on the financial performance of companies in the Czech Republic | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| local.access | open | |
| local.citation.epage | 160 | |
| local.citation.spage | 146 | |
| local.faculty | Faculty of Economics | |
| local.fulltext | yes | |
| local.relation.abbreviation | E&M | en |
| local.relation.abbreviation | E+M | cs |
| local.relation.issue | 2 | |
| local.relation.volume | 17 |