Information management tools for implementing an effective enterprise business continuity strategy

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPodaras, Athanasios
dc.contributor.authorAntlová, Klára
dc.contributor.authorMotejlek, Jiří
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09
dc.date.available2016-03-09
dc.date.defense2016-03-09
dc.description.abstractThe current work aims to the development of the Business Continuity Testing Points method which can help both IT as well as business managers define an efficient business continuity strategy. The BCTP method stems from the UML Use Case Points theory which is a practically tested and accepted approach to SW complexity estimation. The Use Case Points methodology was selected as the theory behind the construction of the BCTP model, due to the fact that firstly, both theories share the requirement analysis task and secondly because complexity of information systems is strongly related to their recovery in cases of their unexpected failovers. In the Use Case Points theory IT analysts perform software requirement analysis by executing various business scenarios. The BCTP theory, on the other hand, is constructed to support the analysis of IT system recovery requirements, by executing multiple efficient recovery scenarios. The method is a new approach to the objective determination of the Recovery Time Effort of a business function in comparison to the Rational Time Objective and the Maximum Acceptable Outage, which are defined with regard to the Impact Value Level of the function. The most critical functions of the enterprise should be included in the Minimum Business Continuity Objective (MBCO) concept. MBCO refers to vital business functions without which the enterprise is not able to perform its basic operations. The Recovery Time Effort of a given business function is affected by multiple Technical, Environmental and Unexpected factors with precise weights and assessment values. Recovery exercises should be based on scenarios which include the unexpected factors that may delay the recovery process. The derived exercise results are proposed as drivers for the reassessment of the criticality of a business function.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent165-182 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2016-1-012
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/13613
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAntlová, K., Popelinský, L., & Tandler, J. (2011). Long Term Growth of SME from the View of ICT Competencies and Web Presentations. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 14(4), 125-139.
dc.relation.isbasedonAsnar, Y., & Giorgini, P. (2008). Analyzing Business Continuity through a Multi-Layers Model. In M. Dumas et al. (Eds.), P. Int. Conf. on Business Process Management (BPM ’08), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5240, (pp. 212-227). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
dc.relation.isbasedonBagla, V., Gupta, A., & Kukreja, D. (2011). A Qualitative Assessment of Educational Software. International Journal of Computer Applications, 36(11),1-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonBanerjee, G. (2001). Use Case Points – An Estimation Approach. Retrieved April 2, 2015, from http://www.bfpug.com.br/Artigos/UCP/Banerjee-UCP_An_Estimation_Approach.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonBarron, F.H., & Barrett, B.E. (1996). Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights. International Management Science, 42(11), 1515-1523. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515.
dc.relation.isbasedonBritish Standards Institution (BSI). (2012). Business Continuity Exercises and Tests. Delivering Successful Exercise Programmes with ISO 22301. British Standards Institution. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/bip2143-chapter1_watermarked.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonCrisis Solutions-British Standards Institution (BSI) (Ed.). (2008). Exercising for Excellence: Delivering Successful Business Continuity Management Exercises. BSI British Standards Institution.
dc.relation.isbasedonCruz, E.F., Machado, R.J., & Santos, M.Y. (2014). From Business Process Models to Use Case Models: A Systematic Approach. In D. Aveiro et.al. (Eds.), P. 4th Enterprise Engineering Working Conference .Advances in Enterprise Engineering VIII - Lecture Notes In Business Information Processing (pp. 167-181). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
dc.relation.isbasedonDiev, S. (2006). Use Cases Modeling and Software Estimation: Applying Use Case Points. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 31(6). doi:10.1145/1218776.1218780.
dc.relation.isbasedonDoughty, K. (Ed.). (2001). Business Continuity Planning Protecting Your Organization’s Life: Best practice series. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonGibson, D. (2010). Managing Risks in Information Systems. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
dc.relation.isbasedonInformation and Technology Services-University of Michigan. (2014). Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://www.mais.umich.edu/search_results.php?cx=013541196959893833844%3Aunxac5bpi7w&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=www.mais.umich.edu%2F...%2FT-BC8000-exercise-templat...
dc.relation.isbasedonKamal, M.W., Ahmed, M.A., & El-Attar, M. (2011). Use Case-Based Effort Estimation Approaches: A Comparison Criteria. In J.M. Zain, et. al (Eds.), P. 2nd International Conference Software Engineering and Computer Systems. Communications in Computer and Information Science 181 (pp. 735-754). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
dc.relation.isbasedonKarner, G. (1993). Resource Estimation for Objectory Projects. Retrieved April 5, 2015, from http://www.bfpug.com.br/Artigos/UCP/Karner%20-%20Resource%20Estimation%20for%20Objectory%20Projects.doc.
dc.relation.isbasedonKepenach, R.J. (2007). Business Continuity Plan Design. In ICIMP '07: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection, 27. IEEE Computer Society.
dc.relation.isbasedonKusumoto, S., Matukawa, F., Inoue, K., Hanabusa, S., & Maegawa, Y. (2004). Estimating Effort by Use Case Points: Method, Tool and Case Study. In P. of 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS’04). Retrieved April 26, 2015, from http://people.eecs.ku.edu/~saiedian/811/Papers/use-case-points-kusmoto.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonLaird, M.L., & Brennan, M.C. (2006). Software Measurement and Estimation – A practical approach. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons and Inc. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
dc.relation.isbasedonLam, W. (2002). Ensuring Business Continuity. IT Professional, 4(3), 19-25. doi:10.1109/MITP.2002.1008533.
dc.relation.isbasedonNagar, C., & Dixit, A. (2012). Efforts Estimation by Combining the Use Case Point and COCOMO. International Journal of Computer Applications, 52(7). doi:10.5120/8211-1624.
dc.relation.isbasedonNageswaran, S. (2001). Test Effort Estimation Using Use Case Points. Quality Week 2001. Retrieved from http://www.bfpug.com.br/Artigos/UCP/Nageswaran-Test_Effort_Estimation_Using_UCP.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonOchodek, M., Nawrocki, J., & Kwarciak, K. (2011). Simplifying Effort Estimation Based on Use Case Points. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 53(3), 200-213. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.005.
dc.relation.isbasedonRorzkowska, E. (2013) Rank Order Criteria Weighting Methods – A Comparative Overview. Optimum Studia Ekonomiczne, 65(5), 14-33. doi:10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02.
dc.relation.isbasedonSapriel, C. (2003). Effective crisis management: Tools and best practice for the new millennium. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 348-355.
dc.relation.isbasedondoi:10.1108/13632540310807485.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchneider, G., & Winters, J.P. (1998). Applying Use Cases: A Practical Guide. Boston: Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series.
dc.relation.isbasedonSkrbek, J. (2011). Radio-Help as a Smart Early Warning and Notification System. In P. 55th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. Hull: University of Hull Business School. Retrieved April 25, 2015, from http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/issue/view/11.
dc.relation.isbasedonSnedaker, S. (2007). Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning for IT Professionals. Burlington: Syngress Publishing Inc., Elsevier Inc.
dc.relation.isbasedonSwanson, M., Bowen, P., Philips, A.W., Gallup, D., & Lynes, D. (2010). Contigency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems (NIST Special Edition 800-834 Rev.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology – U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-34-rev1/sp800-34-rev1_errata-Nov11-2010.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonZambon, E., Bolzoni, D., Etalle, S., & Salvato, M. (2007). A Model Supporting Business Continuity Auditing and Planning in Information Systems (Technical Report TR-CTIT-07-17). Centre for Telematics and Information Technology University of Twente. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://eprints.eemcs.utwente.nl/9529/01/23-400559139.pdf.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectCredibility premiumen
dc.subjectBühlmann-Straub modelen
dc.subjectmultidimensional credibility modelen
dc.subjectestimation of structural parametersen
dc.subjectmotor vehicle third party liability insuranceen
dc.subject.classificationY80
dc.subject.classificationM150
dc.titleInformation management tools for implementing an effective enterprise business continuity strategyen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage182
local.citation.spage165
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.identifier.publikace902
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume19
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2016_12.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Číslo 1