Does economic interventionism help strategic industries? Evidence from Europe

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record Maček, Anita Ovin, Rasto
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs 2014-08-28 2014-08-28
dc.identifier.issn 12123609
dc.description.abstract Although most studies proves that Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions (C-B M&A) cause more benefits than threats, the real economic policy in the EU countries offsets the fear that liberalization of inward C-B M&A would endanger economic position of strategic industries and thus national economic goals. After the adoption of EU Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover Bids the era of fast growth of inward C-B M&A in the EU and consequently the era of rising interventionism so as to protect national strategic industries and companies has started. Additional stimulus for the European Union’s (EU) most developed economies to exercise interventionism was financial and economic crisis starting in 2008. Considering high ranking of employment goals and state-supported social cohesion in continental Europe, it is not surprise that interventionist reactions came from ruling parties and coalitions regardless their political orientation. By the help of the results of their 2009 empirical study on C-B M&A authors tested the relation between the results referring to C-B M&A effects on strategic sectors and the Heritage Foundation Index of Investment Freedom. With combining the results from 2009 study with Index of Investment Freedom from 2009 and in the second equation with index from 2014 authors checked if strategic sectors benefit from incoming C-B M&A when subject to the previous market oriented industrial policy. Both estimated equations proves that unlike with sheltering economic policy, when subject to market conform measures of industrial policy, strategic sectors will benefit from inward C-B M&A. By proving the statistical significant relationship between the results from 2009 study and Index from 2014 authors also proved the statistical and analytical quality of the equation from 2009. By proving statistical significance of the second equation we proved that the judgement of the academic community could be considered relevant also after five years following the real experience as basis of their judgement. en
dc.format text
dc.format.extent 4-14 s. cs
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon BLOMSTROM, M. and PERSSON, H. Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry. World Development. 1983, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 493-501. ISSN 0305-750X.
dc.relation.isbasedon CAVES, R.E. Multinational firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-Country Markets. Economica. 1974, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 176-193. ISSN 1468-2702.
dc.relation.isbasedon DRIFFIELD, N. The Impact on Domestic Productivity of Inward Investment in the UK. The Manchester School. 2001, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 103-119. ISSN 1467-9957.
dc.relation.isbasedon EGIP. European Group for investor protection [online]. 2005 [cit. 2007-09-22]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon ESTRIN, S., HUGHES, K.S. and TODD, S. Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: multinationals in transition. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1997. 276 p. ISBN 978-1855674813.
dc.relation.isbasedon FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER. Public takeovers in Europe [online]. 2006 [cit. 2007-05-04]. 56 p. (PDF). Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon GFC/NET. Economic Patriotism/Nationalism Likely to Intensify According to Business Journalists Worldwide. Business Wire [online]. Global Financial Communication Network, 2007 [cit. 2007-12-09]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon KAMINSKY, G.L. International Capital Flows, Financial Stability and Growth. DESA Working Paper [online]. 2005, No. 10 [cit. 2007-03-05]. 24 p. (PDF). Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon LIN, C.H. Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Telecommunication Industries: A Developing Countries’ Perspective. Contemporary Management Research. 2008, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 29-42. ISSN 1813-5498.
dc.relation.isbasedon LIPSEY, R.E. Interpreting Developed Countries’ Foreign Direct Investment [online]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000. Working paper No. 7810 [cit. 2007-05-04]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon LIU, X., P. SILER, C WANG and WEI, Y. Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data. Journal of International Business Studies. 2000, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 407-425. ISSN 0047-2506.
dc.relation.isbasedon MAČEK, A. Čezmejne združitve in prevzemi kot dejavnik tranzicije v EU. Doktorska disertacija. UM, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta. (Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions as a Factor of the Transition in the EU – a doctoral thesis, University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business). 2009.
dc.relation.isbasedon MARCHICK, D.M., SLAUGHTER, M.J. Global FDI policy: correcting a protectionist drift [online]. Council on Foreign relations, 2008. CSR No. 32 [cit. 2008-06-15]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon PAPE, E., DICKEY, C. Rising Barriers; French Prime Minister Dominique De Villepin Is Leading a New Wave of Protectionism-In Europe-But Also, Possibly, One of Reform. Newsweek international. 2006, March 20. ISSN 0163-7053.
dc.relation.isbasedon PEREZ, T. Multinational Enterprises and Technological Spillovers. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1998. ISBN 90-5702-295-8.
dc.relation.isbasedon REISEN, H. After the Great Asian Slump: Towards a Coherent Approach to Global Capital Flows. Policy Brief. Paris: OECD Development Centre. 1999, No. 16. ISSN 2077-1681.
dc.relation.isbasedon TANDON, Y. M&A is takeover of firms in north, economies in south [online]. Geneva: Third world network, 2000 [cit. 2005-02-04]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon TSANG, M., HAUCK, D. Stock Markets Contract as M&A Overtakes Equity Sales [online]. Bloomberg, 2007-01-08 [cit. 2009-01-09]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2007. Transnational Corporations. Extractive Industries and Development [online]. United Nations: UNCTAD, 2007 [cit. 2012-08-05]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2013. Global value chains: investment and trade for development. [online]. New York and Geneva: United Nations. UNCTAD, 2013 [cit. 2014-03-02]. Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon VAARA, E., TIENARI, J., SAURI, N., BJOERKMAN, I. Global Capitalism Meets National Spirit: Discourses in Media Texts on a Cross-Border Acquisition. The 2nd Critical Studies Conference [online]. Manchester, 2001 [cit. 2004-09-11]. 21 p. (PDF). Available from:
dc.relation.isbasedon WYPLOSZ, C. How Risky is Financial Liberalization in the Developing Countries? CEPR Discussion Paper [online]. Geneva: University of Geneva, 2001 [cit. 09-01-2007]. Available from:
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject redistribution en
dc.subject efficiency en
dc.subject social protection expenditure en
dc.subject economics development en
dc.subject.classification C3
dc.subject.classification E2
dc.subject.classification F2
dc.title Does economic interventionism help strategic industries? Evidence from Europe en
dc.type Article en 2014-09-04
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2014-3-001
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 17
local.relation.issue 3
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 4
local.citation.epage 14
local.access open
local.fulltext yes

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account