Do the data on municipal expenditures in the Czech Republic imply incorrectness in their management?

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Půček, Milan
dc.contributor.author Plaček, Michal
dc.contributor.author Ochrana, František
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-05
dc.date.available 2016-12-05
dc.date.issued 2016-12-05
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/19271
dc.description.abstract Limited public resources confront public administration bodies with the question of how to handle them in an economically rational manner. Audit of public expenditures necessitates an ongoing creation and modification of an effective control system. Such a system is made up by subsystems of a formal (accounting and documentation) and economic control, responsible for monitoring the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of managing public expenditures. Significance of such interconnection rests in the fact that the formal control may signal possible improper management of public expenditures. This may become a stimulus for the economic control subsystem to verify the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of outlaid expenditures. For identification purposes related to potential accounting and record-keeping incorrectnesses in the management of public expenditures is proposed adoption of Benford’s Law (Benford’s test). Benford’s test is applied on municipal expenditure data for the year 2012. Data represent sums of public expenditures in the structure of the statement of budgetary execution and control specified by the Regulation of the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic No. 323/2002 Coll. For the data analysis there were used statistical methods, hypothesis testing, linear regressions and comparisons. Although the empirical analysis points at a limited use of Benford’s test in the conditions of municipal expenditures in the Czech Republic (mainly due to the instability of results and unavailability of suitable data), the analysis showed that Benford’s test can be adopted as a supporting tool, suitable for building into the control system of public expenditures. It is one of the ways to increase the effectiveness of a complex control of public expenditures. en
dc.format.extent 89-103 s. cs
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon Beblavý, M. & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2006). Institucionálne dilemy pri zabezpečení verejných služeb. Bratislava: Transparency International.
dc.relation.isbasedon Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 78(4), 551-572.
dc.relation.isbasedon Berger, A. & Hill, P. T. (2011). A Basic Theory of Benford’s Law. Probability Surveys, 8, 1-126. doi:10.1214/11-PS175.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bergmann, A. (2012). The Influence of the Nature of Government Accounting and Reporting in Decision – Making: Evidence from Switzerland. Public Money & Management, 32(1). 15-20. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.643050.
dc.relation.isbasedon Carslaw, C. A. P. (1988). Anomalies in Income Numbers: Evidence of Goal Oriented Behaviour. Accounting Review. 63(2), 321-327.
dc.relation.isbasedon Decker, J., Myagkov, M. & Ordeshook, C. P. (2011). The Irrelevance of Benford’s Law for Detecting Fraud in Elections (Capotech / MIT Voting Technology Project. Working Paper). Retrieved October 9, 2013, from http://www.vote.caltech.edu/drupal/files/rpeavt_paper/benford_pdf_4b97cc5b5b.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedon Diekmann, A. (2007). Not the First Digit! Using Benford’s Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientific Data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(3), 321-329. doi:10.1080/02664760601004940.
dc.relation.isbasedon Diekmann, A. & Jann, B. (2010). Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection: Fact and Legends. German Economics Review.11(3), 397-401. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2010.00510.x.
dc.relation.isbasedon Durtschi, C., Hillison, W. & Pacini, C. (2004). The effective use of Benford’s law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting. 5. 17-34.
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROSTAT. (2012).Government statistics. Retrieved October 9, 2013, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa/portal/pageúportal/government_finance_statistics/data/main_table.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gonzales, J. & Pastor, G. (2009). Benford’s Law and Macroeconomic Data Quality (Working Paper No. 09/10). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1356437.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hill, T. P. (1995a). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science, 10(4), 354-363.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hill, T. P. (1995b). Base-Invariance Implies Benford’s. In Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 123(3). 887-895.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hill, T. P. (1998). The First Digit Phenomenon. American Scientist, 86(4). 358-363.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93-109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
dc.relation.isbasedon Lombrano, A., & Zanin, L. (2013). IPSAS and Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements – Proposal for a Territorial Consolidation Method. Public Money & Management, 33(6), 429-436. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.836004.
dc.relation.isbasedon Maher, M., & Akers, M. (2002). Using Benford’s Law to Detect Fraud in the Insurance Industry. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 1(7). 1-11. doi:10.19030/iber.v1i7.3951.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nemec, J., Ochrana, F., & Šumpíková, M. (2008). Czech and Slovak Lessons for Public Administration Performance Evaluation, Management and Finance. Ekonomický časopis, 56(4), 353-369.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nigrini, M. (1993). Can Benford's Law be used in Forensic Accounting? Balance Sheet.7–8.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nigrini, M. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's law. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(1), 72-91.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nigrini, M. (2011). Forensic Analytics: Methods and Techniques for Forensic Accounting Investigation. John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nigrini, M., & Mittermaier, L. (1997). The Use of Benford’s Law as an Aid in Analytical Procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 16(2). 52-67.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nye, J., & Moul, C. (2007). The Political Economy of Numbers: On the Application of Benford’s Law to International Macroeconomic Statistics. The B. E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 7(1), 1-14.
dc.relation.isbasedon Pavel, J., & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2009). Testing the Validity of the Brown-Potoski Model in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Prague Economic Papers. Quarterly Journal of Economic Theory and Policy, 4, 327-341.
dc.relation.isbasedon Peková, J. (2011). Finance územní samosprávy. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.
dc.relation.isbasedon Rauch, B., Göttsche, M., Brähler, G., & Engel, S. (2011). Facts and Fiction in EU Governmental Economics Data. German Economics Revue, 12(3), 243-255. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00542.x.
dc.relation.isbasedon Půček, M., & Ochrana, F. (2014). Theory and Practice of the Public Sector Savings: the Case of Czech Regions. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 42E, 203-224.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sinervo, L. M. (2014). Interpreting Financial Balance in Local Government: A Case Study from Finland. Public Money & Management, 34(2), 123-130. doi:10.1080/09540962.2014.887521.
dc.relation.isbasedon Špaček, D., & Neshybová, J. (2010). Brief history and current trends of public administration reform in the Czech Republic. In Public Administration in Times of Crisis (pp. 1-18). Bratislava: NISPAcee.
dc.relation.isbasedon Štangová, N., Mihaliková, E., & Mitaľová, J. (2007). Controlling vo verejnej správe. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 10(2), 41-52.
dc.relation.isbasedon Tödter, K. H. (2009). Benford’s Law as an Indicator of Fraud in Economics. German Economic Review, 10(3), 339-351. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00475.x.
dc.relation.isbasedon TPA HORWATH. (2011). Nové způsoby odhalování manipulace s účetními daty. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://www.tpaahorwath.cz/upload/files/PDF/Manipulace_s_ucetnimi_daty_JSK_10_08.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedon Watrin, C., Struffert, R., & Ullmann, R. (2008). Benford’s Law: An Instrument for Selecting Tax Audit Targets. Review of Managerial Science, 2(3), 219-237. doi:10.1007/s11846-008-0019-9.
dc.relation.isbasedon Act No. 320/2001 Coll., On Financial Control in Public Administration.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject control of public expenditures
dc.subject municipal expenditures
dc.subject manipulation of public expenditure data
dc.subject Benford’s Law
dc.subject Benford’s test as a signalling tool for auditing public expenditures
dc.subject.classification H72
dc.subject.classification C12
dc.subject.classification M42
dc.title Do the data on municipal expenditures in the Czech Republic imply incorrectness in their management? en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2016-4-007
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 19
local.relation.issue 4
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.citation.spage 89
local.citation.epage 103
local.fulltext yes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account