Factors affecting sensitivity of commercial banks to bank run in the Visegrad Countries

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKlepková Vodová, Pavla
dc.contributor.authorStavárek, Daniel
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-02
dc.date.available2017-10-02
dc.date.issued2017-10-02
dc.description.abstractWhile managing liquidity, each bank should be prepared also for unexpected and exceptional events, such as bank runs. The aim of this paper is therefore to determine the maximum volume of deposits that can be withdrawn from individual banks operating in the Visegrad countries and to identify the determinants of their sensitivity to a bank run. The data cover the period from 2000 to 2014. Although bank liquidity, measured by the liquid asset ratio, decreased in all countries during the analyzed period, the level of liquidity differs among countries. We have simulated a bank run as a sudden withdrawal of 20% of client deposits. The ability of individual banks to survive this crisis scenario significantly differs. Nevertheless, as Czech and Hungarian banks were more liquid, they are better prepared for a potential bank run than Polish and Slovak banks. After that, using the panel data regression analysis, we tested seven bank-specific factors and seven macroeconomic factors. The sensitivity of commercial banks from the Visegrad countries to a possible bank run is determined mainly by different aspects of bank liquidity (not only the level of bank liquidity, but also connection to bank lending activity, the way of its financing and also activity on the interbank market). Among the other bank specific factors, profitability, capital adequacy and size of the banks are relevant in some countries. When it comes to macroeconomic factors, interest rate and unemployment rate are important. However, we can conclude that the most important factor is the level of bank liquidity: banks with a sufficient buffer of liquid assets are safer than other banks, particular during periods of financial distress.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent17 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2017-3-011
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/20921
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAdusei, M. (2015). The impact of bank size and funding risk on bank stability. Cogent Economics & Finance, 3(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/23322039.2015.1111489.
dc.relation.isbasedonAgénor, P., Aizeman, J., & Hoffmaister, A. (2000). The Credit Crunch in East Asia: What Can Bank Excess Liquid Assets Tell Us? [NBER Working Paper no. 7951]. doi:10.3386/w7951.
dc.relation.isbasedonAcharya, V. V., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Precautionary Hoarding of Liquidity and Interbank Markets: Evidence from the Subprime Crisis. Review of Finance, 17(1), 107-160. doi:10.1093/rof/rfs022.
dc.relation.isbasedonAllen, F., & Gale, D. (1998). Optimal Financial Crises. The Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1245-1284. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00052.
dc.relation.isbasedonAllen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial Contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1086/262109.
dc.relation.isbasedonAspachs, O., Nier, E., & Tieset, M. (2005). Liquidity, Banking Regulation and the Macroeconomy. Evidence on bank liquidity holdings from a panel of UK-residents banks. Presentation at BIS. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/events/rtf05AspachsNierTiesset.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonBerger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank Liquidity Creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779-3837. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn104.
dc.relation.isbasedonBerrospide, J. (2013). Bank Liquidity Hoarding and the Financial Crisis: An Empirical Evaluation. [Finance and Economics Discussion Series of Federal Reserve Board no. 03]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2207754.
dc.relation.isbasedonBIS. (2000). Stress Testing by Large Financial Institutions: Current Practice and Aggregation Issues. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
dc.relation.isbasedonBIS. (2010). Basel III: International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlavarg, M., Nimander, P. (2002). Interbank exposures and systemic risk. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, 2002(2), 19-45.
dc.relation.isbasedonBoss, M., Krenn, G., Schvaiger, M., & Wegschaider, W. (2004). Stress Testing the Austrian Banking System. Österreichisches Bankarchiv, 52(11), 841-852.
dc.relation.isbasedonBoss, M., Fenz, G., Krenn, G., Pann, J., Puhr, C., Scheiber, T., Schmitz, S. W., Schneider, M., & Ubl, E. (2007). Stress Tests for the Austrian FSAP Update 2007: Methodology, Scenarios and Results. In Financial Stability Report (pp. 68-92). Vienna: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.
dc.relation.isbasedonBryant, J. (1980). A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 4(4), 335-344. doi:10.1016/0378-4266(80)90012-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonBunda, I., & Desquilbet, J. B. (2008). The Bank Liquidity Smile Across Exchange Rate Regimes. International Economic Journal, 22(3), 361-386. doi:10.1080/10168730802287952.
dc.relation.isbasedonCNB. (2008). Financial Market Supervision Report 2007. Praha: Czech National Bank.
dc.relation.isbasedonCNB. (2012). Financial Market Supervision Report 2011. Praha: Czech National Bank.
dc.relation.isbasedonCNB. (2014). Financial Market Supervision Report 2013. Praha: Czech National Bank.
dc.relation.isbasedonCornet, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E., & Tehranian, H. (2012). Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 297-312. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonDiamond, D., & Dybvig, P. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401-419. doi:10.1086/261155.
dc.relation.isbasedonDiamond, W. D., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A theory of banking [NBER Working paper no. 7430]. doi:10.3386/w7430.
dc.relation.isbasedonDinger, V. (2009). Do foreign-owned banks affect banking system liquidity risk? Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 647-657. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2009.04.003.
dc.relation.isbasedonDistinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(9), 3295-3317. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.027.
dc.relation.isbasedonFielding, D., & Shortland, A. (2005). Political Violence and Excess Liquidity in Egypt. Journal of Development Studies, 41(4), 542-557. doi:10.1080/00220380500092580.
dc.relation.isbasedonFrait, J., & Komárková, Z. (2011). Financial Stability, Systemic Risk and Macroprudential policy. In Financial Stability Report 2010/2011 (pp. 96-111). Praha: Czech National Bank.
dc.relation.isbasedonFreixas, X., & Rochet, J. C. (1997). Microeconomics of Banking. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
dc.relation.isbasedonGorton, G., & Winton, A. (2000). Liquidity Provision, Bank Capital, and the Macroeconomy. [Working Paper of the University of Minnesota].
dc.relation.isbasedonGrant, J. (2012). Liquidity Buffers of Australian-Owned ADIs. JASSA, 2012(3), 31-36.
dc.relation.isbasedonHFSA. (2009). Annual report 2008. Budapest: Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority.
dc.relation.isbasedonJurča, P., & Rychtárik, Š. (2006). Stress Testing of the Slovak Banking Sector. BIATEC, 14(4), 15-21.
dc.relation.isbasedonKapadia, S., Drehmann, M., Elliot, J., & Sterne, G. (2012). Liquidity risk, cash-flow constraints and systemic feedbacks [Bank of England Working Paper no. 456]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2093439.
dc.relation.isbasedonKomárková, Z., Geršl, A., & Komárek, L. (2011). Models for Stress Testing Czech Banks’ Liquidity Risk [Working Paper Series of Czech National Bank no. 11].
dc.relation.isbasedonLei, A. C. H., & Song, Z. (2013). Liquidity creation and bank capital structure in China. Global Financial Journal, 24(3), 188-202. doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2013.10.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonLucchetta, M. (2007). What Do Data Say About Monetary Policy, Bank Liquidity and Bank Risk Taking? Economic Notes by Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, 36(2), 189-203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0300.2007.00180.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonMemmel, C., & Sachs, A. (2013). Contagion in the interbank market and its determinants. Journal of Financial Stability, 9(1), 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2013.01.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonMoore, W. (2010). How do financial crises affect commercial bank liquidity? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean [MPRA Paper no. 2010-21473].
dc.relation.isbasedonMunteanu, I. (2012). Bank liquidity and its determinants in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2012(3), 993-998. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00263-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonNBS. (2010). Analysis of the Slovak Financial Sector for the Year 2009. Bratislava: National Bank of Slovakia.
dc.relation.isbasedonNegrila, A. (2010). The Role of Stress-test Scenarios in Risk Management Activities and in the Avoidance of a New Crisis. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 17(2), 5-24.
dc.relation.isbasedonPFSA. (2008). Report on the condition of Polish banks in 2007. Warsaw: Polish Financial Supervision Authority.
dc.relation.isbasedonPFSA. (2009). Report on the condition of Polish banks in 2008. Warsaw: Polish Financial Supervision Authority.
dc.relation.isbasedonRauch, C., Steffen, S., Hackethal, A., & Tyrell, M. (2010). Determinants of Bank Liquidity Creation [Working Paper of Centre for Economic and International Studies]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1343595.
dc.relation.isbasedonReinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). The Aftermath of Financial Crises. American Economic Review, 99(2), 466-472. doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.466.
dc.relation.isbasedonRychtárik, Š. (2009). Liquidity Scenario Analysis in the Luxembourg Banking Sector [BCDL Working Paper no. 41].
dc.relation.isbasedonVan den End, J. W. (2008). Liquidity Stress-Tester: A macro model for stress-testing banks’ liquidity risk [DNB Working Paper no. 175].
dc.relation.isbasedonVodová, P. (2013). Liquid assets in banking: What matters in the Visegrad Countries? E&M Ekonomie a Management, 16(3), 113-129.
dc.relation.isbasedonVodová, P. (2015). To Lend or to Borrow on the Interbank Market: What Matters for Commercial Banks in the Visegrad Countries. Prague Economic Papers, 24(6), 662-677. doi:10.18267/j.pep.529.
dc.relation.isbasedonWells, S. (2004). Financial interlinkages in the United Kingdom’s interbank market and the risk of contagion [Bank of England Working Paper no. 230]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.641288.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectbank runen
dc.subjectliquid asset ratioen
dc.subjectscenario analysisen
dc.subjectpanel data regression analysisen
dc.subject.classificationC23
dc.subject.classificationG01
dc.subject.classificationG21
dc.titleFactors affecting sensitivity of commercial banks to bank run in the Visegrad Countriesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage175
local.citation.spage159
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume20
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2017_11.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3