Trademark infringements in the domain .cz

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGongol, Tomáš
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T10:20:14Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T10:20:14Z
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to fill a gap in an area that has not yet been closely examined in the Czech Republic and the world: examining the level of trademark infringement in relation to the basic elements of the logical architecture of the Internet, namely domain names, resp. Websites that are published on them. The article aims to determine the actual state and create a methodology of rapid, and to some extent automated detection of the collision of rights connected to trademarks with domain names. Not only for the large scope of the investigated subject has it focused on the sector of the automotive industry in particular. Given the aim of the work, it answers questions whether the phenomenon of trademark infringement on the Internet is rather a minor issue, which concerns only a fraction of domain names and websites; whether the domains names, resp. websites violating the trademark rights share any similar characters; whether it is possible to automate the search process of finding trademark infringements or if there is a way of finding general rules that can be a valuable help in this process. The first part of the article describes the used methodology, sources of available data and the way the data were worked with. The next part deals in detail with input data that are relevant for this article. It describes the ways the data were obtained and the constraints that needed to be overcome doing so. Basic statistical parameters of the input data are also mentioned. The third part is focused on the important findings found in input data relating to Czech domain names and trademarks used on the Internet followed by detail examination of the Czech domain names for the sector of the automotive industry. By using the defined indicators of a collision (the characters) the results of the article show that the domain names on which the trademark infringement has been committed, share the same set of characters that can be tested automatically by a computer program.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-011
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154270
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonBettinger, T., Willoughby, T., & Abel, S. (2005). Domain name law and practice: an international handbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonBurmann, C., Riley, N. M., Halaszovich, T., & Schade, M. (2017). Identity-Based Brand Management. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
dc.relation.isbasedonBranthover, N. (2002). UDRP – A Success Story: A Rebuttal to the Analysis and Conclusions of Professor Milton Mueller in „Rough Justice“. International Trademark Association. Retrieved July 23, 2019, from https://www.inta.org/Advocacy/Documents/INTAUDRPSuccesscontraMueller.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonCrass, D., Czarnitzki, D., & Toole, A. A. (2019). The Dynamic Relationship Between Investments in Brand Equity and Firm Profitability: Evidence Using Trademark Registrations. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 26(1), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2019.1553292.
dc.relation.isbasedonEdwards, L., & Waelde, Ch. (2009). Law and the internet. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonGielen, Ch. (2010). Keyword advertising and European Trade Mark Law, Retrieved July 22, 2019, from http://charlesgielen.com/2.html.
dc.relation.isbasedonGongol, T. (2012). The Analysis of Czech Arbitral Court Verdicts in Cases. DANUBE/Law and Economics Review, 3(1), 71-93.
dc.relation.isbasedonGongol, T. (2013). Právní aspekty nekalé soutěže na internetu. Karviná: Silesian University in Opava, Faculty of Business Administration in Karviná.
dc.relation.isbasedonGongol, T. (2013b). The Preliminary Ruling Decision in the Case of Google vs. Louis Vuitton Concerning the AdWord Service and its Impact on the Community Law. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 15(33), 246-260.
dc.relation.isbasedonGongol, T. (2014). Contribution to the discussion on the notion of 'Alternative dispute resolutions'. European Offroads of Social Science, 5(1), 3-15.
dc.relation.isbasedonGongol, T. (2016). Judicial practice in selected countries in cases of legal liability of auction portals for the sale of counterfeits. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 16(4), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2016.029.
dc.relation.isbasedonGriffiths, A. (2008). A Law-and-Economic Perspective on Trade Marks. In: L. Bently, J. Davis, J. C. Ginsburg (ed). An Interdisciplinary Critique (pp. 241-267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495212.012.
dc.relation.isbasedonHalvorson, T., Der, M. F., Foster, I., Savage, S., Saul, L. K., & Voelker, G. M. (2015). From .Academy to .Zone: An Analysis of the New TLD Land Rush, In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, (pp. 381-394). San Diego, CA: University of California. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815696.
dc.relation.isbasedonHoráček, R., Čada, K., & Hajn, P. (2017). Práva k průmyslovému vlastnictví. 3rd ed. Praha: C. H. Beck.
dc.relation.isbasedonJanis, M., & Dinwoodie, G. (2007). Confusion Over Use: Contextualism in Trademark Law. Iowa Law Review, 92, 1597-1667.
dc.relation.isbasedonJansa, L., Otevřel, P., Čermák, J., Mališ, P., Hostaš, P., Matějka M., & Matejka, J. (2016). Internetové právo. Brno: Computer Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonJanouch, V. (2014). Internetový marketing. 2nd ed. Brno: Computer Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonKleinbaum, D., Klein, M., & Pryor, E., R. (2010). Logistic regression: a self-learning text. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
dc.relation.isbasedonKlerman, D. (2016). Forum Selling and Domain-Name Disputes. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 48(2), 561–584.
dc.relation.isbasedonKorczynski, M., Wullink, M., Tajalizadehkhoob, S., Moura, G. C., & Hesselman, C. (2017). Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs. ICANN. Retrieved July 23, 2019, from https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sadag-final-09aug17-en.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonLloyd, I. J. (2011). Information Technology Law. 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonLukose, L. (2013). Consumer Protection vis a vis Trademark Law. International Journal on Consumer Law and Practise, 1(2013), 89–101.
dc.relation.isbasedonMerges, R., Menell, P. S., & Lemley M. A. (2012). Intellectual property in the new technological age. 6th ed. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.
dc.relation.isbasedonMunková, J., Kindl, J., & Svoboda, P. (2012). Soutěžní právo. 2nd ed. Prague: C. H. Beck.
dc.relation.isbasedonOullette, L. (2014). The Google Shortcut to Trademark Law. California Law Review, 102(2), 351-407. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195989.
dc.relation.isbasedonOtim, S., & Grover, V. (2010). E-commerce: a brand name’s curse. Electronic Markets, 20(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0039-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonPelikánová, R. (2012). Ekonomické, právní a technické aspekty doménových jmen v globální perspektivě. Ostrava: Key Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonPolčák, R. et al. (2018). Právo informačních technologií. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.
dc.relation.isbasedonSaunders, K. M., & Berger-Walliser, G. (2011). The Liability of Online Markets for Counterfeit Goods: A Comparative Analysis of Secondary Trademark Infringement in the United States and Europe. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 32(1), 37-92.
dc.relation.isbasedonSenftleben, M. R. F. (2012). Keyword Advertising in Europe – How the Internet Challenges Recent Expansion of EU Trademark Protection. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 2012(27), 39-74.
dc.relation.isbasedonSlováková, Z. (2006). Průmyslové vlastnictví. 2nd ed. Prague: LexisNexis.
dc.relation.isbasedonVissers, T., Wouter, J., & Nikiforakis, N. (2015). Parking Sensors: Analyzing and Detecting Parked Domains. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. San Diego, CA: Internet Society. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2015.23053.
dc.relation.isbasedonWerra, J. (2016). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace: The Need to Adopt Global ADR Mechanisms for Addressing the Challenges of Massive Online Micro-Justice. Swiss Review of International and European Law, 26(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2783213.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectalternative dispute resolutionen
dc.subjectdomain nameen
dc.subjectlogistic regressionen
dc.subjecttrademark infringementen
dc.subject.classificationK24
dc.titleTrademark infringements in the domain .czen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage181
local.citation.spage162
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_4_2019_11
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue4
local.relation.volume22
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_4_2019_11.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 4