Obraz člověka a výchovy v Esejích Michela de Montaigne
Title Alternative:The Concept of Man and Education in Michel de Montaigne’s Essays
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Národní pedagogické muzeum a knihovna J. A. Komenského
Technická univerzita v Liberci, Fakulta přírodovědně-humanitní a pedagogická
Technická univerzita v Liberci, Fakulta přírodovědně-humanitní a pedagogická
Abstract
The study deals with the question of the relationships among the conception of human nature, its cognition and education in Michel de Montaigne’s Essays. In the series of essays, Montaigne repeatedly rejects attempts to base his conception of human nature on antic- scholastic traditions operating with the general concepts of man. Montaigne’s specific Christian scepticism (“new pyrrhonism”) is the starting point and the argumentative method for rejecting the reliability of general concepts and definitions. Whereas scholastic (as well as predominantly entire ancient) philosophy assumed the existence of an ideal species to be the essence that determines each individual’s essential characteristics, Montaigne sees, on the contrary, man in the state of constant transformation, transition as crucial to understanding the human situation. This fundamentally transforms the traditional understanding of the relationship between a pattern and its imitation, into a relationship that has not only epistemological but also pedagogical and moral implications. Montaigne argues that subjectivity cannot be understood against the background of a general pattern, but only from itself, from ambiguities and paradoxes that, on the contrary, exclude, elude any generalization. Human nature cannot be captured in a general concept, it can only be exemplified from a specific experience. Thus, man is much more a transition (from one form to another) than a substance. The aim of this study is to show Michel de Montaigne as a modern and up-to-date thinker who, through his rhetoric and his way of grasping pedagogical issues, has opened up a number of educational questions that are relevant today: for example, how to understand the educational goal in a practical and informal way, how to work in education with the unique and the non-generalizable, and how to consider the relationship between knowledge and action.
Martin Strouhal studied philosophy and education at the Faculty of Arts of Charles University, where he also defended his dissertation on Durkheim’s moral sociology and sociology of education. Since 2010 he has been working at the Department of Education at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University. In 2020 he habilitated in Education at Palacký University. He is interested in general pedagogy and philosophy of education, he also lectures on ethics for teachers. His starting point is inspired by Durkheim and selected trends of the contemporary French philosophy of education. His other areas of interest include the perspectives of humanities education and the teaching profession. martin.strouhal@ff.cuni.cz
Martin Strouhal studied philosophy and education at the Faculty of Arts of Charles University, where he also defended his dissertation on Durkheim’s moral sociology and sociology of education. Since 2010 he has been working at the Department of Education at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University. In 2020 he habilitated in Education at Palacký University. He is interested in general pedagogy and philosophy of education, he also lectures on ethics for teachers. His starting point is inspired by Durkheim and selected trends of the contemporary French philosophy of education. His other areas of interest include the perspectives of humanities education and the teaching profession. martin.strouhal@ff.cuni.cz
Description
Subject(s)
education, Essays, experience, human condition, metaphysics, scepticism
Citation
ISSN
2336-680X