Values Endorsed by Top Responsible Large Czech Companies – Existent and Inconsistent?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMacGregor Pelikánová, Radka
dc.contributor.authorZavřelová, Veronika
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T12:41:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T12:41:00Z
dc.description.abstractThe sustainability command is embraced by businesses in the 21st century and is projected in their corporate social responsibility (CSR). The need of the employment of a multi-stakeholder model leads to a focus on common principles and priorities, i.e. creating shared values (CSV). The EU, with EU law, supports it, while various policies and organization reward it, such as the Czech organization Business pro Společnost, which, based on its synthetic index, selects the Czech TOP 25 most responsible companies. These companies have different countries of origins and operate in diverse industries, but they all are pro-sustainability. The question is whether they endorse the expected cultural, legal and social values (H1) and, if yes, whether there is a consistency and/or patterns (H2). Based on a sustainability, CSR and CSV review, a set of cultural, legal and social values are identified in order to be used in a case study. A pool of 36 large Czech companies from these TOP 25 in 2018-2022 is examined based on their BpS synthetic index, their country of origin´s Hofstede LTO and IDV and their advancement of internal reactive legal and social values (solidarity, respect) and external proactive legal and social values (equality, no waste) via their domains. These four legal and social values are ranked by an independent panel using a modified Likert scale and a manual Delphi approach. The yielded results are juxtaposed via a chart to allow pioneering propositions about the existence (H1) and inconsistency (H2) of values endorsed by top responsible large Czech companies.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/009/lef-2023-22
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-7494-627-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/172838
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonBALCERZAK, A., & MacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R. (2020). Projection of SDGs in Codes of Ethics – Case study about Lost in Translation? Administrative Sciences, 2020, 10(4): 1-18. Paper 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040095
dc.relation.isbasedonBPS (2023). Byznys pro společnost. Business for Society. [online]. Top odpovědná firma 2022 [cit. 2023-05-05]. Available at … https://www.odpovednefirmy.cz/
dc.relation.isbasedonBURKHARDT, A. (1923). History of the Development of the Law of Corporations. Notre Dame Law Review, 1923, 4(1).
dc.relation.isbasedonCARROLL, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2016, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonD´ADAMO, I., & LUPI, G. (2021). Sustainability and Resilience after COVID-19: A Circular Premium in the Fashion Industry. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4), 1861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041861
dc.relation.isbasedonHÁLA, M., CVIK, E.D., & MacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R. (2022). Logistic Regression of Czech Luxury Fashion Purchasing Habits During the Covid-19 Pandemic – Old for Loyalty and Young for Sustainability? Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 2022, 22(1): 85-110. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2022-0005.
dc.relation.isbasedonHOFSTEDE, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications., 2001, 596 p.
dc.relation.isbasedonMABOLOC, Ch.R. (2020). New Normal or Post Normal? Philosophical Implications of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Eubios journal of Asian and international bioethics (EJAIB), 2020, 30(8):438-440
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR, R.K., SROKA, W., & MacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R. (2020). The CSR Perception of Front-line Employees of Luxury Fashion Businesses: Fun or Free for Sustainability? Organizacija, 2020, 53(3): 198-211. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2020-0013
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, Radka (2021). Internal Website Presentation Of Czech Luxury Fashion Businesses In The Covid-19 Era. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2021, 3, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-18
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R. & RUBÁČEK, F. (2021). Unofficial CSR Reporting by Top Czech Companies – A Website Case Study. In: ANTLOVÁ, K., SEMERÁDOVÁ, T. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 15th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum, Liberec, 2021, pp. 469-478.
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R., & HÁLA, M. (2021). CSR Unconscious Consumption by Generation Z in the COVID-19 era – Responsible Heretics not Paying CSR Bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2021, 14(8), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080390
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R., & MacGREGOR, R.K. (2020). The EU puzzling CSR regime and the confused perception by ambassadors of luxury fashion businesses: A case study from Pařížská. Central European Business Review, 2020, 9(3): 74-108. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.240
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R., MacGREGOR, R.K., & ČERNEK, M. (2021a). New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2021, 12(4), 973–1009. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.032
dc.relation.isbasedonMacGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R., CVIK, E.D., & MacGREGOR, R.K. (2021b). Addressing the COVID-19 challenges by SMEs in the hotel industry – a Czech sustainability message for emerging economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 2021, 13(4): 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0245.
dc.relation.isbasedonPORTER, M.E., & KRAMER, M.R. (2006). The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Hardvard Business Review, 2006, 1-16.
dc.relation.isbasedonPORTER, M.E., & KRAMER, M.R. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. How to Reinvent Capitalism—and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review, 2011, 89(1-2): 62-77.
dc.relation.isbasedonROYO-VELA, M., & CUEVAS LIZAMA, J. (2022). Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 8505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148505
dc.relation.isbasedonSALONEN, A. O., & CAMILLERI, M. A. (2020). Creating Shared Value. In: Idowu S., Schmidpeter R., Capaldi N., Zu L., Del Baldo M., Abreu R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_74-1.
dc.relation.isbasedonVan TULDER, R. & KEEN, N. (2018). Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 150, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
dc.relation.isbasedonWHITE, M.A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 2013, 86, 213-217. https://doi.org/1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.020.
dc.relation.ispartofLiberecké ekonomické fórum 2023cs
dc.relation.ispartofLiberec Economic Forum 2023en
dc.subjectCreating Shared Values (CSV)en
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR)en
dc.subjectEuropean Union (EU)en
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subject.classificationD22
dc.subject.classificationL21
dc.subject.classificationM14
dc.subject.classificationQ56
dc.titleValues Endorsed by Top Responsible Large Czech Companies – Existent and Inconsistent?en
dc.typeproceeding paperen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage206
local.citation.spage196
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationLEFcs
local.relation.abbreviationLEFen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LEF_2023_22.pdf
Size:
640.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
conference paper
Download
Collections
LEF 2023