Asymmetric Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in Selected ASEAN Countries

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSriyana, Jaka
dc.contributor.authorAfandi, Akhsyim
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T08:31:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T08:31:46Z
dc.description.abstractIn the growing of economic integration and international relations, the effect of trade openness on economic growth has become an important issue across countries. Following the economic integration, the world trading system has become progressive and competitive in recent years. Many countries generated their economic growth by attracting both foreign and domestic investments and expanding export production. In response to current challenges posed by the implementation of economic integration in the ASEAN region, it is important to conduct a study focusing on the impact of trade openness as well as other economic factors on economic growth. This research examines the effects of trade openness and other economic variables such as foreign direct investment, gross capital formation and human capital on economic growth in selected ASEAN countries. Using long term annual data, the empirical NARDL models incorporate asymmetric effects of trade openness on economic growth in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Singapore. While such effects for the case of Malaysia are symmetric both in the short and long-run models, the effects are asymmetric in the long run and symmetric in the short run for the Philippines, Thailand, and Singapore. The results are different for Indonesia where the impact of trade openness is asymmetric in the short run and symmetric in the long run. This paper highlights that trade openness has a net positive impact on economic growth only in the Philippines and Singapore. It implies that most of the other countries in that region have a challenge regarding the implementation of trade liberalization. This research also found that both foreign and domestic investments are important factors of economic growth in the ASEAN countries. Similarly, human capital is proven to be an important factor in economic growth. This paper contributes to the literature by providing a new insight that incorporates the asymmetric effects of trade openness on economic growth.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2020-2-005
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154919
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAli, U., Shan, W., Wang, J., & Amin, A. (2018). Outward foreign direct investment and economic growth in China: Evidence from asymmetric ARDL approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(5), 706–721. http://doi.org/10.3846/ jbem.2018.6263.
dc.relation.isbasedonAltaee, H. H. A., & Al-Jafari, M. K. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth: A trilateral analysis of Bahrain. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(1), 241–255. http://doi.org/10.5539/ ijef.v7n1p241.
dc.relation.isbasedonAlvarado, R., Iñiguez, M., & Ponce, P. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Latin America. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 176–187. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonAnsar, R., Naim, M. M., & Yaqoob, S. (2017). Impact of FDI on economic growth: Evidence from Pakistan. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 6(3), 111–116.
dc.relation.isbasedonBajwa, S., & Siddiqi, M. W. (2011). Trade openness and its effects on economic growth in selected South Asian countries: A panel data study. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 940–945.
dc.relation.isbasedonButkiewicz, J. L., & Yanikkaya, H. (2011). Institutions and the impact of government spending on growth. Journal of Applied Economics, XIV(2), 319–341. http://doi. org/10.1016/S1514-0326(11)60017-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonComes, C. A., Bunduchi, E., Vasile, V., & Stefan, D. (2018). The impact of foreign direct investments and remittances on economic growth: A case study in central and eastern Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.3390/su10010238.
dc.relation.isbasedonDas, A., & Paul, B. P. (2011). Openness and growth in emerging Asian economies: Evidence from GMM. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2219– 2228.
dc.relation.isbasedonHabibi, F., & Karimi, M. S. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: evidence from Iran and GCC. Iranian Economic Review, 21(3), 601–620.
dc.relation.isbasedonHassen, S., Anis, O., Taha, Z., & Yosra, S. (2013). Trade openness and economic growth: The case of Tunisia. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(2), 24–32.
dc.relation.isbasedonHye, Q. M. A., Wizarat, S., & Lau, W.- Y. (2016). The impact of trade openness on economic growth in China: An empirical analysis. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(3), 27–37. http://doi. org/10.13106/jafeb.2016.vol3.no3.27.
dc.relation.isbasedonIyke, B. N. (2017). Does trade openness matter for economic growth in the CEE countries? Review of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 3–24. http://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0001.
dc.relation.isbasedonMahmoodi, M., & Mahmoodi, E. (2016). Foreign direct investment, exports and economic growth: Evidence from two panels of developing countries. Economic Research- Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29(1), 938–949. http://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1164922.
dc.relation.isbasedonMajeed, M. T. (2010). Inequality, trade openness and economic growth in Asia. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 10(2), 201–212.
dc.relation.isbasedonMalefane, M. R. (2018). Impact of trade openness on economic growth: Empirical evidence from South Africa. International Economics, 71(4), 387–416.
dc.relation.isbasedonMaria, R. S., Urata, S., & Intal, P. S. J. (2017). The ASEAN Economic Community Into 2025 and Beyond (Vol. 5). Manila, Philippines: Economic Research Institute.
dc.relation.isbasedonMohamed, M. R., Singh, K. S. J., & Liew, C.-Y. (2013). Impact of foreign direct investment & domestic investment on economic growth of Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 50(1), 21–35. http://doi.org/10.21511/ ppm.14(2-2).2016.04.
dc.relation.isbasedonNagyová, Ľ., Horáková, M., Moroz, S., Horská, E., & Poláková, Z. (2018). The analysis of export trade between Ukraine and Visegrad countries. E&M Economics and Management, 21(2), 115–132. http://doi.org/10.15240/ tul/001/2018-2-008.
dc.relation.isbasedonOgbokor, C. A. (2018). Foreign direct investment and economic progress: Application of a dynamic model. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 10(1), 1–15.
dc.relation.isbasedonOlabisi, O. E., & Lau, E. (2016). Causality testing between trade openness, foreign direct investment and economic growth : Fresh evidence from sub-Saharan African countries. International Economics, 71(4), 437–464.
dc.relation.isbasedonPaudel, R. (2014). Trade liberalization and economic growth in developing countries: Does stage of development matter? (Research Paper No. 14-13). Canberra: Crawford School of Public Policy.
dc.relation.isbasedonPesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. http://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255.
dc.relation.isbasedonRafat, M. (2018). The interactive relationship between economic growth and foreign direct investments (FDI): A VAR analysis in Iran. Iranian Economic Review, 22(1), 163–185. http://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2018.65355.
dc.relation.isbasedonShayanewako, V. B. (2018). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: The case of BRICS countries. Journal of Global Economics, 6(2), 6–10. http://doi. org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000289.
dc.relation.isbasedonShin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modeling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In W. C. Horrace & R. C. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. New York, NY: Springer.
dc.relation.isbasedonSing, C. C. (2018). A Resilient and Future- Ready ASEAN (in ASEAN Economic Integration Brief No. 04/November). Jakarta, Indonesia.
dc.relation.isbasedonSirag, A., SidAhmed, S., & Ali, H. S. (2018). Financial development, FDI and economic growth: evidence from Sudan. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(8), 1236–1249. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2017-0476.
dc.relation.isbasedonSrinivasan, P., Kalaivani, M., & Ibrahim, P. (2011). An empirical investigation of foreign direct investment and economic growth in SAARC nations. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 5(2), 232–248. http://doi. org/10.1108/15587891111152366.
dc.relation.isbasedonTaleb, D. (2018). The dynamic interactions among trade openness and economic growth: Evidence from Algeria. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5(6), 162–167. http://doi.org/10.11648/j. ijebo.20170506.16.
dc.relation.isbasedonVedia-Jerez, D. H., & Chasco, C. (2016). Long-run determinants of economic growth in South America. Journal of Applied Economics, 19(1), 169–192. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1514- 0326(16)30007-1.
dc.relation.isbasedonYiew, T. H., & Lau, E. (2018). Does foreign aid contribute to or impeded economic growth? Journal of International Studies, 11(3), 21–30. http://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-3/2.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjecteconomic growthen
dc.subjecttrade opennessen
dc.subjectasymmetric effectsen
dc.subjectcapitalen
dc.subjectNARDLen
dc.subject.classificationF0
dc.subject.classificationF1
dc.subject.classificationO24
dc.titleAsymmetric Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in Selected ASEAN Countriesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage82
local.citation.spage66
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_2_2020_5
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume23
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2020_05.pdf
Size:
1.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 2