Key Performance Indicators for Adopting Sustainability Practices in Footwear Supply Chains
dc.contributor.author | Moktadir, Md. Abdul | |
dc.contributor.author | Mahmud, Yead | |
dc.contributor.author | Banaitis, Audrius | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarder, Tusher | |
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Mahabubur Rahman | |
dc.contributor.other | Ekonomická fakulta | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-16T10:51:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-16T10:51:28Z | |
dc.description.abstract | The footwear industry has contributed notably to different countries’ economic development. Therefore, it needs to focus on operational excellence in order to achieve a sustainable level of development. Achieving sustainability in the footwear industry, however, is a complex task since various issues are involved in the footwear manufacturing process. Currently, in order to see how firms can sustain their place in the competitive global business environment, researchers and practitioners are giving special attention to operational excellence in the footwear manufacturing industry. Operational excellence is a business term that indicates the actual performance of an organization. To make the supply chain agile, resilient, and sustainable, it is imperative that firms incorporate sustainable practices in the footwear industry, and operational excellence can help in this regard. The sustainability of the footwear industry can be examined by using a set of key performance indicators (KPIs). Therefore, identifying and examining the KPIs for adopting sustainable practices in the footwear supply chain is a very important task. There is still a knowledge gap in research on the KPIs for attaining sustainability in the footwear industry. To fill in this knowledge gap, this study contributes to the existing literature by identifying and assessing the KPIs by using a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method named the best-worst method (BWM). This study uses a previous study to identify some relevant KPIs, some of which were included in the assessment process based on footwear industry experts’ feedback. After finalizing the relevant KPIs, BWM was utilized to find the most important KPIs for adopting sustainability practices in the footwear industry’s supply chains. The findings of this study reveal that the KPIs “quality production”, “timely order processing” and “accuracy of moulding” received the first three positions in the rankings we performed. The results of this study will help practitioners, industry experts, and decision-makers to find out a pathway for easily adopting sustainability practices in the footwear supply chains. | en |
dc.format | text | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/001/2021-1-013 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2336-5604 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1212-3609 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/159938 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Technická Univerzita v Liberci | cs |
dc.publisher | Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic | en |
dc.publisher.abbreviation | TUL | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Ala-Harja, H., & Helo, P. (2016). Food supply chain sustainable performance in plant decision. International Journal of Advanced Logistics, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2287108x.2015.1103542 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Alvandi, M., Fazli, S., Yazdani, L., & Aghaee, M. (2012). An integrated MCDM method in ranking BSC perspectives and key performance indicators (KPIs). Management Science Letters, 2(3), 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2012.01.024 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Amer, Y., Ashraf, M. A., Luong, L., Lee, S. H., & Wang, W. Y. C. (2007). A systems approach to order fulfilment using design for six sigma methodology. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 1(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbsr.2007.015831 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Banaitis, A. (2020). A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793424 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Amrina, E., & Vilsi, A. L. (2015). Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Manufacturing Evaluation in Cement Industry. Procedia CIRP, 26, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.173 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Andersson, E., & Thollander, P. (2019). Key performance indicators for energy management in the Swedish pulp and paper industry. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.004 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Arzu Akyuz, G., & Erman Erkan, T. (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17), 5137–5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903089536 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Bhagwat, R., & Sharma, M. K. (2007). Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.001 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Blake, B. F. (1984). Diet and fish stock availability as possible factors in the mass death of auks in the North Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 76(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90058-3 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Bruccoleri, M., Cannella, S., & La Porta, G. (2014). Inventory record inaccuracy in supply chains: The role of workers’ behavior. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 44(10), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2013-0240 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Chand, P., Thakkar, J. J., & Kanti, K. (2020). Analysis of supply chain performance metrics for Indian mining & earthmoving equipment manufacturing companies using hybrid MCDM model. Resources Policy, 68, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101742 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Coelli, T., Grifell-Tatjé, E., & Perelman, S. (2002). Capacity utilisation and profitability: A decomposition of short-run profit efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, 79(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00236-0 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., Gupta, R., & Dong, J. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation of real-time key performance indicators of supply chain with consideration of big data architecture. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.012 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Dočekalová, M. P., & Kocmanová, A. (2016). Composite indicator for measuring corporate sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 61(P2), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.012 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Du, Y., Yang, D., & Xiu, C. (2015). A novel method for constructing a WIFI positioning system with efficient manpower. Sensors (Switzerland), 15(4), 8358–8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150408358 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Elhuni, R. M., & Ahmad, M. M. (2017). Key performance indicators for sustainable production evaluation in oil and gas sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.172 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Er Kara, M., & Oktay Fırat, S. Ü. (2018). Supplier risk assessment based on best-worst method and k-means clustering: A case study. Sustainability, 10(4), 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041066 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Garg, C. P., & Sharma, A. (2020). Sustainable outsourcing partner selection and evaluation using an integrated BWM–VIKOR framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 1529–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0261-5 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Ghimire, M., Boyer, T. A., Chung, C., & Moss, J. Q. (2016). Consumers’ shares of preferences for turfgrass attributes using a discrete choice experiment and the best-worst method. HortScience, 51(7), 892–898. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.51.7.892 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Gigović, L., Drobnjak, S., & Pamučar, D. (2019). The application of the hybrid GIS spatial multi-criteria decision analysis best–worst methodology for landslide susceptibility mapping. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8020079 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Gopalakrishnan, K., Yusuf, Y. Y., Musa, A., Abubakar, T., & Ambursa, H. M. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.003 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Gupta, H. (2018). Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.001 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Gupta, P., Anand, S., & Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.005 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Helms, M., Ettkin, L., & Chapman, S. (2000). Supply chain forecasting – Collaborative forecasting supports supply chain management. Business Process Management Journal, 6(5), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150010352408 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Hendiani, S., Liao, H., Bagherpour, M., Tvaronavičienė, M., Banaitis, A., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2020). Analyzing the status of sustainable development in the manufacturing sector using multi-expert multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making and integrated triple bottom lines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113800 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Ishaq Bhatti, M., & Awan, H. M. (2014). The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance. Quality and Quantity, 48(6), 3127–3143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9945-y | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Jiang, S., Shi, H., Lin, W., & Liu, H. C. (2020). A large group linguistic Z-DEMATEL approach for identifying key performance indicators in hospital performance management. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105900 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Karmarkar, U. S. (2008). Lot sizes, lead times and in-process inventories. Management Science, 33(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.3.409 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Konsta, K., & Plomaritou, E. (2012). Key performance indicators (KPIs) and shipping companies performance evaluation: The case of Greek tanker shipping companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(10), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n10p142 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Kumar, A., Moktadir, A., Liman, Z. R., Gunasekaran, A., Hegemann, K., & Rehman Khan, S. A. (2019). Evaluating sustainable drivers for social responsibility in the context of ready-made garments supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119231 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Kumar, A., Moktadir, M. A., Khan, S. A. R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Tyagi, M., & Kazançoğlu, Y. (2020). Behavioral factors on the adoption of sustainable supply chain practices. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104818 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Kumar, A., Aswin, A., & Gupta, H. (2020). Evaluating green performance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology. Tourism Management, 76, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.06.016 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Lai, H., Liao, H., Šaparauskas, J., Banaitis, A., Ferreira, F. A. F., Al-Barakati, A. (2020). Sustainable cloud service provider development by a Z-number-based DNMA method with Gini-coefficient-based weight determination. Sustainability, 12(8), 3410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083410 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Larrea, O. (2013). Key performance indicators in humanitarian logistics in Colombia. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(24), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130911-3-BR-3021.00089 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., Scinto, P., & Dixit, M. K. (2014). Key performance indicators for facility performance assessment: simulation of core indicators. Construction Management and Economics, 32(12), 1183–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.970208 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Li, J., Wang, J.-Q., & Hu, J.-H. (2019). Multi-criteria decision-making method based on dominance degree and BWM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10(7), 1671–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0845-2 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Li, H., Hong, T., Lee, S. H., & Sofos, M. (2020). System-level key performance indicators for building performance evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 209, 109703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109703 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Madhusudhana Rao, C., & Prahlada Rao, K. (2009). Inventory turnover ratio as a supply chain performance measure. Serbian Journal of Management, 4(1), 41–50. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2019). Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.056 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Mezouar, H., Elafia, A., Chiheb, R., & Ouzayd, F. (2016). Proposal of a modeling approach and a set of KPI to the drug supply chain within the hospital. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Logistics Operations Management, (GOL) (pp. 1–6). Fez, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/GOL.2016.7731691 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.020 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Jabbour, C. J. C., Paul, A., Ahmed, S., Sultana, R., & Rahman, T. (2019). Key factors for energy-efficient supply chains: Implications for energy policy in emerging economies. Energy, 189, 116129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116129 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Moktadir, M. A., Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Nahar, N., & Paul, S. K. (2019). Examining barriers to reverse logistics practices in the leather footwear industry. Annals of Operations Research, 293, 715–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03449-y | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Moktadir, M. A., Dwivedi, A., Rahman, A., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Paul, S. K., Sultana, R., & Madaan, J. (2020). An investigation of key performance indicators for operational excellence towards sustainability in the leather products industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3331–3351. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2575 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Moslem, S., Farooq, D., Ghorbanzadeh, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Application of the AHP-BWM model for evaluating driver behavior factors related to road safety: A case study for Budapest. Symmetry, 12(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12020243 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A novel integrated provider selection multicriteria model: The BWM-MABAC model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003078m | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Naeini, A. B., Mojaradi, B., Zamani, M., & Chawla, V. K. (2019). Prevention of cardiovascular diseases by combining GIS with fuzzy best-worst decision-making algorithm in areas of Tehran. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research, 30(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijiepr.30.3.255 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Niekerk, V. (2010). (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0287795 A1. 1(19). | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Omrani, H., Alizadeh, A., & Amini, M. (2020). A new approach based on BWM and MULTIMOORA methods for calculating semi-human development index: An application for provinces of Iran. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70, 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.02.004 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Pakzad, P., & Osmond, P. (2016). Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrastructure performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.009 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Palau, A., Velo, E., & Puigjaner, L. (1999). Use of neural networks and expert systems to control a gas/solid sorption chilling machine. International Journal of Refrigeration, 22(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(97)00046-7 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Pishdar, M., Ghasemzadeh, F., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2019). A mixed interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst MACBETH approach to choose hub airport in developing countries: Case of Iranian passenger airports. Transport, 34(6), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.11723 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport Policy, 68, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.007 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152–9164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Sellitto, M. A., Pereira, G. M., Borchardt, M., da Silva, R. I., & Viegas, C. V. (2015). A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: Application in the footwear industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 4917–4926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1005251 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Selmeci, A., Orosz, I., Györök, G., & Orosz, T. (2012). Key Performance Indicators used in ERP performance measurement applications. In 2012 IEEE 10th Jubilee International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Subotica, Serbia. https://doi.org/10.1109/SISY.2012.6339583 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Setijono, D., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2007). Customer value as a key performance indicator (KPI) and a key improvement indicator (KII). Measuring Business Excellence, 11(2), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040710752733 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Sharifi, S., Shirouyehzad, H., & Esfahani, A. N. (2016). Identifying and prioritising of KPIs based on BSC by multi-criteria decision making – The case of the Central Post Office of Isfahan. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 19(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2016.080151 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | So, K. C., & Zheng, X. (2003). Impact of supplier’s lead time and forecast demand updating on retailer’s order quantity variability in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00050-1 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Subotić, M., Antuchevičienė, J., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). The location selection for roundabout construction using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS approach based on a new Rough Hamy aggregator. Sustainability, 10(8), 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082817 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Towill, D. R., Naim, M. M., & Wikner, J. (1992). Industrial dynamics simulation models in the design of supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 22(5), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039210016995 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Ugwu, O. O., & Haupt, T. C. (2007). Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability – A South African construction industry perspective. Building and Environment, 42(2), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.018 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Van de Kaa, G., Fens, T., Rezaei, J., Kaynak, D., Hatun, Z., & Tsilimeni-Archangelidi, A. (2019). Realizing smart meter connectivity: Analyzing the competing technologies power line communication, mobile telephony, and radio frequency using the best worst method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.035 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Velimirović, D., Velimirović, M., & Stanković, R. (2011). Role and importance of key performance indicators measurement. Serbian Journal of Management, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm1101063v | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Waller, M., & Johnson, M. E. (1980). Vendor-managed inventory in the retail supply chain. Reprinted wit permission of Journal of Business Logistics. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Wang, Z., Xu, G., Lin, R., Wang, H., & Ren, J. (2019). Energy performance contracting, risk factors, and policy implications: Identification and analysis of risks based on the best-worst network method. Energy, 170, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.140 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Weich, S., & Lewis, G. (1998). Material standard of living, social class, and the prevalence of the common mental disorders in Great Britain. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.1.8 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (2006). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022670 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Xu, H., Miao, X., & Wu, Q. (2006). High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. Journal of Biotechnology, 126(4), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.05.002 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Yazdani, M., Wen, Z., Liao, H., Banaitis, A., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(8), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Yazdi, M., Saner, T., & Darvishmotevali, M. (2020). Application of an Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Method for the Selection of Maintenance Strategy. In R. A. Aliev, J. Kacprzyk, W. Pedrycz, M. Jamshidi, M. B. Babanli, & F. M. Sadikoglu (Eds.), 10th International Conference on Theory and Application of Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions – ICSCCW-2019 (pp. 246–253). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Yuan, J., Zeng, A. Y., Skibniewski, M. J., & Li, Q. (2009). Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902748705 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Zhang, Z., Liao, H., Al-Barakati, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2020). Supplier selection for housing development by an integrated method with interval rough boundaries. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(4), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2020.12434 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ekonomie a Management | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Economics and Management | en |
dc.relation.isrefereed | true | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC | |
dc.subject | sustainability | en |
dc.subject | footwear industry | en |
dc.subject | key performance indicators | en |
dc.subject | best worst method | en |
dc.subject | operations excellence | en |
dc.subject.classification | C44 | |
dc.subject.classification | L25 | |
dc.subject.classification | L67 | |
dc.subject.classification | M11 | |
dc.title | Key Performance Indicators for Adopting Sustainability Practices in Footwear Supply Chains | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
local.access | open | |
local.citation.epage | 213 | |
local.citation.spage | 197 | |
local.faculty | Faculty of Economics | |
local.filename | EM_1_2021_13 | |
local.fulltext | yes | |
local.relation.abbreviation | E+M | cs |
local.relation.abbreviation | E&M | en |
local.relation.issue | 1 | |
local.relation.volume | 24 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- EM_1_2021_13.pdf
- Size:
- 839.9 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- článek