eHealth in the European Union – Comparative Study
Title Alternative:eHealth v Evropské unii – srovnávací studie
dc.contributor.author | Ardielli, Eva | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-22T06:51:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-22T06:51:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | eHealth je jedním z moderních globálních trendů v oblasti IT, medicíny a politiky. Jedná se o široký pojem, který se týká elektronizace zdravotnictví a zdravotnických služeb, a hlavně popisuje použití informačních a komunikačních technologií ve zdravotnictví. V praxi je hodnocení eHealth důležitou záležitostí, protože vede k výběru vhodných opatření důležitých pro další pokrok v oblasti elektronické zdravotní péče a k návrhu doporučení pro rozvoj eHealth v zemích EU. Článek je zaměřen na komparaci stavu implementace eHealth v členských státech Evropské unie. Analýza je provedena metodou ELECTRE III. Výsledky empirického výzkumu hodnotí stav implementace eHealth ve všech členských státech Evropské unie podle vybraných kritérií a umožňují srovnání implementace eHealth v mezinárodním kontextu. Výsledky jsou ověřeny aplikací metody MAPPAC. Na základě výzkumu bylo potvrzeno, že nejlépe hodnocenými zeměmi v této oblasti jsou Dánsko, Finsko, Estonsko a Švédsko. | cs |
dc.description.abstract | eHealth ist einer der modernen globalen Trends in IT, Medizin und Politik. Es ist ein weit gefasster Begriff, der das elektronische Gesundheitswesen und die Gesundheitsdienste betrifft und hauptsächlich den Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien im Gesundheitswesen beschreibt. In der Praxis ist die Bewertung von eHealth ein wichtiges Thema, da sie zur Auswahl geeigneter Maßnahmen führt, die für weitere Fortschritte im Bereich eHealth wichtig sind, und zur Ausarbeitung von Empfehlungen für die Entwicklung von eHealth in EU-Ländern. Der Artikel konzentriert sich auf den Vergleich der Implementierung von eHealth in den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union. Die Analyse wird unter Verwendung der ELECTRE III-Methode durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse der empirischen Forschung bewerten dann den Stand der Implementierung von eHealth in allen Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union anhand ausgewählter Kriterien und ermöglichen den Vergleich der Implementierung von eHealth im internationalen Kontext. Die Ergebnisse werden durch Anwendung der MAPPAC-Methode verifiziert. Die Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass Dänemark, Finnland, Estland und Schweden die besten Positionen in diesem Bereich haben. | de |
dc.description.abstract | eHealth is one of the global modern trends in IT, medicine and politics. It is a broad term that refers to electronization of healthcare and health services and mainly describes the use of information and communication technologies in healthcare. In practice, the evaluation of eHealth is an important matter because it leads to selection of appropriate measures for further progress in the field of electronic healthcare. What is more, it proposes recommendations for the development of eHealth in the EU countries. The article is focused on the comparison of eHealth implementation in the European Union member states. The analysis is performed by means of ELECTRE III method. The results of the empirical research further evaluate the state of eHealth implementation in all European Union member states by selected criteria and enable the comparison of the eHealth implementation in the international context. The results are verified by application of MAPPAC method. It has been acknowledged that the best ranking countries in this area has been obtained by Denmark, Finland, Estonia and Sweden. | en |
dc.description.abstract | e-Zdrowie to jeden z nowoczesnych światowych trendów w dziedzinie IT, medycynie i polityce. To szerokie pojęcie, które dotyczy elektronizacji służby zdrowia i opieki zdrowotnej, opisujące przede wszystkim wykorzystanie technologii informacyjnokomunikacyjnych w służbie zdrowia. Ocena e-Zdrowia jest w praktyce istotną kwestią, gdyż przyczynia się do wyboru odpowiednich działań ważnych dla dalszego postępu w dziedzinie elektronicznej opieki zdrowotnej oraz do sformułowania zaleceń dotyczących rozwoju eZdrowia w krajach UE. Artykuł koncentruje się na porównaniu wdrażania e-Zdrowia w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Analiza wykonywana jest metodą ELECTRE III. Wyniki badań empirycznych oceniają stan wdrażania e-Zdrowia we wszystkich państwach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej według wybranych kryteriów i pozwalają na porównanie realizacji eZdrowia w kontekście międzynarodowym. Wyniki weryfikowane są metodą MAPPAC. Badania wykazały, że w tej dziedzinie przodują Dania, Finlandia, Estonia i Szwecja. | pl |
dc.format | text | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/004/2020-2-001 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2571-0613 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1803-9782 | |
dc.identifier.other | ACC_2020_2_01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/157681 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.license | CC BY-NC 4.0 | |
dc.publisher | Technická univerzita v Liberci, Česká republika | cs |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ADEBESIN, F.; KOTZÉ, P.; van GREUNEN, D.; FOSTER, R.: Barriers and Challenges to the Adoption of E-Health Standards in Africa. In: Proceedings of Health Informatics South Africa 2013 (HISA 2013) Conference. 2013, pp. 1–9. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | AHAD, A.; TAHIR, M.; YAU, K.-L. A.: 5G-Based Smart Healthcare Network: Architecture, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Research Directions. IEEE Access. 2019, Vol. 7, pp. 100747–100762. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930628 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ARAK, P., WÓJCIK, A.: Transforming eHealth into a political and economic advantage. [online]. Polityka Insight. [online]. 2017. [accessed 2020-18-01]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/transforming-ehealthpolitical-and-economic-advantage | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | CIPRESSO, P. et al.: Is your phone so smart to affect your state? An exploratory study based on psychophysiological measures. Neurocomputing. 2012, Vol. 84, pp. 23–30. DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.027 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | CHAUDHRY, B, et al.: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006, Vol. 144, Issue 1, pp: 742–752. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | DIGITAL HEALTH NEWS: European Countries on their Journey Towards National eHealth Infrastructures. [online]. 2011. [accessed 2020-08-02]. Available from WWW: http://www.ehealthnews.eu/publications/latest/2494--european-countries-on-theirjourney-towards-national-ehealth-infrastructures | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | eHEALTH STRATEGIES: The European Union (EU) eHealth Action Plan of 2004. [online]. 2009. [accessed 2020-08-02]. Available from WWW: http://www.ehealthstrategies.eu/ | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EMPIRICA: Towards the establishment of a European e-health research area. [online]. 2007. [accessed 2020-02-02]. Available from WWW: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/015854 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: eHealth : Digital health and care. [online]. 2018 [accessed 2020-02-02]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/overview_en | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: Redesigning health in Europe for 2020. [online]. 2012 [accessed 2020-02-02]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/redesigning-health-europe-2020_en | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: eHealth action plan 2012-2010: Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. [online]. 2012. [accessed 2020-05-02]. Available from WWW: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/docs/com_2012_736_en.pdf | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: Benchmarking deployment of eHealth among general practitioners (2018). [online]. 2018. [accessed 2020-07-07]. Available from WWW: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1286ce7-5c05-11e9-9c52- 01aa75ed71a1 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures - evidence on progress and recommendations for cooperative actions. [online]. 2011. [accessed 2020-02-01]. Available from WWW: http://www.ehealthnews.eu/images/stories/pdf/ehstrategies_final_report.pdf | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EYSENBACH, G.: What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2001, Vol. 3, Issue 2. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | eZDRAV,cz: eHealth v EU. [online]. 2018. [accessed 2020-15-02]. Available from WWW: http://www.ezdrav.cz/ehealth-v-eu/ | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | GULLIFORD, M.; MORGAN, M.: Access to Health Care. Psychology Press, New York, 2003. ISBN 0415275458, 9780415275453. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | JUNG, M.-L.; LORIA, K.: Acceptance of Swedish e-health services. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2010, Vol. 3, pp. 55–63. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S9159 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | LAU, F.; KUZIEMSKY, C. (eds.): Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidencebased Approach. [online]. 2017. [accessed 2020-01-02]. ISBN-13 9781550586022, ISBN-13 9781550586039, ISBN-13 9781550586015. Available from WWW: https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/7814, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481590/ | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | MARTEL, J.-M.; MATARAZZO, B.: Other Outranking Approaches. In: Greco, S. (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of The Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | OECD: Health at a Glance: Europe 2016: State of Health in the EU Cycle. [online]. 2016. DOI: 10.1787/9789264265592-en. [accessed 2020-04-08]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/health_glance_2016_rep_en.pdf | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | OECD: Health at a Glance 2019. [online]. 2019. DOI: 10.1787/4dd50c09-en. [accessed 2020-04-08]. Available from WWW: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthsystems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | OH, H.; RIZO, C.; ENKIN, M.; JADAD, A.: What Is eHealth (3): A Systematic Review of Published Definitions. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2005, Vol. 7, Issue 1. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | STROETMANN, K. A. et al: European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures. Final European progress report. [online]. 2011. [accessed 2020-16-01]. Available from WWW: http://www.ehealthstrategies.eu/report/eHealth_Strategies_Final_Report_Web.pdf | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ŠUBRT, T. et al.: Ekonomicko-matematické metody. Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, s.r.o., Plzeň, 2015. EAN 9788073807627. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EUROPEAN COMMISSION: Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation and daily life. [online]. 2017. [accessed 2020-16-01]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/attitudes-towards-impactdigitisation-and-automation-daily-life | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | HWANG, Ch.-L.; YOON, K. P.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. An Introduction. Vol. 104. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. 1995. ISBN 9780803954861. | |
dc.relation.ispartof | ACC Journal | en |
dc.relation.isrefereed | true | |
dc.subject | eHealth | en |
dc.subject | ELECTRE III | en |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en |
dc.subject | EU countries | en |
dc.title | eHealth in the European Union – Comparative Study | en |
dc.title.alternative | eHealth v Evropské unii – srovnávací studie | cs |
dc.title.alternative | eHealth in der Europäischen Union – eine vergleichende Studie | de |
dc.title.alternative | e-Zdrowie w Unii Europejskiej – badania porównawcze | pl |
dc.type | Article | en |
local.access | open | |
local.citation.epage | 18 | |
local.citation.spage | 7 | |
local.fulltext | yes | en |
local.relation.issue | 2 | |
local.relation.volume | 26 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- ACC_2020_2_01.pdf
- Size:
- 350.08 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- článek