Potential of the Czech business environment assumes the effects of foreign direct investment

dc.contributor.authorKotíková, Sylvie
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T10:20:11Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T10:20:11Z
dc.description.abstractThe localisation of foreign capital affecting both the immediate and future situation of the host locality in a number of ways. The positive effects of the location of FDI are welcomed all over the world, and their emergence is supported by the granting of investment incentives. The question is how to correctly measure these effects, but also the potential of specific areas to accept them. The aim of this contribution is to determine the size of the technology gap between FDI supported by investment incentives and the business environments in a group of six regions of the Czech Republic as well as to determine the absorption capacity of the technology transfer of these regions. Based on shift-share analyses, an indicator quantifying the size of the technology gap at the regional level of NUTS 3 has been constructed. This indicator has been supplemented by an indicator of technology transfer intensity. The benchmarking method illustrates the absorption capacity of the Czech business environment in an interregional comparison reflecting the strong and weak sides of the Czech regions in terms of absorbing the benefits of locating multinational corporations in their territories. The calculations and analyses have proved the leading position of the Plzeň Region, which takes advantage of its geographical position as well as its historical industrial tradition. At the same time, the high absorption capacity of the Hradec Králové Region, a region with a high potential for intensive growth, has been identified. On the other hand, the Karlovy Vary Region has been an outsider in the examined set of regions. In the long run, this region has not been and will not be able to attract at least a satisfactory level of foreign presence from which the region could positively benefit and start its economic growth.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-002
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154261
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonArregle, J. L., et al. (2018). The role of MNEs’ internationalization patterns in their regional integration of FDI locations. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 896-910. 10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonAsmussen, C.G., & Goerzen, A. (2013). Unpacking dimensions of foreignness: Firm-specific capabilities and international dispersion in regional, cultural, and institutional space. Global Strategy Journal, 3(2), 127-149. 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2013.01055.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlažek, J. (2012). Regionalni inovacni systemy a globalni produkcni site: dvoji optika na zdroje konkurenceschopnosti v soucasnem svete? Geografie, 117(2), 209–233.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlažek, J. (2016). Towards a typology of repositioning strategies of GVC/GPN suppliers: the case of functional upgrading and downgrading. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(4), 849-869. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv044.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlažek, J., & Uhlíř, D. (2011). Teorie regionálního rozvoje: nástin, kritika, implikace. Praha: Karolinum.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlomstrom, M., & Kokko, A. (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers of technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5-6), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002972.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlonigen, B. A., et al. (2007), FDI in Space: Spatial Autoregressive Relationships in Foreign Direct Investment. European Economic Review. 51(5), 1303–1325. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.08.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonBoudier-Bensebaa, F. (2005). Agglomeration economies and location choice: Foreign direct investment in Hungary. Economics of Transition, 13(4), 605–628. doi: 10.1111/j.0967-0750.2005.00234.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonBucar, M., Rojec, M., & Stare, M. (2009). Backward FDI linkages as a channel for transferring technology and building innovation capability: The case of Slovenia. European Journal of Development Research, 21(1), 137–153. http://doi:10.1057/ejdr.2008.11.
dc.relation.isbasedonCamagni, R. (2009). Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions: A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 342-350. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.014.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarbaugh, R. (2009). International economics. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.isbasedonChausse, J., & Pomfret, R. (2019). The RCEP and the Changing Landscape of World Trade: Assessing Asia-Pacific Investment Regionalism Next Stage. Law and Development Review, 12(1), 159-190. 10.1515/ldr-2018-0058.
dc.relation.isbasedonCheng, Z., Li. L., & Liu., J. (2018). The spatial correlation and interaction between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 54(2), 124-146. 10.1007/s11149-018-9366-x.
dc.relation.isbasedonCooke, P. (1983). Theories of planning and spatial development. London: Hutchinson.
dc.relation.isbasedonCoughlin, C. C., & Segev, E. (2000). Foreign direct investment in China: a spatial econometric study. World Economy 23(1), 1–23. 10.1111/1467-9701.t01-1-00260.
dc.relation.isbasedonCurwin, K., & Mahutga, M. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Post-Socialist Transition Countries. Social Forces, 92(3), 1159–1187. 10.1093/sf/sot128.
dc.relation.isbasedonCzech National Bank. (2019). Přímé zahraniční investice. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://www.cnb.cz/cs/statistika/platebni_bilance_stat/publikace_pb/pzi/
dc.relation.isbasedonCZSO. (2018). Statistické ročenky. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/katalog-produktu
dc.relation.isbasedonCzechInvest. (2019). Investiční pobídky. Retrieved January 7, 2019 from http://www.czechinvest.org/investicni-pobidky-czechinvest
dc.relation.isbasedonDamborský, M., Wokoun, R. & Krejčová, N. (2013). The Effectiveness of Industrial Zones Support in the Czech Republic. E&M Ekonomie a management, 16(4), 104-117.
dc.relation.isbasedonEstrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2009). The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), 699–728. 10.1257/jel.47.3.699
dc.relation.isbasedonFerenčiková, S., & Fifeková, M. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers in Slovakia. Ekonomický časopis, 56(9), 855-872.
dc.relation.isbasedonFonseca, F. J. & Liamosas-Rosas, I. (2019). Spatial linkages and third-region effects: evidence from FDI in Mexico. The Annals od Regional Science, 62(2), 265-284. 10.1007/s00168-019-00895-1.
dc.relation.isbasedonGarretsen, H. & Peeters, J. (2009). FDI and the Relevance of Spatial Linkages: Do Third-country Effects Matter for Dutch FDI? Review of World Economics, 145(2), 319–338. 10.1007/s10290-009-0018-1.
dc.relation.isbasedonGoerzen, A. & Beamish, P.W. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1289-1306. 10.1002/smj.357.
dc.relation.isbasedonGorynia, M., Nowak, J., & Wolniak, R. (2007). Motives and modes of FDI in Poland: An exploratory qualitative study. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12(2), 132–151.
dc.relation.isbasedonGutierrez-Portilla, P., Maza, A., & Villaverde, J. (2019). Spatial Linkages in FDI Location: Evidence from the Spanish Regions. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 110(4), 395–411. 10.1111/tesg.12346.
dc.relation.isbasedonHafner, K. A., & Kleinert, J. (2018). FDI Flows and Regional Development: Lessons for Transition Countries. In J. Ateljević & Budak, J. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in Post-Communist Countries (pp. 47-59). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonHardy, J., Micek, G., & Capik, P. (2012). Upgrading Local Economies in Central and Eastern Europe? The Role of Business Service Foreign Direct Investment in the Knowledge Economy. European Planning Studies, 19(9), 1581–1591. http://doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.586180.
dc.relation.isbasedonHlaváček, P., & Bal-Domanska, B. (2016). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Central European Countries. Engineering Economics, 27(3), 294-303. 10.5755/j01.ee.27.3.3914.
dc.relation.isbasedonHlavacek, P., & Koutsky, J. (2011). The Polarisation Tendencies in Localization of Foreign Direct Investments in the Czech Republic. In A. Kocourek, M. Ortova & D. Mysakova (Eds.). 10th International Conference of Liberec Economic Forum. (pp.186-194). Liberec: Technical University of Liberec.
dc.relation.isbasedonJordaan, J.A. (2008). State characteristics and the locational choice of foreign direct investment: Evidence from regional FDI in Mexico 1989-2006. Growth and Change, 39(3), 389-413. 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00431.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonKornecki, L., & Raghavan, V. (2011). FDI Stock and Growth in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Trade Journal, 25(5). 10.1080/08853908.2011.604297.
dc.relation.isbasedonKotíková, S. (2018a). Measuring the Size of the Technology Gap at a Level of Czech Regions. Scientific Papers of University of Pardubice, 26(43), 123-134.
dc.relation.isbasedonKotíková, S. (2018b). Reflection of the Degree of Interationalization in the Absorption Capacity of the Czech Regional Business Environment. AD ALTA Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(1), 142-147. 10.15208/beh.2018.67.
dc.relation.isbasedonKotíková, S. & Čuhlová, R. (2017). Market Internationalization in the Regional Context. 20th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8587-2017-20.
dc.relation.isbasedonKotíková, S. & Čuhlová, R. (2016). Foreign Presence, Cultural Distance and Technology Gap as Indicators of Globalization in the Czech region.16th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economics Consequences. Zilina: University of Zilina.
dc.relation.isbasedonLeibrecht, M., & Riedl, A. (2014). Modeling FDI based on a spatially augmented gravity model: Evidence for Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal of International Trade, 23(8), 1206–1237. 10.1080/09638199. 2013.861006.
dc.relation.isbasedonLi, X., et al. (2018). Do MNEs from developed and emerging economies differ in their location choice of FDI? A 36-year review. International Business Review. 27(5), 1089-1103. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.03.012.
dc.relation.isbasedonMinistry of Justice of the Czech Republic. (2018). Veřejný rejstřík a sbírka listin. Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://www.justice.cz.
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD. (2018). Level of GDP and productivity. Retrieved January 27, 2018 from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDB_LV
dc.relation.isbasedonPavlinek, P. (2012). The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe. Economic Geography, 88(3), 279–310. http://doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01155.x
dc.relation.isbasedonPavlínek, P. (2018). Global Production Networks, Foreign Direct Investment, and Supplier Linkages in the Peripheries of the Automotive Industry. Economic Geography, 94(2), 141-165. 10.1080/00130095.2017.1393313.
dc.relation.isbasedonPosner, M. (1961). International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfo.
dc.relation.isbasedonProkop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2018). The Effects of Cooperation and Knowledge Spillovers in Knowledge Environment. In J. Stejskal, P. Hajek, &, Hudec, O. (Eds.), Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems. ( pp. 3-46). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4_1.
dc.relation.isbasedonRapacki, R., & Prochniak, M. (2009). Economic Growth Accounting in Twenty-Seven Transition Countries,1990–2003. Eastern European Economics, 47(2), 69–112. 10.2753/EEE0012-8775470205.
dc.relation.isbasedonRegelink, M., & Elhorst, J.P. (2015), The spatial econometrics of FDI and third country effects. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 8, pp. 1–13.
dc.relation.isbasedonShevelova, S., & Plaskon, S. (2018). Is the Ukrainian economy’s absorptive capacity appropriate to attract foreign direct investment and facilitate economic growth? International Journal of Emerging Markets. 13(6), 1928-1947.
dc.relation.isbasedonSharma, S., Wang, M., & Sunny Wong, M.C. (2014). FDI Location and the Relevance of Spatial Linkages: Evidence from Provincial and Industry FDI in China. Review of International Economics, 22(1), 86–104. 10.1111/roie.12098.
dc.relation.isbasedonStarzyczná, H. (2010). Vybrané aspekty internacionalizace vnitřního obchodu v teoretických přístupech a v empirickém zkoumání v České republice v období transformace. E&M Ekonomie a management, 1, 115-130.
dc.relation.isbasedonŠimanová, J. & Trešl, F. (2011). Vývoj průmyslové koncentrace a specializace v regionech NUTS3 České republiky v kontextu dynamizace regionální komparativní výhody. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 14(1), 38-52.
dc.relation.isbasedonŠpiroch, M. (2013). Póly regionálního růstu a regionální disparity. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://www.conference-cm.com/podklady/history4/Prispevky/prispevek_Spiroch_Michal_VUT.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonTun,Y., Azman-Saini, W. N. W., & Law, S. (2012). International Evidence on the link between Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Quality. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 23(4), 379–386. http://dx.doi:10.5755/ j01.ee.23.4.2569.
dc.relation.isbasedonUNCTAD. (2019). FDI Statistics. Retrieved July 27, 2019 from https://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/FDI%20Statistics/FDI-Statistics.aspx
dc.relation.isbasedonVerbeke, A., & Asmussen, C. G. (2016). Global, local or regional? The locus od MNE stategies. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1051-75. 10.1111/joms.12190.
dc.relation.isbasedonWokoun, R., Tvrdon, J., & Damborsky, M. (2010). Prime zahranicni investice a regionalni rozvoj. Prague, Czech Rep.: Oeconomica.
dc.relation.isbasedonWu, Ch., & Burge, G. S. (2018). Competing for Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Local Governments in China. Public Finance Review, 46(6), 1044-1068. 10.1177/1091142117698015.
dc.relation.isbasedonZamrazilová, E. (2007). Přímé zahraniční investice v České republice: rizika duality a role trhu práce. Politická ekonomie. 55(5), 578-602. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.614.
dc.relation.isbasedonZdeněk, R. & Střeleček, F. (2012). Hodnocení vývoje zaměstnanosti, průměrné mzdy a produktivity práce pomocí shift-share analýzy. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 15(3), 4-15.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectforeign direct investmenten
dc.subjectforeign presenceen
dc.subjectlabour productivityen
dc.subjecttechnology gapen
dc.subject.classificationE22
dc.subject.classificationE24
dc.subject.classificationF21
dc.subject.classificationF23
dc.subject.classificationF43
dc.titlePotential of the Czech business environment assumes the effects of foreign direct investmenten
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage35
local.citation.spage18
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_4_2019_02
local.fulltextyes
local.identifier.publikace7003
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue4
local.relation.volume22
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_4_2019_02.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections