The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluation of Efficiency of Healthcare Delivery for CVD Patients

dc.contributor.authorKočišová, Kristína
dc.contributor.authorCygańska, Małgorzata
dc.contributor.authorKludacz-Alessandri, Magdalena
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T08:31:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T08:31:47Z
dc.description.abstractThe focus placed on the effi ciency of the healthcare system can vary across the countries. This paper aims to analyse and compare the technical effi ciency of medical care for CVD patients across selected OECD countries using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method according to two models. The fi rst model (TE) incorporates the quantitative outputs that are connected with the quantity of the hospital outcomes (the number of surgical operations and procedures related to disease of the circulatory system per 100,000 inhabitants; hospital discharge rates for in-patients with diseases of the circulatory system). The second model (QE) includes the quality outputs that are connected with the health outcomes (survival rates of patients with diseases of the circulatory system). A number of cardiologists and angiography equipment per 100,000 inhabitants and total healthcare costs of CVD patients per 100,000 inhabitants were considered as inputs in both models. Secondly, we analyse whether endogenous (institutional arrangements) and exogenous (population behaviour, economic determinants) factors are associated with the effi ciency of medical care. We utilise Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to calculate the effi ciency of medical care for CVD patients in selected OECD countries and establish healthcare systems’ rankings according to TE and effi cient healthcare delivery for CVD patients. The study found that the technically effi cient countries were not as far effi cient when the quality measure was used to calculation of effi ciency. On the other hand, some of the technically ineffi cient countries were performing well concerning effi ciency based on a quality measure.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2020-2-007
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154921
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAdang, E. M. M., Gerritsma, A., Nouwens, E., van Lieshout, J., & Wensing, M. (2016). Effi ciency of the implementation of cardiovascular risk management in primary care practices: An observational study. Implementation Science, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi. org/10.1186/S13012-016-0434-2
dc.relation.isbasedonAfonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2005). Non- parametric approaches to education and health effi ciency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1 080/15140326.2005.12040626
dc.relation.isbasedonAhmed, S., Hasan, M. Z., Laokri, S., Jannat, Z., Ahmed, M. W., Dorin, F., Vargas, V., & Khan, J. A. M. (2019). Technical effi ciency of public district hospitals in Bangladesh: A data envelopment analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 17(1), 15–24. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12962-019-0183-6
dc.relation.isbasedonAkkan, C., Karadayi, M. A., Ekinci, Y., Ülengin, F., Uray, N., & Karaosmanoğlu, E. (2019). Effi ciency analysis of emergency departments in metropolitan areas. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 69. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.01.001
dc.relation.isbasedonAl-Shammari, M. (1999). A multi- criteria data envelopment analysis model for measuring the productive effi ciency of hospitals. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(9), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910280205
dc.relation.isbasedonAnand, S., Ammar, W., Evans, T., Hasegawa, T., Kissimova-Skarbek, K., Langer, A., Lucas, A. O., Makubalo, L., Marandi, A., Meyer, G., Podger, A., Smith, P., & Wibulpolprasert, S. (2003). Report of the Scientifi c Peer Review Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment. In C. J. L. Murray, D. B. Evans (Eds.), Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods and Empiricism. Geneve: World Health Organization.
dc.relation.isbasedonArocena, P., & García-Prado, A. (2007). Accounting for quality in the measurement of hospital performance: Evidence from Costa Rica. Health Economics, 167(7), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1204
dc.relation.isbasedonAstraZeneca. (2014). The economic cost of cardiovascular disease from 2014–2020 in six European economies (Research paper prepared for AstraZeneca). London: Centre for Economics and Business Research.
dc.relation.isbasedonBartak, M., & Gavurova, B. (2015). Economics and Social Aspects of Long-Term Care in the Context of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic EU Membership. Proceedings of 12th International Scientifi c Conference: Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries (pp. 35–44). Opava: Silesian University.
dc.relation.isbasedonBhat, V. N. (2005). Institutional arrangements and effi ciency of health care delivery systems. European Journal of Health Economics, 6(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005- 0294-1
dc.relation.isbasedonBorisov, D., Cicea, C., & Turlea, C. (2012). DEA model for assessing effi ciency in providing health care and management decisions. Management Research and Practice, 4(1), 5–18.
dc.relation.isbasedonCharnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the effi ciency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi. org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
dc.relation.isbasedonDe-Pablos-Heredero, C., Fernández- Renedo, C., Medina-Merodio, J. A. (2015). Technical effi ciency and organ transplant performance: A mixed-method approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(5), 4869–4888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120504869
dc.relation.isbasedonDrake, L., & Howcroft, B. (1994). Relative effi ciency in the branch network of a UK bank: an empirical study. OMEGA, 22(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(94)90009-4
dc.relation.isbasedonEconomou, C., & Giorno, C. (2009). Improving the performance of the public health care system in Greece (Economics Department Working Paper No. 722). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/221250170007
dc.relation.isbasedonErsoy, K., Kavuncubasi, S., Ozcan, Y. A., & Harris, J. M. (1997). Technical effi ciencies of Turkish hospitals: DEA approach. Journal of Medical Systems, 21(2), 67–74. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1022801222540
dc.relation.isbasedonEuropean Heart Network. (2017). European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017 edition. Brussels: European Heart Network.
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROSTAT Health Data. (2015). Health care resources, Eurostat Health Statistics (database).
dc.relation.isbasedonEzzati, M., Lopez, A. D., Rodgers, A., Vander Hoorn, S., & Murray, C. J. L. (2002). Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. The Lancet, 360(9343), 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(02)11403-6
dc.relation.isbasedonGavurova, B., & Soltes, M. (2016). System of Day Surgery in Slovakia: Analysis of Pediatric Day Surgery Discrepancies in the Regions and their Importance in Strategy of its Development. E&M Economics and Management, 19(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016- 1-006
dc.relation.isbasedonGok, M. S., & Sezen, B. (2013). Analyzing the ambiguous relationship between effi ciency, quality and patient satisfaction in healthcare services: The case of public hospitals in Turkey. Health Policy, 111(3), 290–300. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.010
dc.relation.isbasedonGreene, W. (2004). Distinguishing between heterogeneity and ineffi ciency: Stochastic frontier analysis of the world health organization’s panel data on national health care systems. Health Economics, 13(10), 959– 980. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.938
dc.relation.isbasedonHadad, S., Hadad, Y., & Simon-Tuval, T. (2013). Determinants of healthcare system’s effi ciency in OECD countries. European Journal of Health Economics, 14(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0366-3
dc.relation.isbasedonHernandez de Cos, P., & Moral-Benito, E. (2014). Determinants of health-system effi ciency: Evidence from OECD countries. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 14(1), 69–93. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10754-013-9140-7
dc.relation.isbasedonHofmarcher, M., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2013). The Health Data Navigator. Your toolkit for comparative performance analysis (EuroREACH product). Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Reserarch.
dc.relation.isbasedonHollingsworth, B. (2008). The measurement of effi ciency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics, 17(10), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1391
dc.relation.isbasedonIkegami, N., Hirdes, J. P., & Carpenter, I. (2002). Measuring the quality of long-term care in institutional and community setting. In P. Smith (Ed.), Measuring up: Improving health system performance in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonInstitute of Medicine. (2006). Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonJacobs, R. (2001). Alternative Methods to Examine Hospital Effi ciency: Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Health Care Management Science, 4(2), 103– 115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011453526849
dc.relation.isbasedonKocisova, K., Hass-Symotiuk, M., & Kludacz-Alessandri, M. (2018). Use of the DEA method to verify the performance model for hospitals. E&M Economics and Management, 21(4), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.15240/ tul/001/2018-4-009
dc.relation.isbasedonPai, D. R., Hosseini, H., & Brown, R. S. (2019). Does effi ciency and quality of care affect hospital closures? Health Systems, 8(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2017. 1405874
dc.relation.isbasedonMitropoulos, P. (2019). Production and quality performance of healthcare services in EU countries during the economic crisis. Operational Research, 1–17. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12351-019-00483-3
dc.relation.isbasedonMohan, R., & Mirmirani, S. (2007). An assessment of OECD health care system using panel data analysis. Southwest Business and Economics Journal, 16, 21–35.
dc.relation.isbasedonMoran, V., & Jacobs, R. (2013). An international comparison of effi ciency of inpatient mental health care systems. Health Policy, 112(1–2), 88–99. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.06.011
dc.relation.isbasedonNayar, P., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2008). Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital effi ciency and quality. Journal of Medical Systems, 32(3), 193–199. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10916-007-9122-8
dc.relation.isbasedonÖzcan, Y. (2008). Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 120. Basel: Springer Nature.
dc.relation.isbasedonOzgen, H., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2002). A national study of effi ciency for dialysis centers: an EM_2_2020.indd 112 M_2_2020.indd 112 1.6.2020 16:39:37 .6.2020 16:39:37 2, XXIII, 2020 113 Business Administration and Management examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs. Health Services Research, 37(3), 711– 732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00045
dc.relation.isbasedonReinhardt, U. E., Hussey, P. S., & Anderson, G. F. (2002). Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data. Health Affairs, 21(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1377/ hlthaff.21.3.169
dc.relation.isbasedonRetzlaff-Roberts, D., Chang, C. F., & Rubin, R. M. (2004). Technical effi ciency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries. Health Policy, 69(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.002
dc.relation.isbasedonRichardson, J., Wildman, J., & Robertson, I. K. (2003). A critique of the World Health Organisation’s evaluation of health system performance. Health Economics, 12(5), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.761
dc.relation.isbasedonSchwellnus, C. (2009). Achieving higher performance: enhancing spending effi ciency in health and education in Mexico (Economics Department Working Papers No. 732). Paris: OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonSezen, B., & Gok, M. S. (2016). Analyzing the Effi ciencies of Hospitals: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 2(5), 137–137. https://doi.org/10.20460/jgsm.2011515804
dc.relation.isbasedonSharkey, P., Dehaemer, M., & Horn, S. (1993). Assessing the severity of patient’s illness to better manage health care resources. Interfaces, 23(4), 12–20.
dc.relation.isbasedonSimar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009
dc.relation.isbasedonSoltes, M., & Gavurova, B. (2014). Identifi cation of the Functionality Level of Day Surgery in Slovakia. Ekonomický časopis, 62(10), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.15240/ tul/001/2016-1-006
dc.relation.isbasedonSpinks, J., & Hollingsworth, B. (2009). Cross-country comparisons of technical effi ciency of health production: a demonstration of pitfalls. Applied Economics, 41(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701604354
dc.relation.isbasedonStancheva, N., & Angelova, V. (2004). Measuring the effi ciency of university libraries using data envelopment analysis. Inforum, 32(1990), 136–146.
dc.relation.isbasedonStarfi eld, B. (1973). Health services research: a working model. The New England Journal of Medicine, 289(2), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197307192890305
dc.relation.isbasedonStefko, R., Gavurova, B., & Korony, S. (2016). Effi ciency Measurement in Healthcare Work Management Using Malmquist Indices. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.17512/ pjms.2016.13.1.16
dc.relation.isbasedonSzabo, S., Mihalčová, B., Gallo, P., & Ivaničková, M. (2018). Evaluating effi ciency in specialized hospital facilities – developing the model by way of the discriminant analysis. E&M Economics and Management, 21(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-006
dc.relation.isbasedonVarabyova, Y., & Schreyögg, J. (2013). International comparisons of the technical effi ciency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches. Health Policy, 112(1–2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. healthpol.2013.03.003
dc.relation.isbasedonWang, R., & Yu, M. (2006). Evaluating the effi ciency of hospital’s departments using DEA. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics (pp. 1167–1170). Soli.
dc.relation.isbasedonWilliams, A. (2003). Science or marketing at WHO? A commentary on ‘World Health 2000’. Health Economics, 10(2), 93–100. https://doi. org/10.1002/hec.594
dc.relation.isbasedonYawe, B. L., & Kavuma, S. N. (2008). Technical effi ciency in the presence of desirable and undesirable outputs: A case study of selected district referral hospitals in Uganda. Health Policy and Development, 6(1), 37–53.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjecthealthcare system efficiencyen
dc.subjectOECD countriesen
dc.subjectDEA analysisen
dc.subjectefficiency of healthcare deliveryen
dc.subjectCVD patientsen
dc.subject.classificationI18
dc.subject.classificationM41
dc.titleThe Application of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluation of Efficiency of Healthcare Delivery for CVD Patientsen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage113
local.citation.spage96
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_2_2020_7
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume23
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2020_07.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections