Empirical Analysis of Long Memory and Asymmetry Effects for the Effectiveness of Forecasting Volatility of Returns on the Commodity Market Based on the Example of Gold and Silver

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWłodarczyk, Bogdan
dc.contributor.authorMiciuła, Ireneusz
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T08:31:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T08:31:47Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an empirical analysis of the signifi cance of the long memory and asymmetry effects for forecasting conditional volatility and market risk on the commodity market based on the example of gold and silver. The analysis involved testing a wide range of linear and non-linear GARCH-type models. The aim of studying dependencies between rates of return and volatility was to select the optimum model. In-sample and out-of-sample analysis indicated that volatility of returns on gold and silver is better described with non-linear volatility models accommodating long memory and asymmetry effects. In particular, the FIAPARCH model proved to be the best for estimating VaR forecasts for long and short trading positions. Also, this model generated the lowest number of violations of Basel II regulations at the confi dence level of 99%. Among the models studied, the FIAPARCH has the most elastic news impact curve, which translates into more possibilities to adjust to data. The results of the analyses suggest that within the period studied, the FIAPARCH model was the best predictive tool compared to the other models. This stems from the model’s ability to satisfactorily capture the effects accompanying price volatility of precious metals, i.e. asymmetry and long memory. The FIAPARCH model produced the lowest number of VaR violations (lowest risk of the model) for all series, which means that it seems to be the most advantageous predictive model with respect to gold and silver from the point of view of fi nancial institutions. Attention was also paid to the prevalence and signifi cance of long memory and asymmetry effects, which should be taken into account when using GARCH-class models.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2020-2-009
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154923
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAiolfi , M., & Timmermann, A. (2006). Persistence of Forecasting Performance and Combination Strategies. Journal of Econometrics, 135(1–2), 31–53. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.015
dc.relation.isbasedonAloui, C., & Mabrouk, S. (2010). Value-at- risk estimations of energy commodities via long-memory, asymmetry and fat-tailed GARCH models. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2326–2339. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.020
dc.relation.isbasedonAndersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Meddahi, N. (2004). Analytic Evaluation of Volatility Forecasts, International Economic Review, 45(4), 1079–1110. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.0020-6598.2004.00298.x
dc.relation.isbasedonArouri, M., Hammoudeh, S., Lahiani, A., & Nguyen, D. K. (2012a). Long memory and structural breaks in modeling the return and volatility dynamics of precious metals. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(2), 207–218. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. qref.2012.04.004
dc.relation.isbasedonArouri, M., Lahiani, A., Lévy, A., & Nguyen, D. K. (2012b). Forecasting the conditional volatility of oil spot and futures prices with structural breaks and long memory models. Energy Economics, 34(1), 283–293. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.015
dc.relation.isbasedonAssaf, A. (2009). Extreme observations and risk assessment in the equity markets of MENA region: Tail measures and Value-at-Risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18(3), 109–116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. irfa.2009.03.007
dc.relation.isbasedonBaillie, R., Bollerslev, T., & Mikkelsen, H. O. (1996). Fractionally Integrated Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 3–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(95)01749-6
dc.relation.isbasedonBasher, S. A., & Sadorsky, P. (2016). Hedging emerging market stock prices with oil, gold, VIX, and bonds: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH. Energy Economics, 54, 235–247. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.022
dc.relation.isbasedonBaur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis od stocks, bonds and gold. The Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6288.2010.00244.x
dc.relation.isbasedonBaur, D. G., & McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is gold a safe have? An international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1886–1898. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jbankfi n.2009.12.008
dc.relation.isbasedonBekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 13(1), 1–42. https://dx.doi. org/10.1093/rfs/13.1.1
dc.relation.isbasedonBodington, L., & Seetharam, Y. (2015). Gold in a South African Market: A Safe Haven or Hedge? Applied Economics Quarterly, 61(4), 331–352. https://dx.doi.org/10.3790/ aeq.61.4.331
dc.relation.isbasedonCheng, W. H., & Hung, J. C. (2011). Skewness and leptokurtosis in GARCH- typed VaR estimation of petroleum and metal asset returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1), 160–173. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jempfi n.2010.05.004
dc.relation.isbasedonChoi, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2009). Long memory in oil and refined products markets. Journal of Energy, 30(2), 97–116. https://dx.doi. org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No2-5
dc.relation.isbasedonDoman, M., & Doman, R. (2009). Volatility and risk modeling. Methods of fi nancial econometrics. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
dc.relation.isbasedonElder, J., & Serletis, A. (2008). Long memory in energy futures prices. Review of Finance and Economics, 17(2), 146–155. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.rfe.2006.10.002
dc.relation.isbasedonEngle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1008. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912773
dc.relation.isbasedonFurió, D., & Climent, F. J. (2013). Extreme value theory versus traditional GARCH approaches applied to fi nancial data: a comparative evaluation. Quantitative Finance, 13(1), 45–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697 688.2012.696679
dc.relation.isbasedonGeweke, J., & Porter-Hudak, S. (1983). The estimation and application of long- memory time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4(4), 221–238. https://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1983.tb00371.x
dc.relation.isbasedonHammoudeh, S., & Yuan, Y. (2008). Metal volatility in presence of oil and interest rate shocks. Energy Economics, 30(2), 606–620. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.09.004
dc.relation.isbasedonHammoudeh, S., Yuan, Y., McAleer, M., & Thompson, M. (2010). Precious metals- exchange rate volatility transmissions and hedging strategies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(4), 633–647. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2010.02.003
dc.relation.isbasedonIwaszczuk, N., & Orłowska-Puzio, J. (2015). Hedging impast on the development of foreign trade operators. Economic Studies. Scientifi c Paper of the University of Economics in Katowice, 214, 51–63.
dc.relation.isbasedonJajuga, K. (2016). From duration analysis to GARCH models – An approach to systematization of quantitative methods in risk measurement. Economics and Business Review, 2(16), 7–19. https://dx.doi. org/10.18559/ebr.2016.3.2
dc.relation.isbasedonJorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.isbasedonKang, S. H., & Yoon, S. M. (2013). Modeling and forecasting the volatility of petroleum futures prices. Energy Economics, 36, 354–362. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.010
dc.relation.isbasedonKasprzak-Czelej, A. B. (2015). Gold investments as a hedge against infl ation in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie- Sklodowska Lublin – Polonia, XLIX(4), 205–214.
dc.relation.isbasedonKupiec, P. (1995). Technique for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73–84. https://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
dc.relation.isbasedonLama, A., Jha, G. K., Paul, R. K., & Gurung, B. (2015). Modelling and Forecasting of Price Volatility: An application of GARCH and EGARCH Models. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 28(1), 73–82. https://dx.doi. org/10.5958/0974-0279.2015.00005.1
dc.relation.isbasedonMamcarz, K. (2015). Long-term determinants of the price of gold. Economic Studies. Scientifi c Paper of the University of Economics in Katowice, Contemporary Finance, 4(252), 80–94.
dc.relation.isbasedonMckenzie, M. D., Mitchell, H., Brooks, R. D., & Faff, R. W. (2001). Power ARCH modelling of commodity futures data on the London Metal Market. European Journal of Finance, 7(1), 22–38. https://dx.doi. org/10.1080/13518470123011
dc.relation.isbasedonMiciuła, I. (2014). The concept of FTS analysis in forecasting trends of exchange rate changes, Economics & Sociology, 7(2), 172–182. https://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2014/7-2/14
dc.relation.isbasedonMiciuła, I. (2015). The Universal Elements of Strategic Management of Risks in Contemporary Enterprises. Entrepreneurship and management, 16(8), 313–322.
dc.relation.isbasedonMiciuła, I. (2018). Methods of Creating Innovation Indices Versus Determinants of Their Values. Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 8(2), 357–366. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-67916-7_23
dc.relation.isbasedonMikita, M. (2016). Future internationl monetary system. Optimum. Economic studies, 1(79), 85–99. https://dx.doi.org/10.15290/ ose.2016.01.79.06
dc.relation.isbasedonMohammadi, H., & Su, L. (2010). International evidence on crude oil price dynamics: applications of ARIMA-GARCH models. Energy Economics, 32(5), 1001–1008. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.009
dc.relation.isbasedonMoskal, A., & Zawadzka, D. (2014). Investment in gold as an example of alternative investment – in the context of capital market in Poland. Economics and Management, 3, 330–343. https://dx.doi.org/10.12846/j. em.2014.03.23
dc.relation.isbasedonNielsen, M., & Sørensen, T. (2015). Has Gold lost its Safe-Haven Property? Aarhus: Economics and Business Economics.
dc.relation.isbasedonPedersen, C. S., & Satchell, S. E. (1998). An Extended Family of Financial Risk Measures. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 23(2), 89–117. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1008665926432
dc.relation.isbasedonPotrykus, M. (2015). Investment in gold – safe haven, security, or source of diversifi cation for a Polish investor. Science of Finance, 3(24), 193–207.
dc.relation.isbasedonRiskMetrics. (1996). RiskMetrics – Technical Document. New York, NY: J. P. Morgan.
dc.relation.isbasedonRobinson, P. M. (1995). Log-periodogram regression of time series with long range dependence. Annals of Statistics, 23(3), 1048–1072. https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/ aos/1176324636
dc.relation.isbasedonStock, J. H., & Watson, M. (2004). Combination Forecasts of Output Growth in Seven-Country Data Set. Journal of Forecasting, 23(6), 405–430. https://dx.doi. org/10.1002/for.928
dc.relation.isbasedonSzczerbak, G. (2017). The use of GARCH models in the analysis of the fi nancial risk of joint-stock companies listed on the GPW. Optimum. Economic studies, 3(87), 176–194.
dc.relation.isbasedonTarczyński, W., & Mojsiewicz, M. (2001). Risk management. Warsaw: PWE.
dc.relation.isbasedonTayefi , M., & Ramanathan, T. V. (2012). An overview of FIGARCH and Related Time Series Models. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 41(3), 175–196. https://dx.doi.org/10.17713/ ajs.v41i3.172
dc.relation.isbasedonThuraisamy, K. S., Sharma, S. S., & Ahmed, H. J. A. (2013). The relationship between Asian equity and commodity futures markets. Journal of Asian Economics, 28, 67–75. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.04.003
dc.relation.isbasedonTimmerman, A. (2006). Forecast Combi- nations. In Handbook of Economic Forecasting (Vol. 1, pp. 135–196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
dc.relation.isbasedonVivian, A., & Wohar, M. E. (2012). Commodity volatility breaks. Journal of International Finance Market, Institutions and Money, 22(2), 395–422. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.intfi n.2011.12.003
dc.relation.isbasedonWang, Y., Wu, C., & Wei, Y. (2011). Can GARCH-class models capture long memory in WTI crude oil markets? Econometric Models, 28(3), 921–927. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. econmod.2010.11.002
dc.relation.isbasedonWei, Y., Wang, Y., & Huang, D. (2010). Forecasting crude oil market volatility: further evidence using GARCH-class models. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1477–1484. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.009
dc.relation.isbasedonWilhelmsson, A. (2006). GARCH Forecasting Performance under Different Distribution Assumptions. Journal of Forecasting, 25(8), 561–578. https://dx.doi. org/10.1002/for.1009
dc.relation.isbasedonXekalaki, E., & Degiannakis, S. (2010). Arch models for fi nancial applications. Chichester: Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonZivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/073 50015.1992.10509904
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectforecastingen
dc.subjectprice volatilityen
dc.subjectcommodity marketen
dc.subjectrisk managementen
dc.subjectlong memory effecten
dc.subjectGARCH modelsen
dc.subject.classificationC53
dc.subject.classificationC58
dc.subject.classificationE37
dc.subject.classificationF37
dc.subject.classificationF65
dc.subject.classificationQ31
dc.titleEmpirical Analysis of Long Memory and Asymmetry Effects for the Effectiveness of Forecasting Volatility of Returns on the Commodity Market Based on the Example of Gold and Silveren
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage143
local.citation.spage126
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_2_2020_9
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume23
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2020_09.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 2