Space in Organisation and Management. Interdisciplinary Perspective in Modelling towards New Managerial Roles

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPachura, Piotr
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T08:54:20Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16T08:54:20Z
dc.description.abstractThe concept of space is a category that has been present in science since antiquity. Experiencing “spatiality” of the world was one of key experiences of human being throughout the development of Civilisation. Space was of primary concern to physicists, mathematicians, and philosophers of nature. Socio-economic sciences treated the issue of space primarily in terms of distance, possibly as a configuration of material objects. To a great extent, modernist interpretations of organisation and management processes have been limited to the relationship between “an organisation and its environment”. The concept of space is trapped in metaphor. It was assumed that if organisation by definition may be described without references to space, however the way organisation is functioning has always a reference to space. Simultaneously, organisations are increasingly struggling with different spaces, especially in the face of the “localness-globalness” dichotomy, or virtual and network spaces. This paper attempts to achieve an interdisciplinary conceptualisation of space issues in the context of organisation and management sciences. A conceptual innovative model of space dimensions for organizations was developed, identifying: (1) Organisational space; (2) Glocal space (between locality and globality); (3) Topical (contextual) space and (4) Cyberspace, so-called “Space Organisation Model” (SOM). In the latter part of the paper, a theoretical experiment based on deductive substantiation is presented which focuses on the meso-level, with a view to proposing new “spatial” managerial roles in organisations. The research logic presented in this paper, leading from wide interdisciplinary studies through construction of a conceptual model as the meta-level (SOM), to theoretical experiments at the micro-level (New Managerial Roles).en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-003
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2007-6005 Pachura, Piotr
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/153572
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAntolín-Lopez, R., Martinez-del-Rio, J., José, J., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Pérez-Valls, M. (2015). The choice of suitable cooperation partners for product innovation: Differences between new ventures and established companies. European Management Journal, 33(6), 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.09.002.
dc.relation.isbasedonBaudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904.
dc.relation.isbasedonBeard, C., & Price, I. (2010). Space, conversations and place: lessons and questions from organisational development. International Journal of Facility Management, 1(2), 1-14.
dc.relation.isbasedonBeichler, J. (1981). The Ancient Greek Concept of Space. Scientific Thought I, Fall.
dc.relation.isbasedonBillsberry, J., & Birnik, A. (2010). Management as a contextual practice: the need to blend science, skills and practical wisdom. Organization Management Journal, 7(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2010.15.
dc.relation.isbasedonBlake, A., & Moseley, J. (2011). Frederick Winslow Taylor: One Hundred Years of Managerial Insight. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 346-353.
dc.relation.isbasedonBolin, M., & Härenstam, A. (2008). An Empirical Study of Bureaucratic and Post-Bureaucratic Characteristics in 90 Workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 29(4), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X08096228.
dc.relation.isbasedonBoschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887.
dc.relation.isbasedonBrunet-Thornton, R., & Bureš, V. (2012). Cross-Cultural Management: Establishing A Czech Benchmark. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 15(3), 46-62.
dc.relation.isbasedonCannon, J., Floyd, W., Kenyon, W., & Parry, R. (1997). Hyperbolic Geometry. Flavors of Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarrincazeaux, C., Lung, Y., & Vicente, J. (2008). The scientific trajectory of the French school of proximity: interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 16(5), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802049117.
dc.relation.isbasedonCastells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
dc.relation.isbasedonCaygill, H. (1995). A Kant Dictionary. The Blackwell Philosopher Dictionaries. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonChan Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonChanlat, J-F. (2013). Space, Organisation and Management Thinking: a Socio-Historical Perspective. In S. Clegg & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Space, Organizations and Management Theory, Advances in Organization Studies. Frederiksberg: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonClegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (Eds.). (2013). Space, Organizations and Management Theory, Advances in Organization Studies. Frederiksberg: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonCoe, N. (2012). Geographies of production II. A global production network A–Z. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511402784.
dc.relation.isbasedonDale, K., & Burrell, G. (2007). The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.isbasedonDeprez, F., & Tissen, R. (2009). Creating Spatial Organizations. NRI Research Paper Series, 9(7), 1-55.
dc.relation.isbasedonDerksen, M. (2014). Turning men into machines? Scientific management, industrial psychology and the human factor. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21650.
dc.relation.isbasedonDescartes, R. (2008). Principles of Philosophy. New York: Barnes and Noble.
dc.relation.isbasedonFayol, H. (1979). Administration industrielle et générale. Paris: Dunod.
dc.relation.isbasedonFerraro, S. (2016). Frederick Taylor’s other Principles. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(11), 24-27.
dc.relation.isbasedonFlyverbom, M., Leonardi, P. M., Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2016). The management of visibilities in the digital age. International Journal of Communication, 10, 98-109.
dc.relation.isbasedonFoucault, M. (1984). Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, 46-49.
dc.relation.isbasedonFraassen van, B. (1985). An introduction to the philosophy of time and space. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonGentry, W., Harris, L., Baker, B., & Leslie, J. (2008). Managerial skills: what has changed since the late 1980s. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852506.
dc.relation.isbasedonGereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805.
dc.relation.isbasedonGiddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonGraeber, D. (2015). The Utopia of Rules. On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Brooklyn, London: Melville House Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonGreenberg, M. J. (1994). Euclidean and non-euclidean geometries. Development and history (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
dc.relation.isbasedonHalford, S. (2004). Towards a Sociology of Organizational Space. Sociological Research Online, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.885.
dc.relation.isbasedonHeinzmann, G., & Stump, D. (2014). Henri Poincaré. In N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University. Available from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/poincare/.
dc.relation.isbasedonHernes, T. (2004). Spatial Construction of Organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1075/aios.12.
dc.relation.isbasedonHughes, A., & Reimer, A. S. (2004). Geographies of Commodity Chains. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.20592/jaeg.51.1_131.
dc.relation.isbasedonHussey, E. (1983). Aristotle Physics Books III and IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonJones, A. (2009). Theorizing global business space. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 91(3), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00315.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonKačerauskas, T. (2016). The paradoxes of creativity management. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 19(4), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-4-003.
dc.relation.isbasedonKant, I. (1992). On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World. In Theoretical Philosophy (pp. 1755-1770) (D. Walford & R. Meerbote, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonKanter, R. M. (1989). The new managerial work. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 85-92.
dc.relation.isbasedonKornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2004). Bringing Space Back In: Organizing the Generative Building. Organization Studies 25(7), 1095-1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046312.
dc.relation.isbasedonLefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonLekanne Deprez, F., & Tissen, R. (2008). Towards a Spatial Theory of Organizations, Creating new organizational forms to improve business performance [NRG Working Paper No. 08-04]. Nyenrode: Nyenrode Business University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105664.
dc.relation.isbasedonLenz, B. (1997). Das Filière-Konzept als Analyseinstrument der organisatorischen und räumlichen Anordnung von Produktions und Distributionsprozessen. Geographische Zeitschrift, 85(1), 20-33.
dc.relation.isbasedonLorenzen, M. (2007). Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(4), 799-817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184752.
dc.relation.isbasedonMacInnis, D. (2011). A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136.
dc.relation.isbasedonMandelbrot, B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
dc.relation.isbasedonMassey, D. (2005). For Space. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.isbasedonMayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. Cambridge: Harvard.
dc.relation.isbasedonMintzberg, H. (2009). Managing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
dc.relation.isbasedonMintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation. Management Science, 18(2), 97-110.
dc.relation.isbasedonNewton, I. (1999). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Oakland: University of California Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonNonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of "Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942.
dc.relation.isbasedonNonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonPeaucelle, J.-L. (2000). From Taylorism to post‐Taylorism: Simultaneously pursuing several management objectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 452-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010377426.
dc.relation.isbasedonPrice, I. (2007). Lean assets: new language for new workplaces. California Management Review, 49(2), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166385.
dc.relation.isbasedonRopo, A., De Paoli, D., Solovaara, P., & Sauer, E. (2015). Why does space need to be taken seriously in leadership and organization studies and practice? In A. Ropo, P. Solovaara, D. De Paoli, & E. Sauer (Eds.), Leadership in spaces and places. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
dc.relation.isbasedonRoth, S., Sales, A., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2017). Multiplying the division of labor: Functional differentiation of the next key variables in management research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2452.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchachter, H. (2010). The role played by Frederick Taylor in the rise of the academic management fields. Journal of Management History, 16(4), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011073924.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchemmel, M. (2016). Historical Epistemology of Space: from Primate Cognition to Spacetime Physics. Cham, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25241-4.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchlunze, R., Agola, N., & Baber, W. (2012). Spaces of International Economy and Management. Launching New Perspectives on Management and Geography. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
dc.relation.isbasedonShafritz, J., Ott, S., & Jang, Y. (2010). Classics of Organization Theory. Boston: Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.isbasedonTaylor, F. W. (1967). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Norton Library.
dc.relation.isbasedonTaylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational space. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonTengblad, S. (2006). Is there a ‘new managerial work’? A comparison with Henry Mintzberg’s classic study 30 years later. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1437-1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00651.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonVaujany, de F. X., & Mitev, N. (2013). Introduction: Space in Organisation and Sociomateriality. In F. X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices (pp. 1-21). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_1.
dc.relation.isbasedonWeber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonWhetten, D. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371.
dc.relation.isbasedonVetráková, M., & Smerek, L. (2016). Diagnosing Organizational Culture in National and Intercultural Context. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 19(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-1-005.
dc.relation.isbasedonYeung, H. W.-C., & Coe, N. (2014). Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12063.
dc.relation.isbasedonZhang, Z., Spicer, A., & Hancock, P. (2008). Hyper-organizational space in the work of J. G. Ballard. Organization, 15(6), 889-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408095819.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectspaceen
dc.subjectorganisationen
dc.subjectmanagementen
dc.subjectconceptualisationen
dc.subjectontology of spaceen
dc.subjectmanagerial rolesen
dc.subject.classificationC9
dc.subject.classificationD23
dc.subject.classificationM1
dc.subject.classificationO31
dc.subject.classificationM21
dc.subject.classificationE71
dc.titleSpace in Organisation and Management. Interdisciplinary Perspective in Modelling towards New Managerial Rolesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage50
local.citation.spage36
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2019_03
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume22
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2019_03.pdf
Size:
596.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3