JOB STANDARDIZATION AND DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR

dc.contributor.authorMao, Hsiao-Yen
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T07:58:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T07:58:20Z
dc.description.abstractFacing fiercely competitive global environments, organizations use widespread mass production of goods and services for lower cost and larger market shares for survival and growth. Thus, a job design and characteristic of standardization has long been adopted and recognized to be essential for the competitiveness of organizations by sustaining output consistency, effectiveness and efficiency. However, Keeley (1988) maintained that organizations have a fundamental tension between the goal of efficiency and the goal of morality and struggle for a delicate balance between these competing objectives. This tension elicits the question whether job standardization relates to deviant workplace behavior (DWB), which is immoral, pervasive in the workplace and harmful to organizational competitiveness. Using conservation of resources theory as an underlying explanation, this study developed an interesting theoretical model that specified how and why job standardization enhances DWB directed at the organization (DWB-O) and attenuates DWB directed at organizational members/individuals (DWB-I). Three-wave panel survey data were collected from 283 employees with various occupations. Empirical results found job standardization evokes employee boredom, which, in turn, translates into increased DWB-O and decreased DWB-I, suggesting employees’ concern for workplace relationships. With job design of standardization, organizations can use the influence of coworkers to stifle DWB-O. This study extends and shifts the understanding of job standardization consequences from the side of employee positive behavior to the side of negative behavior. DWB literature on situational antecedents, focusing on the organizational systems/social context and theory, is enriched by invoking a job perspective of standardization and resource theory.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2022-3-006
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/166031
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAndersson, L., Lindebaum, D., Chamberlain, J., Greenwood, M., & den Hond, F. (2019). Freedom, work and organizations in the 21st century: Freedom for whom and for whose purpose? Human Relations, 73(8), 1398–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720938623
dc.relation.isbasedonBiolcati, R., & Mancini, G. (2018). Proneness to Boredom and Risk Behaviors During Adolescents’ Free Time. Psychological Reports, 121(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117724447
dc.relation.isbasedonBrehm, J. W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonBrooks, B. A., & Anderson, M. A. (2005). Defining quality of nursing work life. Nurse Economics, 23(6), 319–326.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, L. C., Niu, H. J., Wang, Y. D., Yang, C., & Tsaur, S. H. (2009). Does job standardization increase organizational citizenship behavior? Public Personnel Management, 38(3), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600903800303
dc.relation.isbasedonChullen, C. L., Dunford, B. B., Angermeier, I., Boss, R. W., & Boss, A. D. (2010). Minimizing Deviant Behavior in Healthcare Organizations: The Effects of Supportive Leadership and Job Design. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(6), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-201011000-00004
dc.relation.isbasedonColquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.09.001
dc.relation.isbasedonDe Treville, S., Antonakis, J., & Edelson, N. M. (2005). Can standard operating procedures be motivating? Reconciling process variability and behavioural outcomes. Total Quality Management, 16(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500054236
dc.relation.isbasedonEisenberger, R., Shoss, M. K., Karagonlar, G., Morales, M. G. G., Wickham, R. E., & Buffardi, L. C. (2014). The supervisor POS–LMX–subordinate POS chain: Moderation by reciprocation wariness and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1877
dc.relation.isbasedonEschleman, K. J., Bowling, N. A., & LaHuis, D. (2015). The moderating effects of personality on the relationship between change in work stressors and change in counterproductive work behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 656–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12090
dc.relation.isbasedonFiske, S. T. (2004). Chapter 4: Developing a Program of Research. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 71–90). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976190.n4
dc.relation.isbasedonFornell, C. (1982). A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Methods. New York, NY: Praeger.
dc.relation.isbasedonGame, A. M. (2007). Workplace boredom coping: health, safety and HR implications. Personnel Review, 36(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710774007
dc.relation.isbasedonGkorezis, P., & Kastritsi, A. (2017). Employee expectations and intrinsic motivation: work-related boredom as a mediator. Employee Relations, 39(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2016-0025
dc.relation.isbasedonGkorezis, P., & Vatou, A. (2018). Perceived overqualification and organisational cynicism: The role of work- related boredom and empowering leadership. International Journal of Employment Studies, 26(1), 93–112.
dc.relation.isbasedonHarju, L. J., & Hakanen, J. J. (2016). An employee who was not there: a study of job boredom in white-collar work. Personnel Review, 45(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2015-0125
dc.relation.isbasedonHarvey, R. J., Billings, R. S., & Nilan, K. J. (1985). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Good news and bad news. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.461
dc.relation.isbasedonHobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513
dc.relation.isbasedonHobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
dc.relation.isbasedonHogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249–279). Blackwell Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonHoudek, P., & Koblovský, P. (2017). Behavioural Economics of Organization: Employees and Managers. E&M Economics and Management, 20(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-1-001
dc.relation.isbasedonHsieh, Y. M., & Hsieh, A. T. (2003). Does job standardization increase job burnout? International Journal of Manpower, 24(5), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720310491107
dc.relation.isbasedonJelinek, R., & Ahearne, M. (2006). The Enemy within: Examining Salesperson Deviance and its Determinants. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134260401
dc.relation.isbasedonJuillerat, T. L. (2010). Friends, not foes?: Work design and formalization in the modern work context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.654
dc.relation.isbasedonKaratepe, O., Avci, T., & Arasli, H. (2004). Effects of Job Standardization and Job Satisfaction on Service Quality: A Study of Frontline Employees in Northern Cyprus. Services Marketing Quarterly, 25(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J396v25n03_01
dc.relation.isbasedonKasiri, L. A., Cheng, K. T. G., Sambasivan, M., & Sidin, S. M. (2017). Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.007
dc.relation.isbasedonKeeley, M. (1988). A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations (SOUNDINGS). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonKim, H., Woo, E., Uysal, M., & Kwon, N. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee well-being in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1584–1600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2016-0166
dc.relation.isbasedonKim, J. J., Park, J., Sohn, Y. W., & Lim, J. I. (2019). Perceived Overqualification, Boredom, and Extra-Role Behaviors: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Career Development, 48(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319853879
dc.relation.isbasedonKish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103
dc.relation.isbasedonKoval, O., Nabareseh, S., & Chromjaková, F. (2019). Standardization in Services: Assessing the Impact on Customer Satisfaction. E&M Economics and Management, 22(3), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-012
dc.relation.isbasedonKrištofík, P., Lament, M., & Musa, H. (2016). The Reporting of Non-financial Information and the Rationale for Its Standardization. E&M Economics and Management, 19(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-011
dc.relation.isbasedonLi, J., Sekiguchi, T., & Qi, J. (2020). When and why skill variety influences employee job crafting: Regulatory focus and social exchange perspectives. Employee Relations, 42(3), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2019-0240
dc.relation.isbasedonLoukidou, L., Loan-Clarke, J., & Daniels, K. (2009). Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00267.x
dc.relation.isbasedonLuoh, H., Tsaur, S., & Tang, Y. (2014). Empowering employees: job standardization and innovative behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(7), 1100–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2013-0153
dc.relation.isbasedonMadsen, P. E. (2011). How Standardized is Accounting? The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1679–1708. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10102
dc.relation.isbasedonMarasi, S., Bennett, R. J., & Budden, H. (2018). The Structure of an Organization: Does It Influence Workplace Deviance and Its’ Dimensions? And to What Extent? Journal of Managerial Issues, 30(1), 8–28.
dc.relation.isbasedonMao, H. Y., & Hsieh, A. T. (2013). Perceived job insecurity and workplace friendship. European Journal of International Management, 7(6), 646–670. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2013.057113
dc.relation.isbasedonMathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational Inferences in Organizational Research: Then, Now, and Beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107310089
dc.relation.isbasedonMayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. M., Dijke, M. V., & Cremer, D. D. (2012). Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
dc.relation.isbasedonMitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
dc.relation.isbasedonMoenaert, R. K., & Souder, W. E. (1990). An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(90)90052-G
dc.relation.isbasedonMoore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 235–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1011522
dc.relation.isbasedonMorgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2005). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
dc.relation.isbasedonMulki, J. P, Jaramillo, F., & Locander, W. B. (2006). Emotional exhaustion and organizational deviance: Can the right job and a leader’s style make a difference? Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.001
dc.relation.isbasedonNeves, P., & Champion, S. (2015). Core self-evaluations and workplace deviance: The role of resources and self-regulation. European Management Journal, 33(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.06.001
dc.relation.isbasedonNg, K.-Y., Ang, S., & Chan, K.-Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733
dc.relation.isbasedonNg, T. S. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.754
dc.relation.isbasedonOgunfowora, B. (2013). When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1841
dc.relation.isbasedonOhly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.376
dc.relation.isbasedonOprea, B., Iliescu, D., Burtăverde, V., & Dumitrache, M. (2019). Personality and boredom at work: the mediating role of job crafting. Career Development International, 24(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2018-0212
dc.relation.isbasedonPodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
dc.relation.isbasedonPulich, M., & Tourigny, L. (2004). Workplace Deviance: Strategies for Modifying Employee Behavior. The Health Care Manager, 23(4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200410000-00002
dc.relation.isbasedonShalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2017). Creativity and the Management of Technology: Balancing Creativity and Standardization. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12639
dc.relation.isbasedonSkarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.5465/256877
dc.relation.isbasedonSpector, P., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. In S. Fox, & P. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007
dc.relation.isbasedonSulphey, M. M., Alanzi, A. A., & Klepek, M. (2021). Development and Standardization of a Tool to Measure Knowledge of Labour Laws among Employees. E&M Economics and Management, 24(4), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-006
dc.relation.isbasedonTangirala, S., & Alge, B. J. (2006). Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.002
dc.relation.isbasedonTaylor, P., & Bain, P. (2003). ‘Subterranean Worksick Blues’: Humour as Subversion in Two Call Centres. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1487–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603249008
dc.relation.isbasedonThau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.250
dc.relation.isbasedonThau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003
dc.relation.isbasedonTsai, C. J. (2016). Boredom at Work and Job Monotony: An Exploratory Case Study within the Catering Sector. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27(2), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21249
dc.relation.isbasedonVelasco, F. (2017). Understanding Workplace Boredom among Service Employees: Qualitative Insights and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29(3), 278–293.
dc.relation.isbasedonVelez, M. J., & Neves, P. (2016). Abusive supervision, psychosomatic symptoms, and deviance: Can job autonomy make a difference? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039959
dc.relation.isbasedonVveinhardt, J., & Štreimikienė, D. (2017). Demographic, Social and Organizational Characteristics on the Levels of Mobbing and Single Cases of Harassment: The Multicomplex Approach. E&M Economics and Management, 20(3), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-3-004
dc.relation.isbasedonWeiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of The Structure, Cause and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonWong, S., DeSanctics, G., & Staudenmayer, N. (2007). The Relationship Between Task Interdependency and Role Stress: A Revisit of the Job Demands–Control Model. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00689.x
dc.relation.isbasedonWu, M. L. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling – AMOS Operation and Application (2nd ed.). Taipei: Wunanbooks.
dc.relation.isbasedonWu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership: from her to where? In H. Xu, & M. H. Bond (Eds.), The Handbook of Chinese Organizational Behavior: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonZakay, D. (2014). Psychological time as information: the case of boredom. Frontier in Psychology, 5, 917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00917
dc.relation.isbasedonZhang, C., Mayer, D. M., & Hwang, E. B. (2018). More is less: Learning but not relaxing buffers deviance under job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000264
dc.relation.isbasedonZheng, X., Qin, X., Liu, X., & Liao, H. (2019). Will Creative Employees Always Make Trouble? Investigating the Roles of Moral Identity and Moral Disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3683-3
dc.relation.isbasedonZimmerman, J. (2001). The Effects of Bureaucratization on Corruption, Deviant and Unethical Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(1), 119–128.
dc.relation.isbasedonZoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., & Sharifiatashgah, M. (2019). The emerge ce of deviant behaviors in the physical work environment: A study of workers in open offices. International Journal of Manpower, 40(5), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2018-0307
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectjob standardizationen
dc.subjectdeviant workplace behavioren
dc.subjectemployee boredomen
dc.subjectconservation of resourcesen
dc.subject.classificationM12
dc.subject.classificationM54
dc.titleJOB STANDARDIZATION AND DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage105
local.citation.spage88
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2022_6
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume25
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2022_06.pdf
Size:
531.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections