Evaluation of egovernment and good governance development in EU member countries

Title Alternative:Zhodnocení rozvoje eGovernmentu a dobré správy v členských zemích EU
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorArdielli, Eva
dc.contributor.authorVavrek, Roman
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T08:58:05Z
dc.date.available2019-10-10T08:58:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractDobrá správa věcí veřejných (Good Governance) je současný trend ve veřejné správě na celém světě. Zdůrazňuje efektivitu, otevřenost a transparentnost v řízení veřejných záležitostí. Důležitým faktorem dobré správy je aplikace ICT ve veřejné správě a rozšiřování eGovernmentu jako progresivního prvku modernizace veřejné správy. Příspěvek je zaměřen na zhodnocení vzájemné závislosti mezi eGovernmentem a rozvojem Good Governance v zemích Evropské unie (EU). Vzájemná závislost proměnných je zkoumána na základě hodnocení eGovernmentu pomocí metod multikriteriálního rozhodování (metoda TOPSIS) na základě hodnot indexu WGI sledovaného a zpracovávaného Světovou bankou. Na základě využití korelační a regresní analýzy byla potvrzena vzájemná závislost mezi eGovernmentem a rozvojem Good Governance v členských zemích EU.cs
dc.description.abstractGood Governance ist ein aktueller Trend in der öffentlichen Verwaltung weltweit. Dieser Trend betont Effizienz, Offenheit und Transparenz im Public-Affairs-Management. Ein wichtiger Faktor für Good Governance ist die Anwendung von ICT in der öffentlichen Verwaltung und die Ausweitung von e-Government als fortschrittlichem Element der Modernisierung der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Der Artikel befasst sich mit der Bewertung der Interdependenz zwischen e-Government und Good Governance in den Ländern der Europäischen Union (EU). Die Abhängigkeit der Variablen wird auf der Grundlage der E- Government-Bewertung unter Verwendung von Entscheidungsverfahren mit mehreren Kriterien (TOPSIS-Methode) untersucht, die auf WGI-Indexwerten basieren, die von der Weltbank überwacht und verarbeitet werden. Basierend auf der Korrelations- und Regressionsanalyse wurde die Interdependenz zwischen e-Government und der Entwicklung von Good Governance in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten bestätigt.de
dc.description.abstractGood Governance is a contemporary trend in public administration worldwide. It emphasizes efficiency, openness and transparency in the management of public affairs. An important factor of Good Governance is the application of ICT in public administration and the expansion of eGovernment, as a progressive element of the modernization of public administration. The presented article is focused on the evaluation of the interdependence between eGovernment and the development of Good Governance in the European Union (EU) countries. The interdependence of variables is examined based on the results of eGovernment evaluation model using multicriterial decision-making (MCDM) methods (TOPSIS method) and the values of WGI index monitored and processed by the World Bank. Based on the use of correlation and regression analysis, the interdependency between eGovernment and Good Governance development in EU member countries was confirmed.en
dc.description.abstractDobre rządzenie (Good Governance) to aktualny trend w administracji publicznej na całym świecie. Trend ten podkreśla skuteczność, otwartość i przejrzystość w zarządzaniu sprawami publicznymi. Ważnym czynnikiem dobrego rządzenia jest stosowanie ICT w administracji publicznej oraz rozwój e-administracji jako postępowego elementu modernizacji administracji publicznej. Artykuł skupia się na ocenie współzależności pomiędzy administracją elektroniczną a rozwojem dobrego rządzenia w krajach Unii Europejskiej (UE). Współzależność zmiennych jest badana na podstawie oceny eGovernment przy użyciu metod wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji (metoda TOPSIS) w oparciu o wartości wskaźnika WGI badanego i opracowywanego przez Bank Światowy. Na podstawie analizy korelacji i regresji potwierdzono współzależność między administracją elektroniczną a rozwojem dobrego rządzenia w państwach członkowskich UE.pl
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/004/2019-2-001
dc.identifier.eissn1803-9790
dc.identifier.issn1803-9782
dc.identifier.otherACC_2019_2_01
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/153864
dc.language.isoen
dc.licenseCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Liberci, Česká republikacs
dc.relation.isbasedonACCENTURE: eGovernment Leadership: Rhetoric vs Reality – Closing the Gap. [online]. 2001. [accessed 2015-07-20]. Available from WWW: http://afyonluoglu.org/PublicWebFiles/eGovBenchmark/ACC/2001-Accenture.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonAGERE, S.: Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives. Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 2000. ISBN 978-0-85092-629-3.
dc.relation.isbasedonALENEZI, H.; TARHINI, A.; SHARMA, S. K.: Development of quantitative model to investigate the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 2015. 9(3), 324–351. ISSN 1750-6166. DOI: 10.1108/TG-01-2015-0004
dc.relation.isbasedonARDIELLI, E.; HALÁSKOVÁ, M.: Assessment of E-government in EU countries.Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 4-16. ISSN 1211555X.
dc.relation.isbasedonARDIELLI, E.; HALÁSKOVÁ, M.: Evaluation of Good Governance in EU countries. Acta academica karviniensia. 2015. 15(3), 5-17. ISSN 1212-415X. DOI: 10.25142/aak.2015.027
dc.relation.isbasedonBHUTIA, P. W.; PHIPON, R.: Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem. Journal of Engineering. 2012. 2(10), 43-50, ISSN 2278-8719. DOI: 10.9790/3021-021034350
dc.relation.isbasedonCAPGEMINI: The User Challenge Benchmarking the Supply of Online Public Services. [online]. 2007. [accessed 2015-07-21]. Available from WWW: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9b1d1b48-9c1d-453a86a6-9e1caf7b6d98/language-en
dc.relation.isbasedonCHARRON, N.; DIJKSTRA, L.; LAPUENTE, V.: Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Social Indicators Research. 2015. 122(2), 315-346. ISSN 0303-8300. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
dc.relation.isbasedonCLAGUE, Ch. et al.: Contract-Intensive Money: Contract Enforcement, Property Rights, and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Growth. 1999. 4(2), 185-211. ISSN 1381-4338. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009854405184
dc.relation.isbasedonCOURT, J.; HYDEN, G.: World Governance Survey: a new approach to assessing governance. [online]. 2003. [accessed 2015-02-12]. Available from WWW: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4084.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonHAMMERSCHMID, G.: Decentralisation and Accountability as Focus of Public Administration Modernisation: A Comparative European Perspective. In: Hermann Hill (Hrsg.) Modernizing Government in Europe. pp. 255-271. 2006. ISBN print 978-3- 8329-2799-8. ISBN online 978-3-8452-0343-0. DOI: 10.5771/9783845203430-255
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROPEAN COMMISSION: EU eGovernment Report 2014 shows that usability of online public services is improving, but not fast. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-02-16]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/euegovernment-report-2014-shows-usability-online-public-services-improving-not-fast
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROPEAN COMMISSION: The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). [online]. 2019. [accessed 2016-09-11]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/desi
dc.relation.isbasedonCAPGEMINI: Delivering on the European advantage? - ‘How European governments can and should benefit from innovative public services’, eGovernment benchmark. 2014. ISBN 978-92-79-38052-5. DOI: 10.2759/4919. ISBN 978-92-79-38051-8. DOI: 10.2759/48856.
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROSTAT: Statistical database. [online]. 2013. [accessed 2015-02-20]. Available from WWW: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROSTAT. Statistical database. [online]. 2016. [accessed 2015-03-22]. Available from WWW: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database?node_code=isoc_ciegi_sat
dc.relation.isbasedonGRÖNLUND, Å.: Connecting eGovernment to Real Government - The Failure of the UN eParticipation Index. In: Electronic Government. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. pp. 26-37. ISBN print 978-3-642-22877-3. ISBN online 978-3-642-22878-0. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_3
dc.relation.isbasedonHALDENWANG, Ch. Von: Electronic Government (E-Government) and Development. The European Journal of Development Research. 2004. 16(2), 417-432, ISSN 0957- 8811. DOI: 10.1080/0957881042000220886
dc.relation.isbasedonZOLFANI, S. H.; ANTUCHEVICIENE, J.: Team Member Selecting Based on AHP and TOPSIS Grey. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics. 2012. 23(4), 425- 434. ISSN 1392-2785. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.23.4.2725
dc.relation.isbasedonKETTANI, D.; MOULIN, B.: E-government for Good Governance in developingmcountries: Empirical Evidence from the eFez Project. Anthem Press, London, 2015. ISBN 978-0-85728-125-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonKLENK, T.; NULLMEIER, F.: Public Governance als Reforms Strategie. Edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 97. Düsseldorf, 2004. ISBN 3-935145-72-1.
dc.relation.isbasedonKRISHNAN, S.; TEO, T.; LIM, J.: Electronic Services of eGovernment in the European Union Countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2010. 15(17), 138-150. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedonLNĚNIČKA, M.: E-government Development Index and its Comparison in the EU Member States. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 75-87. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedonMÁCHOVÁ, R.: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model for the Evaluation of the Egovernment Development. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. 2015. 22(34), 88-100. ISSN 1211-555X.
dc.relation.isbasedonMADZOVA, V.; SAJNOSKI, K.; DAVCEV, L.: E-Government as an Efficient Tool towards Good Governance. Balkan Social Science Review. 2013. 1, 157-174, ISSN 1857-8799.
dc.relation.isbasedonMOHAMMED, F.; IBRAHIM, O.: Refining E-government Readiness Index by Cloud Computing. Jurnal Teknologi. 2013. 65(1), 23-34. ISSN 1979-3405. DOI: 10.11113/jt.v65.1759
dc.relation.isbasedonNORRIS, P.: Digital divide: Civic engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet in Democratic Societies. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. ISBN 978-0521002233.
dc.relation.isbasedonNORTH, C. D.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. ISBN 9780521397346.
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD: OECD E-Government Project – Benefits Realisation Management. [online].2006. [accessed 2015-06-25]. Available from WWW: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=GOV/PGC/EGOV(2006)11/REV1&docLanguage=En
dc.relation.isbasedonO’CONNELL, K. A.: Computerizing Government: The Next Generation. The American City & County Journal. 2003. 118(8). ISSN 0149-337X.
dc.relation.isbasedonOLSON, D. L.: Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2004. 40(7-8), 721-727, ISSN 0895-7177. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
dc.relation.isbasedonPOTŮČEK, M. et al.: Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. Grada, a.s., Praha, 2007. ISBN 978-80-247-2126-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonRORISSA, A.; DEMISSIE, D.; PARDO, T.: Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly. 2011. 28(3), 354-362. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006
dc.relation.isbasedonSHIH, H.-S.; SHYUR, H.-J.; LEE, E. S.: An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2007. 45(7-8), 801-813. ISSN 0895-7177. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
dc.relation.isbasedonPRADA, L. T.; PINA, V.; ROYO, S.: E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/14684520510628918 [online]. [accessed 2015-03-22]. Available from WWW: http://www.dteconz.unizar.es/DT2005-01.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonUNITED NATIONS: United Nations E-Government Survey 2014. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-08-02]. Available from WWW:https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey2014
dc.relation.isbasedonUNITED NATIONS. Responsive and Accountable Public Governance. ISBN 978-92-1-123196-0. [online]. 2015. [accessed 2016-09-22]. Available from WWW: http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN95253.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonUNITED NATIONS: UN Data Center – E-Government Development Index. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016- 08-02]. Available from WWW: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/enus/Data-Center
dc.relation.isbasedonVAVREK, R.; KOTULIČ, R.; ADAMIŠIN, P.: Topsis Method and Its Application to the Local Self-Government of the Slovak Republic. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2014. 9(3), 504-512. ISSN 18436110.
dc.relation.isbasedonVAVREK, R., KOTULIČ, R.; ADAMIŠIN, P.: Evaluation of MunicipalitiesnManagement with the Topsis Technique Emphasising on the Impact of Weights of Established Criteria. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government. 2015. 13(2), 249-264. ISSN 1581-5374. DOI: 10.4335/249-264(2015)
dc.relation.isbasedonWASEDA UNIVERSITY: IAC International E-Government Ranking Survey. [online].2015. [accessed 2018-10-02]. Available from WWW: http://www.egov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2015_Waseda_IAC_E-Government_Press_Release.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonWEST, D. M.: E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review. 2004. 64(1), 15-27. ISSN 0033-3352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
dc.relation.isbasedonWORLD BANK: Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online]. 2014. [accessed 2016-04-05]. Available from WWW: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
dc.relation.isbasedonYOON, K. P.; HWANG, Ch.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage, California, 1995. ISBN 9780803954861.
dc.relation.isbasedonZANGER, S. C.: Good Governance and European Aid: The Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics. 2000. 1(3), 293-317. ISSN 1741-2757. DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001003002
dc.relation.ispartofACC Journalen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.subjecte-governmenten
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.subjectevaluationen
dc.subjectgood governanceen
dc.subjectpublic administrationen
dc.titleEvaluation of egovernment and good governance development in EU member countriesen
dc.title.alternativeZhodnocení rozvoje eGovernmentu a dobré správy v členských zemích EUcs
dc.title.alternativeBewertung der eGovernment und Good Governance Entwicklung in den Mitgliedstaaten der EUde
dc.title.alternativeOcena rozwoju egovernment i dobrego rządzenia w krajach członkowskich UEpl
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage20
local.citation.spage7
local.fulltextyesen
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume25
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ACC_2019_2_01.pdf
Size:
563.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
2019/2 - Science of Economics