Policies to promote Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and assessment of CSR impacts
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Jintao | |
dc.contributor.author | Ren, Licheng | |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Wenfang | |
dc.contributor.author | He, Yifan | |
dc.contributor.author | Streimikis, Justas | |
dc.contributor.other | Ekonomická fakulta | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-15 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept is linked to the company’s responsibility for its impact on the society. The CSR is important for sustainability, competitiveness and innovation of the economy of each country and is tightly linked to the success in approaching Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by the world countries. SDGs provide many benefits and opportunities for companies and in terms of risk management, increase the access to capital, improvement of stakeholders’ relationships etc. The literature on CSR has shifted from analysing the questions on whether companies should engage in societal challenges to whether and how countries and people benefit from these interventions in addressing sustainable development challenges, such as poverty, education, health, energy and environment. The recent scientific discussion on the assessment of CSR impacts provides contradictory results and findings. Therefore, this paper aims to shed more light on this issue and provide clear policy recommendations based on the conducted analysis. The paper analyses and compares the main policies that are aiming at the promotion of CSR, including reporting initiatives and requirements. The measures to assess the impact of CSR are discussed as well based on various reporting incentives that are guiding companies on how to assess and actually measure the effects of their activities by setting quantitative indicators. The dynamics of socially responsible companies and sustainability reporting initiatives are provided by indicating the effectiveness of the implemented policies and other initiatives to promote the CSR; however; the main emphasis of the paper is the impact of CSR on the societal challenges such as Sustainable Development Goals and integration of SDGs in the CSR assessment. | en |
dc.format | text | |
dc.format.extent | 17 stran | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/001/2019-1-006 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2336-5604 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1212-3609 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/151423 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Technická Univerzita v Liberci | cs |
dc.publisher | Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic | en |
dc.publisher.abbreviation | TUL | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Albareda, L. (2007). Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9514-1. Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2013). Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility Policies. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1922-1927. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.014. Aspelund, A., Fjell, L., & Rødland, S. E. (2017). Doing Good and Doing Well? International Entrepreneurship and Social Responsibility. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(2), 13-32. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don’t Know about Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079. Baron, D. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2001.00007.x. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2018). SDG Index and Dashboards Reports; A Global Report. New York, US. Retrieved from http://sdgindex.org/reports/2018/. Cahan, S. F., de Villiers, C., Jeter, D. C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2016). Are CSR Disclosures Value Relevant? Cross-Country Evidence. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 579-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1064009. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 19-46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412-1425. https://doi.org/10.1086/680089. Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2018). Does Institutional Context Affect CSR Disclosure? A Study on Eurostoxx 50. Sustainability, 10(8), 2823. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082823. Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2016). The Grammar of Decoupling: Stakeholder Heterogeneity and Firm Decoupling of Sustainability Practices. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 705-729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0171. Desai, V. (2016). Under the Radar: Regulatory Collaborations and Their Selective Use to Facilitate Organizational Compliance. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 636-657. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0943. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10218. Eccles, R. G., Perkins, K. M., & Serafeim, G. (2012). How to Become a Sustainable Company. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 43-50. Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environment and Economic Impacts. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-Level Institutions, Firm Value, and the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 360-385. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.4. García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016). Impact of the Institutional Macro Context on the Voluntary Disclosure of CSR Information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004. Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the Immeasurable? Constructing an Index of CSR Practices and CSR Performance in 20 Countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003. Halkos, G., & Skouloudis, A. (2016). Cultural Dimensions and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Cross-Country Analysis [Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No. 69222]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69222/1/MPRA_paper_69222.pdf. Hamner, B. (2005). Integrating Market-Based Sustainability Indicators and Performance Management Systems. Seattle, WA: Cleaner Production International. Hategan, C.-D., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R.-I., & Hategan, V.-P. (2018). Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies. Sustainability, 10, 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041041. Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ekonomie a Management | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Economics and Management | en |
dc.relation.isrefereed | true | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC | |
dc.subject | corporate social responsibility | en |
dc.subject | sustainable development goals | en |
dc.subject | policies to promote CSR | en |
dc.subject | impacts of CSR | en |
dc.subject.classification | M14 | |
dc.subject.classification | Q56 | |
dc.title | Policies to promote Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and assessment of CSR impacts | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
local.access | open | |
local.citation.epage | 98 | |
local.citation.spage | 82 | |
local.faculty | Faculty of Economics | |
local.filename | EM_1_2019_06 | |
local.fulltext | yes | |
local.relation.abbreviation | E+M | cs |
local.relation.abbreviation | E&M | en |
local.relation.issue | 1 | |
local.relation.volume | 22 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- EM_1_2019_06.pdf
- Size:
- 1.01 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- článek