Determinants of the impact of ESG policy and corporate governance on employee rights

dc.contributor.authorLi, Chiao-Ming
dc.contributor.authorLee, Joe-Ming
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.description.abstractTo comply with international development trends in recent years, Taiwanese government agencies have formulated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) legal policies and strengthened publicity for listed firms to prepare sustainability reports. Government agencies are trying to use ESG legal policies to gradually guide firms to take environmental, social, and governance measures and move toward sustainable operations. However, employee rights were easier for firms to ignore in the past, so paying attention to the correlation between employee rights and organizational governance is necessary. This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the organizational governance and employee turnover rate of Taiwanese food firms in the ten years from 2011 to 2021 through a panel regression model. The results show that there is a U-shaped relationship between board size and employee turnover. There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the development of major shareholders’ shareholding and the strength of human resources. The research results show that organizational governance is significantly related to employee turnover. Finally, this paper believes that paying attention to human resources will contribute to the sustainable development of enterprises. Therefore, in terms of organizational governance policies, although government agencies have formulated relevant reference standards, firms should have functions more conducive to developing human resource measures. These functions include utilizing the guiding energy of the board of directors functions, and shareholding structure design, which will further help the stable development of human resources. Firms need high-quality human resources to make breakthroughs in technology or the market. Therefore, when firms cultivate high-quality human resources, they not only rely on employee welfare conditions but consider long-term organizational governance and human resource development as necessary planning conditions. These factors will drive firms to have the ability to break through the status quo, value all stakeholders, and create an attitude toward sustainable business development.en
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.relation.isbasedonAbe, M. (2002). Corporate governance structure and employment adjustment in Japan: An empirical analysis using corporate finance data. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 41(4), 683–702. https:// Abe, N., & Shimizutani, S. (2007). Employment policy and corporate governance— An empirical comparison of the stakeholder and the profit-maximization model. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(2), 346–368. https:// Bassett, G., & Koenker, R. (1978). Asymptotic theory of least absolute error regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 622(363), 10480065. 01621459.1978.10480065 Bernacchio, C. (2015). Rival versions of corporate governance as rival theories of agency. Philosophy of Management, 14(1), 67–76. Campbell, B. A., Ganco, M., Franco, A. M., & Agarwal, R. (2012). Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee turnover, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 65–87. Chen, M. Y., & Kao, C. L. (2022). Women on boards of directors and firm performance: The mediation of employment downsizing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(13), 2597–2629. 10.1080/09585192.2020.1867617 Chiu, H. H., Zhu, Y. Q., & Fonda, W. (2021). Employee turnover and innovation: The role of turnover rate and network centrality. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(09), 2150102. 919621501024 Cho, J. (2005). Human resource management, corporate governance structure and corporate performance in Korea: A comparative analysis of Japan, US and Korea. Japan and the World Economy, 17(4), 417–430. https:// Croucher, R., & Miles, L. (2010). Corporate governance and employees in South Africa. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 10(2), 367–389. De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public firms in Europe. Sustainability, 12(13), 5317. https://doi. org/10.3390/su12135317 Dore, R. (2005). Deviant or different? Corporate governance in Japan and Germany. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3), 437–446. 8683.2005.00438.x Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https:// Grossman, W. (2010). The influence of board monitoring, executive incentives, and corporate strategy on employment stability. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22(1), 45–64. 009-9101-y Han, S., & Kim, C. (2020). Employment stability and corporate innovation. Applied Economics Letters, 27(21), 1722–1725. https://doi. org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1716936 Han, S., & Kim, C. (2021). Employment stability and corporate cash holdings. Applied Economics Letters, 29(21), 1991–1995. https:// Harsch, K., & Festing, M. (2020). Dynamic talent management capabilities and organizational agility – A qualitative exploration. Human Resource Management, 59(1), 43–61. https:// Hrazdil, K., Kim, J. B., & Li, X. (2021). What shapes CSR performance? Evidence from the changing enforceability of non-compete agreements in the United States. Review of Financial Economics, 39(3), 334–359. 10.1002/rfe.1132 John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371–403. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00005-3 Kocmanová, A., & Šimberová, I. (2014). Determination of environmental, social and corporate governance indicators: Framework in the measurement of sustainable performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 1017–1033. 16111699.2013.791637 Lo, F. Y., & Liao, P. C. (2021). Rethinking financial performance and corporate sustainability: Perspectives on resources and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120346. j.techfore.2020.120346 Michie, J., & Oughton, C. (2002). Employee participation and ownership rights. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2(1), 139–154. https:// Montani, F., Vandenberghe, C., Khedhaouria, A., & Courcy, F. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73(1), 59–93. https://doi. org/10.1177/0018726718819055 Muthusamy, S., Bobinski, P. A., & Jawahar, D. (2011). Toward a strategic role for employees in corporate governance. Strategic Change, 20(3–4), 127–138. 10.1002/jsc.890 Roberts, J., & Steen, E. (2001). Human capital and corporate governance. In Corporate governance (pp. 128–144). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171–190. 8551.12237 Taiwan Stock Exchange. (2021). Taiwan Stock Exchange corporation rules governing the preparation and filing of sustainability reports by listed firms. Taiwan Stock Exchange. Taiwan Stock Exchange. (2022a). Corporate social responsibility best practice principles for listed firms. Taiwan Stock Exchange. https:// aspx?FID=FL100318 Taiwan Stock Exchange. (2022b). Sustainable development best practice principles for listed firms. Taiwan Stock Exchange. Villiers, C. (2021). Corporate governance, employee voice and the interests of employees: The broken promise of a ‘World Leading Package of Corporate Reforms’. Industrial Law Journal, 50(2), 159–195. dwaa017 Wang, M., & Yan, W. (2022). Brain gain: The effect of employee quality on corporate social responsibility. Abacus, 58(4), 679–713. Werner, S., Tosi, H. L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2005). Organizational governance and employee pay: How organizational governance affects the firm’s compensation strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 377–384.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectOrganizational financeen
dc.subjectboard sizeen
dc.subjectR&D intensityen
dc.titleDeterminants of the impact of ESG policy and corporate governance on employee rightsen
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
687.94 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format