Family Business Innovativeness: A Tool for Successful Succession?
dc.contributor.author | Skrbková, Denisa | |
dc.contributor.author | Rydvalová, Petra | |
dc.contributor.author | Linhart, Ondřej | |
dc.contributor.other | Ekonomická fakulta | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-27T12:40:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-27T12:40:58Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Family businesses are founded with a vision of long-term sustainability and longevity over generations. Therefore, succession in a family business is an important prerequisite for achieving this goal, representing one of the greatest challenges for contemporary family businesses. We are now in an era in which the millennial generation, which is known for their interest in innovation and technology, is among the potential successors. However, the relationship between family business innovation as a potential motivating factor and the next generation’s intention to take over the family business has not been sufficiently investigated. This study examines the relationship between family businesses’ innovativeness and potential successors’ intention to take over the family business. On a sample of 18,000 responses from university students in the role of a potential successor to a family business, we demonstrate a positive correlation between the intention to take over a family business and the innovativeness of that business. Although the Cramér’s V coefficient indicates weak association, it is evident that the relative number of potential successors of family businesses increases with a higher rating of innovativeness. We also show that this trend has not changed over the last five years. The innovativeness of the family business plays an important role in the next generation's decision whether to continue with the business and ensure the longevity of the family business over generations. Our findings may therefore be relevant for owners of family businesses in addressing potential succession issues. | en |
dc.format | text | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15240/tul/009/lef-2023-17 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-80-7494-627-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/172833 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Technická Univerzita v Liberci | cs |
dc.publisher | Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic | en |
dc.publisher.abbreviation | TUL | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ANDERSON, R. C., and D. M. REEB. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ANTLOVÁ, K., P. RYDVALOVÁ, and M. LAMR. (2020). The Role of the Young Generation in Family Business. In P. Doucek, G. Chroust, & V. Oškrdal (Eds.), Proceedings 28th conference IDIMT-2020, Digitalized Economy, Society and Information Management (pp. 133–141). Trauner Verlag. https://idimt.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/IDIMT_proceedings_2020.pdf. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | BALLAL, J. M., and V. BAPAT. (2019). How Does Family Succession Impact Family Firms’ Innovation? Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8(2), 302–324. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2019.8.2.302 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | BASCO, R., and A. CALABRÒ. (2017). “Whom do I want to be the next CEO?” Desirable successor attributes in family firms. Journal of Business Economics, 87(4), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0828-2 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | CEFIS, E., andO. MARSILI. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Chan, C. M. L., S.Y. TEOH, A. YEOW, andG. PAN. (2019). Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: Case study of an SME. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12215 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | CIEŚLIK, J., andA. van STEL. (2017). Explaining university students’ career path intentions from their current entrepreneurial exposure. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2016-0143 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | COVIN, J. G., D.P. SLEVIN, andM. B. HEELEY. (2000). Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00015-9 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | EDDLESTON, K. A., F. W. KELLERMANNS, and R. SARATHY. (2008). Resource Configuration in Family Firms: Linking Resources, Strategic Planning and Technological Opportunities to Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | GUESSS. (2022). GUESSS | Key Facts. Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students‘ Survey. http://www.guesssurvey.org/keyfacts/index.html | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | HIDAYATI, A., A. HERMAWAN, A. W. SOEHADI, and HARTOYO. (2020). Intra-family succession insights: The presence of millennial cohort successors. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(1), 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2019-0052 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | HOLMBERG-WRIGHT, K., T. HRIBAR, and J. D. TSEGAI. (2017). More Than Money: Business Strategies to Engage Millennials. 9(2). | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | JEBSEN, S., and B. BOYD. (2023). Institutional influences on succession intentions: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. In Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Family Firms (pp. 88–106). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800889248/book-part-9781800889248-10.xml. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889248.00010 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | KELLERMANNS, F. W., K. A. EDDLESTON, R. SARATHY, and F. MURPHY. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | KUNZ, W., B. SCHMITT, and A. MEYER. (2011). How does perceived firm innovativeness affect the consumer? Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.005 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | MCGRATH, R. G. (2001). Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069340 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | NWUKE, O. (2020). Family Firms in Africa is the Focus of New Lagos Business School SNOC. The Global Network for Advanced Management. https://globalnetwork.io/news/2020/07/family-firms-africa-focus-new-lagos-business-school-snoc | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ROMANÍ, G., K. SORIA-BARRETO, G. HONORES-MARÍN, R. RUIZ ESCORCIA, and J. RUEDA. (2022). Not Like My Parents! The Intention to Become a Successor of Latin American Students with Entrepreneur Parents. Sustainability, 14(3), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031193 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | SCHERER, R. F., J. S. ADAMS, S. S. CARLEY, andF. A. WIEBE. (1989). Role Model Performance Effects on Development of Entrepreneurial Career Preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878901300306 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | SETIYANI, A., A. SUTAWIJAYA, L. C. NAWANGSARI, andE. ENDRI. (2020). Motivation and the Millennial Generation. International Journal of Innovation, 13(6). | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | SHANKER, M. C., and J. H. ASTRACHAN. (1996). Myths and Realities: Family Businesses’ Contribution to the US Economy— A Framework for Assessing Family Business Statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | SONI, S. (2019, June 18). Why innovation remains top challenge for 83% next-generation family business leaders. Financial Express. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2242041464/citation/7CA47DA4A55747E8PQ/1 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | SPIEZIA, V., and M. VIVARELLI. (2000). The analysis of technological change and employment. In The Employment Impact of Innovation. Routledge. | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ZELLWEGER, T., R. S. NASON, and M. NORDQVIST. (2012). From Longevity of Firms to Transgenerational Entrepreneurship of Families: Introducing Family Entrepreneurial Orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511423531 | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | ZELLWEGER, T., P. SIEGER, and F. HALTER. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Liberecké ekonomické fórum 2023 | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Liberec Economic Forum 2023 | en |
dc.subject | family firms | en |
dc.subject | succession intention | en |
dc.subject | potential successor | en |
dc.subject | innovation | en |
dc.subject | millennials | en |
dc.subject.classification | O30 | |
dc.subject.classification | M21 | |
dc.subject.classification | J53 | |
dc.title | Family Business Innovativeness: A Tool for Successful Succession? | en |
dc.type | proceeding paper | en |
local.access | open | |
local.citation.epage | 161 | |
local.citation.spage | 152 | |
local.faculty | Faculty of Economics | |
local.fulltext | yes | |
local.relation.abbreviation | LEF | cs |
local.relation.abbreviation | LEF | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- LEF_2023_17.pdf
- Size:
- 473.71 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- conference paper