FIRM AGILITY AND DIGITALISATION LESS HELPFUL THAN EXPECTED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, BUT VALUABLE IN THE LONGER RUN

dc.contributor.authorRedek, Tjaša
dc.contributor.authorČater, Tomaž
dc.contributor.authorČater, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorČerne, Matej
dc.contributor.authorKoman, Matjaž
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T07:58:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T07:58:20Z
dc.description.abstractFirms’ performance during exogenous crises depends on several factors, from strategic foresight, financial readiness, and a number of firm-specific as well as sectoral aspects, also including luck and government support. The aim of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the ‘crisis readiness’ of firms, defined by factors like a proactive strategic approach, digitalisation, and financial constraints, as well as the reliance on or availability of government support, is responsible for the outcome during the COVID-19 crisis compared to the long-run contribution made by these factors. The empirical investigation uses a unique combination of firm-level balance sheet data and unique survey data concerning the strategic focus and implementation of Industry 4.0. While the literature suggests that digitalisation, a strategic proactive approach, and crisis readiness (itself depending on several factors) impacted the firms significantly during the COVID-19 crisis, the results show firm performance primarily depended on other (sectoral) aspects serving as a major exogenous factor impacting their performance. During the crisis, digitalisation was additionally mentioned as an important adjustment factor. However, using firm-level data we show that while companies were able to mitigate certain impacts of the supply and demand shocks triggered by COVID-19 using their internal resources and characteristics, including strategic elements, the biggest explanatory factor remains the sector involved. This leads to important managerial and policy recommendations, principally stressing the importance of proactivity and agility for firms’ long-run performance, whereas in the short run the state must help mitigate the effects.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2022-3-005
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/166030
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAgency of the Republic of Slovenia for Public Legal Records and Related Services. (2021). AJPES Podatkovna baza, zaključni računi podjetij [AJPES Database, Firms’ financial statements]. https://www.ajpes.si/
dc.relation.isbasedonAlonso-Almeida, M. d. M., Bremser, K., & Llach, J. (2015). Proactive and reactive strategies deployed by restaurants in times of crisis: Effects on capabilities, organization and competitive advantage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(7), 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0117
dc.relation.isbasedonArellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
dc.relation.isbasedonBaah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Issau, K., & Moro Abdoulaye, F. A. (2020). Understanding the influence of environmental production practices on firm performance: A proactive versus reactive approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2020-0195
dc.relation.isbasedonBachas, P. J., Brockmeyer, A., & Semelet, C. M. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Formal Firms: Micro Tax Data Simulations across Countries (Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 9437). The World Bank.
dc.relation.isbasedonBai, J. (J.), Brynjolfsson, E., Jin, W., Steffen, S., & Wan, C. (2021). Digital Resilience: How Work-From-Home Feasibility Affects Firm Performance (Working Paper 28588). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28588
dc.relation.isbasedonBaldwin, R., & di Mauro Weder, B. (2020). Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes. VoxEU CEPR. https://voxeu.org/content/mitigating-covid-economic-crisis-act-fast-and-do-whatever-it-takes
dc.relation.isbasedonBettiol, M., Capestro, M., Di Maria, E., & Furlan, A. (2019). Impacts of industry 4.0 investments on firm performance: Evidence from Italy (Marco Fanno Working Paper 233). Padua: University of Padova, Department of Economics and Management.
dc.relation.isbasedonBloom, N., Fletcher, R. S., & Yeh, E. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on US Firms (Working Paper No. 28314). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28314
dc.relation.isbasedonBodnár, K., Le Roux, J., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Szörfi, B. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on potential output in the euro area. ECB Economic Bulletin, 7. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/articles/2020/html/ecb.ebart202007_01~ef0a77a516.en.html
dc.relation.isbasedonBole, V., Oblak, A., Prašnikar, J., & Trobec, D. (2018). Financial frictions and indebtedness of Balkan firms: A comparison with Mediterranean and Central European countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(4), 790–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.02.013
dc.relation.isbasedonBorrett, A. (2021, March 25). Covid-19 digital transformation integral to performance. Tech Monitor. https://techmonitor.ai/leadership/digital-transformation/covid-19-digital-transformation-integral-company-performance
dc.relation.isbasedonĆehajić, A., & Košak, M. (2021). Tightening and Loosening of Macroprudential Policy, Its Effects on Credit Growth and Implications for the COVID-19 Crisis. Economic and Business Review, 23(4), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1293
dc.relation.isbasedonČater, B., Čater, T., Černe, M., Koman, M., & Redek, T. (2019). Nove tehnologije industrije 4.0 v majhnih in srednjih podjetjih v Sloveniji [New technologies of industry 4.0 in small and medium-sized enterprises in Slovenia]. Economic and Business Review, 21(4), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1074
dc.relation.isbasedonČerne, M., Ajdovec, P., Kovačič Batista, R., & Vidmar, M. (2017). Corporate strategy and Industry 4.0. In J. Prašnikar, T. Redek, & M. Koman (Eds.), Robots Among Us (pp. 79–91). Ljubljana: Časnik Finance.
dc.relation.isbasedonChiacchio, F., Petropoulos, G., & Pichler, D. (2018). The impact of industrial robots on EU employment and wages: A local labour market approach (Working Paper No. 2018/02). Brussels: Bruegel. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/207001
dc.relation.isbasedonDauti, B., & Elezi, S. (2022). Economic growth in the Central East European Union and the Western Balkan countries in the course of Stability and Growth Pact and COVID-19. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka School of Economics, 40, 29–61. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2022.1.29
dc.relation.isbasedonDill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 409–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390794
dc.relation.isbasedonDomadenik, P., Koman, M., & Redek, T. (2020). The virus aftermath: A socio-economic twist? Ljubljana: Časnik Finance. https://plus-nuk.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/COBIB/34772739
dc.relation.isbasedonDykes, B. M., Hughes-Moran, M., & Ferrier, W. J. (2020). Responding to Crises with Speed and Agility. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/responding-to-crises-with-speed-and-agility/
dc.relation.isbasedonEuropean Commission. (2021). Recovery plan for Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/recovery-plan-europe_en
dc.relation.isbasedonEurostat. (2021). Comprehensive database – Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society/data/comprehensive-database
dc.relation.isbasedonFernández-Temprano, M., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0096
dc.relation.isbasedonGiudici, G., & Bonaventura, M. (2018). The impact of M&A strategies on the operating performance and investments of European IPO firms. Journal of Economics and Business, 95, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2017.06.005
dc.relation.isbasedonGolubeva, O. (2021). Firms’ performance during the COVID-19 outbreak: International evidence from 13 countries. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2020-0405
dc.relation.isbasedonGraetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at Work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00754
dc.relation.isbasedonIazzolino, G., & Laise, D. (2013). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A methodological and critical review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(4), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2012-0107
dc.relation.isbasedonLangford, L., & Haynes, B. (2015). An investigation into how corporate real estate in the financial services industry can add value through alignment and methods of performance measurement. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 17(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-06-2014-0015
dc.relation.isbasedonLebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice (pp. 65–79). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.006
dc.relation.isbasedonLevinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.
dc.relation.isbasedonMilanović, M., & Stamenković, M. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on economic performance of European Countries. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 40(1), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2022.1.17
dc.relation.isbasedonMills, R., & Keremah, O. (2020). Crisis Management and Organisational Agility: A Theoretical Review. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 7(5), 5–12.
dc.relation.isbasedonNakatani, R. (2019). Firm performance and corporate finance in New Zealand. Applied Economics Letters, 26(13), 1118–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1539805
dc.relation.isbasedonObal, M. (2017). What drives post-adoption usage? Investigating the negative and positive antecedents of disruptive technology continuous adoption intentions. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.003
dc.relation.isbasedonOblak, A. (2021). A First Peek at Firms’ Cash Flow Dynamics in the Pandemic Year: A Lesson Learned? Economic and Business Review, 23(4), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1292
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD. (2020a). The global economy risks falling ill, OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2020. OECD Economic Outlook. http://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/march-2020/
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD. (2020b, December 11). Focus on the global economy. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/themes/global-economy
dc.relation.isbasedonOlley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831
dc.relation.isbasedonPark, W., Sung, C. S., & Byun, C. G. (2019). Impact of unlisted small and medium-sized enterprises’ business strategies on future performance and growth sustainability. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030060
dc.relation.isbasedonParnell, J. (2021). An Ounce of Prevention: What Promotes Crisis Readiness and How Does It Drive Firm Performance? American Business Review, 24(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.24.1.90-113
dc.relation.isbasedonPereshybkina, A., Castillo Conde, M. E., & Kalyesubula, T. (2017). How will the industry 4.0 transformations affect SMEs in Germany by 2030? (Research Paper). Furtwangen im Schwarzwald: Furtwangen University.
dc.relation.isbasedonPiccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10(10), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103821
dc.relation.isbasedonPortes, J. (2020, June 1). The lasting scars of the Covid-19 crisis: Channels and impacts. VoxEU. https://voxeu.org/article/lasting-scars-covid-19-crisis
dc.relation.isbasedonPrajogo, D. I. (2011). The roles of firms’ motives in affecting the outcomes of ISO 9000 adoption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111098753
dc.relation.isbasedonPrašnikar, J. (Ed.). (2010). The role of intangible assets in exiting the crisis. Ljubljana: Časnik Finance.
dc.relation.isbasedonPrašnikar, J., Redek, T., & Drenkovska, M. (2017). Survival of the fittest: An evolutionary approach to an export-led model of growth. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305796
dc.relation.isbasedonRepublic of Slovenia. (2021a). Koronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) [COVID-19 virus]. https://www.gov.si/teme/koronavirus-sars-cov-2/
dc.relation.isbasedonRepublic of Slovenia. (2021b). Sedmi paket ukrepov za omilitev posledic epidemije [7th package of measures to alleviate Covid impact]. https://www.gov.si/teme/koronavirus-sars-cov-2/odpravljanje-posledic-epidemije/sedmi-paket-ukrepov-za-omilitev-posledic-epidemije-pkp7/
dc.relation.isbasedonRovigatti, G., & Mollisi, V. (2018). Theory and Practice of Total-Factor Productivity Estimation: The Control Function Approach using Stata. The Stata Journal, 18(3), 618–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800307
dc.relation.isbasedonRüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. The Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries
dc.relation.isbasedonSewchurran, K., Dekker, J., & McDonogh, J. (2019). Experiences of Embedding Long-Term Thinking in an Environment of Short-Termism and Sub-par Business Performance: Investing in Intangibles for Sustainable Growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 997–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3959-2
dc.relation.isbasedonShubita, M. F. (2019). Intellectual capital and market value: Evidence from Jordan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(4), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.04
dc.relation.isbasedonStatistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. (2021). SI-STAT data portal. www.stat.si
dc.relation.isbasedonThoben, K.-D., Wiesner, S., & Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples. International Journal of Automation Technology, 11(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004
dc.relation.isbasedonVisconti, R. M. (2020). The Valuation of Digital Intangibles: Technology, Marketing and Internet. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36918-7
dc.relation.isbasedonVolberda, H., & van Bruggen, G. (1997). Environmental Turbulence: A look into its Dimensionality. In ERIM (Electronic) Books and Chapters. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/6438
dc.relation.isbasedonWeiss, A. M., Anderson, E., & MacInnis, D. J. (1999). Reputation Management as a Motivation for Sales Structure Decisions. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251975
dc.relation.isbasedonYanagi, R. (2018). Corporate Governance and Value Creation in Japan: Prescriptions for Boosting ROE. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8503-1
dc.relation.isbasedonZabkar, V., & Redek, T. (2020). Challenges on the Path toward Sustainability in Europe. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectfirm performanceen
dc.subjectcrisis readinessen
dc.subjectdigitalisation,en
dc.subjectfirm-level evidenceen
dc.subject.classificationD22
dc.subject.classificationE32
dc.subject.classificationO32
dc.titleFIRM AGILITY AND DIGITALISATION LESS HELPFUL THAN EXPECTED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, BUT VALUABLE IN THE LONGER RUNen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage87
local.citation.spage69
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2022_5
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume25
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2022_05.pdf
Size:
921.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Collections