Determinants of bank social responsibility: case of Croatia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorIvanisevic Hernaus, Ana
dc.contributor.authorStojanovic, Alen
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-04
dc.date.available2015-06-04
dc.date.defense2015-06-04
dc.description.abstractRecently fi nancial sector and its responsibilities have come under great scrutiny. This has led to putting more emphasis on social responsibility of fi nancial institutions, primarily banks, due to their powerful and infl uential position. Banks have an impact not only on fi nancial and economic system, but on a wider community as well. Their socially responsible practices in particular may have important social implications, what is even more emphasized within bank-centric fi nancial systems, typical of CEE countries. Due to a lack of existing research, the aim of the paper is to assess social responsibility of banks at individual and industry level in a specifi c CEE context. At bank individual level, focus is put on factors of bank size, ownership status and fi nancial performance, while at the bank industry level the structure of granted loans is included in the analysis. The framework for assessing bank social responsibility is derived and adapted from previous research conducted by Cuesta-Gonzalez, et al. [23] and Scholtens [81]. It is applied to Croatian banking sector, while the level of social responsibility is empirically related to factors at bank individual and industry level. Research fi ndings offer an overview of social responsibility of Croatian banks. The results demonstrate that bank social responsibility is related to factors of bank size and ownership status at the individual level, and to the structure of granted loans at the industry level. However, the nature of the link between bank social and fi nancial performance did not prove signifi cant. Such findings offer a wider lesson of what factors are associated with social performance of fi nancial sector. Additionally, they may serve as a useful reference point for further investigation of socially responsible practices in Croatia and other CEE countries.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent117-134 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-009
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn12123609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/9110
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonZAHRA, S.A., OVIATT, B.M., MINYARD, K. Effects of corporate ownership and board structure on corporate social responsibility and financial performance [online]. In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Academy of Management, 1993 [cit. 2011-11-22]. pp. 336- 340. Available from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=d3a6fe8d-5a8d- 4e31-b565-3035d65efe71%40sessionmgr111& vid=1&hid=110.
dc.relation.isbasedonWU, M-L. Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of American Academy of Business. 2006, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 163-171. ISSN 1540-1200.
dc.relation.isbasedonWOLFE, R. The use of content analysis to assess corporate social responsibility. In: POST, J.E., FREDERICK, W.C., COLLINS, D. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991. pp. 281-308. ISBN 1559381167.
dc.relation.isbasedonWADDOCK, S.A., GRAVES, S.B. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal. 1997, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 303-319. ISSN 0143-2095. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303
dc.relation.isbasedonVAN BEURDEN, P., GOSSLING, T. The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 407-424. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x.
dc.relation.isbasedonVITEZIC, N. Corporate Reputation and Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Large Companies in Croatia. International Business and Economics Research Journal. 2011, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 85-95. ISSN 1535-0754.
dc.relation.isbasedonULLMANN, A.A. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review. 1985, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 540-557. ISSN 0363-7425. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1985.4278989.
dc.relation.isbasedonUDAYASANKAR, K. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 167-175. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonTEWARI, R. Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility in Annual Reports: A Comparative Study of Indian Companies & Multi-National Corporations. Journal of Management and Public Policy. 2011, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 22-51. ISSN 0976-013X.
dc.relation.isbasedonTANKOVIC, M., MATESIC, M. Achievement of competitive advantage through implementation of sustainable development. Acta Turistica Nova. 2009, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 73-85. ISSN 1846-4394.
dc.relation.isbasedonTAFRA-VLAHOVIC, M. Conceptual Frame of Corporate Social Responsibility. Medianali. 2009, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 163-184. ISSN 1846-436X.
dc.relation.isbasedonSUZUKI, K., TANIMOTO, K., KOKKO, A. Does foreign investment matter? Effects of foreign investment on the institutionalization of corporate social responsibility by Japanese firms. Asian Business and Management. 2010, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 379-400. ISSN 1472-4782. DOI: 10.1057/abm.2010.19.
dc.relation.isbasedonSTANWICK, P.A., STANWICK, S.D. The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 195-204. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005784421547.
dc.relation.isbasedonSNOY, B. Ethical Issues in International Lending. Joumal of Business Ethics. 1989, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 635-639. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/BF00383032.
dc.relation.isbasedonSMITH, N.C. Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review. 2003, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 52-76. ISSN 0008-1256. DOI: 10.2307/41166188.
dc.relation.isbasedonSIMPSON, W.G., KOHERS, T. The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics. 2002, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 97-109. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013082525900.
dc.relation.isbasedonSEMRADOVA, I. Ethical aspects of corporate culture. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2009, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 69-76. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCOTT, A. Consumers praise privacy policies. The Internal Auditor. 2001, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 14-15. ISSN 0020-5745.
dc.relation.isbasedonSCHOLTENS, B. Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 159-175. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9841-x.
dc.relation.isbasedonRUNDLE-THIELE, S., BALL, K., GILLESPIE, M. Raising the bar: from corporate social responsibility to corporate social performance. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2008, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 245-253. ISSN 0736-3761. DOI: 10.1108/07363760810882434.
dc.relation.isbasedonRUF, B.M., et al. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 2001, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 143-156. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010786912118.
dc.relation.isbasedonROUF, A. The Corporate Social responsibility Disclosure: A Study of Listed Companies in Bangladesh. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2011, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 19-32. ISSN 1309-2448.
dc.relation.isbasedonRENNEBOOG, L., TER HORST, J., ZHANG, C. Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behaviour. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2008, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 1723-1742. ISSN 0378-4266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039.
dc.relation.isbasedonREINIG, C.J., TILT, C.A. Corporate Social Responsibility Issues in Media Releases: A Stakeholder Analysis of Australian banks. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting. 2008, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 176-197. ISSN 1978-0591.
dc.relation.isbasedonREINHARDT, F.L., STAVINS, R.A. Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.164-181. ISSN 0266-903X. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grq008.
dc.relation.isbasedonQU, R. Effects of Government Regulations, Market Orientation and Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility in China: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management. 2007, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 582-591. ISSN 0813-0183.
dc.relation.isbasedonPOOLTHONG, Y., MANDHACHITARA, R. Customer expectations of CSR, perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2009, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 408-427. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652320910988302.
dc.relation.isbasedonPETERSON, R.T., HERMANS, C.M. The communications of social responsibility by US banks. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2004, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 199-211. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652320410530313
dc.relation.isbasedonPAVA, M.L., KRAUSZ, J. The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics. 1996, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 321-357. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/BF00382958.
dc.relation.isbasedonORLITZKY, M. Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations: The Social Construction of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2011, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 409-444. ISSN 1052-150X. DOI: 10.5840/beq201121325
dc.relation.isbasedonOH, W.Y., CHANG, Y.K., MARTYNOV, A. The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 283-297. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z.
dc.relation.isbasedonNATALE, S.M., SORA, S.A. Ethics in strategic thinking: business processes and the global market collapse. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 309-316. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0270-2.
dc.relation.isbasedonMULLER, A., KOLK, A. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Drivers of Corporate Social Performance: Evidence from Foreign and Domestic Firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies. 2010, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1-26. ISSN 0022-2380. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00855.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonMULKI, J.P., JARAMILLO, F. Ethical reputation and value received: customer perceptions. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2011, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 358-372. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652321111152891.
dc.relation.isbasedonMENASSA, E. Corporate social responsibility: An exploratory study of the quality and extent of social disclosures by Lebanese commercial banks. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 2010, Vol. 11, Iss.1, pp. 4-23. ISSN 0967-5426. DOI: 10.1108/09675421011050009.
dc.relation.isbasedonMCDONALD, L.M., RUNDLE-THIELE, S. Corporate social responsibility and bank customer satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2008, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 170-182. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652320810864643.
dc.relation.isbasedonMCDONALD, L.M., HUNG LAI, C. Impact of corporate social responsibility initiatives on Taiwanese banking customers. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2011, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 50-63. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652321111101374.
dc.relation.isbasedonMARGOLIS, J.D., WALSH, J.P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 268-305. ISSN 0001-8392. DOI: 10.2307/3556659.
dc.relation.isbasedonMAKNI, R., FRANCOEUR, C., BELLAVANCE, F. Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 409-422. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonMADDEN, K., SCAIFE, W., CRISSMAN, K. How and Why Small to Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs) Engage with Their Communities: An Australian Study. International Journal of Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 2006, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49-60. ISSN 1465-4520. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.40.
dc.relation.isbasedonLI, W., ZHANG, R. Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 631-645. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z.
dc.relation.isbasedonLI, S., FETSCHERIN, M., ALON, I., LATTEMANN, C., YEH, K. Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets. Management International Review. 2010, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 635-654. ISSN 0938-8249. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9.
dc.relation.isbasedonLEKO, V., STOJANOVIC, A. Financijska iskljucenost (Financial exclusion). In: GULIN, D., et al. Proceedings of the 42nd symposium of Croatian Association of Accountants and Financial Experts in Pula – Finance and accounting in the function of supporting Croatian economy. Pula: Croatian Association of Accountants and Financial Experts, 2007. pp. 123-134. ISBN 978-253-027-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonLEKO, V., STOJANOVIC, A. Social Responsibility of Private Banks. In: RAJKOVIC, V., et al. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Organizational Science Development – Creative Organization. Portoroz: University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 2007. pp. 976-983. ISBN 978-961-232-200-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonLEE, M.-D.P. Does Ownership Form Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Performance between Public, Private, and Joint-venture Firms. Business and Society Review. 2009, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 435-456. ISSN 0045-3609. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2009.00349.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonKUZMA, J., KUZHABEKOVA, A. Nanotechnology, voluntary oversight, and corporate social performance: does company size matter? Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2011, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1499-1512. ISSN 1388-0764. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0235-0.
dc.relation.isbasedonKUNTZ, E.C., KEDIA, B.L., WHITEFAEAD, C.J. Variations in Corporate Social Performance. California Management Review. 1980, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 30-36. ISSN 0008-1256. DOI: 10.2307/41164887.
dc.relation.isbasedonKUNDID, A., ROGOSIC, A. Bank Online Reporting: Comparative Advantage, Formalism or Fashion? Global Business and Economics Anthology. 2011, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 500-518. ISSN 1553-1392
dc.relation.isbasedonKRONBORG, D., THOMSEN, S. Foreign ownership and long-term survival. Strategic Management Journal. 2009, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 207-219. ISSN 0143-2095. DOI: 10.1002/smj.732
dc.relation.isbasedonKORICAN, M., JELAVIC, I. CSR, women and SMEs: the Croatian perspective. Social Responsibility Journal. 2008, Vol. 4, No. 1/2, pp. 56-62. ISSN 1747-1117. DOI: 10.1108/17471110810856839.
dc.relation.isbasedonKARAIBRAHIMOGLU, Y.Z. CSR in times of financial crisis. Africal Journal of Business Management. 2010, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 382-389. ISSN 1990-3839.
dc.relation.isbasedonKANGARLUIE, S.J., BAYAZIDI, A. Corporate Governance Mechanisms And Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Evidence From Iran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2011, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 1591-1598. ISSN 1991-8178.
dc.relation.isbasedonKAMINSKA-LABBE, R., BUCHELT, B. Corporate Social Performance in a Post-transition Context: The Case of Polish Firms. In: SUDER, G.G.S. International Business under Adversity: A Role in Corporate Responsibility, Conflict Prevention and Peace. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2008. pp. 104-118. ISBN 978-1847203748.
dc.relation.isbasedonJONES, S., VAN DER LAAN, S., FROST, G., LOFTUS, J. The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 181-203. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9412-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonJOHNSON, R.A., GREENING, D.W. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1999, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 564-576. ISSN 0001-4273. DOI: 10.2307/256977.
dc.relation.isbasedonJAGGI, B., FREEDMAN, M. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1992, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 697-713. ISSN 0306-686X. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00652.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonINTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION, IFC. Banking on Sustainability: Financing Environmental and Social Opportunities in Emerging Markets [online]. Washington: IFC, c2007 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_BankingonSustainability/$FILE/FINAL_IFC_BankingOnSustainability_web.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonIAMANDI, I.-E., CAGARIN, A.R., CHICIUDEAN, A., DRAGOI, M.C. Corporate Social Responsibility – Analysing Social and Financial Performance, The Case of Romania. European Research Studies. 2007, Vol. 11, Special Issue 3-4, pp. 19-30. ISSN 1108-2976.
dc.relation.isbasedonHUMPHREYS, M., BROWN, A.D. An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility at Credit Line. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 403-418. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9426-0.
dc.relation.isbasedonHOREHAJOVA, M., MARASOVA, J. The institutional factors of the corporate social responsibility development in the Central European countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2008, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 58-64. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedonHINSON, R., BOATENG, R., MADICHIE, N. Corporate social responsibility activity reportage on bank websites in Ghana. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2010, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 498-518. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652321011085176.
dc.relation.isbasedonGREEN, C.F. Business Ethics in Banking. Journal of Business Ethics. 1989, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 631-634. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/BF00383031.
dc.relation.isbasedonGRBAC, B., LONCARIC, D. Ethics, social responsibility and business performance in a transition economy. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2009, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 143-158. ISSN 1450-2194. DOI: 10.1108/14502190910976501.
dc.relation.isbasedonGRAVES, S.B., WADDOCK, S.A. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1994, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1034-1046. ISSN 0001-4273. DOI: 10.2307/256611.
dc.relation.isbasedonGRAVES, S.B., WADDOCK, S.A. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1994, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1034-1046. ISSN 0001-4273. DOI: 10.2307/256611.
dc.relation.isbasedonGOND, J.-P., PALAZZO, G. The social construction of the positive link between corporate social and financial performance. In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings [CD]. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California: Academy of Management, 2008. pp. 1-6. ISSN 1543-8643.
dc.relation.isbasedonGOLJA, T., KRSTINIC NIZIC, M. Corporate social responsibility in tourism – The most popular tourism destinations in Croatia: Comparative analysis. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues. 2010, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 107-121. ISSN 1331-0194.
dc.relation.isbasedonGAO, Y. Corporate Social Performance in China: Evidence from Large Companies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 23-35. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9982-y. [33] GLOBAL COMPACT CROATIA. Official data [online]. UNDP Global Compact, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.drustvena-odgovornost.undp.hr/.
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. Glossary [online]. ECB, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/glossary/html/index.en.html.
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. [30a] Monthly Bulletin 10/2009; [30b] Monthly Bulletin 10/2011. Frankfurt am Main: ECB, c2009; c2011. ISSN 1725-2822.
dc.relation.isbasedonEUROPEAN BANKING FEDERATION, EBF. European banking sector best practices [online]. EBF, c2008 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://bank-axess.com/PageFiles/10249/CSR-sizereduced.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonDUJMOVIC, M., SINKOVIC, D., VITASOVIC, A. Corporate social responsibility in the banking sector – Case study Croatia. In: TRIVUN, V., et al. Proceedings of the International Conference ICES 2010, “Economic Development Perspectives of SEE Region in Global Recession Context”. Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo, School of Economics and Business, 2010. pp. 181. ISBN 978-9958-25-046-0.
dc.relation.isbasedonRaiffeisen Research. Available from: http://www.rbinternational.com/eBusiness/services/resources/media/677012584775275435-677012584775275436_677251119927032833-772104317120223179-1-9-DE.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonDEUBER, G., SIKIMIC, J. CEE Banking Sector Report – Banking Sector Convergence 2.0 [online]. Vienna: Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisen Centrobank AG, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22].
dc.relation.isbasedonDENNIS, B, D’INTINO, R.S., HOUGHTON, J.D., NECK, C.P., BOYLES, T. Corporate Social Performance: Creating Resources to Help Organizations Excel. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 2008, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 26-41. ISSN 1932-2054. DOI: 10.1002/joe.20192.
dc.relation.isbasedonDE LOS SALMONES, M., DEL, M.G., PEREZ, A., DEL BOSQUE, I.R. The social role of financial companies as a determinant of consumer behaviour. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2009, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 467-483. ISSN 0265-2323. DOI: 10.1108/02652320910988339.
dc.relation.isbasedonDEBELJAK, J., KRKAC, K., BUSLJETA BANKS, I. Acquiring CSR practices: from deception to authenticity. Social Responsibility Journal. 2011, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5-22. ISSN 1747-1117. DOI: 10.1108/17471111111114503.
dc.relation.isbasedonCUESTA-GONZALEZ, M., MUNOZ-TORREZ, M.J., FERNANDEZ-IZQUIERDO, M.A. Analysis of Social Performance in the Spanish Financial Industry Through Public Data. A Proposal. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 289-304. ISSN 01674544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9091-8.
dc.relation.isbasedonCROATIAN NATIONAL BANK, CNB. Bank Bulletin. Zagreb: Croatian National Bank, 2011. No. 22. ISSN 1333-1035.
dc.relation.isbasedonCROATIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, CBCSD. Official data [online]. CBCSD, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.hrpsor.hr/.
dc.relation.isbasedonCROATIAN BANKING AND FINANCE EMPLOYEES TRADE UNION, CBFETU. Official data [online]. CBFETU, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.sbf.hr/.
dc.relation.isbasedonCROATIAN BANKING ASSOCIATION, CBA. Official data [online]. CBA, c2011 [cit. 2011-11-22]. Available from: http://www.hub.hr/.
dc.relation.isbasedonCOSTA, J.D. The Ethical Imperative: Why Moral Leadership is Good Business. Reading. Mass: Perseus Books,1998. ISBN 0738201308.
dc.relation.isbasedonCOCHRAN, P., WOOD, R.A. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1984, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 42-56. ISSN 0001-4273. DOI: 10.2307/255956
dc.relation.isbasedonCOFFEY, B.S., FRYXELL, G.E. Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics. 1991, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 437-444. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/BF00382826.
dc.relation.isbasedonCOELHO, M., FILIPE, J.A., FERREIRA, M.A.M. Environmental sustainability as a dimension of corporate social responsibility: The case of CGD – Caixy Geral Depositos/Portugal. International Journal of Academic Research. 2011, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 610-617. ISSN 2075-4124.
dc.relation.isbasedonCHIH, H.-L., CHIH, H.-H., CHEN, T.-Y. On the Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: International Evidence on the Financial Industry. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 115-135. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x.
dc.relation.isbasedonCAVANA, R.Y., DELAHAYE, B.H., SEKARAN, U. Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. 1st ed. Brisbane: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. ISBN 0471341266.
dc.relation.isbasedonCARROLL, A.B. Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2000, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 33-42. ISSN 1052-150X. DOI: 10.2307/3857692.
dc.relation.isbasedonCALLAN, S.J., THOMAS, J.M. Corporate Financial Performance and Corporate Social Performance: An Update and Reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2009, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 61-78. ISSN 1535-3958. DOI: 10.1002/csr.182.
dc.relation.isbasedonCALABRESE, A., LANCIONI, F. Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Service Sector: Does Exist a Strategic Path? Knowledge and Process Management. 2008, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 107-125. ISSN 1092-4604. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.303.
dc.relation.isbasedonBRONN, P., BRONN, C. A reflective stakeholder approach: co-orientation as a basis for communication and learning. Journal of Communication Management. 2003, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 291-303. ISSN 1363-254X. DOI: 10.1108/13632540310807430.
dc.relation.isbasedonBRAMMER, S., MILLINGTON, A. Firm Size, Organizational Visibility and Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review. 2006, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 6-18. ISSN 0962-8770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00424.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonBORCK, J., COGLIANESE, C., NASH, J. Why Do They Join? An Exploration of Business Participation in Voluntary Environmental Programs. In: Beyond Compliance: Business Decision Making and the US EPA's Performance Track Program. Regulatory Policy Program Report. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2006. RPP-10.
dc.relation.isbasedonBIHARI, S.C. Green banking – towards socially responsible banking in India. International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation. 2010, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 82-87. ISSN 0974-5874.
dc.relation.isbasedonBELAL, A.R. A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2001, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 274-289. ISSN 0268-6902. DOI: 10.1108/02686900110392922.
dc.relation.isbasedonBARON, D.P., HARJOTO, M.A., JO, H. The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Politics. 2011, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.1-46. ISSN 1469-3569. DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1374.
dc.relation.isbasedonANDERSEN, M.L., OLSEN, L. Corporate social and financial performance: A canonical correlation analysis. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal. 2011, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 17-36. ISSN 1096-3685.
dc.relation.isbasedonADAMS, M., HARDWICK, P. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies. 1998, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 641-654. ISSN 0022-2380. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00113.
dc.relation.isbasedonABBOT, W.F., MONSEN, R.J. On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement. Academy of Management Journal. 1979, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 501-515. ISSN 0001-4273. DOI: 10.2307/255740.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectinternationalizationen
dc.subjectexport motivesen
dc.subjectentry modesen
dc.subjectPolish exportersen
dc.subject.classificationG21
dc.subject.classificationM14
dc.titleDeterminants of bank social responsibility: case of Croatiaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage134
local.citation.spage117
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.issue2
local.relation.volume18
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_2_2015_9.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Číslo 2