The Role of Perceived Risk and Security Level in Building Trust in E-government Solutions

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorEjdys, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorGinevicius, Romualdas
dc.contributor.authorRozsa, Zoltan
dc.contributor.authorJanoskova, Katarina
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T08:54:23Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16T08:54:23Z
dc.description.abstractIncreasingly, social and economic development is determined by the technologies, including ICT. Technologic development can be seen, on the one hand, as an opportunity and, on the other hand, as a threat to the socio-economic development. The substitution of human-to-human relationships with human-to-machine or machine-to-machine connections is becoming increasingly more controversial, thus providing a basis for scientific deliberations. Trust, which is the cornerstone of all interpersonal relationships, is frequently mentioned in the context of interactions between humans and technologies, becoming the object of scientific interest. One of the growing ICT areas is services provided by public administration (e-government) enabling citizens to deal with official matters via the Internet. Considering a relatively low level of e-government technology adoption in Poland, compared to other European countries, it is justified to search for reasons for such a state of affairs. Trust seems to have an important place among many factors determining the development of e-government technology. In technology acceptance models, among the determinants of trust in technology, especially in the context of personal data security, an important role is played by the perceived level of risk and security associated with the use of solutions. This article aimed to identify if the perceived risk and security of e-government technology determine the level of trust in the technology and future intentions of its adoption. Based on the literature review, the authors hypothesised that trust in e-government technology and the future intention of its use could be directly shaped by perceived risk and security. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect research data from Polish citizens. All in all, 1,067 forms were filled. Results received using the structural equation modelling confirmed that the most important factor shaping trust in technology was a perceived level of security. Results also confirmed a positive impact of trust on the future intended use.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-014
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5132-166X Ejdys, Joanna
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2067-4398 Ginevicius, Romualdas
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5748-5702 Rozsa, Zoltan
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7887-7326 Janoskova, Katarina
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/153583
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.isbasedonAlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2008). The Use of the UTA UT Model in the Adoption of e-Government. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.452.
dc.relation.isbasedonAl-Thunibat, A., Zin, N., & Sahari, N. (2011). Modelling the Factors That Influence Mobile Government Services Acceptance. African Journal of Business Management, 5(34), 13030-13043. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2083.
dc.relation.isbasedonAlzahrani, L., Al.-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonAyyash, M. M., Ahmad, K., & Singh, D. (2013). Investigating the effect of information systems factors on trust in e-government initiative adoption in Palestinian public sector. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(15), 3865-3875. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4447.
dc.relation.isbasedonBelanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(4), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004.
dc.relation.isbasedonBelanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002.
dc.relation.isbasedonBenlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). The Signaling Role of IT Features in Influencing Trust and Participation in Online Communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 7-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/41300715.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adaptation: a cultural comparison. Information System Frontier, 10(4), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, L. (2008). A Model of Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Payment. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6(1), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2008.015997.
dc.relation.isbasedonChodakowska, E., & Nazarko, J. (2017). Environmental DEA method for assessing productivity of European countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1272069.
dc.relation.isbasedonColesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding Trust in e-Government. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 63(4), 1-15.
dc.relation.isbasedonEjdys, J. (2016). Prospective Quality Attributes of Nursing Home Care Services. In Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference Business and Management, Vilnius, Lithuania, 12-13 May 2016. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2016.59.
dc.relation.isbasedonEjdys, J., & Halicka, K. (2018). Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology – The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults. Sustainability, 10(10), 3770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103770.
dc.relation.isbasedonEuropean Commission. (2016). Digital Public Services. Europe's Digital Progress Report 2016. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/official-documents/digital-public-services.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonEuropean Commission. (2018a). Digital Single Market. Digital Economy & Society. Retrieved from www.digital-agenda-data.eu/charts/desi-composite#chart.
dc.relation.isbasedonEuropean Commission. (2018b). Glossary. Digital Single Market. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/glossary#letter_e.
dc.relation.isbasedonEurostat. (2016). Digital Economy and Society Database. Retrieved from www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society/data/database.
dc.relation.isbasedonGefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 33(3), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/569905.569910.
dc.relation.isbasedonGefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519.
dc.relation.isbasedonHernández-Ortega, B. (2011). The role of post-use trust in the acceptance of a technology: Drivers and consequences. Technovation, 31(10-11), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.07.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonHiltunen, E., & Hiltunen, K. (2015). Technolife 2035. How Will Technology Change our Future. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonHole, K. J. (2016). Building Trust in E-Government Services. Computer, 19(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.4.
dc.relation.isbasedonHorst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003.
dc.relation.isbasedonJacob, D. W., Fudzee, M. F., Salamat, M. A., Kasim, S., Mahdin, H., & Ramli, A. A. (2017). Modelling End-User of Electronic-Government Service: The Role of Information Quality, System Quality and Trust. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226 (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012096.
dc.relation.isbasedonJasimuddin, S. M., Mishra, N., & Saif Almuraqab, N. A. (2017). Modelling the factors that influence the acceptance of digital technologies in e-government services in the UAE: a PLS-SEM Approach. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1307-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1375144.
dc.relation.isbasedonJoshi, P. R., & Islam, S. (2018). E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Sustainability, 10(6), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882.
dc.relation.isbasedonKaur, K., & Rampersad, G. (2018). Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonKhanyako, E., & Maiga, G. (2013). An information security model for e-Government services adoption in Uganda. In 2013 IST-Africa Conference & Exhibition. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6701771/.
dc.relation.isbasedonKhasawneh, R. W., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2013). E-government acceptance factors: trust and risk. In The 6th international conference on information technology (pp. 8-10). http://icit.zuj.edu.jo/icit13/Papers%20list/Camera_ready/E-Technology/613_final.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonKim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonKoller, M. (1988). Risk as a determinant of trust. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9(4), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0904_2.
dc.relation.isbasedonKolnhofer Derecskei, A. (2018). Relations between risk attitudes, culture and the endowment effect. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(4), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2018-0019.
dc.relation.isbasedonKumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5(1), 63-76.
dc.relation.isbasedonKurfal, M., Arifoglu, A., Tokdemir, G., & Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041.
dc.relation.isbasedonLai, K. W. I., Tong, V. W. L., & Lai, D. C. F. (2011). Trust factors influencing the adoption of internet-based interorganizational systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonLankton, N. K., & McKnight, H. D. (2011). What Does it Mean to Trust Facebook? Examining Technology and Interpersonal Trust Beliefs. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 42(2), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989098.1989101.
dc.relation.isbasedonLean, O. K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012.
dc.relation.isbasedonLee, C. B. P., & Wan, G. (2010). Including Subjective Norm and Technology Trust in the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case of E-Ticketing in China. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 41(4), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1145/1899639.1899642.
dc.relation.isbasedonLemire, M., Paré, G., Sicotte, C., & Harvey, C. (2008). Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(11), 723-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.002.
dc.relation.isbasedonLewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601.
dc.relation.isbasedonLi, X., Hess, T. J., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(1), 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonLippert, S. K., & Davis, M. (2006). A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behaviour. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506066042.
dc.relation.isbasedonLiu, Y., & Zhou, C. (2010). A citizen trust model for e-government. In Software Engineering and Service Sciences (ICSESS), IEEE International Conference (pp. 751-754). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2010.5552260.
dc.relation.isbasedonLuhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. London: John Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonMayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
dc.relation.isbasedonMazey, N. CHL, & Wingreen, S. C. (2017). Perceptions of trust in bionano sensors: Is it against our better judgement? An investigation of generalised expectancies and the emerging technology trust paradox. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(7), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717717388.
dc.relation.isbasedonMcKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359. https://doi.org/doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81.
dc.relation.isbasedonMellouli, M., Bentahar, O., & Bidan, M. (2016). Trust and e-government acceptance: The case of Tunisian on-line tax filing. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 19(3), 197-212.
dc.relation.isbasedonMuraya, B. M. (2015). Factors affecting successful adoption of e-government in Kenya’s public sector (Unpublished masters thesis). United States International University Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
dc.relation.isbasedonMyeong, S., Kwon, Y., & Seo, H. (2014). Sustainable E-Governance: The Relationship among Trust, Digital Divide, and E-Government. Sustainability, 6(9), 6049-6069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6096049.
dc.relation.isbasedonNazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Magruk, A., Nazarko, Ł., & Skorek, A. (2017). Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology. Procedia Engineering, 182, 482-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.140.
dc.relation.isbasedonNazarko, L. (2016). Responsible Research and Innovation – A New Paradigm of Technology Management. In 9th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2016”. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2016.71.
dc.relation.isbasedonNazarko, L. (2017). Future-Oriented Technology Assessment. Procedia Engineering, 182, 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.144.
dc.relation.isbasedonPavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69-103.
dc.relation.isbasedonPolak-Sopinska, A., & Wisniewski, Z. (2009). The analysis and assessment of adjustment of selected web sites and web browsers to the needs of people with disabilities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5616(22), 768-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_82.
dc.relation.isbasedonPolish Ministry of Digitalization. (2016). E-administracja w oczach internautów (E-Government in the eyes of Internet users), Sopot.
dc.relation.isbasedonRadziszewski, P., Nazarko, J., Vilutiene, T., Dębkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kilon, J., Kononiuk, A., Kowalski, K. J., Król, J. B., Nazarko, Ł., & Sarnowski, M. (2016). Future trends in road pavement technologies development in the context of environmental protection. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 11(2), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2016.19.
dc.relation.isbasedonRanaweera, H. M. B. P. (2016). Perspective of trust inwards e‑government initiatives in Sri Lanka. SpringerPlus, 5(22), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1650-y.
dc.relation.isbasedonReiersen, J. (2017). Trust as a booster. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(4), 585-598. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1334228.
dc.relation.isbasedonRotchanakitumnuai, S. (2007). The important risk factors of E-Government service adoption. In 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICOM.2007.904.
dc.relation.isbasedonRukiza, V., Karokola, G., Mwakalinga, J., & Kowalski, S. (2011). Secure e-government adoption: A case study of Tanzania. In Proceedings of the European Security Conference (ESC 2011) (pp. 18-32). Örebro, Sweden.
dc.relation.isbasedonRutkauskas, A. V., & Stasytytė, V. (2011). Peculiarities of risk concept formation. Business: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2011.15.
dc.relation.isbasedonSalam, A. F., Rao, H. R., & Pegels, C. C. (2003). Consumer-perceived risk in e-commerce transactions. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1145/953460.953517.
dc.relation.isbasedonSalam, M. A. (2017). The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance. An empirical investigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 298-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0075.
dc.relation.isbasedonSchlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006). Converting website visitors into buyers: how website investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.133.
dc.relation.isbasedonShareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). E-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonShiau, W.-L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1317-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0807-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonSöderström, E., Eriksson, N., & Åhlfeldt, R.-M. (2016). Managing healthcare information: analyzing trust. Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 29(7), 786-800. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2015-0136.
dc.relation.isbasedonTung, F.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Chou, C.-M. (2008). An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006.
dc.relation.isbasedonUnited Nations. (2016). United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
dc.relation.isbasedonVenkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Science, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
dc.relation.isbasedonVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1966). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonVerkijika, S. F., & Wet, L. D. (2018). E-government adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.101 /j.elerap.2018.05.012.
dc.relation.isbasedonVeselý, Š., & Dohnal, M. (2016). Formalized qualitative modeling of online trust: introduction of the method and a detailed example. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 19(2), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-014.
dc.relation.isbasedonWang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72-101. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol6/iss3/4.
dc.relation.isbasedonWarkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P., & Rose, G. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162.
dc.relation.isbasedonWeerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001.
dc.relation.isbasedonWisniewski, Z., & Polak-Sopinska, A. (2009). HCI standards for handicapped. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5614(21), 672-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02707-9_76.
dc.relation.isbasedonWitarsyah, D., Fudzee, M. F., & Salamat, M. A. (2017). A conceptual study on generic end users adoption of e-government services. International Journal of Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 7(3), 1000-1006. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.1654.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjecte-governmenten
dc.subjecttrust in technologyen
dc.subjectperceived risk|wsafetyen
dc.subject.classificationG34
dc.subject.classificationM12
dc.titleThe Role of Perceived Risk and Security Level in Building Trust in E-government Solutionsen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage235
local.citation.spage220
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_3_2019_14
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume22
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2019_14.pdf
Size:
736.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 3