Innovations among people. How positive relationships at work can trigger innovation creation

dc.contributor.authorGlińska-Neweś, Aldona
dc.contributor.authorSudolska, Agata
dc.contributor.authorKarwacki, Arkadiusz
dc.contributor.authorGórka, Joanna
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-02
dc.date.available2017-10-02
dc.date.issued2017-10-02
dc.description.abstractInnovations are the essence of the successful organization. The process of their creation is strongly based on individual and team commitment to create improvements in every organizational area. This commitment is triggered by innovation climate including employee positive relationships (PRW) and supporting internal communication facets. The aim of the paper is to define causal relations among the aforementioned variables. We hypothesize that positive relationships at work are a prerequisite of the innovation creation process, i.e. they stimulate employee commitment to innovation creation regardless of the employee position in an organization as well as influence internal communication facets that support innovativeness. Notably, among internal communication elements we analyze open communication of both good and bad information and employee informal meetings. The analyses are based on the quantitative survey conducted on the sample of 200 Polish companies representing various sectors and selected from rankings of the most dynamically developing organizations in Central Europe. In each company we obtained information from a person involved in leading a team creating innovations, i.e. representing different functional departments. In the course of data analyses we used the hierarchical regression and the linear regression analysis. The results support the hypotheses of PRW key role in the innovativeness process, and the effect appeared to be linear. Specifically, positive relationships at work stimulate both employee individual commitment to innovations and internal communication supporting innovativeness. These findings contribute to the research stream connected with the Positive Organizational Scholarship umbrella concept. Practical implications of the survey point to the need of positive relationships at work stimulation in organizations.en
dc.formattext
dc.format.extent17 s.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2017-3-006
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/20916
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAbeyrathne, H.R.M.P., & Jayawardena, L.N.A.C. (2014). Impact of Group Interactions on Farmers’ Entrepreneurial Behaviour. E&M Ekonomie a Management. 17(4), 46-57. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2014-4-004.
dc.relation.isbasedonAgrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1996). Innovation and creativity in work groups. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 314-343). London: Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonAiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5, 63-82.
dc.relation.isbasedonAlexander, J. F., & Parsons, B. V. (1973). Short-term Behavioral Intervention with Delinquent Families: Impact on Family Process and Recidivism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81(3), 219-225.
dc.relation.isbasedonAnderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Vallidation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 19(3), 235-268. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235
dc.relation.isbasedonAydin, B., & Ceylan, C. (2009). The Role of Organizational Culture on Effectiveness. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 12(3), 33-49.
dc.relation.isbasedonBaregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578.
dc.relation.isbasedonBerman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, M. N. (2002). Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00172.
dc.relation.isbasedonBessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H., & Philips, W. (2005). Managing innovations beyond the steady state. Technovation, 25(12), 1366-1376. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.007.
dc.relation.isbasedonBessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Chichester: Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonBono, J. E., & Yoon, D. J. (2012). Positive Supervisory Reelationships. In L. Turner de Tormes Eby & T. D. Allen (Eds.), Personal Relationships. The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being (pp. 43-66). New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.isbasedonBradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000). Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between. Organization Science, 11(5), 551-564. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.551.15203.
dc.relation.isbasedonBrounstein, M. (2001). Communicating Effectively for Dummies. New York: Wiley Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonBrown, T. E., & Ulijn, J. M. (2004). Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture, a matter of interaction between technology, progress and economic growth? An Introduction. In T. E. Brown, & J. M. Ulijn (Eds.), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture, a matter of interaction between technology, progress and economic growth (pp. 1-38). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
dc.relation.isbasedonBurke, W. W., & Litwin G. H. (1992). A casual model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523-545. doi:10.1177/014920639201800306.
dc.relation.isbasedonBurtis, J. O., & Turman, P. D. (2005). Group Communication Pitfalls: Overcoming Barriers to an Effective Group Experience. New York: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.isbasedonCameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonCameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship. Foundation of a New Discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
dc.relation.isbasedonCarmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81-98. doi:10.1002/sres.932.
dc.relation.isbasedonChen, G., & Sharma, P. N. (2012). Bringing Together the Yin and Yang of Social Exchanges in Teams. In L. Turner de Tormes Eby, & T. D. Allen (Eds.), Personal Relationships. The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being (pp. 221-234). New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.isbasedonChiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do Peers Make the Place? Conceptual Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Co-Worker Effects on Perceptions, Attitudes, OCBs, and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1104. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082.
dc.relation.isbasedonCollins, K. (2003). Penetrating Barriers. Communication World, June–July, 26-30.
dc.relation.isbasedonColquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A. & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909.
dc.relation.isbasedonCushman, D. P., & Cahn, D. D. Jr. (1985). Communication in Interpersonal Relationships. New York: State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonDamanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. doi:10.2307/256406.
dc.relation.isbasedonDamanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693.
dc.relation.isbasedonDavidson, M. N., & James E. H. (2007). The Engines of Positive Relationships Across Difference: Conflict and Learning. In J. E. Dutton, & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (pp. 137-158). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.isbasedonDeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefit of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1), 4-22. doi:10.1108/eb022847.
dc.relation.isbasedonDe Dreu, K. W. (2006). When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107. doi:10.1177/0149206305277795.
dc.relation.isbasedonDe Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team effectiveness, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
dc.relation.isbasedonDirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
dc.relation.isbasedonDrah-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamic Theory, 5(2), 111-123. doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.2.111.
dc.relation.isbasedonDrah-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2013). Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation: The Role of Team Composition and Climate for Innovation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684-708. doi:10.1177/0149206310394187.
dc.relation.isbasedonDutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The Power of High-Quality Connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship. Foundation of a New Discipline (pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
dc.relation.isbasedonDutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. (Eds.). (2007). Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.isbasedonEkvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123. doi:10.1080/13594329608414845.
dc.relation.isbasedonEllonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organizational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181. doi:10.1108/14601060810869848.
dc.relation.isbasedonErven, B. L. (2012). Overcoming Barriers to Communication. Retrieved April 24, 2015, from http://aede.ag.ohio-state.edu/people/erven.1/HRM/communication.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedonFredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive Emotions and Upward Spirals in Organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundation of a New Discipline (pp. 163-173). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
dc.relation.isbasedonGorse, C. A., & Emmitt, S. (2009). Informal interaction in construction progress meetings. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), 983-993. doi:10.1080/01446190903179710.
dc.relation.isbasedonGrant, A. R., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375. doi:10.1080/19416520903047327.
dc.relation.isbasedonHalbesleben, J. R. B. (2012). Positive Coworker Exchanges. In L. Turner de Tormes Eby, & T. D. Allen (Eds.), Personal Relationships. The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being (pp. 107-130). New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.isbasedonHardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonHolá, J. (2012). Internal Communication in the Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 15(3), 32-45.
dc.relation.isbasedonHunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90. doi:10.1080/10400410709336883.
dc.relation.isbasedonIbarra, H. (1993). Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87. doi:10.5465/AMR.1993.3997507.
dc.relation.isbasedonIsaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for Innovation: The Two Faces of Tension in Creative Climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00558.x.
dc.relation.isbasedonIsaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_5.
dc.relation.isbasedonKahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287.
dc.relation.isbasedonKram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132. doi:10.2307/256064.
dc.relation.isbasedonLeenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 69-92. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5.
dc.relation.isbasedonLewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.isbasedonLoewe, P., & Dominiquini, J. (2006). Overcoming the barriers to effective innovation. Strategy and Leadership, 34(1), 24-31. doi:10.1108/10878570610637858.
dc.relation.isbasedonMakin, P. J., Cooper, C. L., & Cox, C. J. (1996). Organizations and Psychological Contract. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
dc.relation.isbasedonMangrum, F. G. (2002). Macro and Micro Features of Informal Meetings: A Theoretical Framework. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Central States Communication Association. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED463519.
dc.relation.isbasedonMcKnight, D. H., & Chervany, D. H. (1996). The Meaning of Trust. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
dc.relation.isbasedonMitrović, S., Grubić-Nešić, L., Milisavljević, S., Melović, B., & Babinková, Z. (2014). Manager's Assessment of Organizational Culture. E&M Economics and Management, 17(3), 35-49. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2014-3-004.
dc.relation.isbasedonMumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., Eubanks, D. L., Bedell, K., & Murphy, S. T. (2007). Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 402-417. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.002.
dc.relation.isbasedonMuñoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 125-145. doi:10.1108/02635571211193671.
dc.relation.isbasedonMurstein, B. I. (1977). The Stimulus-Value-Role (SVR) Theory of Dydic Relationship. In S. Duck (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 105-129). London: Academic Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonNaranjo-Valencia J. C., Jimenez-Jimenez D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55-72. doi:10.1108/00251741111094437.
dc.relation.isbasedonNemeth, C., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 275-280. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180306.
dc.relation.isbasedonNonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonO’Conaill, B., & Frohlich, D. (1995). Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. Proceedings of CHI’95 Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 262-263). New York: ACM Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonPerry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89-106. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.8925236.
dc.relation.isbasedonPietrzak, M. B., & Łapińska, J. (2015). Determinants of the European Union’s Trade – Evidence From a Panel Estimation of the Gravity Model. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 18(1), 18-27. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2015-1-002.
dc.relation.isbasedonPirson, M. (2008). Facing the Trust Gap Measuring and Managing Stakeholder Trust. Saarbrucken: SVH.
dc.relation.isbasedonPlessis, M. D. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20-29. doi:10.1108/13673270710762684.
dc.relation.isbasedonQuinn, R. W. (2007). Energizing Others in Work Connections. In J. E. Dutton, & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (pp. 73-90). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.isbasedonRagins, B. R., & Dutton, J. E. (2007). Positive Relationships at Work: An Introduction and Invitation. In J. E. Dutton, & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (pp. 3-25). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.isbasedonRawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics, and the Life Course. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
dc.relation.isbasedonRoberts, L. M. (2007). From Proving to Becoming: How Positive Relationships Create a Context for Self-discovery and Self-actualization. In J. E. Dutton, & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (pp. 29-46). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.isbasedonRoss, P. F. (1974). Innovation adoption by organizations. Personnel Psychology, 27, 21-47.
dc.relation.isbasedonShalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal. 38(2), 483-503. doi:10.2307/256689.
dc.relation.isbasedonServa, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The Reciprocal Nature of Trust: A Longitudinal Study of Interacting Teams. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26(6), 625-648. doi:10.1002/job.331.
dc.relation.isbasedonShaw, R. B. (1997). Trust in the Balance: Building Successful Organizations on Results, Integrity and Concern. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.isbasedonSökmen, A., Bitmiş, M. G., & Üner, M. M. (2015). The Mediating Role of Person-Organization Fit in the Supportive Leadership-Outcome Relationships. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 18(3), 62-72. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2015-3-006.
dc.relation.isbasedonStephens, J. P., Heaphy, E., & Dutton, J. E. (2012). High-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 385-399). New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.isbasedonSzczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2014). Innovation process in the social space of the organization. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 14(3), 220-229. doi:10.15181/rfds.v14i3.878.
dc.relation.isbasedonTurner de Tormes Eby, L., & Allen, T. D. (Eds.). (2012). Personal Relationships. The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.isbasedonUtterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7.
dc.relation.isbasedonVan Offenbeek, M., & Koopman, P. (1996). Interaction and decision making in project teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 159-187). London: Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonWest, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 3-13). Chichester: Wiley.
dc.relation.isbasedonWestphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). A Behavioral Theory of Corporate Governance: Explicating the Mechanisms of Socially Situated and Socially Constituted Agency. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 607-661. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.783669.
dc.relation.isbasedonWolf, P., Kaudela-Baum, S., & Meissner, J. O. (2012). Exploring innovating cultures in small and medium-sized enterprises: Findings from Central Switzerland. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 242-274. doi:10.1177/0266242610386666.
dc.relation.isbasedonWoodman, R., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Towar a theory of organizational creativity. Academ of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
dc.relation.isbasedonZhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-697. doi:10.2307/3069410.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectInnovationen
dc.subjectinnovation creationen
dc.subjectpositive relationships at worken
dc.subjectinternal communicationen
dc.subject.classificationO31
dc.subject.classificationJ29
dc.subject.classificationD23
dc.titleInnovations among people. How positive relationships at work can trigger innovation creationen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage100
local.citation.spage84
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue3
local.relation.volume20
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_3_2017_06.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Článek
Collections