Human Resource Sustainability and Digital Transformation: Exploring the Role of Key Actors

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorEger, Ludvík
dc.contributor.authorEgerová, Dana
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T12:40:57Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T12:40:57Z
dc.description.abstractDigital transformation changes economy and society, makes significant changes in people’s life and can have both positive and negative consequences for individuals, organisations and society. To the success of digital transformation, the human factor is more important than the technology itself. This research survey focuses on the human perception of support needed from different actors for their adaptation towards digital transformation. The quantitative research in the form of a questionnaire survey was carried out using an online panel. The respondents for the questionnaire survey were adult people living in the Czech Republic (n = 1000 from generations Baby Boomers, X and Y). The questionnaire design was inspired by the OECD Risks That Matter Survey 2020. The research focuses on what role different actors play in addressing negative impacts of digital transformation. The findings show that the highest level of responsibility was given to the Czech government, followed by firms and public administration. Conversely, lower levels of accountability were attributed to nonprofit organisations and trade unions, but surprisingly also at the individual level. The findings further found no significant effect on the perception of responsibility of government, firms and public administration, nonprofit organisations and trade unions for gender, education, nature of work and type of generation. However, we identified differences among groups in their assessment of responsibility on an individual level. Findings are important for decision-makers that should be responsible for peoples’ transformation in the context of digital transformation.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/009/lef-2023-09
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-7494-627-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/172825
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonALIEVA, J. and POWELL, D.J. (2023). The significance of employee behaviours and soft management practices to avoid digital waste during a digital transformation, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(1), (2023) 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2021-0127
dc.relation.isbasedonALY, H. (2022). Digital transformation, development and productivity in developing countries: is artificial intelligence a curse or a blessing? Review of Economics and Political Science, 7(4), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-11-2019-0145
dc.relation.isbasedonAUST, I., MATTHEWS, B., and MULLER-CAMEN, M. (2020). Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705
dc.relation.isbasedonBLANKA, CH., KRUMAY, B., and RUECKEL, D. (2022). The interplay of digital transformation and employ competence: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 178, 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575
dc.relation.isbasedonBOSWELL, W. R., OLSON‐BUCHANAN, J. B., and HARRIS, T. B. (2014). I cannot afford to have a life: Employee adaptation to feelings of job insecurity. Personnel Psychology. 67(4), 887–915. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2556303
dc.relation.isbasedonBRINK, K.L., and ZONDA, M.M. (2021). Examining Job Attribute Preferences Across Three Generational Cohorts. Journal of Career Development, 48(1) 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319837384
dc.relation.isbasedonBURS, A. C., VEECK A., and BUSH, R. F. (2017). Marketing research. Harlow: Pearson.
dc.relation.isbasedonCALVO-PORRAL, C., PESQUEIRA-SANCHEZ, R., and FAIÑA MEDÍN, A. (2019). A clustered-based categorization of millennials in their technology behavior, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 35(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1451429
dc.relation.isbasedonCHEN, P., and HAO, Y. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: the moderating role of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibilty and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2324
dc.relation.isbasedonCVVM. (2021). How does the Public Opinion Research Centre select respondents? [online]. [cit. 2021-12-15]. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/en/cvvm2/frequently-asked-questions-menu/4847-how-does-the-public-opinion-research-centre-select-respondents
dc.relation.isbasedonDATACOLLECT, 2022. CAWI – Online Interviewing. [online]. [cit. 2021-12-15]. Available at: https://www.datacollect.cz/en/cawi-online-research/
dc.relation.isbasedonFREY, C.B., and OSBORNE, M.A. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
dc.relation.isbasedonHECKLAU, F., GALEITZKE, M., & FLACHS, S. and KOHL, H. (2016). Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0, Procedia CIRP, 54, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102
dc.relation.isbasedonHEILIG, L., LALLA-RUIZ, E., and VOß, S. (2017). Digital Transformation in Maritime Ports: Analysis and a Game Theoretic Framework. Neteconomics: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 18(2–3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x
dc.relation.isbasedonINTERNET WORLD STATS. (2023). Usage and population statistics. [cit. 2023-06-15]. Available at: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm
dc.relation.isbasedonKRAMAR, R. (2022). Sustainable human resource management: Six defining characteristics. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12321
dc.relation.isbasedonKRAUS, S., DURST, S, FERREIRA, J. J., VEIGA, P., KAILER, N., and WEINMANN, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
dc.relation.isbasedonKRISTAL,T. (2020). Why has computerization increased wage inequality? Information, occupational structural power, and wage inequality, Work and Occupations, 47(4) (2020) 466–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888420941031
dc.relation.isbasedonLI, S.; GAO, L., HAN, C.; GUPTA, B., ALHALABI, W., and ALMAKDI, S. (2023). Exploring the effect of digital transformation on Firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100317
dc.relation.isbasedonOECD (2021). OECD Risks That Matter Survey 2020 survey. [online]. [cit. 2021-10-15]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/social/risks-that-matter.htm
dc.relation.isbasedonPAPPAS, I.,O., MIKALEF, P., GIANNAKOS, M., N.,KROGSTIE, J., and LEKAKOS, (2018). Big dataand business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information System and e-Business Management, 16, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-018-0377-z
dc.relation.isbasedonŠVARC, J., LAŽNJAK, J., and DABIĆ, M., (2021). The role of national intellectual capital in the digital transformation of EU countries. Another digital divide?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(4), 768–791.
dc.relation.isbasedonTABRIZI, B., LAM, E., GIRARD, K. and IRVIN, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harward Bussines Review, [online]. [cit. 2021-10-15]. Available at: https://hbr.org/2019/03/digital-transformation-is-notabout-technology.
dc.relation.ispartofLiberecké ekonomické fórum 2023cs
dc.relation.ispartofLiberec Economic Forum 2023en
dc.subjectdigital transformationen
dc.subjecthuman resourcesen
dc.subjectgenerationsen
dc.subjectindividual’s perceptionen
dc.subject.classificationM39
dc.subject.classificationM53
dc.subject.classificationM54
dc.titleHuman Resource Sustainability and Digital Transformation: Exploring the Role of Key Actorsen
dc.typeproceeding paperen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage84
local.citation.spage77
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationLEFcs
local.relation.abbreviationLEFen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LEF_2023_09.pdf
Size:
430.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
conference paper
Download
Collections
LEF 2023