Recommendations for Strengthening the Critical Factors of Utilizing the Public Procurement for Innovative Solutions

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJanuska, Martin
dc.contributor.authorPesik, Jiri
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T12:41:03Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T12:41:03Z
dc.description.abstractThe presented article presents recommendations for strengthening the critical factors of utilizing the Public Procurement for Innovative solutions (PPI) concept. The utilization of the PPI concept is the author's research topic, and the author has already published several articles on this subject. As part of the author's research, critical success factors of the PPI concept were identified in the Januska & Palacka (2023) article. This article presents research conducted within autor habilitation thesis and describes proposals for eliminating or mitigating the identified barriers based on structured interviews with industry experts and a literature review. The aim of this article is to disseminate the results of the conducted research among the scientific community. Martin Januska has also been a co-researcher on two international projects, PPI2Innovate and RI2Integrate, focusing on supporting the PPI concept in the Interreg Central and Interreg Danube programs. Expert groups have been established within these project structures and are utilized in the development of the proposals.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/009/lef-2023-44
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-7494-627-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/172860
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAJMAL, M., KHAN, M. and AL-YAFREI, H. (2020), "Exploring factors behind project scope creep – stakeholders’ perspective", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2018-0228
dc.relation.isbasedonBLOCH, C. and M. M. BUGGE. (2013). Public sector innovation – From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27: 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
dc.relation.isbasedonCALOGHIROU, Y., PROTOGEROU, A. and P. PANAGIOTOPOULOS. (2016). Public procurement for innovation: A novel eGovernment services scheme in Greek local authorities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.016
dc.relation.isbasedonEDLER, J., GEORGHIOU, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation - Resurrecting the demand side. Research policy. 36: 949-963 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
dc.relation.isbasedonHOMMEN, L. and M. ROLFSTAM. (2008). Public procurement and innovation: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 8 (3): 17-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001.
dc.relation.isbasedonJANUŠKA, M., AND A., PALACKÁ. (2023). Critical Success Factors for Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions in Central Europe: Empirical Study, E&M Economics and Management, 2023.
dc.relation.isbasedonKALVET, T. and V. LEMBER. (2010). Risk management in public procurement for innovation: the case of Nordic–Baltic Sea cities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23 (3): 241-262, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2011.553509.
dc.relation.isbasedonLEMBER, V., KATTEL, R. and T. KAVLET. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28 (3): 403421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245
dc.relation.isbasedonMIRZA, M. N., POURZOLFAGHAR, Z., & SHANAZARI, M. (2013). Significance of Scope in Project Success. Procedia Technology, 9, 722–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROTCY.2013.12.080
dc.relation.isbasedonPODOLOVA, L. (2019). POSTUP KRAJE JAKO VEŘEJNÉHO ZADAVATELE PŘI ZADÁVÁNÍ VEŘEJNÝCH ZAKÁZEK V OBLASTI INOVACÍ MANUÁL. [online], [2020-1-1]. Dostupné z: https://www.kr-jihomoravsky.cz/Default.aspx?PubID=370945&TypeID=2
dc.relation.isbasedonROLFSTAM, M. (2012). An institutional approach to research on public procurement of innovation, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25 (3): 303- 321, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.717475
dc.relation.isbasedonTORVINEN, H. and P. ULKUNIEMI. (2016). End-user engagement within innovative public procurement practices: A case study on public-private partnership procurement. Industrial Marketing Management, 58: 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.015
dc.relation.isbasedonUYARRA, E., and K. FLANAGAN. (2010). Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement. European Planning Studies, 18 (1): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567
dc.relation.isbasedonVALOVIRTA, V. and J. EDLER. (2015). Building capability for public procurement of innovation. In: Edquist, C., Vonortas, N., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. (Eds.), Public Procurement for Innovation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471898.00009
dc.relation.ispartofLiberecké ekonomické fórum 2023cs
dc.relation.ispartofLiberec Economic Forum 2023en
dc.subjectpublic procurement for innovative solutionsen
dc.subjectPPIen
dc.subjectPPI critical sucess facotrsen
dc.subject.classificationH0
dc.subject.classificationM0
dc.titleRecommendations for Strengthening the Critical Factors of Utilizing the Public Procurement for Innovative Solutionsen
dc.typeproceeding paperen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage415
local.citation.spage407
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationLEFcs
local.relation.abbreviationLEFen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LEF_2023_44.pdf
Size:
348.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
conference paper
Download
Collections
LEF 2023