Assessment of Logistics Platform Efficiency Using an Integrated Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process-data Envelopment Analysis Approach: A Novel Methodological Approach Including a Case Study in Slovenia

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record Bajec, Patricija Kontelj, Monika Groznik, Aleš
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs 2020-09-02T09:42:32Z 2020-09-02T09:42:32Z
dc.identifier.issn 1212-3609
dc.description.abstract The objective of this study is to propose a trustworthy, valid and consistent methodological approach for measuring the efficiency of a logistics platform, where an entire country constitutes a logistic platform. Traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is found to be an appropriate tool – if its weaknesses are eliminated. DEA results are highly influenced by the choice of appropriate inputs and outputs variables, but the method itself does not provide guidance for their identification. The authors therefore propose to integrate traditional DEA by combining the Delphi technique with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which will assist in identifying proper, consistent input/output variables, evaluated by their relevance. The proposed framework allows the performance evaluation of the selected platform’s element or elements. It is thus a useful decision support tool for enterprises (private, public, both) that are managing logistics platforms and trying to improve their productivity in order to sustain or improve their position on the competitive market. This methodology allows comparative efficiency analyses to be estimated for similar countries. The presented methodology on one hand enables tailor-made solutions, but on the other hand is very general, and, with minor adjustments, can be applied by a variety of firms and industries. It can be applied in private sector firms in production and service industries, to analyse the relative performance of diverse logistics and non-logistics services, and in public profit or non-profit organisations. en
dc.format text
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon Abrahamsson, M., Aldin, N., & Stahre, F. (2003). Logistics platforms for improved strategic flexibility. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(3), 85–106.
dc.relation.isbasedon Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 39(10), 1261–1264.
dc.relation.isbasedon Antún, J. P., & Alarcón, R. (2014). Ranking Projects of Logistics Platforms: A Methodology Based on the Electre Multicriteria Approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160, 5–14.
dc.relation.isbasedon Awad-Núñez, S., González-Cancelas, N., Soler-Flores, F., & Camarero-Orive, A. (2015). How should the sustainability of the location of dry ports be measured? A proposed methodology using Bayesian networks and multi-criteria decision analysis. Transport, 30(3), 312–319.
dc.relation.isbasedon Azadi, M., Hosseinzadeh Zoroufchi, K., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2012). A combination of Russell model and neutral DEA for 3PL provider selection. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 10(1), 25–39.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bansal, A., & Kumar, P. (2013). 3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 14(3), 373–397.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bolumole, Y. A., Closs, D. J., & Rodammer, F. A. (2015). The economic development role of regional logistics hubs: a cross‐country study of interorganizational governance models. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(2), 182–198.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bourlakis, M., Melewar, T., Banomyong, R., & Supatn, N. (2011). Selecting logistics providers in Thailand: a shippers’ perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 419–437.
dc.relation.isbasedon Bray, S., Caggiani, L., & Ottomanelli, M. (2015). Measuring transport systems efficiency under uncertainty by fuzzy sets theory based Data Envelopment Analysis: theoretical and practical comparison with traditional DEA model. Transportation Research Procedia, 5, 186–200.
dc.relation.isbasedon Çakir, E. (2009). Logistics outsourcing and selection of third party logistics service provider (3PL) via fuzzy AHP (Master Thesis). Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul.
dc.relation.isbasedon Charles, V., Kumar, M., & Kavitha, S. I. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of assembled printed circuit boards with undesirable outputs using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 194–206.
dc.relation.isbasedon Cheng, M. C. B., & Wang, J. J. (2016). An integrative approach in measuring hub-port supply chain performance: Potential contributions of a logistics and transport data exchange platform. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(2), 150–160.
dc.relation.isbasedon Cook, W. D., Kress, M., & Seiford, L. M. (1992). Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(2), 319–323.
dc.relation.isbasedon Cylus, J., Papanicolas, I., & Smith, P. C. (2017). Using data envelopment analysis to address the challenges of comparing health system efficiency. Global Policy, 8(52), 60–68.
dc.relation.isbasedon Daim, T. U., Udbye, A., & Balasubramanian, A. (2012). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 28–51.
dc.relation.isbasedon de Carvalho, C. C., de Carvalho, M. F. H., & Lima Jr, O. F. (2013). Efficient logistic platform design: the case of Campinas Platform. Paper presented at XVI International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, São Carlos, Brazil. Retrieved from
dc.relation.isbasedon Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259.
dc.relation.isbasedon Fanti, M. P., Iacobellis, G., Mangini, A. M., Precchiazzi, I., & Ukovich, W. (2017). A flexible platform for intermodal transportation and integrated logistics. Paper presented at the Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI), 2017 IEEE International Conference (pp. 224–229).
dc.relation.isbasedon Fawcett, S. E., Waller, M. A., & Bowersox, D. J. (2011). Cinderella in the C‐suite: conducting influential research to advance the logistics and supply chain disciplines. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(2), 115–121.
dc.relation.isbasedon Forman, E. H., Saaty, T. L., Selly, M. A., & Waldron, R. (1983). Expert choice. McLean, VA: Decision Support Software Inc.
dc.relation.isbasedon Gattuso, D., Cassone, G. C., & Pellicanò, D. S. (2014). A micro-simulation model for performance evaluation of a logistics platform. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 574–583.
dc.relation.isbasedon Grzybowska, K., & Gajsek, B. (2016). Supply Chain Logistics Platform as a Supply Chain Coordination Support. In J. Bajo, M. J. Escalona, S. Giroux, P. Hoffa-Dąbrowska, V. Julián, P. Novais, N. Sánchez-Pi, R. Unland & R. Azambuja-Silveira (Eds.), Highlights of Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-Agent Systems (Vol. 616, pp. 61–72). Cham: Springer.
dc.relation.isbasedon Haralambides, H., & Gujar, G. (2012). On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: An eco-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14(1), 122–137.
dc.relation.isbasedon Hsu, C.-I., Liao, P., Yang, L.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2005). High-tech firm’s perception and demand for air cargo logistics services. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 2868–2880.
dc.relation.isbasedon Huguenin, J.-M. (2012). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): a pedagogical guide for decision makers in the public sector. Chavannes-près-Renens: Institut de hautes études en administration publique.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jablonský, J. (2009). Software support for multiple criteria decision making problems. Management Information Systems, 4(2), 29–34.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jaskowski, P., Biruk, S., & Bucon, R. (2010). Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment. Automation in construction, 19(2), 120–126.
dc.relation.isbasedon Jenkins, L., & Anderson, M. (2003). A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 51–61.
dc.relation.isbasedon Johnes, J. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273–288.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kocisova, K., Hass-Symotiuk, M., & Kludacz-Alessandri, M. (2018). Use of the DEA method to verify the performance model for hospitals. E&M Economics and Management, 21(4), 125–140.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumar, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), 287–303.
dc.relation.isbasedon Kumar Singh, S., & Kumar Bajpai, V. (2013). Estimation of operational efficiency and its determinants using DEA: The case of Indian coal-fired power plants. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 7(4), 409–429.
dc.relation.isbasedon Lakshmanan, T. R. (2011). The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. Journal of transport geography, 19(1), 1–12.
dc.relation.isbasedon Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307–317.
dc.relation.isbasedon Markovits-Somogyi, R., Gecse, G., & Bokor, Z. (2011). Basic efficiency measurement of Hungarian logistics centres using data envelopment analysis. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 19(2), 97–101.
dc.relation.isbasedon Martí, L., Martín, J. C., & Puertas, R. (2017). A DEA-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX. Journal of Applied Economics, 20(1), 169–192.
dc.relation.isbasedon Matajič, M., Šarenac, M., Bolha, V., Dobrijević, A., Fridrih Praznik, M., Genjac, A., … Kramar, U. (2011). Analiza možnosti in potreb razvoja javne železniške infrastrukture v Republiki Sloveniji: Strokovno-razvojna naloga, končno poročilo. Ljubljana: Prometni inštitut Ljubljana.
dc.relation.isbasedon Nataraja, N. R., & Johnson, A. L. (2011). Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 662–669.
dc.relation.isbasedon Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(3), 297–313.
dc.relation.isbasedon Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2002). A statistical test for nested radial DEA models. Operations Research, 50(4), 728–735.
dc.relation.isbasedon Qureshi, M., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2007). Selection of potential 3PL services providers using TOPSIS with interval data. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007 IEEE International Conference (pp. 1512–1516).
dc.relation.isbasedon Rajasekar, T., & Deo, M. (2014). Is there any efficiency difference between input and output oriented DEA Models: An approach to major ports in India. Journal of Business and Economic Policy, 1(2), 18–28.
dc.relation.isbasedon Ramanathan, R. (2003). An introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance measurement. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.isbasedon Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.
dc.relation.isbasedon Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM – Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 102(2), 251–318.
dc.relation.isbasedon Saaty, T. L., & Ergu, D. (2015). When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(06), 1171–1187.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sarmento, J., Renneboog, L., & Verga-Matos, P. (2017). Measuring highway efficiency by a DEA approach and the Malmquist index. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 17(4), 530–551.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sheffi, Y. (2013). Logistics-intensive clusters: global competitiveness and regional growth. In Handbook of global logistics (pp. 463–500). New York, NY: Springer.
dc.relation.isbasedon Silva, R. M. d., Senna, E. T. P., Lima, O. F. Jr, & Senna, L. A. d. S. (2015). A framework of performance indicators used in the governance of logistics platforms: the multiple-case study. Journal of Transport Literature, 9(1), 5–9.
dc.relation.isbasedon Srisawat, P., Kronprasert, N., & Arunotayanun, K. (2017). Development of decision support system for evaluating spatial efficiency of regional transport logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4832–4851.
dc.relation.isbasedon Sufian, F. (2007). Trends in the efficiency of Singapore’s commercial banking groups: A non-stochastic frontier DEA window analysis approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(2), 99–136.
dc.relation.isbasedon Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.
dc.relation.isbasedon Vincová, K. (2005). Using DEA models to measure efficiency. Biatec, 13(8), 24–28.
dc.relation.isbasedon Wu, H.-b., & Yue, Y. (2008). 3PL Vendors Evaluation Project Based on Entropy Right TOPSIS. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 27, 88–91.
dc.relation.isbasedon Yang, C., Taudes, A., & Dong, G. (2017). Efficiency analysis of European Freight Villages: three peers for benchmarking. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 25(1), 91–122.
dc.relation.isbasedon Yasaroglu, B. A., Özdağoğlu, G., & Özdağoğlu, A. (2006). Fuzzy logic-based decision making model on selection and evaluation of logistics service providers within a firm. Paper presented at the 4th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, Izmir, Turkey.
dc.relation.isbasedon Yong, G. (2017). The Impact of Service Innovation Capability on Logistics Platform Performance. Paper presented at International Conference on Economics, Management Engineering and Marketing (EMEM 2017).
dc.relation.isbasedon Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets, In International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Vol. 213). Cham: Springer.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject Supply chain en
dc.subject logistics platform en
dc.subject measuring efficiency en
dc.subject methodology en
dc.subject Delphi en
dc.subject AHP en
dc.subject DEA en
dc.subject.classification C39
dc.subject.classification D57
dc.subject.classification M21
dc.subject.classification O49
dc.subject.classification R42
dc.title Assessment of Logistics Platform Efficiency Using an Integrated Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process-data Envelopment Analysis Approach: A Novel Methodological Approach Including a Case Study in Slovenia en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2020-3-012
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 3
local.relation.issue 23
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 191
local.citation.epage 207
local.access open
local.fulltext yes
local.filename EM_3_2020_12

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account