Porovnání metodiky výuky sjezdového lyžování v České republice, Austrálii a Kanadě
Title Alternative:Comparison of the methodology of teaching downhill skiing in the Czech Republic, Australia and Canada
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Hlavním cílem bakalářské práce bylo porovnat metodiku výuky sjezdového lyžování v České republice, Kanadě a Austrálii. Po pročtení metodik a překladu zahraničních materiálů z anglického jazyka do českého jazyka bylo zjištěno, že metodiky se v dnešní době liší jen v několika fázích a celkový postup a výsledek metodik je velice podobný. Největším rozdílem je možnost vynechání fáze pluhu u australského přístupu a zařazení jízdy v neupraveném terénu hned po zvládnutí kontrolovaného paralelního oblouku v australské a kanadské metodice. Celkově všechny tři metodiky obsahují podobné postupy a pružně reagovaly na změny v trendech a směrech v závodním sjezdovém lyžování v průběhu let.
The main aim of this thesis was to compare the methodology of downhill skiing in the Czech Republic, Canada and Australia. After reading through and translating foreign sources from the English language to the Czech language was determined that the methodology from those three countries, and their procedures and result, are different only in minor parts now days and they are indeed very similar. The biggest difference is the possibility to skip the phase of the snowplough in Australian approach and get directly to the parallel turning and then the inclusion of bump skiing right after mastering the parallel turning in Canadian and Australian approach. In general, all of the three approaches contain similar procedures and they have been flexibly responding to the changes in trends and directions in competitive downhill skiing over the years.
The main aim of this thesis was to compare the methodology of downhill skiing in the Czech Republic, Canada and Australia. After reading through and translating foreign sources from the English language to the Czech language was determined that the methodology from those three countries, and their procedures and result, are different only in minor parts now days and they are indeed very similar. The biggest difference is the possibility to skip the phase of the snowplough in Australian approach and get directly to the parallel turning and then the inclusion of bump skiing right after mastering the parallel turning in Canadian and Australian approach. In general, all of the three approaches contain similar procedures and they have been flexibly responding to the changes in trends and directions in competitive downhill skiing over the years.