Marketing tools in the era of digitization and their Use in Practice by Family and other Businesses

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPetrů, Naděžda
dc.contributor.authorKramoliš, Jan
dc.contributor.authorStuchlik, Peter
dc.contributor.otherEkonomická fakultacs
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-06T13:38:25Z
dc.date.available2020-04-06T13:38:25Z
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses Marketing 4.0 as an exceptionally dynamic field for company competitiveness that is evolving rapidly. The main goal of this article is to evaluate and compare the overall level of use of modern marketing tools in practice by family and non-family businesses, and subsequently to measure the dependence between the extent of Marketing 4.0 activities and number of employees, volume of sales, field of business, and year the company was established. Primary and secondary data was analyzed using basic and advanced statistical methodologies, including the testing of six hypotheses. The study showed that for both family and non-family businesses there has not been any significant increase in overall marketing vitality in the years studied. Indeed, the long-term focus of companies on values provided to customers and relationships with customers was confirmed. The results further showed that from the perspective of marketing vitality, one of the currently more significant weaknesses of smaller companies in particular of both family and non-family types is a missing or insufficient strategy for realization of marketing activities. This study confirms the dependence of the level of overall marketing vitality on sales volume and company size by number of employees, but on the other hand no dependence was proven between marketing vitality on field of business or year company established. This study evaluates the liminality and states that family businesses above all others address what is for them the more important strategic question, namely that of succession. The study is unique in that it compares the results of three studies carried out between 2016 and 2019. The context of this study is framed by an appeal to eliminate barriers to change and rapid response by companies to the needs, requirements, and expectations of customers operating in the online world.en
dc.formattext
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2020-1-014
dc.identifier.eissn2336-5604
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/154710
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechnická Univerzita v Libercics
dc.publisherTechnical university of Liberec, Czech Republicen
dc.publisher.abbreviationTUL
dc.relation.isbasedonAcosta‐Prado, J. C., Longo‐Somoza, M., & Lozano, M. B. (2017). Does family ownership affect innovation activity? A focus on the biotechnological industry. Innovar, 27(65), 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v27n65.64886
dc.relation.isbasedonAnderson R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
dc.relation.isbasedonBinz Astrachan, C., & Botero, I. (2018). We are a family firm: An exploration of the motives for communicating the family business brand. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(1), 2–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-01-2017-0002
dc.relation.isbasedonBinz Astrachan, C., & Astrachan, J. H. (2015). Family Business Branding: Leveraging Stakeholder Trust. London: IFB Research Foundation.
dc.relation.isbasedonBotero, I. C., Thomas, J., Graves, C., & Fediuk, T. A. (2013). Understanding multiple family firm identities: an exploration of the communicated identity in official websites. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 12–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.11.004
dc.relation.isbasedonCailluet, L., Bernhard, F., & Labaki, R. (2018). Family firms in the long run: the interplay between emotions and history. Entreprises et histoire, 91, 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/eh.091.0005
dc.relation.isbasedonCeja, L., Agulles, R., & Tàpies, J. (2010). The Importance of Values in Family-Owned Firms (Working Paper No. 875). Pamplona: University of Navarra, IESE Business School. Retrieved July, 2010, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6259595.pdf
dc.relation.isbasedonChebbi, H., Yahiaoui, D., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2013). The Exploration Activity’s Added Value into the Innovation Process. Global Business and Economics Review, 15(2/3), 265–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2013.053073
dc.relation.isbasedonColli, A., & Rose, M. (2016). Family Business. In G. G. Jones & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199263684.003.0009
dc.relation.isbasedonDana, L.-P., & Ramadani, V. (Eds.). (2015). Family Businesses in Transition Economies. Management, Succession and Internationalization. Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14209-8
dc.relation.isbasedonDavis, J. A. (2017). The Three-Circle Model of the Family Business System. Retrieved from http://johndavis.com/three-circle-model-family-business-system/
dc.relation.isbasedonDenison, D., Lief, C., & Ward, J. L. (2004). Culture in Family-Owned Enterprises: Recognizing and Leveraging Unique Strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00004.x
dc.relation.isbasedonDuke Perspective. (2019). The Vitality of Creative Marketing in Modern Business. Retrieved March 9, 2019, from https://sites.duke.edu/perspective/2019/03/09/the-vitality-of-creative-marketing-in-modern-business
dc.relation.isbasedonEven, Y. (2017). Family Business the Growth DNA of Family Business. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/lu/en/services/specialty-services/family-business-services/family-business-services_growth-dna-of-family-business
dc.relation.isbasedonFerramosca, S., & Ghio, A. (2018). Accounting Choices in Family Firms: An Analysis of Influences and Implications. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73588-7
dc.relation.isbasedonGottschalk, S. (2017). ZEW News: Family Firms Employing More and More People in Germany and Abroad. Retrieved from http://www.zew.de/en/das-zew/aktuelles/familienunternehmen-steigern-beschaeftigung-im-in-und-ausland/
dc.relation.isbasedonHabbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). Unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3
dc.relation.isbasedonHorčičková, Z., & Stasiulis, N. (2019). Participation of Young People in Family Business. Filosofija. Sociologija, 30(1), 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v30i1.3912
dc.relation.isbasedonJelínková, E., & Jiřincová, M. (2015). Diversity Management as a Tool of Managing Intellectual Capital. Journal of Competitiveness, 7(4), 3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2015.04.01
dc.relation.isbasedonKamei, K., & Dana, L.-P. (2012). Examining the impact of new policy facilitating SME succession in Japan: From a viewpoint of risk management in family business. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 16(1), 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2012.046917
dc.relation.isbasedonKammerlander, N., & van Essen, M. (2017). Family Firms Are More Innovative Than Other Companies. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/01/research-family-firms-are-more-innovative-than-other-companies
dc.relation.isbasedonKeller, L. K., & Lehmann, R. D. (2006). Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 551–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0153
dc.relation.isbasedonKljučnikov A., & Sobeková Majková M. (2016). Impact of Gender in the Perception of Administrative Burdens among Young Entrepreneurs – Evidence from Slovakia. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(2), 17–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.02.02
dc.relation.isbasedonKotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2016). Marketing 4.0: Moving from Traditional to Digital. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.isbasedonKotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2018). Marketing 4.0: When Online Meets Offline, Style Meets Substance, and Machine-to-Machine Meets Human-to-Human. The Marketing Journal.
dc.relation.isbasedonKraiczy, N. (2013). Innovations in small and medium-sized family firms. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00063-9
dc.relation.isbasedonMashchak, N., & Dovhun, O. (2020). Modern Marketing and Logistics Approaches in the Implementation of E-Commerce. In Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management (pp. 375–391). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24355-5_19
dc.relation.isbasedonNegricea, C. I., & Purcarea, I. M. (2018). Digital marketers challenged to drive results within the connected world. Holistic Marketing Management Journal, 8(3), 8–13.
dc.relation.isbasedonNurita, P., & Lundia, I. (2017). The mapping of internet marketing potential for SMEs working on indonesian traditional fabrics. Bisnis & Birokrasi, 24(1), 14–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v24i1.9465
dc.relation.isbasedonOsunde, C. (2017). Family Businesses and Its Impact on the Economy. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 6(251), 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000251
dc.relation.isbasedonParada, M. J., & Gimeno, A. (2016). Understanding characteristics of long-term value creating family businesses. Effective Executive, 19(4), 43–54.
dc.relation.isbasedonPetrů, N., & Zich, F. (2017). Evaluation of family business marketing activities. In D. Petranová, L. Čábyová, & Z. Bezáková (Eds.), Proceedings from International Scientific Conference Marketing Identity 2017 (pp. 397–410). Trnava: University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius.
dc.relation.isbasedonPetrů, N., Havlíček, K., & Tomášková, A. (2018). Comparison of Marketing Vitality of Family and Non-Family Companies doing Business in theCzech Republic. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 138–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/10
dc.relation.isbasedonPetrů, N., Pavlák, M., & Polák, J. (2019) Factors impacting startup sustainability in the Czech Republic. Innovative Marketing, 15(3), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(3).2019.01
dc.relation.isbasedonPetrů, N., Tomášková, A., & Krošláková, M. (2019). Diversification of export territories of family businesses as a tool of their further development. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 306–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.25
dc.relation.isbasedonPlamínek, J. (2014). Diagnostika a vitalizace firem a organizací: teorie vitality v podnikatelské a manažerské praxi. Praha: Grada.
dc.relation.isbasedonPoza, E. J. (2014). Family Business. Boston, MA: Cengage.
dc.relation.isbasedonQuaye, D., & Mensah, I. (2019). Marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs in Ghana. Management Decision, 57(7), 1535–1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2017-0784
dc.relation.isbasedonRaab, G., Ajami, R. A., Gargeya, V. B., & Goddard, G. J. (2016). Customer Relationship Management: A Global Perspective. Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
dc.relation.isbasedonRahman, M. H., Galván, R. S., & Martínez, A. B. (2017). Impact of Family Business on Economic Development: A Study of Spain’s Family-owned Supermarkets. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 5(4), 129–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/jbms-5-4-4
dc.relation.isbasedonRamadani, V., & Hoy, F. (2015). Context and Uniqueness of Family Businesses. In L.-P. Dana, V. Ramadani (Eds.), Family Businesses in Transition Economies (pp. 9–37). Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14209-8_2
dc.relation.isbasedonRosalina, V., Hamdan, H., & Triayudi, A. (2019). Electronic Customer Relationship Management (E-CRM) Application as Efforts to Increase Customer Retention of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Banten Indonesia. International Journal of Computer Applications, 181(39), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918310
dc.relation.isbasedonSabaitytė, J., Davidavičienė, V., Straková, J., & Raudeliūnienė, J. (2019). Decision Tree Modelling of E-Consumers’ Preferences for Internet Marketing Communication Tools during Browsing. E&M Ekonomics and Management, 22(1), 206–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-1-014
dc.relation.isbasedonSerrano-Bedia, A. M., Palma-Ruiz, J. M., & Flores-Rivera, C. (2019). Innovation and Family Firms. In J. Saiz-Álvarez & J. Palma-Ruiz (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurial Leadership and Competitive Strategy in Family Business (pp. 371–398). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8012-6.ch018
dc.relation.isbasedonShi, H. X. (2014). Entrepreneurship in Family Business. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04304-3
dc.relation.isbasedonStankovska, I., Josimovski, S., & Edwards, C. (2016). Digital channels diminish SME barriers: The case of the UK. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 217–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1164926
dc.relation.isbasedonSujitha, K. A., & Johnson, B. (2017). Electronic customer relationship management (e-CRM) techniques for effective banking. In Research Methodology and Statistical Analysis using SPSS (pp. 32–40). New Delhi: Excel India Publishers.
dc.relation.isbasedonTagiuri, R., & Davis, J. A. (1996). Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x
dc.relation.isbasedonTàpies, J., & Ward, J. L. (Eds.). (2008). Family Values and Value Creation. The Fostering of Enduring Values within Family-Owned Businesses. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594227
dc.relation.isbasedonThrassou, A., Vrontis, D., & Bresciani, S. (2018). The Agile Innovation Pendulum: A Strategic Marketing Multicultural Model for Family Businesses. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(1), 105–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2018.1407178
dc.relation.isbasedonVacek, J., & Zbránková, M. (2017). Rodinné podnikání: Manažerský modul. Liberec: Technická univerzita v Liberci.
dc.relation.isbasedonVorhies, D. W., Orr, L. M., & Bush, V. D. (2011). Improving customer-focused marketing capabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(5), 736–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0228-z
dc.relation.isbasedonWesthead, P. (1997). Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non–family companies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9(2), 127–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985629700000007.
dc.relation.ispartofEkonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and Managementen
dc.relation.isrefereedtrue
dc.rightsCC BY-NC
dc.subjectfamily businessen
dc.subjectnon-family businessen
dc.subjecttrend toolsen
dc.subjectmarketing vitalityen
dc.subjectMarketing 4.0en
dc.subjectdigitizationen
dc.subject.classificationF40
dc.subject.classificationL60
dc.subject.classificationM20
dc.titleMarketing tools in the era of digitization and their Use in Practice by Family and other Businessesen
dc.typeArticleen
local.accessopen
local.citation.epage214
local.citation.spage199
local.facultyFaculty of Economics
local.filenameEM_1_2020_14
local.fulltextyes
local.relation.abbreviationE+Mcs
local.relation.abbreviationE&Men
local.relation.issue1
local.relation.volume23
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EM_1_2020_14.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections
Číslo 1