Building in greenfield as a main negative of new cycle paths: Qualitative case study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDrápela Emilcs
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-29T18:16:27Z
dc.date.available09-26-2021en
dc.date.available2022-01-29T18:16:27Z
dc.date.issued2020cs
dc.format.extent8cs
dc.identifier.doi10.5593/sgem2020/6.1/s27.065
dc.identifier.issn1314-2704cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/161789
dc.language.isoengcs
dc.publisherInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconferencecs
dc.publisher.cityAlbenacs
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM. Volume 2020-August, Issue 6.1en
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sgem.org/index.php/elibrary?view=publication&task=show&id=7573cs
dc.riv.kontrolni-cislo192273671cs
dc.riv.specifikaceRIV/46747885:24510/20:00008486!RIV21-MSM-24510___cs
dc.subjectattitudescs
dc.subjectcycle path constructioncs
dc.subjectcyclingcs
dc.subjectcycling infrastructurecs
dc.subjectsustainable mobilitycs
dc.titleBuilding in greenfield as a main negative of new cycle paths: Qualitative case studyen
dc.titleBuilding in greenfield as a main negative of new cycle paths: Qualitative case studycs
local.citation.epage507-514cs
local.citation.spage507-514cs
local.event.locationAlbena, Bulgariaen
local.identifier.publikace8486
Files
Collections