Comparison of ultrasound and LIB generated cavitation bubble

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJašíková Darinacs
dc.contributor.authorSchovanec Petrcs
dc.contributor.authorKotek Michalcs
dc.contributor.authorMüller Milošcs
dc.contributor.authorKopecký Václavcs
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T12:13:41Z
dc.date.available2018-09-25T12:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2017cs
dc.description.abstractThere has been tried many methods how to generate single cavitation bubble. The purpose of these experiments is to observe the surface impact of collapsing cavitating bubbles. The most of method are based on spark to induced superheat limit of liquid. Here we compare the one of these methods – laser induced breakdown (LIB) with more correct mechanical way using ultrasound as generator. There is described the setup for ultrasound cavitation effecting the sessile bubble as well as random generated and moving bubble. We visualize the cavitation bubble using high speed camera of speed 180 kHz. There are observed interface instabilities as the ultrasound response.en
dc.format.extent6cs
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/epjconf/201714302044
dc.identifier.issn2100-014Xcs
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/31142
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/12/epjconf_efm2017_02044.pdf
dc.language.isoengcs
dc.relation.ispartofseries1cs
dc.subjectcavitation bubblecs
dc.subjecthight speed visualizationcs
dc.subjectsurface impactcs
dc.titleComparison of ultrasound and LIB generated cavitation bubblecs
local.identifier.publikace4600
local.identifier.wok407743800046en
local.relation.issue2017cs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of ultrasound.pdf
Size:
184.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
článek
Download
Collections