N-butanol and isobutanol as alternatives to gasoline: Comparison of port fuel injector characteristics
dc.contributor.author | Fenkl Michael | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Pechout Martin | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Vojtíšek Michal | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-25T11:46:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-25T11:46:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | cs |
dc.format.extent | 5 | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1051/epjconf/201611402021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2100-014X | cs |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/27026 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 1 | cs |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02021.pdf | cs |
dc.subject | gasoline engine port fuel injector | cs |
dc.subject | production injector | cs |
dc.subject | production fueling system | cs |
dc.title | N-butanol and isobutanol as alternatives to gasoline: Comparison of port fuel injector characteristics | en |
dc.title | N-butanol and isobutanol as alternatives to gasoline: Comparison of port fuel injector characteristics | cs |
local.identifier.publikace | 321 |