Comparison of dilatometry results obtained by two different devices when generating CCT and in-situ diagrams

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMoravec Jaromírcs
dc.contributor.authorDikovits Martinacs
dc.contributor.authorNováková Ivacs
dc.contributor.authorCaliskanoglu Ozancs
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T12:01:35Z
dc.date.available2018-09-25T12:01:35Z
dc.date.issued2016cs
dc.format.extent8cs
dc.identifier.doi10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.669.477
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-03835-629-5cs
dc.identifier.issn1013-9826cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/29266
dc.language.isoengcs
dc.publisherTrans Tech Publicationscs
dc.relation.ispartofseries1cs
dc.relation.urihttp://www.scientific.net/KEM.669.477cs
dc.subjectCCT diagramcs
dc.subjectIn-situ diagramcs
dc.subjectDilatometrycs
dc.subjectGleeblecs
dc.subject10GN2MFA steelcs
dc.titleComparison of dilatometry results obtained by two different devices when generating CCT and in-situ diagramscs
local.citation.epage477-484cs
local.citation.spage477-484cs
local.identifier.publikace2680
local.relation.issue669cs
Files
Collections