Podniky se zahraniční účastí v Libereckém kraji. Výsledky dotazníkového šetření

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Potužáková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.author Demel, Jaroslav
dc.contributor.other Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-05
dc.date.available 2014-06-05
dc.identifier.issn 12123609
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7059
dc.description.abstract Foreign direct investment (FDI) influenced deeply the economic development of the transition economies after 1989. The Czech Republic is one of the leading recipients of the FDI in the CEE. The impact of the FDI is visible not only on national level but also on the regional level. Despite the fact that the Czech Republic belongs to the middle-size EU Member States, the regional development after 1989 differs distinctly. The article focuses on results of the questionnaire survey of the foreign-owned companies in Liberec region. The results are compared with the average values of the indicators for Liberec region. The aim of the article is to determine the motives of the investment, the structure of exported production, workforce development and employment of foreign workers in the companies that came to the Liberec Region as the FDI. We have also verified the hypothesis that the main reasons of the FDI entry were the low production costs and the investment incentives. According to the results of the questionnaire survey we can confirm only the first part of the hypothesis. The importance of the low production costs which were the most significant for almost 60% of the companies. Another essential factor for 50% companies was the qualified labor force. However, this does not corresponds with the education structure of the FDI workers, 62% of them achieved only basic education or secondary education without leaving examination. Anyway, the investment incentives were significant reason only for one company. According to our survey the FDI helped the region to reallocate the workforce form the previously dominating textile industry to nowadays dominating automotive sector. The other positive effect of the FDI is the employment of the lower qualified work force which has a worse position on the labor market than the highly qualified. Nevertheless it neither is important to emphasize that the positive effect of the FDI is nor based on the long-term factors. en
dc.format text
dc.format.extent 61-72 s. cs
dc.language.iso cs
dc.publisher Technická Univerzita v Liberci cs
dc.publisher Technical university of Liberec, Czech Republic en
dc.relation.ispartof Ekonomie a Management cs
dc.relation.ispartof Economics and Management en
dc.relation.isbasedon AYYAGARI, M., KOSOVÁ, R. Does FDI Facilitate Domestic Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Prague: CERGE-EI, 2006. 54 s. ISSN 1211-3298
dc.relation.isbasedon BAŠTOVÁ, M., DOKOUPIL, J. Negativní dopady přímých zahraničních investic na trh práce města Plzně. Geografie Sborník ČGS. 2010, roč. 115, č. 2, s. 188-206. ISSN 1212-0014.
dc.relation.isbasedon BARRELL, R., HOLLAND, D. Foreign Direct Investment and Enterprise Restructuring in Central Europe. Economics of Transition. 2000, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, s. 477-504. ISSN 1468-0351.
dc.relation.isbasedon BEYER, J. Please invest in our country. How successful were tax incentives for foreign investment for transition countries. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2002, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, s. 191-211. ISSN 0967-067X.
dc.relation.isbasedon BEVAN, A.A, ESTRIN, S. The Determinants of FDI in Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, s. 775-787. ISSN 0147-5967.
dc.relation.isbasedon BALOCK, G., GERTLER, P. Welfare Gains from FDI through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers. Journal of International Economics. 2008, Vol. 74, Iss. 2, s. 402-421. ISSN 0022-1996.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČNB. Přímé zahraniční investice za rok 2010. Praha: Česká národní banka, 2011. 59 s.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČNB. Příliv přímých zahraničních investic dle sektorů a zemí – časová řada [online]. Praha: Česká národní banka, 2013 [cit. 2013-03-09]. Dostupné z: http://www.cnb.cz/cs/statistika/platebni_bilance_stat/pzi/index.html.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Hlavní obchodní partneři v roce 2010 [online]. Praha: Český statistický úřad, 2013 [cit. 2013-04-09]. Dostupné z: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2011edicniplan.nsf/t/840039A6E4/$File/60081204.pdf.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Interní databáze ČSÚ. Praha: Český statistický úřad, 2011.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Ročenka Euroregionu Nisa-Neisse-Nysa 2011. Liberec: Český statistický úřad, 2011. ISBN 978-80-250-2143-9.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Statistická ročenka Libereckého kraje. Liberec: Český statistický úřad, 2012. ISBN 978-80-250-2119-4.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Trh práce v ČR 1993-2011. Praha: Český statistický úřad, 2012.
dc.relation.isbasedon ČSÚ. Veřejná databáze [online]. Praha: Český statistický úřad, 2013 [cit. 2013-04-07]. Dostupné z: http://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo/uvod.jsp.
dc.relation.isbasedon CZECHINVEST Projekty agentury Czechinvest [online]. Praha: CZECHINVEST, 2013 [cit. 2013-04-05]. Dostupné z: http://www.czechinvest.org/lb-investice.
dc.relation.isbasedon DINGA, M. The Impact of FDI in Kolín on Local Labour Market. CERGE-EI Discussion Paper 182. Prague: CERGE-EI, 2007. ISSN 1211-3298.
dc.relation.isbasedon DINGA, M. The Role of the Investment Incentives in Regional FDI Relocation: A Regression Discontinuity Approach. CERGE-EI WP 348. Prague: CERGE-EI, 2011. ISSN 1211-3289.
dc.relation.isbasedon DUNNING, J.H., NARULA, R. Foreign direct investment and governments: catalysts for economic restructuring. London: Routledge, 1996. 455 s. ISBN 0-415-11820-4.
dc.relation.isbasedon EUROSTAT. Real GDP growth volume [online]. Brussels: Eurostat, 2013 [cit. 2013-03-05]. Dostupné z: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec00115.
dc.relation.isbasedon HLAVÁČEK, P. The FDI Investment in Usti Region, Theory, Actors and Space Differentiation. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2009, roč.12, č. 4, s. 27-39. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedon JÁČ, I., et al. Jedinečnost obce v regionu. 1. vyd. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2010. 203 s. ISBN 978-80-74310-38-6.
dc.relation.isbasedon JÁČ, I. Rizika odhadu úspěšnosti investice při alternativním scénáři vývoje ekonomiky. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2012, roč. 15, č. 2, s. 38-52. ISSN 1212-3609.
dc.relation.isbasedon JURAJDA, Š, TERRELL, K. Regional Unemployment and Human Capital in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition. 2009, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, s. 241-274. ISSN 1468-0351.
dc.relation.isbasedon KINOSHITA, Y., CAMPOS, N. F. Why does FDI go where it goes? New evidence from the transition economies. IMF Working Paper 03/228. Washington: IMF, 2003. 32 s.
dc.relation.isbasedon KORNECKI, L. Foreign direct investment and macroeconomic changes in CEE integrating into the global market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 2008, Vol. 5, Iss. 4., s. 124-132. ISSN 1812-9358.
dc.relation.isbasedon MPO. Analýza vývoje ekonomiky ČR a odvětví v působnosti MPO za rok 2010. Praha: Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu ČR, 2011. 114 s.
dc.relation.isbasedon PAVLÍNEK, P. Internationalization of the Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of the Central-East Europe. Economic Geography. 2012, Vol. 88, No. 3, s. 279-310, ISSN 1944-8287.
dc.relation.isbasedon PAVLÍNEK, P. Regional Development Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2004, Vol. 11, No. 1, s. 47-70. ISSN 1944-8287.
dc.relation.isbasedon PAVLÍNEK, P. Transformation of the Czech Automotive Components Industry through Foreign Direct Investment. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2003, Vol. 44, No. 3, s. 184-209. ISSN 1538-7216.
dc.relation.isbasedon RYDVALOVÁ, P., ŽIŽKA, M. Klíčové faktory problematického vývoje regionů v České republice. 1. vyd. Liberec: VÚTS, 2007. 54 s. ISBN 978-80-903865-5-6.
dc.relation.isbasedon SRHOLEC, M. Přímé zahraniční investice v ČR: teorie a praxe v mezinárodním srovnání. Praha: Linde, 2004. 171 s. ISBN 80-86131-52-1.
dc.relation.isbasedon STANČÍK, J. Horizontal and Vertical FDI Spillovers: Recent Evidence from the Czech Republic. WP Series 340. Prague: CERGE-EI, 2007. 39 s. ISSN 1211-3298.
dc.relation.isbasedon STUCHLÍKOVÁ, Z. Světová ekonomika jako sociálně ekonomický systém, procesy jeho formování, rozvoje a diferenciace. In CIHELKOVÁ, E., et al. Světová ekonomika. Obecné trendy rozvoje. Praha:
dc.relation.isbasedon C.H. Beck, 2009. s. 1-31. ISBN 978-80-7400-155-0.
dc.relation.isbasedon TORLAK, E. FDI, Technology Transfer and Productivity Growth in Transition countries, Evidence from Panel Data. CeGe Discussion Paper 26. Gottingen: Georg-August-Universität, 2004. 26 s. ISSN 1439-2305.
dc.relation.isbasedon UNCTAD. FDI database [online]. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2013 [cit. 2013-04-15]. Dostupné z: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/TableViewer/tableView.aspx.
dc.relation.isbasedon ÚŘAD PRÁCE. Analýza vývoje na trhu práce v okrese Liberec. Liberec: Úřad práce, 2012.
dc.relation.isbasedon VOŠTA, M. Nové země EU: jádro a periferie. Současná Evropa a Česká republika. 2005, roč. 10, č. 1, s. 114-132. ISSN 1211-4073.
dc.relation.isbasedon WORLD BANK. FDI Database [online]. Washington: World Bank, 2013 [cit. 2013-03-25]. Dostupné z: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD.
dc.relation.isbasedon WORLD BANK. From Plan to Market, Patterns of Transition. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1564. Washington: World Bank, 1996. 70 s.
dc.relation.isbasedon ZEMPELINEROVÁ, A., BENÁČEK, V. FDI in the Czech Manufacturing Sector. Prague Economic Papers. 1997, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, s. 141-155. ISSN 1210-0455.
dc.relation.isbasedon ŽÍŽALOVÁ, P. Přímé zahraniční investice v Česku. Geografie - Sborník ČGS. 2006, roč. 111, č. 2, s. 186-197. ISSN 1212-0014.
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.subject Kaklauskas, Artūras en
dc.subject Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras en
dc.subject.classification E22
dc.subject.classification F21
dc.subject.classification J24
dc.title Podniky se zahraniční účastí v Libereckém kraji. Výsledky dotazníkového šetření cs
dc.title.alternative Foreign companies in Liberec region. Results of the questionnaire survey en
dc.type Article en
dc.date.defense 2014-06-11
dc.publisher.abbreviation TUL
dc.relation.isrefereed true
dc.identifier.doi 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-005
dc.identifier.eissn 2336-5604
local.relation.volume 17
local.relation.issue 2
local.relation.abbreviation E&M en
local.relation.abbreviation E+M cs
local.faculty Faculty of Economics
local.citation.spage 61
local.citation.epage 72
local.access open
local.fulltext yes
local.identifier.publikace 2212


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account